Feelin' heavy...

Jul 9, 2017 3:32 PM

enjoytheveiw

Views

108318

Likes

1859

Dislikes

39

Just thought this was cool...

You are correct, it is very cool.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I really want to see graphene be used in computer heatsinks since its such a good conductor of heat.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can't do it my self but I'll be mad if no one puts the bender neat up

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So it is really light, or is it just really thin "bubbles" filled with air?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

LEAST DENSE!!!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When saying a material is light when not refering to amount, it generally implies less dense-- especially in layman's terms

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plot twist - it's the worlds strongest flower

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Crap! Didn't read the comments all the way down. You beat me to it! +1

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Plot twist: That's a hefty stone and the flower is genetically modified for super strength and durability.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was beat to this comment. :(

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just thought this was coal.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Solid is not a good description of an open cell foam @op.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So... How far could you throw it?...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They make tennis racquets with this in

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Graphene is also incredibly durable as I recall

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Feels like 2012 all over again.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There's that word again, heavy. Why are things so heavy in the future?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if it was lighter than air, wouldn it it float like helium?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Lightest solid, not lightest substance.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The article linked says 7 times lighter than air

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Incorrect.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That was my point ;)

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

graphene is one monolayer thick carbon. im not an expert, but my approximation is that this is more than one atom thick, thus not graphene.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

I think this is called graphene because the sheets were layered in such a way that they aren't structurally the same as graphite, but IDK

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

nah, graphene is made from graphite by peeling it off. i also happen to know they have the exact same structure.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's mistaking the tree for the forest. It's not one contiguous sheet, it's made of smaller graphene sheets randomly arranged.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

yes, problem is that we already have a name for that, its called graphite or carbon. this is like calling windows sand grains. its dumb.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Graphite isn't all graphene flakes, though. Yes it's carbon, yes it has graphene in it. This semantic pedantry is what's dumb.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

what do you mean graphite isnt all graphene flakes? its not pendatry or semantic, it is a definition. stupid hype.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Huh, I should have fact-checked myself. You're right, I was mistaken. That means this is basically foamed graphite.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It isn't just graphene, it's called graphene aerogel because it is made up of graphene that is supported by carbon nano-tubes

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If it's lighter than air why doesn't it float like a helium balloon?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Idk, probably whoever wrote the article was exaggerating

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe if you remove the air from inside it it's lighter, but it naturally has air in it (air is about 1.3 kg/m3 and this said 0.160 kg/m3)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So... the antithesis of OP's Mom?

8 years ago | Likes 191 Dislikes 6

So the heaviest gaseous substance in existence.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

wait there's something heavier than Osmium, but that will crumble under less than 4 g/cm²? holy shit.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Gee... ummm... nice to meet you?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You mean the person who has a mass even without Higg's boson?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Higg's boson? More like your mom's bosom! Ayyy lamao, get e-rekt.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 332 Dislikes 10

Wash this!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What this material can do for future technology is thrilling.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Omg this is awesome

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is this from Life of Brian, or History of the World Part 1?

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

History of the World-Part 1.

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Ok faggot! What's next?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Treasure bath!

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

How strong is this stuff?

8 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 0

Asking the real questions

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Judging from the picture, it's at least strong enough to keep a flower from floating away.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Over 9000

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Like 3 strong.

8 years ago | Likes 125 Dislikes 1

3strong5me

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Mom uses to work for museum, got a shipment of a small amount, broke it in first 30 mins

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Is that why she no longer works at the museum?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Unless you do some serious geometric wizardry, graphene is very anisotropic.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

In general is it very strong stuff tho, or not so much?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes. Graphene has a very high ultimate tensile strength. Orders of magnitude higher than most materials.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I.e. It's material properties will vary depending on your stress tensors.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What about, uh, amorphous graphene aerogel? (Is that a thing?)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

While I have some training in the subject, I am by no means an expert.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Great question! On the microscale, graphene will retain its structure, but on the mesoscale can might be configured differently for 3-D.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

high compression strength, low sheer strength, it's very brittle

8 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 1

It's not brittle it can be squeezed down to a 10th of its self and reform again

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 8

The hell do you think "compression" means?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I used to have a bunch, it's crazy brittle.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Are you sure it was graphene aerogel? or was it some other kind? Cause Silica aerogel is super brittle, it's made of the same stuff glass is

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why did you have a bunch of graphene aerogel, and what happened to it?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Compressed it down to a tenth of its size then lost the damn thing

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Somebody better tell me whether this shit is brittle or not before I shank a bitch with sharpened peanut brittle

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

It's friable, technically not the same thing as brittle but pretty close.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

If you try to flatten it, it'll be fine, if you grab by the top and bottom and twist, it'll break, cuz it's brittle

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

strong enough that if you layer it in a weird shape it it's so strong we can build a space tower and plans are in motion for that, 1

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

Plans are not in motion, it's merely an idea

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

i mean a bunch of rich people are talking about it, location, logistics, anything that can point to a certainty of construction not done yet

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the problem is making enough of it, in this shape https://www.fastcodesign.com/3066988/mit-invented-the-material-well-need-to-build-in-space

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Thanks for an actual answer instead of some not funny trying to be witty answer

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

"Like 3 strong." was pretty funny

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Darude - Sandstorm

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Interesting read. Hated the intrusive ads, but good info. Can you imagine funky cars made out of silk?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*least dense.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Doesn't calling it light when refering to type imply low density?

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

NECROMANCY OF THE FOULEST KIND!!

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0