Well I guess you don’t open

May 15, 2021 2:31 PM

DrVenture420

Views

97654

Likes

2580

Dislikes

51

Yet people will still defend the rich and why a burger flipper can't make 15.00 an hour. :/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

@OP: Source?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not at CBS. He lost his golden parachute package of $125 million for sexual harassment. 2018 Hah Hah!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We could fix this, but these lies about how it will hurt the economy and partisan tribalism keep ppl voting against their own interests.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

There are salary caps in sports. Seems elsewhere could do wonders as well. Ethically, I don't see more than 10x being okay for the very top

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, „earn“. As if they‘d actually do any valuable work. It‘s more like stealing

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 5

I guess you can start a company then... Show them how it's done

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

#EatTheRich

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Fucking parasites.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

80% of that is from stock going up - not from money they take from profits that could go towards employees

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

than the AVERAGE worker, which means they make much more than the lowest paid worker, just fucking strangle them already....

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They don’t care because the lower tiers are replaceable

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Start your own business. Pay your workers fairly. Start a grassroots trend.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I always believed there should be a cap on executive pay.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Problem is they start getting "gifts" instead like shares and houses

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Earn"

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

“Now.”

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh yes, I just need to become a CEO

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And where do expect them to get the $ for their yachts and shit...? We commoners just can’t relate to their struggles.../s

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Im angry

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm a CEO and I earn EXACTLY the same as everyone in my company.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So.... It's just you?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I don't remember where I got that number, but I always thought the highest wage should max. be 20 times the lowest wage.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is mentioned in the utopian socialist writings of the 1800s. Morris Hillquit mentions it in the History of the Socialist Party of America

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Value of the US dollar since 1978. https://www.in2013dollars.com/us/inflation/1978?amount=1

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's gonna raise the price of Big Macs

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Since the Big Macs are going to be 'unaffordable' can there be more Little Macs?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now compare their pay to how many employees they have. It'll look much less significant. $11m split among 210k workers isn't much money.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

But they make terrible decisions because they know they’ll personally be rich no matter what.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

What do you mean? Terrible CEOs get fired, and there are plenty of incredible CEOs that ABSOLUTELY deserve their pay like Lisa Su

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Fired. But still multimillionaires who will never go hungry.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

everyone gets paid for the job they do, even if its a bad job. Can't really stop companies from making bad choices with the CEO pick.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

and its not like they are picking random people off the streets, its usually people already high up in management.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And lots of terrible ones who ruin companies and leave with their golden parachutes like carol bartz, Hank mckinnel, Adam Neumann and more

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

right

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

US minimum wage in 1978 was $11.32 compared to now which is 7.25. I'm not sure how you get a positive percentage? It should be -36.95%

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

The median wage in 1978 was $33.03 while today it is $19.33 or -41.48%.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, it wasn't, unless you're adjusting for inflation

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Which is what I did as that is the equivalent and buying a power

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Coulda had 320 employees

4 years ago | Likes 288 Dislikes 4

Or 315 from the CEO's pay, over 200 from the CFO's, and so on and so on.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well CEOs clearly work 320 times as hard and 320 times as many hours so its super justified. /S

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Nah the ceo should be making more than their avg employees but not more than 10x which is pushing it. 320 is just greedy

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's perverted.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My man!

4 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 2

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I have no business posting this gif but I've already walked out of my house drunk today so v

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

See you on the other side v

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

CEO wages don't always justify their output of value, but 320 extra employees might not benefit the company as much as one person with

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

the right experience and ideas. Just saying.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Do you really think they're arguing to just go out and hire 320 randos?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I mean, that's what they said

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I think if your company can afford to pay someone 320x their average worker, they’ve already figured out business well enough they don’t...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Need a “Ringer” that badly.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or 160 more employees at double the wages... Or 80 more employees at quadruple the wages...

4 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

Your math skills are breathtaking.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thanks, I've had a few years of practice.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or 1 more employee at 320x the wages.....wait.

4 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

Or 200 more workers with vacation a proper pay increase and sick leave

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Or half the employee at 640x the w- okay this is getting silly now.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I want a leg of this employee ! How much does it cost ?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

An arm

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Set the law that CEOs cannot earn more than 10 times their lowest paid worker then see those lowest wages shoot up.

4 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 1

No, wages will stay the same and bonuses will quintuple. Gotta patch every loophole.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's why you make the income tax for upper brackets high. The government doesnt really get the money, it just disincentivizes excessive $$

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

And so the exec compensation money gets plowed into the company instead (and ergo wages, as long as we reregulate stock bullshit).

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If it weren't for loopholes, sure.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even with loop holes this would still close the gap quite a bit. Only backing perfect solutions with zero flaws is just analysis paralysis

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The salary would just be set at the 10x the lowest page, then they'd get millions in 'bonuses'

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

All forms of payment including bonuses, gifts, shares, delayed funds, are included in that 10x.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Politicians should only be paid the median wage for their state too. I wonder if the minimum wage would rise?

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Nah, cause they know they'd still make more selling their vote.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They are including value of these company owned by the CEO - not compensation from profits. Bezos, for example, only earns $1.8m

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Is that ALL?!? ONLY a lifetime supply of cash money in a single year?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

That's only 60x the starting salary of Amazon employees. If you want to be shocked over that, have at it

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I think 8 to 15x starting salary including stock options and bonuses is sufficient.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You're entitled to your opinion, but he also runs one of the biggest and complex companies in the world. 8 delivery boys couldn't take over

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Then raise the wages of the lowest paid employees if he deserves more.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I keep seeing Amazon commercial propaganda on youtube. Workers saying their pay is awesome and their jobs are awesome, no peeing in bottles

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Peeing in bottles has more to do with public restrooms being closed than company not letting them stop.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Are you sure because I've read otherwise. They can't take their half hour breaks because they will become behind in deliveries.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Probably a combination. Closed bathrooms means it takes more time than they have to find something open

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I think you guys are confusing regular small business franchises with mega conglomerates. Mom and pop shops don't have margins to support

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But, Their employees just like the ones for corporations, have families to support.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

The point it's they aren't making 300 times those family earnings

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Are they pretending to a be a real business? Maybe that don't actually have a viable business model and cant afford employees?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Why do you assume we are confusing this when the article specifies CEOS? This would scale regardless of size of business.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

They only looked at S&P 500 companies, so you are confusing the two groups though

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It doesn't scale, small businesses can't just take a pay cut somewhere to pay employees more

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So that is a thousand times minimum wage?

4 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 1

I'm unsure if you're misinterpreting the post or implying that many workers are being paid less than the minimum wage.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Implying that they are being paid ABOVE minimum wage, about 3 times on average.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah but I'm betting that $46,800 is the average income when your management and CEOs are included. Non management workers?? Definitely less

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Average is different than minimum by quite a bit.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Average wages are about 3x minimum wage. So yes, CEOs are making about 1000x minimum wage.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ok, now I understand whatcha mean ?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ummm, no, it’s ~10x

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

If they are making 10 times minimum wage but 300 times average wage, that would mean the average worker makes 1/30th of minimum wage.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They don't make 300x average wage

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You can't deduce that at all. It gives no numbers regarding what workers or the CEOs actually make, just the ratio between them.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That’s true based on this post, but the data is available online. US jobs reports including salary data are released to the public.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So CEO pay is about 1000x minimum wage, since it is 320x average and average is about 3x minimum.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Umm I just meant 1000% is 10x...

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Right, 1000% is the CEO increase since 1978, 320 to 1 is the ratio of current CEO pay to current average worker pay.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is but it is irrelevant. The average CEO is making 1,000 times the wage of a gull time minimum wage worker

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Average it's not the minimum. According to what I could find the USA is $46,800/yr so 320 x that is 14.97 million US$

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Which is just about 1,000 times US minimum wage

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Where do you get that $46,800 though?? The overall average will include CEOs and whatnot. The average salary for non management is WAY less

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

US Bureau of Labor Statistics, average salary in America for standard full-time employee was approximated at $46,800

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And when I read the 'average worker' in the original I feel like it means regular level employees, not the average of all incomes

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Minimum wage is 15,000 a year.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's definitely not the average CEO salary unless they include wealth from stocks and just ignore that's not company compensation

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

US Bureau of Labor Statistics, average salary in America for standard full-time employee was approximated at $46,800

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most of the CEO "earnings" they are using is from increase in stock value owned outside of company compensation. It's not company profits

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Bezos made more last year than Amazon because of the stock market. Not because he was taking from profits that should have gone to workers

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I think it's an important distinction

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1