Ethics are Hard

Apr 6, 2015 5:48 PM

telkanuru

Views

11953

Likes

623

Dislikes

16

"If a man is able to lie to save himself from death, then it is true that, unwillingly, he either lies or dies. However, it does not therefore follow that he either unwillingly lies or unwillingly dies." - Anselm of Canterbury, On Free Choice

From: http://nuclearspaceheater.tumblr.com/post/115002025103/advanced-trolley-problems

The lesson is: Don't let yourself get tied to a railroad track... avoid this, always.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would not push the fat guy. Just on the basis that there is no guarentee hes fat enough to stop the trolley.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why does it matter who we are on number 2?

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

After re-reading them all, Let them all die. Who gets tied to railroad tracks in 2015....

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I didn't have enough utilitarianism in my life before this post

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For the last one, you always change your choice because of conditional probability.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm against overpopulation and for mayhem, so lets go with maximum destruction and fatalities.

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I feel like being a sociopath gives me a free pass on most of these. That or just being an asshole.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The right answer is always to let the train takes its course

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Morally and legally the best option

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Was I the only one who found all of these decissions really easy

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I just kill everybody and call it a day.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

By controlling the lever you accept responsibility for the results, thus I choose to abstain from choosing anything.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why would I save those people after putting them on the tracks?

11 years ago | Likes 175 Dislikes 2

The answer is always to do nothing, because you don't have positive ethical obligations. Only negative ones. (But I would kill in #2).

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Always choose the answer that will get you on the news.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nice take on the Monty-hall problem!

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why would you save the SJWs? The fat dude looks pretty cool.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

First one: Pull the lever. 2nd: Pull it. 3rd:A. 4th:Fuck fat acceptancies. 5th:A 6th:Switch at every chance.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I agreed with you on every single one except the 90yr olds vs the 1 year old - overpopulation brah

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

#1 do nothing and let man on A live with his choice.

11 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

doing nothing is as much your choice as doing something is his

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: ... Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act. (Dietrich Bonhoeffer). Not acting is acting.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Just imagine how pissed his parents would be if he KILLED 9 PEOPLE

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Trolleys dont hurtle. also they stop almost immediately upon sensing an object in front of it. I'd go home.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ah, game theory

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1. Pull the lever, less loss of life 2. Do not pull the lever, less loss of life 3. Do not pull the lever on account of the 1 year old (1/2)

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

has more total years of life left 4. Save the fuckers 5. Do not pull the level, 6 vs 5 6. Always

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do nothing in every instance. Even if you've "saved lives" you will still be prosecuted and potentially jailed for murder in every instance.

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

"what is necessary is legal"? and no DA would prosecute you for most of these, just too messy. maybe some probation public service works.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

exept pushing a guy, that will be a manslaughter prosecuted by his family

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1. don't pull (he will always blame you and himself), 2. pulling guarantees survival, can't promise the won't pull to save themselves 1/?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3. save more people vs save less, or save old people who will die soon or save a 1-year-old who can contribute to society, 4. don't push 2/?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5. 6 (potential) lives vs 5, 6. don't switch

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only one I have an opinion on is the last one. It's always to your benefit to change your initial guess after a reveal, such as this.

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That is not so much an opinion as a solid grasp on the underlying statistics.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Why is it better to switch? Regardless you have a 50% chance of being correct no?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

False. If you do not switch, you have a 33% chance of being correct.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Don't push the fat fucker, let it hit the other assholes

11 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 0

If they are ungrateful for saving their lives, then they do not deserve to be saved! Asshats

11 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

In all seriousness: I'd push if there were no social repercussions. But IRL you'd get sued so I'd let them all die.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The last one is statistical analysis. You change your pick because the new pick is 50/50 instead of 33/33/33 so yes.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What if your original pick was correct?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Doesn't matter, see wikipedia link.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wouldn't it be more accurate to say you re-evaluate instead of change? That door you picked first could still be correct.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Eh, semantics.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And then there's still the fact that you have no indication of which one's corect, so technically any choice is a valid one.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hence the new choice. You don't have to choose the other one, but you have no knowledge other than 50/50 odds, so choosing new is wise.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My answer would be to make the choice that has the greatest life left over at the end. 1: pull the lever, 2 & 3: don't pull, 4: don't push

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Number 5 I wouldn't change my answer as the only thing that happened was i now have a 50% chance in place of 33%

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or even #3?

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Number 3 is me being kind of a jerk but, by killing the fat acceptance people the odds of making people healthier are better.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You're off by one. How do you evaluate "life left over" for #5

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Number 5 I'm either right and everyone is saved or I'm wrong and they all die there is nothing I can do to improve the odds.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#5 is the one with pregnant women, and has nothing to do with odds.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You are correct I counted wrong, 5: save the pregnant women

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

in the last one, always.

11 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 2

This explains why you Allways change:http://math.ucr.edu/~jdp/Monty_Hall/Monty_Hall_a.GIF

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Statistically in that situation always change.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I'm currently in a raging debate with my fiance over this. (I agree with you)

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Even though I'm relatively good at math, I had to repro it empirically several times before I believed it to be true. It's a confusing sitch

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Watch the variable change classroom scene in the movie 21. Proceed to get sympathy kisses.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No. You're never suppose to switch your answer!

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

You have a 1/3 chance of guessing right at first. When one of the levers is revealed to be fake, you now have a 1/2 chance. Always switch.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

...it never says what effect the working lever will have though

11 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

no but statistically you go from a 30% chance of being right to a 50%

11 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Not to be a pedant, but a 1 in 3 chance ≠ a 30% chance! It's more like 33.333333333333333333333333333333333333yougettheidea%.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

And if you choose the and level you still have a50% chance of being right, you went from 30 to 50

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He is saying that it is never specified what effect the working lever will have. The train could be heading to the 1 person, pulling the 1/2

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"working" lever would change it towards the 5 people.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But how do you know that the working lever is "right"?

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

You don't seem to understand the dilemma

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

mythbusters did a thing; it mathematically works out to favor the person who changes his answer after a wrong answer is shown

11 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

How do you know that the fake lever is wrong? Maybe you don't want to change the outcome? It's never stated what the levers do

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I was always taught to never change my answer. Go with my first instinct always.

11 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

You have a 1/3 chance of guessing right at first. When one of the levers is revealed to be fake, you now have a 1/2 chance. Always switch.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What if I think the one I picked first is still the correct one?

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There is that possibility, but it's more likely you will pick the correct one on your second turn than your first.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/3*

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

why 2/3? when one of the choices is eliminated, you only have 2 options. So you have a 1/2 chance of picking the right one.

11 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because before you pick, you have a 1/3 chance and so there is a 2/3 chance that it is one of the other two. When they take one of those...

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

... choices away, then the one that you didn't pick still has that 2/3 chance.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem odds are better if you change.

11 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I accept what they're saying, but I don't really understand how.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That just seems flawed to me. It'd be better if it says to re-evaluate, not just outright change to the other. The first can still be right.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's wrong.

11 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Better way is in a batch of 100. You pick one, and we'll then remove 98 fakes, leaving you with two - one is yours, the other.. now change?

11 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Nope. Wouldn't change. In my mind it makes sense.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

There are many videos on this if you want to explore it, including a mythbusters that confirmed it, but do what you want.

11 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I'm just going off of my past experiences, and most of the time I change my guess it ends up being the one I chose first.

11 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4