Can / Can't Afford

Jun 5, 2022 8:45 PM

raymm

Views

101024

Likes

1717

Dislikes

59

Don't forget investment on STEM (unless it has military applications)

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Just look how nice Iraq turned out though! /heavy sarcasm.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

jesus f-35 ballooned to 1.5 trillion? hope they finally fixed the whole blacking out from charcoal lung thing

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Anything that involves spending money in to the economy is a good thing - giving it to the rich is not.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Could I have some sources with this please? Lets not be like facebook posts

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Stop saying we can't afford healthcare. We already spend an exorbitant amount on healthcare, but none of it get allocated appropriately.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You people need to learn some altruism! The needs of the wealthy few far outweigh the needs of the many filthy commoners!! /s

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's a shame

3 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 6

Uhm. What about Dougy and what he’s doing to Ontario? Aren’t they now for profit? Asshole extraordinary he is.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Theres a simple reason. The top row costs money. Eventually the bottom row makes money

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not that they think we can't afford education. It's that they don't want to pay for it unless it's about Jesus.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, they as in the right, just want all private schools so the poors are dumb and just skilled enough to be wage slaves.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Defense to the F-35 program; it’s an international cooperation. A lot of economies hinge on it.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Tbf there’s only like 10 people saying we can’t afford it. The rest don’t bother making an excuse and just admit they don’t like helping ppl

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Nothing to see here, system is functioning as intended.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

WEF

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 392 Dislikes 9

the more i see this reposted, the less funny it gets.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

why americans fear socialism? However, America has higher taxes than socialist capitalism countries

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The above would cut into the below’s bottom line.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Our UK government increased poor people's out of work benefit only by £4 a week this year, but justified 28 mill taxpayer money on jubilee

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A couples joint claim went from £509 to £525 ?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can't eat an f35

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Speak for yourself coward

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

GOP we don't have that kind of money to spare. Military wants money to fight an unwanted war. GOP, OK $500 billion, there's more just ask.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why do oil companies need subsidies?

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Because without it energy would be really expensive and not come from the US.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Let the market correct itself

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and Church subsides?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There is a reason my company is a LLC, I have one employee, me. As long as I don't pay myself $72,000 a year I don't have to pay US taxes /1

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For people who don't know, US citizens are required to pay taxes even if you live outside of the country. I would gladly pay if they /2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Went to pay for helping the citizens.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A lot of those things are very, very expensive though. National healthcare would however save money.

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

Please everyone vote - local, state, all elections - especially in the midterms. https://www.vote.org/am-i-registered-to-vote/

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

UHC would even benefit Wall Street. Health insurance is one of the biggest expenses for a company.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Universal is a bit overreaching. Even global is a bit utopian.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Lol I think people missed the joke here.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Look I want money spent differently too but you hurt the cause when you use inaccurate BS data. Example: the 2008 Wall Street bailout spent>

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

2/ about 426~ ish billion between 2008 and 2010 (via the TARP framework). With Interest, AIG, BoA and sevel others repaid over 441 B.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I recall that, I think you are right, thank you for your contribution.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

3/ US taxpayers actually made money on the deal.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

How much would those top 8 things actually cost?

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

healthcare - over 4 trillion a year. infrastructure to "standard" estimate - 3.6 trillion. We already pay into the others.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

We already spend more on healthcare per person then anywhere else. Just incredibly inefficiently. Would save a fortune removing billing

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Taking your word for it with no citations or evidence, how much would the remaining 7 cost?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Maybe two of the bottom programs combined, but they would actually save money and benefit people.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

21 combined years of war would barely pay for a year of free healthcare for a year

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Wow. Talk about completely out of touch and centered in a world of feelings rather than reality.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Which two?

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How about Iraq/Afghanistan wars and Wall Street bailouts. Still better spent on the top 8 than those bottom 2.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Except the bailout money wasn’t spent. It cost the government nothing.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

The F-35 project ran over budget but as a joint program it will recoup a lot in sales to NATO. In the end the program may make $.

3 years ago | Likes 187 Dislikes 20

According to?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Now the F-22 on the other hand…

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Make money for who? Is it going back into healthcare, education, or anything but more military hardware to turn others into red mincemeat?

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Lol make money for who. Clown.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The government is the one selling the jet to others, not the OEM.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Investing in the above (healthcare, education, etc.) will make and save untold trillions. The long-term benefits are nearly infinite.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The f 35 program was/is a debacle.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

MAY...

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, Russia did go and pull a fucky wucky invading Ukraine, and China's been twitchy of late so the odds are in favour.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And the Wall Street bailout was in the forms of loans that the government will *make* money on.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was a bad idea from the start to include the B mode in the idea.

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 6

Yeah, VTOL and STOVL are a bit too complex to try and work into a frame not build around it.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And then the sacrifices made for that frame are so intense that it cripples it for any other scenario.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

And considering the Russian threat. I'd say it was needed.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You sound like a second amendmentologist however let's take the Wall Street buy out I'm sure we could feed a few hungry people

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Cool. Now spend the profits on health care and education.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Just like your username, LOL

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You already have the money. The Healthcare budget is already huge. The problem isn't military spending, it's shitfucked management.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In fact, cutting back military spending to redirect to healthcare probably won't change much, if the issues plaguing the healthcare sector >

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

aren't rectified. It'll just be more bloat for hardly equivalent improvement.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You also forgot the BIG thing here - its estimated that its $1.5 trillion cost is over its 66 year long life cycle. Roughly $19/bil per >

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

For comparison, Americans currently spend $4,100 billion per year.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

> year. I've seen more wasteful projects burn through more money than that sadly.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think we’re already about 400B in, though we’ve also made a fair amount on sales. To UAE alone I think it was 50B at 50% profit.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Sorry, 23B for 50 planes at 50% profit.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Serious question. Does the sale money go to the taxpayer, or to the manufacturer?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The one I referred to was a sale by the US govt. So the govt gets the money. It does necessarily go to taxpayers, it goes to govt spending

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Have you considered the amount of return $1.5T would get if NASA had it and got even a fraction of the return they did from their heyday?

3 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 7

Sadly, a lot of NASA "spinoff tech" was actually DoD spinoff tech that the public didn't know about until NASA.

3 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 3

Sauce please?

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

The obvious one: all those microcomputer guidance systems. They were originally for ICBMs. Just look it up.

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

Citation needed

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

The onus of proof is on you, telling someone to 'look it up' or to 'do their own research' is lazy.

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 16

Oooor, and this sounds crazy… we can work on being self sufficient and stop arming our enemies both directly by giving them weapon and …

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Indirectly by giving them cash through our own consumption thus causing us to have to continue to build up our military thereby perpetuat-

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ing the military industrial complex from both sides and transferring money to the pockets of the few and destroying the created “wealth” …

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Through war when we could literally do anything else with it including but not limited to just not taking that money from the average…

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Person in the first place

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But we couldn't possibly imagine doing away with the predatory healthcare system. Too expensive. Poor people will just have to die.

3 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

Oh wait, they already are. Like the story on Twitter of the guy who hit his head really hard but wouldn't go to the ER because he couldn't

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

afford it. His fiance found him dead the following morning.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

1/ The best/worst part is you already spend more per capita in gov money on Healthcare than any other developed nation. Medicare basically

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yep. But God forbid the health insurance companies lose even 1 cent of potential profit.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2/ costs as much as full universal Healthcare.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0