Moving in silence

Jul 23, 2022 1:45 PM

blackNmild

Views

155593

Likes

1890

Dislikes

30

According to the National Association of Realtors.

no one should be allowed to hoard homes until everyone has one

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

We used to worry the Saudis were doing this. Before them the Japanese. If you go back far enough it was the English, French, Dutch & Spanish

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Canada also. Making it impossible for Canadians to buy a house. Still not even a high priority for any of our parties.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Seems whenever Americans have problems, the first group they blame are foreigners.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is the right wing excuse alway blame the foreigners thats also the same world wide. But the rich are the real problem

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's no lie, fuckers gobbled up a ton of real estate in the Bay Area

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Don't worry, the free market will save us any day now!

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

I'm renting a place in BC owned by people living in Asia. Every place in the area is valued at over 2 million dollars. Locals are fucked

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A while back, maybe 4 or 5 years, a Chinese crime ring bought a few hundred houses and made them growing houses for weed. The power use gave

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Them away. The federal government captured over 100 homes in one operation. Maybe home prices should be like out of state tuition.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Vancouver also seems to be a hot spot for Chinese buyers.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Where are these houses? I hear theres a squatter problem lol

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Wealthy Chinese are hiding money from the government in any way they can, including this. They break real estate markets across the globe

3 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

Instead of blaming foreign buyers, maybe it's more of local regulation issue?

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Ironically China is the only Govt that is taking on the Billionairres.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

While homelessness exists, foreign entities shouldn't be allowed to buy properties

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

corporate entities either. now residential property anyway

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*not. fucking autofill....

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They have been doing that for years now. To a certain extend in anticipation of the collapse of the Chinese government.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

extent*

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Ugh that'll be rough

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Chinese citizens should not be able to own property outside of China.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Now change this to "mexican citizens should not be able to own property outside of mexico". Sounds kinds racist. No?

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

But Chinese are the new boogeyman. Literally it says Chinese instead of 'Chinese investors' or 'chinese billionaires '

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Is there anyway to crash the housing market so these hedgefund fuckers suffer without hurting regular homeowners? Asking for everyone

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Largely or mainly. Not both.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

How to Squat in Abandoned Property Wikihow, 14 steps with pictures./

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What are they planning to do with the 10 houses they bought?

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Probably sell them later when they're worth $61 billion, or when they need the money enough that they're willing to sell at a loss.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Rent them out to pregnant women so they can have their babies in America and become citizens. /1

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

In certain countries only a Citizens can purchase property in that country. we should start looking at that. rental property money 1/-

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Try to buy any real estate in China

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

should stay in the US, not leave abroad 2/2

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

What happens if an immigrant wants to buy a house before they had a chance to get citizenship (which takes over 5 years)?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

gotta wait. just like voting, jury duty etc, etc.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The problem is housing speculation. _Who_ is doing the speculation isn't as important as that it's legal market manipulation.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I remember Japan doing the same in the 80’s. A lot of Hawaii.

3 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Wow they were also headed straight for land in Hawaii in 1941 too

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

In California and Florida as sea levels rise and wildfires increase. A++ investment strategy.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

They will know to sell before that.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if you invest a 1.8 million $ in the US you can get a green card, coincidentally 1.8 Million will soon be the average price of a US house

3 years ago | Likes 173 Dislikes 6

Seems like a gross overstatement

3 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

3 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

The fact this is zeroing in on wealthy chinese individuals is tinged in racism literally every wealthy individual world over buys property

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

2/to invest. In the 00s you had mike moore do this with arab corps buying hotels in the US. This only fuels republican fear mongering of

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

3/foreigners taking over.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I know the demographics I can see with my own eyes.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah I noticed that too. But it's rich foreigners so it's OK! /s

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its neither good nor bad.not like poors are missing out on buying that multumullion dollar building. Its the fact they are putting in a

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/demographic as if its just them. Its has a clickbait fear mongering title

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They're doing it the world over. Been happening in Australia with not only houses, but also farms, for years!

3 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 2

Most of them are dual citizens which is strange since China doesn't allow dual citizens.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If I recall we put a stop to that thankfully

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They've bought a lot of properties in austerity-stricken Greece too. Including most of Greece’s Piraeus port, the main port of the country.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Some countries are smart where you can't buy property without being a citizen. Other countries need to follow suit.

3 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 2

Ironically China has this rule. So they get the benefit of buying other country's properties, not many can buy theirs.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Seems a little xenophobic, no? Sounds like a Trump-era proposal.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 40

Actually no, thing is not every country is equal. If average paycheck is $600, someone from rich country can buy a lot of realestate and 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

2/2 inflate prices so native citizens can't get any.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

house prices have doubled in the past 5 years in my area. Houses should be for residents, not investments. I have no issue 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

With foreigners buying houses as long as theyre residing in them. This applies to corporations too, they're not fucking investment tools.

3 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Many businesses will be 5 acres and put cattle on it so they can use the lower livestock tax on all their property

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Foreign investors you say, buying up real estate? Money laundering

3 years ago | Likes 280 Dislikes 8

For the last few hundred years.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Worse, the economy is wholly dependent on people buying houses and borrowing money to do so.

3 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 1

While you make a valid observation, the two are neither directly connected nor mutually exclusive, and both are pretty equally terrible

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

(see: Canada)

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Property ownership is a cultural thing in China, they view it as a store of value since they distrust domestic capital markets.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not exactly. The money is already in the system. For Russians and Chinese, its to protect their assets from their governments reach and to

3 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

Can confirm. My father was a banker hus whole career and we talked about this. He felt like they were desperately trying to get their money1

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Out of China and beyond the ccp. No product or price was too high.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Water rights too. Saudis buy farms and ship clean water back home

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

water rights are as big of a thing in the USA, Basically anyone can sink a well in this country just need to get the related building permit

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In other places however people do own the ground water the same as one could buy mineral or hydrocarbon resources. Ex Nestle in Africa&water

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Diversify against issues in their home countries. They also typically have limited investment options in their home countries as well.

3 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Also, real estate is culturally something that the Chinese like to invest in, as it's been one of the very few allowed investments in China

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Across the world most people make their biggest investment in real estate. Not sure what point you are making there. You are correct though

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

In noting in China their primary investment vehicle is real estate due to government restrictions. But that's only for within China.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I don't understand what was unclear about my point. Unlike in the west, it was de facto literally the only allowed investment option there.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now let's talk about https://www.nbcnews.com/business/real-estate/who-s-outbidding-you-tens-thousands-dollars-house-hedge-fund-n1274597

3 years ago | Likes 633 Dislikes 4

They should both be illegal.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It’s almost like there should be laws to regulate markets in place or something.

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Why not talk about both?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Don't even get me started on Phoenix

3 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Yeah, a few national rental companies are buying up new construction like mad in the Seattle region, it's nuts

3 years ago | Likes 179 Dislikes 0

Why build your own own development when you can just buy an entire neighborhood?

3 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

3 years ago (deleted Jul 23, 2022 8:14 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Nowhere. They're fucking parasites taking homes from the hands of hard working Americans.

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

How does that CEO boot polish taste while you're locked out from the "American Dream" our parents and their parents were able to achieve?

3 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 1

The precious stock market is not making any money? Really? None?

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Even recession proof investments are losing money right now.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Nope, none. Please stop looking for the profits. /s

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Vancouver BC put a foreign buyer tax in place cuz so many houses sat empty, as they were just money shelters for ppl who live in China

3 years ago | Likes 200 Dislikes 0

It the amount of the tax effective?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dunno, I moved right before it went in place

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It did fuck all. They needed to hardline them and say you aren't allowed to buy if you aren't a citizen, like in new Zealand

3 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Nah, it SHOUlD be ok to have a tax on foreign owned vacant property, if it’s used to build high density apartments in good areas.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

Permanent resident who actually lives in Canada. Saying only citizens can buy property does nothing as it only takes 5 years to be a citizen

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No it does. The problem a lot of high value cities are dealing with is Chinese and Russian oligarchs buying housing through shell companies,

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Just as a way to have a “bank account” that can’t be frozen if they have to flee for political reasons. It’s a LOT safer than trying to

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This seems like a food first step.

3 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

Good damn it xD

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Don't apologize. It was delicious.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Very food.

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

I'm food with that.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So im ethically obligated to either move in homeless people or Molotov the empty real estate?

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

That'll just pay out a higher rate of return in insurance claims.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Did I say that? No. It was a deterrent so they would stop artificially inflating the market, pricing out locals. Entire buildings were empty

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

If entire buildings are empty my previous point still stands. Homes for everyone or Molotovs for everyone.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I think I’m not understanding if you support moving ppl in or riot, or if you are implying you’re against it, cuz text doesn’t have tone

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Im saying these buildings should not be empty while people are homeless. And if people are going to deny the needy get homes while the house

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes because it's somewhere to hold their money - real estate is a pretty good place to store money normally.

3 years ago | Likes 451 Dislikes 12

Bank accounts can also do this thing of 'storing money'

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Money slowly loses it's value over time if your amount stays the same. The theory of buying assets like property, gold, etc is to beat that.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you maintain it, it is

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

"There's always money in the banana stand, I mean, the houses I bought." - Chinese "investors"

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes and companies like this typically invested in large multi family and commercial properties. Not competing with individual homeowners.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

What happened to the good old vault?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Florida, you say? Let's see how well that underwater real estate holds its value.

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Better than the Chinese housing market and stock market combined in all likelihood

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah let’s have the country that steals intellectual property, with inflated currency, continue to inflate a foreign market…..

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

The Chinese also have little else to invest in. I forget why but for some reason normal Chinese people don't have access to stocks.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They're not as equal as some of the others.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Their stock market can be manipulated by the gov and basically the only "stable" investment for them is real estate

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thank you for explaining

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And there should changes to prevent this. If not home ownership will become more impossible for citizens

3 years ago | Likes 100 Dislikes 2

Agreed. No corporation needs hundreds of single family homes. Outlaw it and force them to sell. More inventory=lower prices

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Already in full steam in Canada. We're a tax haven and a great place to launder money with real estate

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And cities should be on board. It's in their interest to sell homes to people who will live there, not to leave them empty as "investments".

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

So you're saying China's laws preventing foreign majority ownership of Chinese businesses was a good idea?

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Yes.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

From the amount of information provided, yes.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yes but have you considered the feelings of the rich people who want to be more rich? No, of course you haven't.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Let’s see how it holds as the bubble (checks notes) pops again.

3 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 4

The wealthy don't care, they can ride out the storm, and pick up a few cheap properties along the way

3 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

Its because its safe from the CCP. They can't confiscate foreign assets if you offend the wrong government official.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

and if they piss off the wrong official, they can easily run away and have a place to go to

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The last time it popped because it was the poors holding the properties, this time it's corporations. See the diff?

3 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

For anyone who thinks Smoky's just being cheeky, keep in mind that investors only liquidate at a loss if they desperately need the money.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ya. It will prolly drop a bit as supply catches up but I don’t think it’s going to pop. Also Gen X is really small, Mills and Z are HUGE.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Demand is only going to go up as Mills move more into their 40s and Gen Z into their 30s.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

When capitalism gets weird- if enough investors have enough money they can exert a huge amount of control on the market. So hedge funds can

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

do things that ought to be risky but with so much clout that they can basically control what side the coin falls. And housing investors can

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

buy so much real state that the market rises even when the real economy tanks

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

People think they need actual homeowners as customers but that's false- they can be their own customers. There are huge numbers of homes in

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0