Meet the James Webb space telescope. The successor to the Hubble telescope. It launches in 2021.

Nov 3, 2018 3:17 PM

XAMANDER

Views

104729

Likes

2023

Dislikes

21

Source: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/

Got to see the mirror fully built before going off to CA, was pretty awesome.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

They enable it to do a science

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

v can’t wait to see what they’ll find!

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The Galaxy Eater.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The only downvotes are prolly from flat earthers

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I didn't realise it was so big.

7 years ago | Likes 141 Dislikes 0

Just like the very distinct boob on the third image...jumped right out and bit me

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

*spits coffee out*

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Really? I thought it was bigger

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hope those mirrors don't have issues this time, as Hubble had.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I am sure that possibility was at least triple independent tested.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Okay, but what about miniature meteorites that strike the mirror?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not to be confused with the Robert Webb Telescope, which is aimed squarely at David Mitchell's home.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I was just wondering which carrier will launch this

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is what happens when you let science do

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But can it see why kids love the great taste of Cinnamon Toast Crunch?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Will be one of the greatest achievements in space exploration. Hopefully everything goes well.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I'm so thrilled for it. Shame it has been delayed so often.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How much more improved is this from hubble? obviously a lot but how much?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A lot. Lol. They should be able to see further back into the universe than ever before and be able to look for signs of life on exoplanets.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wow, sheesh, that's awesome...Hopefully it doesn't get delayed again.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

They should put a spoiler on it

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Will it have bluetooth?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Seems careless to drag it out on the lawn where a bird could shit on the mirrors.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Replica.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Man i can't wait for an Ultra Deep Field on this thing. That's what i loved about Hubble the most, the Deep Field and Ultra Deep Field pics.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Imagine arriving at it's destination only to find a dust bunny appearing on the sensor.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can't wait!! Good luck and godspeed!

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If it stays on the dark side of earth, how does it recharge?

7 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

I'm assuming it has a reactor?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Its orbit around L2 will only be partially shaded.

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Actually, it will stay out of the shadows of both the Earth and Moon all the time. https://jwst.nasa.gov/orbit.html

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

So, dark side of the Earth, but not dark side of the sun. Good to know.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It will still almost always be in sunlight.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

With a really long cord.

7 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

Like 6 100ft extension cords should do it.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So expensive, so delayed, dear god please don't let anything on the booster or shade break.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I am quite sure they already keep duplicate copies of anything important in case JWST does crash into the Atlantic.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't speak to god about this. He's probably responsible for the delays because he doesn't want humanity to spy on him.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

"I see everything, but you must not!" - god, probably

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

We must see God's weiner

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Boy, I hope they got the mirrors ground to the correct spec this time.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I was privileged enough to take a tour of the clean room where the mirrors were assembled. Amazing the shear size of each piece!

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Awesome!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*sheer

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

my brother worked on some of the components for it. he's been sending me pictures of parts of it for a while. First time I really get a /

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

/sense of what it actually is and what it'll look like when it all comes togeher.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I want to see what the Pillars of Creation looks like from this telescope.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"space telescope", it's obviously a beacon of insectoid aliens planning an invasion!

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

v

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Did I read that correctly 933k miles from earth? Why so far away? That like 4 times the distance of the moon

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's the L2 point...they like that for some reason.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's at lagrange point 2 (out of 5) which is a natural point where the gravity is such that the orbit is relatively stable.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Aren't the Lagrange points cluttered with rubble? Or is that a fairly clear spot?...

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

L4 and L5 are because their orbits are stable. So they collect space debris naturally. L1, L2, and L3 are mostly stable but require some 1)

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2) additional means to keep the orbit from decaying (i.e. rockets). Because of this fact L1, L2, and L3 don't collect space debris.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2021...... To be continued...

7 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 0

Good time to work on a sea lab at least.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Again and again and again. They have extended it a few times and have gone WAY over budget! Be lucky if its not canceled.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Far too late to cancel it now at the final assembly and testing stage. You can't be pleased though at the huge overspend & long delays.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not possible.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

No way will they cancel the mission. They've already spent over 10 billion on it and are getting close to the finish line.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

While originally quoting 1 billion... Then they acted shocked when they had a lot of programs axed over the years

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Additionally: It's too awesome to be cancelled. A whole generation of nerds will be dissappointed. JWST or we riot!

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes apparently they've seen the finish line with the telescope.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

https://xkcd.com/2014/

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Lol, that caption is good too

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

https://m.xkcd.com/2014 for the mobile users

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This one should be part of the post, @OP!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Plagued by budget overruns (~100%) and missed schedules (3 years and counting). Sure hope it works.

7 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 1

Ask the military, they've got plenty to spare.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's what happens when you have to invent the technology for the thing you are trying to build

7 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

govt projects are always like that. NASA has a good track record though.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I launched one of these in Kerbal Space Program, it went well. I'm sure Nasa can do the same.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The original estimate was $1.6b budget & 2011 launch. $5b at start of construction. $10b now & 2021 launch.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A pittance for what it is and will do.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Could have spent that $10B on any number of other space missions that would have advanced us farther as a species, though.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Disagree with you yet upvoted since you still have a valid point and things like this should be open to debate.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's NASA. Are they going to be in budget? No. Is it going to be on time? No. But they always work it out eventually.

7 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 1

But Northrop Grumman is building it though.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Was the Apollo mission way over budget and way later than expected?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No but that's old NASA, doesn't count.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Apollo mission was a completely different set of circumstances for the country as a whole.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At the cost of generational tax burdens....yay.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 25

Did you protest the new tax cuts and the unbelievable Pentagon budget?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

If you want generational tax burdens check out the senate budget report of those new tax cuts

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

All of NASA is less than 1% of the federal Budget. Look to multiple unnecessary wars for your tax burdens

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Looking forward to this. I'm still rooting for the hubble though. I hope they can fix it

7 years ago | Likes 399 Dislikes 2

I heard they fixed it by turning it off and turning it on again. Is that wrong? Was I pranked?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Hubble is fine: https://www.nasa.gov/content/latest-hubble-news/

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Hell yeah! Haven't checked up on it for a few months. Thanks

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

? I thought it was still operating with a planned EOL around 2035

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Hubble should be fine at least for another 5 years or so. It's down to 3 gyros. If 1 fails, they'll operate with 1 active and 1 reserve.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

However Chandra did lose a gyro and Spitzer now has a final deathdate.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’ve never had a gyro, are they any good?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure Hubble is running fine again. It was Kepler that was recently retired.

7 years ago | Likes 161 Dislikes 0

And don't forget Dawn is now out of fuel, and out of contact, but as planned now set to orbit Ceres for hundreds of years.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hubble lost a couple more gyroscopes and is down to 1. I think nasa said they can't get any more deep, long exposures

7 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 1

But your mom can

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

So happy they finally found out what was causing the gyroscope failures

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That gyroscope had an overspin problem where they suspected a blockage so had Hubble do manoeuvres to clear blockage & it worked.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nm, article came out a couple weeks ago stating they got it back

7 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 1

They turned it off, and on again

7 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 0

I'm not kidding

7 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 1

Well actually what worked was wiggling it which is the equivalent of just hitting it to make it work

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0