karasu1309
94901
1795
86
ABSOLUTE MADMAN FRASER
Jun 18, 2017 1:59 PM
karasu1309
94901
1795
86
AlmostScientist
FRASERED
Pullout69
But it was already broken, or did you not see the third one?
MisterOp
I never saw the movie.. why is it bad?
Hellstorm99
Can't seem to find his twitter. Then again, hadn't used twitter in well over a year.
SugarSocks
I thought it was good
bringbakfirefly
It would be relevant if Mommy 3 didn't already break the franchise.
IsolatedThinker
sshhhee dont tell them, they will just find another dead horse to beat. It could be a much more obnoxious horse too
wheresthebaby
Not my mummy
frustwrited
Except he kinda let himself go and is near financial ruin. So there's that. . .
idieeverytime
Hey you shut your mouth when your talking to me!
MyBigMouth
Marriage is a hell of a drug
frustwrited
Exactly
futuredogtor
If you went without thinking it would be a sequel, it was a great film. Not the same story, just a few similarities.
Capsulex21
Oh look a bad review on rotten tomatoes... I've never seen that before
giveittomestraightlikeapearcidermadefrom100percentpears
Rotten Tomatoes doesn't review films... Its like critisising Metacritic for what it does.
Capsulex21
Yes. I know
wobbu
The reason a lot of movies have bad scores is that a lot of movies are bad]
employed
Let me guess. You thought suicide squad was awesome?
Capsulex21
No, I think it IS awesome!
Capsulex21
But toy story 2 & 3 being some of the best refs moves of all time?? C'mon
IamJustinSane
I guess I'm the only one that thinks that the Mummy remake that Brendan Fraser made, wasn't very good either.
MerkinSuit
Nope, I'm guessing most of the people that hold them dear were children when the came out. The movies are groan inducing terrible.
IamJustinSane
I don't think they even know his Mummy movies are a remake as well.
Daltypooh
I found them quite fun though even if the cgi was terrible
WookieeBoogiee
That's a fake instagram account (no blue thingie next to his name). The real goodguy Brendan Fraser would never post something like that
giveittomestraightlikeapearcidermadefrom100percentpears
You're right that its not his account, its a fan account. But the blue tick doesn't automatically indicate its a real celebrity account. >
Tsasum
nor the other way around.
giveittomestraightlikeapearcidermadefrom100percentpears
I know someone who could qualify for a blue tick but won't because of what happens to your twitter and insta account. It completely changes.
MadDogMorgan
How?
giveittomestraightlikeapearcidermadefrom100percentpears
Basically firstly you apply for the blue tick its not automatic. And basically it cleans up your homepage, so it shows you anytime your >
giveittomestraightlikeapearcidermadefrom100percentpears
name is used in a tweet. (i'm unsure about insta's blue tick, but i reckon its the same) and you start to be followed by loads of other >
Cheomesh
The original Mummy wasn't good either.
MerkinSuit
The 1959 Hammer one with Christopher Lee? I'm afraid your wrong. If you're referring to the remake with Frasier, yes it's really bad.
Cheomesh
Is that Christopher Lee's face up in the main post?
MerkinSuit
No, nor is Frasier in the original Mummy. I mentioned the incorrect original, the original was 1932 with Karloff.
FussyZeus
People really love shitting on the new Mummy. I thought it was perfectly good, 2 hours of fun. Head shoulders and cock above Mummy 3.
gecko08
Seriously. It does not deserve the ratings that it's gotten. It's not good or bad. It's remarkably average. and worthy of at least 6/10
EarlGreyOrDeath
Okay but is it "Mission Impossible, but this time there is a mummy"?
FussyZeus
Not even close. Tom Cruise is not any kind of bad ass in this movie, he has training (he's a soldier) but he's obviously a shitty one.
LiquidWriter
You're right. It's just a fun popcorn flick. Critics forget that movies should be fun.
EarthDragon2189
No they don't. They just don't think this particular movie WAS fun.
dogfrost9
I don't get the circle jerk either. I just go to the movies for entertainment.
AntiCircleJerker
You summed it up. Society loves group-think lately and especially here on imgur. It's just a circle jerk of pretentious shit to fit in.
EarthDragon2189
This comment always confuses me. Like, do you think people who don't like the movie WEREN'T going to the theater for entertainment?
JeremyPeevin
1/3 Here's what's always bugged me about this new Mummy movie: Tom Cruise totally could've been in the ORIGINAL Mummy. Would've probably
JeremyPeevin
2/3 been a better, or at least more classic Hollywood, action-movie choice. Now that he's 60 and cashed in as much as he can on his MI and
GINVU
2/3 did my mom if he had the chance.
GINVU
3/3 I could have called Tom Cruise my daddy.
JeremyPeevin
3/3 and Minority Report by making a bunch of knock offs of those he's got to do the same for OTHER people's action movies?
iDrinkDrano
What made it good was the humor. If out was just a Cruise action flick it would've (and did) suck.
JeremyPeevin
2/3 In fact I believe the exact opposite. But usually when you remake a movie it's to bring in some young talent and retry.
JeremyPeevin
1/2 Tom Cruise can do humor, if it's written that way. See: Tropic Thunder. Now, I'm not saying he would've been better than Brendan Fraser.
JeremyPeevin
3/3 Not some old untalent and fail. Make sense?
iDrinkDrano
Tropic Thunder seemed to be making fun of how crazy he is but that's me. I getcha, still think it wouldn't be better by miles.
iDrinkDrano
I do wish they'd use a new funny guy. Fuck it. Let's have another Chris Pratt movie.
Mack1986
Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Except you. You are wrong
JeremyPeevin
I'm wrong about facts? Oh hey didn't know that was a thing.
MagikXD
Nothing you said was fact, all opinion, even your age was wrong
JeremyPeevin
1/2 Fact: Tom Cruise could've been in the original Mummy. He was alive, right age at the time. It's not even a stretch. Also Fact: Tom
LincolnSiixEcho
Goddamnit, I was alive and the right age too. Did I miss my mummy shot?!
JeremyPeevin
2/2 Cruise has rehashed old projects for the last going on 20 years. The last semi-original idea for a movie he was in was Magnolia.
Mack1986
We should give up. This guy is not gonna stop chortling tom cruises balls.
LincolnSiixEcho
ElMantishrimp
If only they weren't so hooked on the shared universe and actually focused on the movie
cspinasdf
But it already made more money than it's budget.
EarthDragon2189
So did Dracula Untold. But Universal swept that movie under the rug because it didn't really ignite any interest.
Becktacular
Bro, don't talk shit about the DUCU.
TeddiyBear
They should have just lead out with a movie about how Dr. J became the head of that organization rather than just dump it in the Mummy
MrDeadsr
It's all Marvel's fault
EarthDragon2189
Universal looked at Marvel's success and learned the wrong lessons.
StopLookingAtMyName
They got the idea of 'tie the movies together'. Kinda missed the 'make the individual films great' bit.
EarthDragon2189
And "make characters people care about."
FlowingWalnut
K
Asterfix
Shouldve ended the movie with Tom cruise becoming a mummy and Brendan Fraser killing him at the end
Martecles
I'd pay good money for that
OriginalAngryJoe
This comment
EarlGreyOrDeath
You mean Tom Cruise running, 2017, part 1?
D3nn1s10
sorry for being out of the loop, but what is this shared universe the mummy is in?
SuicidalRubberDucky
They're calling it the Dark Universe. It has Frankensteins monster, mummy, Dracula, Dr.Jackle, creature from the black lagoon, werewolf. 1/2
D3nn1s10
ah thanks, that would explain Dr. J and Mr. H being in it. Seems obvious now that you say it.
SuicidalRubberDucky
Apparently Dracula untold and the movie Frankenstein with Daniel Radcliffe are the first two movies involved.
EarthDragon2189
I'm pretty sure Universal removed Dracula Untold from the plan when it bombed.
shaftinferno
Universal Studio's monster movies called the Dark Universe. Frankenstein, Mummy, Werewolf, Dracula, Creature from Black Lagoon.
YourInfoIsCrapImgur
The Jakyll and Hyde thing with the Mummy was a stretch too far. It had some good jokes tho.