Vegan gets road housed.

Aug 18, 2017 3:36 AM

BoozeVoodoo

Views

139249

Likes

3660

Dislikes

342

I eat meat, but not eating meat is basically good for the environment. I think people just want to think what they're already doing is fine

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Oh look. It's this manipulative, easily disprovable post again.

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 4

What if they did care about all of those things tho....

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

someone was triggered

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Road House...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why say anything about soy? Many vegans don't even eat it. But why pass up that perfect opportunity to basically 'bacon lol' at a vegan?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

imagine if you could care about fucking both

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

I miss the rains down in Africa

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

*bless

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is it weird that I'm not really buying those things either? Except sugar and chocolate, I guess, although I try to limit myself.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I tried a mostly plant diet for a bit, felt great. I was also eating solely raw veggies most of the time cause it's hard to get anything...

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I like meat, but if you're going to bring ecology into an argument with a vegan you've already lost. That poster is an idiot.

8 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 3

Depends what meat you eat. Low density grass pasture is ecologically better than a monoculture of vegetable crop. However grain fed beef 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

and other grain fed meats is ecologically retarded. I'm a meat eater and frankly, we need to do better ethically and ecologically speaking.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's just not enough space for 7bil to have 'ecological' (debatable) beef on the planet.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Corporate death squads?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I feel like most facts nowadays are.. very watered down. But what do I know. My facts come from the same place as that guy. I guess we just

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

have to be there when it happens to truly know the truth these days.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, let's have another go at the vegans. They're really the source of the world's problems after all.

8 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 12

Found the vegan!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

This isn't even really a go at the vegan, it's an exposition of the uninformed idiot who replied

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

I thought it was the millennials?

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Millennial vegans.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I thought it was nazis

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Millennial vegan nazis.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Millennial Nazi Vegans*

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Vegan Millennial Nazis

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's one of them there false dichotomies

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

I have to down vote this every time it gets reposted because there is no evidence to support the claim of "corporate death squads."

8 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 9

that whole middle paragraph of his lame 'roast' doesn't even conflict with what they initially said.. tbh nothing does. it's super dumb.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

if speaking, the first person could've interrupted after the second paragraph, were it true, with just "Yes, duh."

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I looked it up, What i found: They are mercenaries hired by illegal logging companies and shit like that that kill tribals over land.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's because you probably misunderstand. They are not corporate killers, but mercenaries like the FARC that are hired to kill tribesmen.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Those groups are already in the area waging their own wars and very much welcome the additional funding for comparatively easy work.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

For example, around 2010 Chiquita was on trial for hiring FARC fighters to kill off Colombians disturbing the banana trade.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Since the victims had no standing in a US court (how could they) the case was dismissed in favor of Chiquita.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Devil's Advocate, if I had the resources to hire a death squad, I'd also have the resources to destroy evidence of death squad involvement.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

(a famous example amongst thousands of nameless/not famous ones)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

this is stupid

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Oh right, the classic "if you can't fix 100% of a problem, don't bother trying to fix any of it" argument. I know I'll get downvoted (1/2)

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

for this, but holy shit is the vegan hate train old. I see 100x more "lol vegans" posts than ever hear an actual vegan say anything, (2/3)

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

And yeah, factory meat farming is fucking garbage for the environment so why are we making fun of people trying to reduce it? Jesus. (3/3)

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

They make fun because they literally know vegans are on the right side of history. They know they're I'm the wrong so they belittle vegans

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The view of the replier is also horrible. Yeah lets do nothing plus taunt the few who do something.

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 5

Yes, because correcting someone is a "taunt"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

He didn't correct anyone, he merely used flawed logic to advocate being a part of a massive problem as opposed to limiting your impact

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's not flawed logic. Someone was taking the high road for something, but that view itself was askew and called out as such. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 That same logic is like saying by not using plastic i'm saving the Great Barrier Reef but I also use coal power that dumps waste into it

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As someone who recently visited the rainforest, buying sugar/coffee/chocolate actually helps the tribes that live there and harvest it.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Someone sounds guilty

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

To think we could be growing hemp in the US, it makes feed, grows like a weed, makes archival quality paper and doesn't need bleaching...

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

... fiber for cloth, oils for skin balms, food stuffs ppl can eat, and more. It's like it's perfect if only outdated laws n lumber industry>

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Were not prevent ing it. Ps the anti marajuan laws were founded in racist roots, and was once a common safe medicinal vs opioid derivatives.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As someone who lives in a civilized country: does anyone actually use rainforest wood for paper?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

More paper is being produced in the S. hemisphere, due to lower demand for paper killing paper mills in the USA over the last couple years

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's not that they actually slle the timber. Maybe for fuel... They need more land to have crops. Mostly soy for cattlefeed.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yet I constantly hear the paper argument. Is it just ignorance?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep. Like the Soy argument to some degree. The US grows its own, though countries w/o land have issues growing it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

This kind of reasoning is idiotic. "Oh, you feed the homeless because you care, huh? Well, if you REALLY care, you'd offer them a job, and..

8 years ago | Likes 170 Dislikes 16

No, it's more like; Oh you care about the homeless? Then what are you doing to help? Nothing? Great -.- Veganism doesn't help the enviroment

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, how dare you care about something if you dont dedicate your whole life to it!

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yeah. There are other options than all-in.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Well put!

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Yet it's up voted enough to reach the front page because vegan bashing is fun and socially acceptable

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Not really, is the vegan the one sayin "i'm a saint" and the guy being like "Your point is wrong"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Maybe but the original post is so annoying.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It's like "donating to the animal shelter, huh? What have you done for the homeless lately? Got you there." So obnoxious.

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 4

Yep.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

With the difference that nobody claims they're a better human being for donating to the animal shelter instead of feeding the homeless.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

You know about this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90mFGwYJ0s8

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

... pay their medical bills,find them a place to live. Since you only do ONE thing to help, instead of everything, you're just pretentious."

8 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 8

It's an appeal to futility fallacy.

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

What does eating veggies have to do with rainforests tho

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Simplified: Meat production = a lot of amazon deforestation because of cattle farming. So it's more about not eating animal products =)

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yea but theyre gonna farm the cattle whether you eat it or not

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Supply and demand. We buy more cows, they make more cows, we buy lentils instead, more lentils and less cows get made. Econ 101

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, no. Cattle farming is huge because we eat a lot of meat. If consumers stop buying something, production eventually decreases. =)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Empyrean0-Sea is an idiot for assuming that because someone is a vegan (or whatwever) they aren't aware of all the problems in the Amazon.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

And you're an idiot for assuming that what you see in this post is the entirety of the conversation between the these two on Tumblr.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Not having access to the rest of it I sort of have to take it at face value, but I suppose you have a point, I dont have all the context.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2) Perhaps if you supply the rest of it we would know more about what's going on.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I still eat meat but doesn't cattle farming make up the majority of amazon deforestation?

8 years ago | Likes 779 Dislikes 14

I only eat texas beef, and we already deforested texas long ago.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes of course, but it's more fun to argue than to acknowledge facts

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

yes

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Yes, but short: Soy price goes up -> ranchers sell land to soy farmers -> deforest new land for new ranches. Soy is also a driver.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And clearing the land to grow soy to feed cattle.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

No it's Puppies. Puppies are destroying the rainforests. One trillion acres a minute. At this rate the earth will explode by noon today.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Did a presentation on this for environmental studies class. And the simple answer is yes.

8 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 1

In the US though soy and other grains are produced locally. It's one of the few things the US actually exports

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

All hail our Monsanto overlords!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Who are apparently killing everyone with roundup

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Just to add insult to injury i suppose

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When you say apparently, do you say it in jest b/c there are so many ppl that believe it true, or is there some new study I'm unaware of?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not all cattle are fed soy grown in the amazon. But it will be harder to find such beef and possibly more expensive.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dont be silly, cows dont live in trees.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ha

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

① It does indeed. And paper is generally not made from rain forest woods, but from plantations of evergreens.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

② Of the 10% old-growth logging that goes to make paper world-wide, I can't imagine a significant portion of it is Amazonian.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nah ya you right, most of the amazonian deforestation is to make room for agriculture. Slash and burn has higher profits than sustainable 1/

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Agriculture. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also, I really don't get that last comment about the indigenous people. Like how is not eating meat opposed to caring about genocide?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

[s] Mostly because the vegan didn't specifically mention it, so obviously they're just saying they like the rainforest because they don't -

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

- know that there's much more going on in the rainforest than just the soy deforestation. [/s]

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hell, the silly vegan may even just think that cows = global warming = no rainforest! What an ignorant vegan. /s again.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People often don't seem to make that connection between met and agriculture. I mean there is a reason meat is so cheap and it's this

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Australian here, we have so much beef we have to export it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, you're right. Soy used all around the world for cattle feeding is largely grown in Amazonia and is the main cause of deforestation

8 years ago | Likes 276 Dislikes 4

Except the US is also an exporter of soy. 3rd largest in the world.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 20

DAMN YOU WONDER WOMAN!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Soy is also in most processed foods and accounts for most of deforestation. Regardless if it is used to cattle. That is why i went back.

8 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 4

70% of soy is fed to animals. "Going back" to eating animals doesn't make sense.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Humanity is not going to stop eating meat. It makes more sense to me find a sustainable solution than to pursue a pipe dream

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

The most sustainable solution is to eat plants.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Isn't corn mainly the cattle food? I'm a Canadian farmer and we don't import grain from the Amazon. But we also have a much smaller populati

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

At all the farms I've been to in the US on the eastern side, yeah, corn is the main cow food.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Probably more common cattle food in the US because we make so so so much corn.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My dad owns a feed mill in central Texas all of our grain comes from within a 200 mile radius. Why pay the extra shipping cost?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It does but how could the truth be turned into hatibg vegetarians and vegans?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Buy local produce folks

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Local grass fed is the shit. Expensive but so worth it if one can afford it.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But if your in the states you're not getting you meat from south America

8 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 16

Not since the US banned Brazilian beef imports several months ago...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

But much of what the cattle in the states are eating comes from farms in south america.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 8

Yep. What the other guy said. The us is a major grains exporter, so much so the US government buys the excess and destroys it.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Well that's just simply not untrue.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No, but Amazonian soy is the basis of katle feeding all around the world (I eat meat too)

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 4

Not in Australia or Japan.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not in the US though. US is a soy exporter as well.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

I eat local, organic, grass fed beef, bison, and venison

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Although I do feel a little weird about eating fish, even though I love it I feel like most fisheries are fucked

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Catch your own, it's easy peasy. Just hock a loogie in the water and grab the biggest one that goes for it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In the US, easily the majority of feed for cattle is corn

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They'll use the wood for lumber and the soil for cfios before it'll be used for livestock. Doubt not eating meat will fix that.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 12

Doesn't consumer behavior drive market value and production?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sure. And we tend to use a hell of a lot of wood

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

91% of deforestation to be exact.. and agriculture makes up 51% of greenhouse gases.. watch the documentary Cowspiracy.. amazing documentry

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

WHO tf is downvoting facts?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Meat eaters in denial

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Always the case.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I always heard illegal logging and farming

8 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 7

Logging I bet is a large part. But doesn't farming = cattle? Idk I watch too many documentaries

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 4

The word you're looking for its ranching.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Most likely: logging > crops > livestock. Rainforest soil is low in nutrients so demand for fresh cropping areas is constant.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

I think it's: palm oil>soy>logging. Borneo lost 90% it's rain forrest to palm oil

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah I remember the RR issue on palm oil, but areas have to be either slash/burned or logged to make space for crops

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This was my understanding. Logging, then crops, then livestock. Lots of slash and burn agriculture.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Livestock require much more space than any other agriculture, beef especially, so ranching is always first on the list.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0