Does anyone actually disagree in that?

Feb 19, 2017 10:34 AM

mibakr

Views

213354

Likes

4668

Dislikes

448

No one should work, if they don't want to. Working is the way that makes you suffer. Don't be a slave.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well that's not very socialist is it...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a manager I give my employees every opportunity to learn how to do my job and they don't take it

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

....but mining coal is such a great job - Homer Hickam....

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Many times people think if you're in poverty you somehow deserve it. Job or no job you earned that.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I hear people say all the time certain jobs are so easy they don't deserve a living wage. So lots of jerks disagree with it sadly.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nobody disagrees with this sentiment, everyone disagrees on how to get there.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Every time I attempt to offer a counter point to politics on Imgur, I'm happily reminded that 140 char's isn't enough to make a difference.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

Amen

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People work poor: "Get a better job. And learn to handle money". We should educate people in ghettos better: "God no more taxes pls".

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Then stop taxing the shit out of us and driving down the buying power of the Dollar

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

maybe instead of raising min wage to $15 nationwide, we can just adjust min wage to the cost of living in your area?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If u start at McDonald's, you can't stay there forever. You need to get experience and move on from there and so on. Just my opinion.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

If you graduate high school, get a job, and are married before you have kids, you have a 2% chance to be in poverty. If you make bad life 1/

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Decisions, it is not the responsibility of others to pay your way so you can be comfortable. Live with your choices. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Husband works full time, I work 2 jobs and we have no money because of what we pay to student loans!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

When asked directly? No. But owners of big corporations will turn a blind eye to pay raises in favor of profits. Despite the cost of living

9 years ago | Likes 186 Dislikes 41

You could have my luck. Have review 1x yr. Get .50 cent raise. Told company not doing well, but they did buy 3 companies this past year!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I consider myself lucky. My employer gives everyone a yearly 3% "cost of living" increase in June. 14 of last 15 yrs. Exception was 2009

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

3% is actually a little higher than GDP increases

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I was rounding. The controller bases it on inflation rate. I remember the lowest was 2.5% once, a few 2.75%, but mostly 3%

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Can we just go back to titties now?!?!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Yes please!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not wrong. But all business owners will do this (not just big nasty ones). Staff is an overhead and overhead must be reduced.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 7

'Must' be reduced?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Though I don't have the proper source, there is studies done that smaller companies tend to pay their employees better, but you're not wrong

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

I feel a company with stock, with responsibility to multiple "owners", tends to be the culprit here. Similar to what you're saying

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I had a small company for many years,paid my workers better than average. I did good, they did good. Can't say how that works on large scale

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Many larger comps have similar, often formal, arrangements. Small biz is not easy biz (as you will know) & needs buy-in from staff 2 survive

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Frequently it is the public assistance "keeping" a person there as it punishes them for getting a (better) job, so they don't

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 4

When public assistance pays more than a job then their is something wrong with our economy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Literally heard overheard this statement "Why get a job? I make more on welfare." We need to back a living wage and fix welfare.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Living wage and companies won't hire. We need a public assistance program that doesn't disincentivize work

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I have plan. I call it the 1%. Public assistance goes down 1% per month. Eventually getting a job makes more sense than welfare.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Change it so that you don't lose for gaining employment would be a big step.And make it "cost" something,eventually not worth it to collect

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Come on commies, everyone knows you just have to find a better job! Lift yourselves out of poverty!"- Every middle class libertarian ever

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Which is funny because even the middle class is relatively poor and I don't understand why they hate on those poorer than them so much

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

THE TOP 1%ers WEALTH DISTRIBUTION IM BERNIE AND THIS IS ALL I KNOW

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 16

You have a good start, now just look into it and see for yourself if the top 1% is a problem. (hint, it is) :)

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

As a liberal I don't necessarily believe in raising the min. wage. But workers should be entitled to recognition for their hard work.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The person that busts their ass deserves a pay raise sometimes. But the prick that barely skates by deserves nothing more than minimum wage.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm too poor to be in poverty. I work in the Medical field and i can barely keep my head above water.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 8

As do I. Until recently I wasn't being paid enough to cover the costs of my degree that the job required.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Horse shit. We live in such a time of plenty that even the poorest of our poor have problems with obesity. You just don't understand poor.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

I am almost 100% certain you don't understand how poverty works.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its sucks when youve only got $90 for food and all the cheap stuff is fattening. Specially when you work 16 hour shifts. Constantly.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Most stock holders prefer profits and dividends over better wages.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Yea, because they lose less money.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Says the man that wants to give away free college payable by those that had to work their way through college.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Think of it as the government training your employees for free.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hopefully in a degree that you can use. Was free trade school in Bernie's book as well? to lazy to look up

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes it was

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Investing in people's education is smart.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

A lot of people disagree with this. We live in a world full of shitty, selfish people.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 10

With accounts.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Yup. America breeds greed and individualism, that's why you see such a push back against Bernie and this huge ideological divide.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

It's not a giant push back though. Poll after poll shows that the majority of Americans agree with almost all of Bernie's ideas. Sadly most

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Americans did not vote in this election,for various reasons,so they're a silent majority.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sometimes, in order for their to be a winner, there must be a loser. It really is a case of hating the game rather than the player.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

There are more than enough resources for everyone on the planet to have enough. This western "capitalism" system is grossly unfair and waste

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do you think you have "enough", or more than enough? I mean, feel free to give stuff up till you have only what you need.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Bitch,golden toilets and weekly Florida vacations are "normal" to some people. So yeah, people could stand to give a little so that others c

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

an live. More to the point is the fact that A) the grocery and restaurant industries throw out literally TONS of edible food every year and

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

ful

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A job should be the voluntary exchange of a person's time and talents in exchange for things of value. Anyone disagree with that?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Conservatives who pass anti-union laws disagree. They restrict you from making a free-market contract with your employer.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I think you may misunderstand what right to work is. Making a free market contract with an employer is *exactly* what right to work is.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

These laws actually RESTRICT contracts: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-to-work_law

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No. Read the text of these laws. They *PROHIBIT* employers from making private contracts with unions. They are anti-freedom.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Right to work means that employers get to screw their employees and the employees can't band together to avoid being screwed.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

OK, so you don't understand. Right to work /=/ no union. Just means you can't force me to join something I don't want to just to work.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If I own the factory, why should Big Government tell me what contracts I can and can't make with those who choose to work for me?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You realise that as long as poverty is classed as being below a certain % of median income there'll always be people in poverty right?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

Ssssshhhh logic isn't welcome here

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

That isn't how poverty is determined.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Seems not in America, but it is in the UK, technically I'm in poverty

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I looked into this in an attempt to prove you wrong but it turns out you're right http://www.irp.wisc.edu/faqs/faq2.htm

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What we can take away from this is, to lift everyone out of poverty we need to make food dirt cheap.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good job on taking initiative and doing reaearch. I don't think you're supposed to do that on the internet.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm pretty sure you're only supposed to care if people you're arguing with have done theirs.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And then he introduces policies that stifle competition, ensuring that the workers are screwed. But, he's nice or something?

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 15

Incorrect

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

His policies encourage competition?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't see that they discourage it. It's not all one way or the exact opposite.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Big businesses benefit from regulation, because they can hang on while the smaller ones are strangled, effectively stifling competition.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Again incorrect. That is not an absolute. Some regulations definitely do favor big business. Not all. They can be written in such a way

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that their effects on small business are mitigated. Not that they often are written that way. But they can be.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The capitalist creed is "we must maximize profits regardless of the social and environmental cost."

9 years ago | Likes 191 Dislikes 71

No, its "every man for himself"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Capitalism has lifted more humans out of poverty than any economic philosophy in the history of mankind.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The Capitalist creed is, i have ownership of myself and the things i create

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

The awful truth.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

'cause I owe my soul to the company store...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is? I have both of Adam Smith's books here. What page is that quote from?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Oh yeah cause capitalism is the problem, not lazy people

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

oh christ ancap people. the problem with capitalism is the corruption within it, not itself.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Good thing we're not a true capitalist society then, ain't it?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Privatize the gains, socialize the cost." That's the mentality

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Capitalism isn't bad. Capitalism without a moral compass is.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 5

"Capitalism" and "Moral" don't go together

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 12

Capitalism is a framework, Not a moral school.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Not saying it is, I'm saying that within this framework a "moral compass" cannot exist.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

And what I'm saying is that is not true. Capitalism gives you the ability to operate morally or not. It gives you that freedom.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

That's the conservative creed. Capitalism != a form of government. Liberals who want clean env and social safety nets aren't anticapitalist.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Sure, I bet actual Capitalists would totally agree with that statement.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Sure, I bet actual Capitalists would totally agree with that statement.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Sure, I bet actual Capitalists would totally agree with that statement.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Sure, I bet actual Capitalists would totally agree with that statement.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Sure, I bet actual Capitalists would totally agree with that statement.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Socialist idealism is "Everyone owns everything. There's no such thing as exceptionalism. There's no WAY this could go wrong."

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Source? I've always understood it as keeping the product of one's labor. Contract law handles the rest. If you're trading clean water

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

upstream for dirty water for someone downstream and they did not agree to it then in comes contract law to identify who was harmed and who

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

did the harm and the proper course to rectify the situation

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe mostly it is, but I don't think it needs be. I think that's the creed because of unskillful thinking and doesn't make anyone happy

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks to free market principles, from 1990 to 2012, the number of the world's extreme poor was cut in half... 1

9 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 13

, the first significant global decline in extreme poverty. You can downvote if you like, but I can supply sources for my claim.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 11

Extreme poverty is a different than what Bernie was referencing.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 8

Yeah, he's just talking about good old first world poverty I guess.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

What is it, like 9/10 americans are upperclass compared to the world?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

According to last figures, if you make more than 34k a year, you're in the top 1%, globally speaking. So yeah, we're doing pretty good.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

That was the point. His definition of poverty is relative and as such cannot be eliminated

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Doesn't make OC's point any less valid.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Here's the thing... if you make more than 34k/yr, *you're* in the global 1%. If you want to see true, grinding poverty, *real* poverty 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

in the US, take a quick jaunt to the nearest Native American Reservation. What Bernie thinks of as poverty is pretty tame by comparison.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

It does make it irrelevant to the conversation though and just side tracked use from the problem at hand.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

That doesn't sound like a good way to create a society.

9 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 28

That creed combined with a government that follows the best interest of the people would be a good way to create a society. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We lack the latter. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Its not, However we don't really have any better alternatives except maybe a capitalist/socialist hybrid that some countries have adopted.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It has historically proven superior to all the attempted organized societies

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Mostly because these other societies have been a response to the exploitation of Capitalists. The problem wasn't that these societies 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

weren't Capitalist enough, to CAPITALISTS it was the problem, these societies have consistently been replaced by Capitalist dictatorships

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Such as...?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ever heard of Pinochet? How about the Banana Republics? Maybe the corruption of elections in Italy by the CIA? Admittedly, I am naming 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Things committed by the U.S. but it's policies are heavily influenced by Capitalists and leftovers of the Red Scare 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

If you ask capitalists, they'll argue that the free market would actually make companies want to protect the environment and their workers.

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 7

Theoretically maybe but theory is not backed up by any data that I'm aware of.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Sep 26, 2021 5:28 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Some monopolies are unavoidable. Given the choice I'd rather one that was formed because of superior business tactics than legislation

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

See, I've seen it argued that market forces would naturally keep monopolies from forming if consumers were educated about them.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Would it help a Comcast consumer, if he is educated?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 16

That argument is based on rational actors which we know psychologically and sociologically do not exist.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Do pure capitalism not mean, that all the capital ends in one place?

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 19

Pure capitalism would be a purely free market with no restrictions on it. Which some (including myself) argue would guarantee monopolies.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 4

How unrestricted? Like i could hire a PMC to takeover someone else by martial force? Always wonder of that. Like a democracy dents to form

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Because it did. We have historical evidence of this. Free markets tend to destroy personal freedoms

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

Sub "career" for "job" and I agree. A job, however, can be but a stepping stone to a career. A hamburger flipper should not be a career.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 23

So in your perfect world, who flips hamburgers?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Improving one's self" generally takes both disposable income and free time. Barely scraping by flipping burgers full time means you can't.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

That's not true. I worked 2 jobs while going to college. It takes focus.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

What if you had 2 kids? Would you have been able to better yourself in college and work 2 jobs? Everyone's situation is different.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I have 4 kids. And a wife who can't work. So ..... What?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Sounds like your wife did plenty of work, raising the children, cleaning, cooking, laundry, basically running your life for you while 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You fundamentally misunderstand the cycle of impovrishment. Seek more knowledge.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 9

I fundamentally don't take "It's too hard!" as a valid excuse.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm sorry you think that it's that simple. I hope you take the time in the future to dissect these important issues with more understanding

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So in your perfect world, who flips hamburgers?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Kids. Getting experience on their way up.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

So how do we deal with the fact that jobs like those are the only jobs that some people can find and qualify for, even as adults?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Who are these people? Personally, I can't find enough people to work for me for $12.00/hr.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ya know, I'd be OK with paying a bit more for a burger made by a guy who saw it as his career rather than a way to make beer money.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Not me

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'd like burger flippers to make enough for food, a place to live and utilities. Assistant managers could marry, managers, middle class.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Maybe not the high end of the middle class, but at least above the poverty line. Wage increases will help, but we'd also want housing help.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And just because you start flipping burgers, doesn't mean you have to stop looking for better. Took a few years of bouncing around for me.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

A school friend of mine flipped burgers from high school through college and is now a manager. Also does motivational speaking and mentors.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

She's still in poverty, but not as bad as the poverty we grew up in, she can afford a pet, she helps her family and is a good person.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

She mentors kids with learning disabilities like hers (dyslexia,) and sometimes she hires a couple. One boy graduated and credited her help.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Her degree is in biology and she's still looking for work in her field, but even if she does get to teach science, she'd still cook.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Why not?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

You're right. McD and BK is what I meant. By all means flip the best burger at your own place and charge an arm and a leg!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...what...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Improving one's self" generally takes both disposable income and free time. Barely scraping by flipping burgers full time means you can't.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I disagree. Mainly because I did it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why not? Not my path, but some people aren't necessary equipped for more.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 10

There are many jobs that you can take as a career that don't require anything more that a high school degree e.g. secretary, truck driver->

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

(which are in high demand rn) call representative, etc. You shouldn't ever think that you're limited to flipping burgers at McDonald's.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Sure, but you have to know that there is a finite amount of these. Here's some considerations: The population is growing. Even skilled 1/

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

jobs are becoming harder to get. Unskilled jobs are diminishing due to the rise of automation, which will rise exponentially over the 2/

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

next 10 - 15 years. Capitalism is a growth model, which requires greater profit and expansion year on year to remain viable. These are a 3/

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Apparently people do because if you argue this point, a common response is "get a better job lmao"

9 years ago | Likes 959 Dislikes 45

My favorite in response to being an area where it's a job desert: Move to an area to get a better job rofl

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Alot of available jobs don't even try to lift you up

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As if 'better jobs' grow on fucking trees.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Problem, cost too much for EVERY job to be uplifting out of poverty

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Don't make enough? "get a better job lmao" Harassed at work? "get a better job lmao" Don't get any health insurance? "get a better job lmao"

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Yes and this is most ignorant and stupid answer, spit in the face.

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 8

I won't call you the names you deserve but I'll ask you, do you offer to pay more for the things you buy because the cashier deserves more?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Reminds me of Grave of the Fireflies when the doctor says all his sister needs is food and the brother yells WHERE AM I SUPPOSED TO GET FOOD

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

there is a difference between a job and career

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

And you probably have a job, with ignorant comments like that.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Ill up vote that.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Serious question: What's wrong with that response?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

1/2 We need people to do the jobs that we dont want to do, they should be paid livable wages. I don't want to pick my own fruit but

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2/2 I'm happy to pay more for it. Most of the cost of better wages would come from repealing corp. tax welfare.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You understand that double fucks the corporations (whether they deserve it is irrelevant) and would simply result in removing those jobs?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I just don't understand why people would work for someone that doesn't want to pay what your skills demand in compensation

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 9

Your pay depends on market value. That, in part, depends on what others will accept in terms of pay

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because for most people in that situation the only other option is to starve.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Very few people would pay what someone's work is worth. There's no money in that, and money is all that matters at the top

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I agree with that unless it's minimum wage. That's not meant to be a career and if you make it one it's your own fault you can't pay rent

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 14

But minimum wage should still be a livable wage. Not saying living in a turbo mansion and wearing a monocle but.. food and rent at least.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Minimum wage is supposed to afford you a home, food, and recreational expenses. That's what it was designed for.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Minimum wage should still be above the poverty line.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Yeah but why? It's literally the lowest possible amount you can legally be paid. Its what high schoolers do to get money for the movies

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

The full name of minimum wage is minimum LIVING wage. Originally, it was to make sure people could as least eat a meal in their own home.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

None of his policies will actually do this, it's a macro problem that's done deliberately

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

How does raising the federal minimum wage not address the macro problem of intentionally stagnant wages?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

because you are solving inflation by causing more inflation, meanwhile you're also pricing labor out of the market

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's a bad habit where we try to fix a symptom instead of the issue, the issue is inflation.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Inflation has already happened, just not on the end of worker incomes.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

1. Correct, However, you can't ever catch it, inflation is a lagging indicator and the official CPI numbers were changed in the 80s and 90s

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

5 and yes i can feel the eyes rolling at this statement. Even Mr. put Greenspan is coming around to realize he fucked up

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

4 caused by artificially setting interest rates and fiat money.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

3 the attempts to control markets just break them. Everything we do to manipulate markets is an attempt to correct for the breakage

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

2 and understate inflation, making the issue even worse. On Top of that, while you attempt to catch it you price labor out of the market.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Apparently Google paid their employees "too much" because after the project they could stop working there. THATS HOW IT IS SUPPOSED TO WORK!

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

What? You mean they can retire at a young age? Or after a short term project they could retire?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Quitting a job isn't retiring

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Wait, so he is saying they were paid so well, they quit? That's how all short term projects should be?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's how most contracted projects are currently

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Sure. Let me just go out there to the job store where I can just get a job with higher Consumer Reports ratings.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Strap on my job helmet, put me into a job cannon and shoot me to job land, where jobs grow on jobbies!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Love this. Funny how retail prices are known, but nobody has access to retail payscales. Gee who does that benefit?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Maybe I can order one on Amazon.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That sounds like agreeing to me. A better job *would* lift them out of poverty, no?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 14

Some people just don't want to try.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

When people have 2 jobs and work over 50 hour weeks and still qualify for food stamps, go tell them they're not trying.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Some people genuinely need help and gvmt assist is there to get them through those times but they need to find a way to increase their wages

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And get off government assistance

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

This isn't even about work or wages anymore. Some people would rather have a political fight than find even small opportunities to agree.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The way I see it no one in government will help me out. I dont want their help I don't need their help. It's up to me to better my situation

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes, "I'm from the government and I'm here to help" are words to fear. However, family/friends support helps and we don't all have that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Way to go buddy. Why try and work to find solutions to a global existential crisis when you can just shit on countless billions instead.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Buddy, Getting a business to pay above market wages isn't really a solution imo. That's one way businesses go out of business

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No. All full time workers should be not living in poverty, regardless of the job.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Do you see what you just said? You just got their hours dropped from 40 to 39. Welcome to unintended consequences.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

We should be working towards that, is all I'm saying. I know we could be doing a much better job of it.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also 35 hours a week is considered full time in many respectable countries.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Some of which are going back. France was at 35, last year went up to 48 because their unemployment is double ours.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

"lazy liberals"

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 4

I always find that term funny because a majority of unemployment is in red states.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

One I get: "All the big city problems are because democrat mayors have been in control there for decades!"

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

and that's not even considering that most blue states fund red states with federal funds, keeping their state income taxes artificially low.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Seems to be a trend. The GOP seem to always be against reform for the things that are plaguing their states.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

And the turkeys continue voting for christmas.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Let's vote for a NYC billionaire, he totally gets us!"

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm in a red state. It's pretty damn rough

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

There are plenty of tech jobs on the coasts

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah I imagine the job market is different out of this state. Like 90% of work here is food..lucky to land a factory job

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm from Canada, I drove through Kentucky to mammoth caves, it was a completely different world. People were friendly though.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As another Canadian, I had never been told "Fuck off, cracker" by a stranger before I went to the southeast USA.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In small towns or rural America their aren't jobs to be had.

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 4

It's cause menial jobs, the ones most people used to work at, just don't exist anymore. Farming, mining, factory jobs. Yeah they still 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Exist, but not as many as there used to be. As automation improves they may disappear entirely. What to do then? Can't go back in time.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The perplexing thing is these are the people most against Bernie. In my experience at least...

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Because (as I understand it) they want the opportunity to work, not a handout. Different culture.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

For everyone in favor of assistance programs, I know of zero people who advocate handouts to lazy spoiled entitled people.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

You'd be correct

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And all they get is exploited.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yeah, no shit. The Dems need to address this in future if they want a chance at winning any red states. Provide opportunities, you know? (1)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or even make the effort to SAY that you will TRY. (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I recently read an article about people in poor, rural areas who want the minimum wage increased and yet still voted Trump, who nominated

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Its because abortions are bad and muslims are scary.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

someone very opposed to that idea to be the head of the Dept. of Labor. Thankfully he withdrew his candidacy.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

People who push individuals to go to college and make it sound like a college diploma is the golden fucking ticket to job land annoy me.

9 years ago | Likes 362 Dislikes 12

My mom says that and I don't have a job and I have 1 college credit

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Well that's what every millennial was told...

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I feel that many parents, like mine, do this because they dont actually know how to help their children succeed.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

To be fair, nowadays employers demand a uni/college diploma even for menial clerical jobs. I dunno why but it's always there. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh, and 3-5 years of experience. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

College dropout here. I'm grateful as hell to have left that path with no debt, but yeah. Fuck telling everybody they need college.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's as close as we got.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As someone who has interviewed people for my company. We look for using your college skills in your life. A good worker lives their degree

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

as someone who has been laid off of at least 7 jobs in the last 7 years, the fact you have a diploma can get you hired at a minwage place.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

not sure how you get those fancy "real" jobs people are always talking about. I mean, houses exist. people who can afford them live in 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

them. They usually have vehicles in their driveways. seems like theres something everyone else knows that I don't. I just wanna be normal

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm making pretty good money and I don't understand how people afford that all and still manage to squirrel some away

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It is though if you get a worthwhile degree

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

I have an associates in accounting. They still want 5 years experience for Entry.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I dunno man. I have a bs in engineering and had 15 job offers when I graduated

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

BS chemistry here. Most wanted experience, but got a crap job paying $13/hr in Cali. After student loan payments, might as well have been

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Where jobs grow on job trees called jobbies.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The people that ignore parents/others when they tell them not to get a liberal arts degree, do something in STEM then complain about 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Not being able to find a job with their degree in 18th century literature with a minor in play writing annoy me. If you want a degree in 2/?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Something you're interested in, fine. But don't blame anyone except yourself when your degree doesn't line up with current job market 3/?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Demands. It's far too easy to go to a job search site and see who's hiring for what kind of jobs. 4/4

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No no, not a diploma, a better job. For example 15 an hour at mcds leads to machines doing it. Instead work towards being a manager

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

How does that way of thinking work? Not everyone can be a manager. Making the minimum wage livable is the only thing that makes sense.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Sure. Now how do we define liveable? Current gen has way more amenities than previous, despite less "buying power"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Making the minimum wage anything over the price to build and maintain robots that do the same job, 24/7, without breaks or mistakes is dumb

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

I got a degree in accounting. Had a job coming out of college. Pays pretty well. Worked for me.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Yeah, I hate them too. Job land requires a passport as well.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean... if you pick something that leads into a field with a large demand and low supply...you

9 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 10

Truckers and Nursing are probably highest demand atm and you don't need college for one of those.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But telling someone to make that decision when 3 months prior they had to ask permission to take a pee is kind of a problem

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 5

No, they make that decision while they still have to ask permission to pee.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

I have an associates in accounting and I can tell you that no degree will give you the 5 years they want for entry level.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

're going to find work? ...

9 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 7

Regardless of the socialist agenda, I like the message in this one:

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Those fields change on a monthly basis, but it takes years to get a degree.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Source on the "monthly basis" thing? I'm fairly certain most markets do not change that fast.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Those fields change on a monthly basis, but it takes years to get a degree.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

There are other factors at work though. A lot of employers only want to hire new grads for part time.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1. Get hired part time. 2. Work for six months part time. 3. Get a full job now that you have half a year experience, and references.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Majored in chinese am now qa engineer whose your god now

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No one who works a fulltime week, no matter what the job, deserves to be in poverty. Well, nearly no one actually deserves poverty, in truth

9 years ago | Likes 531 Dislikes 50

Dude I work 50 to 60 a week and still struggle to pay rent and shit

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

sounds like you need to find a way to get rid of the person who's keeping you there by pointing a gun to your head. then you'd have options

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I've a FT job that I love with "amazing benefits" for a long time. Still can't afford things like surgery ($1500 deductible) make $8.40/hr.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

A physician I know says that the worker who conscientiously, and diligently cleans the rest rooms does more for health care than he does.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 23, 2017 3:35 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

You're shouting into the wind here. Most people in this world work to improve their life. The rest come to Imgur to rage about it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yes some people have it easier, but that doesn't mean you can't be successful. I was born into poverty but I worked my ass off and it paid

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

There are plenty of people with the same story as you, minus the last part.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What about bank managers who burn/win billions/millions every week?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What about them?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What if I camwhore for 10 hours a day to an empty room because no one wants to see me?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What you deserve and what you get are 2 very different things.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Very, very true.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The working class of America right now deserve more.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly. The working class of everywhere deserve security and safety. If not, then what's even the point of society?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Subjective theory of value, bro. People have to actually want what you produce, and the price they will pay indicates how much they want it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You should look into the economic theory of Universal Basic Income

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 8

Here's a podcast with 2 economists discussing the idea, for the curious: http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2017/01/michael_munger_3.html

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I have, and I'm an advocate.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

This. 100%.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The concept of a negative income tax has been around for a while and would be much more efficient to implement

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's an interesting concept though it still requires a paycheck. I like UBI because it helps folks who can't work as well

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is true. I'm not opposed to the idea but it needs to be implemented in small amounts over time to help its chance at success

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What if you have 6 kids? A single person working 40 hours min wage is not in poverty.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

Heyo! Someone's got the right idea. Don't pump out humans like hotcakes (or at all) and you shouldn't have trouble paying the bills.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Well, at least you had sex 6 times, which, on this site, makes you relatively wealthy in that currency.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You deserve poverty if you are an able bodied person who refuses to get a job. I know this is a small minority of the impoverished.

9 years ago | Likes 213 Dislikes 23

Thank you for realizing that it's a minority of the population.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

I suspect that minority is not as small as many think it is. Know too many people who simply won't work; who won't do particular 1 of ?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

kinds of work; and who won't (not can't) learn something new to do a job. Was a graphic artist during the advent of the desktop 2 of ?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

publishing revolution. Saw many artists leave the field because they didn't want to learn to use computers. I learned & kept working. 3 of 3

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hence my use of the word "nearly". Conversely, you don't deserve poverty if you want to work and can't get employment.

9 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 1

I've had to do a lot of shit jobs before I got to this job that I don't particularly like but isn't terrible either.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, there's wanting to work and then there's being willing to do what's necessary. I know people who only want to do particular work.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

You mean the people who don't want to work those jobs that don't pay a living wage that OP was talking about?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I have a friend who used to making big money in tech consulting. Lost his job. Offered a new one for 2/3 pay because market changed.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It is PRODUCTIVITY. If the job you do don't physically raise enough revenue to pay for a higher salary it ain't gonna happen

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Some productivity is hidden though. The cleaning lady at the train station does a lot to keep health care costs down.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can still establish a metric to approximate the value of that person's labor to the company. If cleanliness of facilities is a drawing

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

point then you will pay your staff the value they bring you. If you don't you'll be punished by lower revenues

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not everything can be linked to profits, though...?! Teachers, crossing guards, government workers - these, and hundreds more, only cost 1/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is a bizarre statement. I can literally think of hundreds of jobs that are pure expense with no profit. Doesn't mean that we 1/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A) don't need them of B) the workers of them don't deserve a fair wage. Did you think this one through? 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Look at the ratio of productivity to compensation over the last 40 years and get back to us.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Then you look at purchasing power to dollar you'll find you can afford more. Green pieces of paper are worthless unless you can buy things

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

with them. If wages are reduced 25% and cost of goods by 50% you are much more wealthier than before

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh, so I can put myself through college and buy a house with a summer job now, or are you talking about incidentals like computers?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Digging ditches or any other zero skill job doesn't deserveas much a a skilled worker. If you want better you must work harder.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

FYI, I don't know if you've ever dug a ditch, but it's fucking hard. Much harder than what I get paid a lot more to do.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes I have I did manual labor for six months and said fuck this and went to school. I have no sympathy for someone that keeps a shit job

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's. it the argument. We need ditches dug. That is necessary work and someone who does an honest day's work shouldn't live in poverty.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

We should drop the word "hard". I can carry rocks in a circle all day. It's hard. Doesn't guarantee anyone's paying me living wage for it.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Sorry for the typo, I'm on a phone. I meant to say "that's not the argument" - no one is saying all jobs should be paid equally.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No one deserves anything...

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 9

How about: everyone deserves just what they really think they deserve?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

So you don't believe people deserve fundamental rights?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

Fundamental, inalienable natural rights are just that, natural. You do not deserve them and are not given them. They merely exist 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the advancement of, protection of, and insurance of natural rights for all (which should be the sole purpose of gov't) is not the same

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not the same as the demanding of goods and services for no compensation, collected and distributed by the authority of the state.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Im speaking to the T.A.N.S.T.A.A.F.L. Fallacy. You don't deserve the free results of the fruits of anyone else's labor or endeavors.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

why tho? just because?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Because it's a claim on someone else's labor. If you want others to provide for your needs & desires, but you must first appeal to theirs.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

This person gets it!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What? I didn't choose to be alive. So now I just get thrown in this world and get shafted because I wasn't born in a rich family?(1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Not an "awful" standard of living, but it definitely should be much better.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Because I don't have that luxury I don't get as good healthcare, education, and have an awful standard of living. Born working class? Tough

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I would love to teach you more about this but I hate communicating in this format. Look up the "T.A.N.S.T.A.A.F.L Fallacy" and read

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A good Robert Heinlein book. I'd say start with Moon is a Harsh Mistress or maybe Stranger in a Strange Land

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not once did I say anything was free. Just because I want a system that creates free college education and healthcare doesn't mean I (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Entitlement is dangerous. Believing you deserve anything from another is an entitled belief. And no one asked to be alive, the fact that 1/X

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You think you're special or deserve something because "you didn't ask to be here" is just laughable. But also dangerous

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Wanting access to more affordable college education and healthcare is not entitled and dangerous, it's perfectly reasonable.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

In fact, you thinking that is entitlement and dangerous is a perfect example of how America has pitted it's own working class against itself

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I know people who work full time but can't afford food but mainly because it's poor money management :/

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 7

This. I know a guy that raised a family of 6 on 30k a year without welfare. It's all about money management

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 8

Yeah, some people like prostitutes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, that definitely exists as well. I'm not referring to that, though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I finally gave my receptionist a raise, see she's now constantly buying junk from Amazon (she uses the business prime account w/ her card).

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Which wouldn't be a problem but she was complaining of money problems hence the raise. Hopefully she's saving too.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Hopefully you're not using your anecdotal experience as an example for the entire economic model, though?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not at all in fact I'm hard left. But I see the Imgur pitchforks came out as per usual with swift judgement.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My comment was intended to be purely antecdotal in response to the above. In fact I take a pretty solid hit to pay my people well. They all

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Another thing... I can't even afford to spend like she does. And supposedly she was having tough times.. purely antecdotal frustration and

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the downvotes just kind of got to me because I know people just assume I'm rich and greedy because I own a business.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sure they may have poor money management. It still doesn't excuse that the working class in this country aren't getting their fair share.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

What's "fair"... and who gets to define it... and what legitimizes that definition? They word is essentially meaningless.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

That's why politics is difficult. Everyone has to come to their own conclusions and hope it's the "right" and "fair" one.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I happen to believe what benefits humanity and promotes progress as being "right," and I've come to the conclusion that the people in pow

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

GDP growth compared to worker's compensation? seems pretty obvious tbh

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That's not how an economy works.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're not taking into account how much of the GDP growth/productivity is due to machine improvement and not increase in human labor.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lets put all the responsibility on the business and none on the person for having to live within their means. Thats so cute.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 67

Who said anything about all that noise? Fulltime workers being eligible for food stamps gives you an idea of the problems I'm talking about.

9 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 5

Most full-time workers aren't on/need food stamps... that's the noise being bandied about. Isolated anecdotes being held up as the norm.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Oh, maybe restrict people's purchases based on their income!? That sounds like a republican thing, the restriction of civil liberty!

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

Expecting others to cover your decisions sounds like a Democrat thing

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 16

Assuming that everyone who isn't a Republican is looking for handouts sounds like a Republican thing.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Not all humans are males but all males are human. Not all dems are looking for handouts but most i know looking for handout are dems

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

You have the liberty to spend what you want and the liberty to earn. Hopefully you have enough common sense to only soend what you earn

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 10

Sooo for someone who can afford two out of three between rent, food, and utilities, what should they give up? Home? Power and water? Food?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

3 kids and other one coming, fancy stuffs, cars, restaurants ... Sometimes, financial poverty is self inflicted.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

The other thing to think of though is that it's not enough to make sure that basics are covered. What sort of quality of life does a person

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

have if they can never afford anything other than work? Not to disagree with your sentiment because I 100% think people should only get into

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

situations like children and large purchases that they can afford, but there needs to be a middle ground.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Absolutely. Whatever your beliefs in deity or otherwise, humans deserve happiness and fulfillment. Living to work alone isn't that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I understand, but this is not being debated. Keep to scope: Fulltime workers that can't afford essentials due to basic cost of living.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The point is, consumerism is the problem. If one can't afford essentials with a full time job,them maybe we're living a life we can't afford

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Consumerism is definitely one part of a multifaceted economic issue. But Consumerism creates jobs. Without buyers, there's less sellers. 1/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Setting that aside though, keep it simple. Do you think a full time worker should be paid enough to raise a small family on basics?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Uhh or maybe you literally can't afford basic room and board while working full time. Which is what OP is talking about.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So if I'm a high school kid I can drop out and go work 40 hours at a taco Bell and I should be able to buy a house?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

You mean like all sorts of baby boomers and early Gen Xers did?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I actually think so. Maybe not a nice big house, but yes, I think you should be able to buy a house.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Or at least be able to afford housing.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Pretty much, yes. A basic home that you can live in. Nothing fancy, buy why shouldn't people be able to live their life if they work hard?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Because it isn't hard work.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Because the universe doesn't work that way.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This is bs, nobody would seek higher education if working 40hrs/week at a movie theater was lucrative. Shit job=shit life, that's reality.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 13

I don't believe that. You just have a very low opinion of people. And there's no reason anyone should have a "shit life".

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Well, actually, that's where you're wrong. If I could earn the same money as a gas station attendant as I could being an analyst, I still 1/

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

wouldn't do it. I need to be mentally stimulated. Some people do, some people don't. But we all need to eat.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Sorry, but this is bullshit

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

How's it being an analyst :'( .... -am a gas station attendant whilst working through college to become a form of analyst

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Stressful, but satisfying. Not in the field I want to be in, but it's a gig and it's stimulating.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You are lying to yourself if you think the world would run on equal pay and hoping people still want to be doctors.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Well honestly, equal pay for all jobs is a whole other thing that I'm not going to get into. But, I was simply illustrating a point: job 1/

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

He's talking more about a universal BASE income than equal pay. So every body gets essentials, and skilled labor gets you to luxuries.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0