Liberal logic

Jul 28, 2016 9:11 AM

GeorgiaDawgs623

Views

59848

Likes

1501

Dislikes

494

Plot twist: OP is Russian and paid to make Imgur talk about the DNC email issue.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Conservative logic: Espionage is fine when it happens to the person I don't like. Even better when my candidate asks them to do it!

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

Even though the DNC whistleblower was found dead, shot in the back at the entrance to his apartment?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

There is no evidence whatsoever that Seth Conrad was a whistleblower and was targeted.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

when did my dad start getting on imgur?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Debating politics on Imgur feels like the Special Olympics.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Mental Gymnastics, if you will.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

porque no los dos?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Except nothing the DNC has been "exposed" of can be considered election tampering...

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 11

People must be allergic to complexity. We SHOULD take in to consideration both the content of the emails AND the motives of the leakers.

9 years ago | Likes 103 Dislikes 10

The fact that people can't consider both shows just how stupid people are.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thank you. The Russians were already proven to have stolen info, had the motive, and excellent tradecraft (though not perfect)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Maybe the Russians don't want HRC f'n up the rest of the world like she did in the Middle East?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

when it comes to international politics and intrigue, quid pro quo should always be the first matter looked into

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

They hacked only the DNC, and wikileaks waited until before the convention to release them and even then staggered the release in an 1/

9 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 8

attempt to do the most damage. Add that with the release of the personal info of donors, and how can anyone not see that there's an agenda?

9 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 6

Well Clinton is apparently above indictment by the FBI and DOJ for obvious crimes, plus she hardly plays fair politically does she?

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 22

Assange has a personal vendetta against HRC re: indictment, and has openly stated this, so it's no mystery

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Oh don't be paranoid. I'm SURE they'll just stop at hacking the DNC and not hack any other sensitive American sites. Those goofs!

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 9

Funny how those pesky hackers only targeted the DNC...

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Is no one going to acknowledge that this is the wrong use for this meme

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

There are dozens of us...DOZENS

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Have you guys noticed it's only the anti-liberal political posts that reach the front page lately?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

More Anti-Hillary than anything.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Read the title, my friend.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, I mean I know that for this particular post. Just mean for what I've personally seen on the FP. More anti Hillary than anti liberal.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hate how imgur exposes to me to inner working of the minds of average people.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

False equivalence fallacy: Domestic force manipulating their primaries is not equivalent to a foreign power manipulating a national election

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Its sad people are OK with the whole DNC thing happening at all, regardless of which side of the aisle you are on you should be upset by it

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Except nothing the DNC has been "exposed" of can be considered election tampering...

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Guys, just because only 20 year olds wanted Bernie and he is out of the running doesn't mean you have to say everything is rigged.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hillary won the primary by millions of votes.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 13

even despite the ever mounting evidence, they defend with vigor. You gotta love a dem and their obscene hero worship.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Even though there's evidence that it was rigged?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

The evidence was on Hillary's homebrew server. It has been wiped clean now.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

There is no evidence of rigging or collusion http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-system-isnt-rigged-against-sanders/

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Does anyone really think that the media didn't cover Bernie's positions enough? Even if it was to cover the horse race, his message got out.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

A Harvard study found that the media covered Sanders more and in a more positive light than Clinton. People have cognitive dissonance.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

I'd be interested to know if that study included social media, where Bernie was trully lifted up. Imho, cable/TV media was a diff. story.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also, is it surprising that DNC employees preferred a lifelong Dem over a guy who joined the party just long enough to run for president?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"I'm not a cheater. WE are ALL cheaters! Okay!?" -Democrats

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Trump, Putin, Erdogan. All who are living in that triangle are facing rough times.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

its a square because you forgot to add hillary

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I rather thought about a geographical triangle.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

May I point out: It's not our election, it's the DNC's election. Our election is in November.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 9

It -is- your election:stage 1. Given the stranglehold on the electoral system the two parties have, their nominat's dictate who has a chance

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Very true. That does tend to get lost on a lot of people... However, if you are a member of that party, your voice was not equally heard.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

True, but the DNC's election has effect on our country's election. Especially since we are for all intensive purposes only a 2 party system.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

All intents and purposes, not all intensive purposes.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Wow, I've been saying that wrong my whole life. I'm a little embarrassed, but thanks!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't be. I have made my share of mistakes.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh, don't get me started on the system...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

FFS The DNC did not manipulate or rig anything, they favored someone when they were supposed to be impartial. Dicks, yes, but not illegal.

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 16

"drink blue pop not red pop red pop sucks red pop isnt christian! red pop is BAD for you its socialist!" "hey red pop had a fair chance!"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Okay, so they were simply discussing strategies. No one on the DNC actually srutinized his Jewish faith IRL, di they?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hillary never attacked his Jewishness, no pro-Hillary campaign did either, nor did DWS. So no, they your statement is crap.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i pretty much agree but there is some evidence that they broke campaign finance laws

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Nope. They skirted the line of a shitty system of laws, but nothing was "illegal"

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

i think after the email leaks last week people are gearing up to argue that it amounted to more than skirting the laws, but hey im no lawyer

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Neither are "people"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

i like your style, Kun

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you're an adherent of realpolitik, it's even questionable if they were supposed to be impartial. HRC is a democrat, Sanders isn't. 1)

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Yes, but they were both democratic candidates which, according to the party bylaws, requires the chairperson to exercise impartiality.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fair enough, but they didn't actively sabotage Sanders' campaign. They just didn't support him as their nominee, for good reasons.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep. None of what they discussed in the emails actually came into fruition save for the press activities, which happens all the time.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's completely understandable they favoured a long-time party member over a recently joined outsider. Then again, if you're an adherent 2)

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

of realpolitik, you wouldn't be a fan of Sanders even if you did agree with what he stands for. 3)

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

As an adherent of realpolitik, you are correct on so many levels!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

"Manipulate" and "rig" do not imply illegal. The post's point is legitimate.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It wasn't rigged, and manipulate is dependent on the definition.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is Trump the first Presidential Nominee to ask a foreign country to hack the US further? He also hopes Putin "likes" him

9 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 22

the enemy of my enemy is my friend, and Putin hates the Democrats; pick your reason: exposing 2010 spy ring, opposing the invasion of UA etc

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Putin outsources slave labor from North Korea. Trump probably wants to capitalize on that free labor.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

If u want to widen that net to any nominee colluding w/ a foreign gov to affect the general election, then maybe Nixon but its not concrete

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

You could include Reagan supposedly conspiring work Iran so they wouldn't release the hostages till after he beat Carter in the election

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

meh that's much more iffy. Iran likely would have released them if Carter had one also.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He's the 1st nominee to do many unexpected things. That's why the media loves to cover him, his random shtick brings in eyeballs & ad money.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Publicly. 100% definitely not privately.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

I hope you're not pinning your vote on what you THINK the nominees are thinking privately vs what you KNOW they are saying publically

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I dont care why you vote for who you vote for and you shouldnt care either.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jul 31, 2016 5:58 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Because I am not going to change anyones minds and neither will you. If someone has decided who they are going to vote for, no matter what

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

the reason, there is basically no chance that I am going to convince anyone otherwise. No point in caring and wasting my time.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

FYI: Trump and Manafort have been very low key running a pro-Soviet campaign for months pretending his statements are mistakes and goofs.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

Things he has advocated for: Trump will give up NATO states to Russian invasion. Would recognize Crimea as a Russian state.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Con't: would end Russian sanctions from Crimea. Says Russia/KGB can't possibly be killing journalists.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Con't: Asked for Russian espionage against our State Department. Forced his party platform to prevent discussion on assistance to Ukraine.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

He's been propped up by morons like Rubio/Ryan/Walker/McConnell who say "he's still learning" or "it was a joke". No the fuck it is not.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

He didn't ask Russia to hack the US. He made a joke about them already having hacked the US and sharing with the FBI.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

He did. Then tried to takehttps://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2016/07/28/politics/donald-trump-russia-hacking-sarcastic/index.html

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Do we know if it's even legal for a candidate to call on another country to hack us? Should that be treason or something in that family?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

He asked a hostile foreign state to commit espionage against our state department. It's absolutely fucking treason. But lolTrump he's kiddin

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Where exactly did Trump ask Russia to hack the State Department? Didn't realize HRC's illegal server was in the State Department.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

How the fuck else do you interpret "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing"?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

by fucking understanding her PRIVATE email server (which no longer exists) was NEVER at the STATE DEPARTMENT .

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah Russia is totally hostile. Just look at how they're bombing ISIS and helping the democratically elected leader of Syria. Damn commies.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

We have active sanctions against them for invading an ally. They also aren't doing anything against IS, theyre bombing the rebels we back.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Should the US sanction itself for sending forces to Syria despite its government denying their help?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0YQ0B8 You can have this too. Sorry for the mobile link.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's troubling that a foreign body so easily hacked into secure servers. It is a matter of national security, higher risk than DNC emails.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 12

All her server had were emails about yoga and shit. And she wiped it with a cloth so thoroughly, that FBI can find nothing on it anymore.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Glad our nation only has the capacity to go after one wrong doing at a time. DNC gets a pass because Russian hackers!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

How do you figure?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You say Russian is true higher risk implying DNC should get a pass so we can chase the Russian line. Luckily the US has the capacity to 1/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/ look into both. Both should be investigated.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@chefrein you implied that the DNC should get a pass, then you base your argument on your own implication. Of course they both should be 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The last line of my original response was meant to be sarcastic. My bad if that didn't come across. Should have used quotes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

investigated. When you look to see what your highest priority is on your to do list, you don't simply chuck the rest of the list. Do you 2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

its so fucking obviously a diversionary tactic. "oh shit, we got caught, we fucked now" "lol just blame the russians" "oh right, silly me".

9 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 40

A foreign rival interfering with our election for their benefit is not a "distraction". It is a sad day when Democrat v. Republican comes

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

before American v. Russian.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The FBI is the one doing the investigation. Don't oversimplify it. Please let Imgur be shits & giggles.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 9

Didn't Romney get blasted for saying they're our greatest geopolitical foe?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

Back when Obama wanted a reset. Well, now we know Russia never had an interest in that and are a rising threat to stability.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

But even then Romney was right. I seem to remember something about Ukraine in the news.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Man who receives daily Intel briefings advocated for cyber warfare against our state dept. on national tv. Fucking lib diversionary tactics.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

What exactly were they caught doing? Liking Hillary better than Bernie?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ways to circumvent camp contr laws. Sending their interns to behave like bad trump supporters to make trump look bad.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Redirecting joint DNC funds to Hillary, specifying that DNC support for her be kept secret, spitballing ways to anonymously slander Bernie

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

giving orders to "free media" and "free media" sending their stories to DNC before their editors.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

What if I told you that it's possible for the emails to be completely damning AND for the Russians to leak them to serve their own interest?

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 5

That's the truth. Trump wants to befriend Russia to better fight ISIS and gain leverage to use against usurious Chinese trade practices. /1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Well as long as we're all happy they're not fabricated, what does it matter? This "enemy of my enemy" bullshit is irrational.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

satellites. On top of that improving its trade situation to shore up its economy. 3/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Russia wants to befriend the US to settle the issue with the Ukraine and gain our intelligence sources to better deal with it's former /2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Ok so 1. Bernie only joined the DNP to help his chance at presidency so some animosity should be expected 2. How did emails affect ur vote

9 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 18

Yeah like, he only joined after being booted from the Liberty Union Party for supporting the Iraq War

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

People conveniently ignore his weaknesses with key Democratic groups to push a narrative of "rigged" Was the primary unfair? Yes. Rigged? No

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

The mass media disperses information to the masses. The sheer amount of coverage Hillary got due to the DNC favouring her could 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

Cause her to win. Note the use of the word "could", I'm just hypothesizing, I don't have an inside link to all Americans' brains. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Bernie lost because he didn't reach out to any communities and relied primarily upon predominantly white 18-30 yr olds.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 12

And that's what they want you to believe

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That is not an intellectually serious belief.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Part of the reason he lost some of the earlier races was the common retelling that he would have no real chance against a Rep. candidate.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Later, it became clear that his following was in fact big enough to take on a the Rep. candidate. Too late for those who'd already voted.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In a country where whites are about 75% of the population, and the median age is 37, his appealing to em would have given a huge advantage.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I am not saying the system IS/ISN'T rigged. I was hypothesizing HOW the DNC emails could affect someone's vote because a commenter asked.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

By the way, I wasn't even arguing whatever you countered. I initially stated, and still stand by, that media bias COULD help Clinton if 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except that the 18-30 demographic doesn't have a tendency to actually go out and vote.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hmm. That's fair. I just checked their stats and it's honestly pathetic to see the people who have to live with the election consequences1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's actually the FBI that thinks the Russians are manipulating the election with illegal behavior.

9 years ago | Likes 375 Dislikes 24

Obviously the FBI thinks what ever they are told to think. If they possessed original thought HRC wud have been in prison months ago

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 17

So we don't like it when foreign governmentd fuck with us. But it's ok for us to fuck with them

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No the DNC is just a lying conniving extension of the Cl*nton coronation campaign. No conspiracy. They've even apologized for this shit.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Yeah, the comment above you has CTR written all over it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

True, but if you inserted anyone but NK, Russia, or China you'd be hailing them like Snowden, remember what he did was illegal too

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So Russia wants Trump to be our president....fuck, I don't even know what to think about that. This election just keeps getting weirder.

9 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 5

If Russia invaded like red dawn style, then I'm gonna be guerrilla style killing some ruskies, their way of life is F'ed.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

because trump wants to leave nato and that's good for putin who wants more "lebensraum".

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

US election: Trump encourages Russia to find Clinton emails - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2016-36907541

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Russia just wants anything that destabilises the West. Same reason they have ties to pretty much every right wing extremist party in Europe.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 4

Agree with all, one more thing: Trump can be easily controlled through his narcissism. Putin is brilliant at that.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

HRC is more the psychopath kind of guy. Which makes her very hard to manipulate. Just Like Putin.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trump has financial ties to Russia, loves Putin, and has suggested ignoring NATO. Plus he might destabilize the west.

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 1

Also, the Trump team's only amendment to the RNC platform was removing a clause about supporting anti-Russian Ukrainians. Really suspicious

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's cute. The Clinton foundation got paid by the Russians then suddenly the Russians were allowed to purchase a uranium mine in the US.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

All while HRC was SOS of the USA. The deal had to be approved by the State Department. How convenient.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Trump and Putin, are kinda friends sorta. Putin I'd openly backing trump and trump says Putin is doing good work in Russia

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

https://goo.gl/BJtxdl Trump is Putin's useful idiot.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Trump also "encouraged" Russia to continue hacking the DNC right?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Not at all. He was referring to Hillary's emails. Also, how can he encourage them to hack a server that doesn't exist anymore...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Who says it still doesn't exist? *adjusts tinfoil hat*

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

also "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing," Trump

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Point? I hope they release them too. I want to see more on how shady the Hildebeast really is.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 16

Asking a foreign government to commit cybercrimes on our nation?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Nations are influenced by the help of other nations... like when the French sided with the colonists against Britain. New world, new help.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Ya, like Putin was just sitting there, waiting on permission from Donald Trump to hack a server that doesn't even exist anymore. Good call.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

It's espionage and quite frankly, treason. This is absurd that we even need to explain it

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

But I thought there wasn't any classified info on those 30K "personal" emails? which is it?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I get you're trying to be sarcastic, but you accidentally hit the whole point the FBI made. Removing the emails alone didn't justify an 1/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

indictment- to be charged you need to have some direct, improper interaction with an agent from another country. That crucial last part is 2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

NOPE. Explain how hacking a PRIVATE individual's email server is treason? The server was for emails about yoga & stuff, right?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd say the FBI got on that in record time... Almost like the guy in charge is upset that his party is the one that got hit...

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 32

They warned the DNC ahead of time, they knew it was coming, the DNC just didn't do anything

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

Almost like it's their job...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh, I agree with that. lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Russian hackers tend not to hide ips because their government encourages the behaviour and won't extradite

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

They also have their famous putinbots. People who get paid to blog and comment to make russia appear positive. It's an actual job.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Foreign powers hacking U.S. organizations to influence our election is a big fucking deal and REALLY illegal.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Commey is a Republican, was appointed by a Republican, and until he didn't do what Republicans wanted was highly respected by Republicans.

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 4

I was referring to the president, not the director of the FBI. :)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 29

In @gdex86's defense. I thought you were referring to Commey as well. Knowing that you meant Obama, your comment makes much more sense

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Tin foil hat trophy

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 5

Can't blame them. He rewrote the law in order to recommend no prosecution.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 27

Explanation or source? I didn't know the director of the FBI had the authority to write or change laws.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

To be more specific, he ignored that negligence was enough to charge by letting her off due to lack of intent.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

He said there wasn't a case of negligence because there was no intent. Neglect, by definition, does not require intent.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Bernie lost the popular vote and says it wasn't rigged.

9 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 24

He probably would have lost without DNC manipulation but now there will always be that question.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 5

It's taken Clinton years and years to get her name out there. Bernie had 14 months. That's what it really boils down to.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

He's been a progressive politician for decades. What are you talking about?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes but that doesn't mean his name was in national headlines for decades. He was largely unknown. Had he been more well known..

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm with you. He lost the popular vote precisely because her unfair lead with the media. TV's got more influence than people.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

his unfair lead with the media was due to DNC collusion. thats part of the leak!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

There was no collusion, just DNC members saying unprofessional things. No evidence of collusion or DNC members acting against Sanders.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

they were discussing what stories to feed the media to undermine his campaign... where were you?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He definitely started at he bottom of a hole and it's amazing to see what he was able to do despite that. Would be interesting to go back 1/

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2/ and see what would have happened if they started on a level playing field. I say this as a non-Sanders fan. (Trump/Hillary neither).

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A Harvard study found that altho media often ignored him early, by the time of primaries his coverage outpaced Clinton's & was more positive

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Irregardless of how much media he had gotten it's nearly impossible to sway a lot of voters after the HIV/AIDS outbreak. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which actually did a lot of good. Lets not forget that not everything she has done has been negative. She's done quite a bit of good.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0