Juno's trajectory

Sep 9, 2016 7:33 PM

This just changed my life. Brilliant.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What did the capital of Alaska do that deserves to get boosted into space?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And here I am struggling to get a curve shot right in Kirby's Dream Course...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This makes me want to send some poor kerbal hurtling into oblivion forever and ever

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Juno I have no idea what the hell Juno is

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Rich Purnell is a steely eyed missile man

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Math 'n such

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What about the astroid thing they just launched yesterday? Is there and gifs for that

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok, but what type of shirt was the man wearing?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is one doodle that can't be undid Homeskillet. http://imgur.com/Om2NeB1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But it's SEPTEMBER! Where is Juno now???? WHERE IS JUNO NOW?!?!?!?!?!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Kerbel Space Program is awesum!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tried this on Simple Rockets. Ran out of fuel and cratered into Smars.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nature

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Space propeller!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Interesting fact: Arthur C. Clarke designed this maneuver in the book of 2001: a space oddesey

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This kind of shit just blows my mind

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Great movie btw

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

a better love story than Twilight

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

So was the starting date of 2011 something they did to use the earth to adjust speed or adjust angle? Diagram makes it look like going...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...directly to Jupiter without the first loop would have been quicker but not sure if that is true or not.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm no expert or anything, but I'm assuming its because of velocity problems, lets say they used the gravity of Earth as a "slingshot" to...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

...gain the speed necessary. I really dont know how true that could be but anyone that has facts about it is free to teach us.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The more Juno /a/XWJkV

9 years ago | Likes 123 Dislikes 3

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

FTFY

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Thanks fam.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Take the upvote and leave.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I will never leave.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Might be hard for you to reach space then...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

+1 for science. But this is a bit outdated

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 5

Still neat how it used gravitational assist to get to Jupiter

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good science is never outdated.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Moon landings are reposted but I never see this stuff. Illustrated Orbital Acceleration maneuvers give me a chub.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Two months?? Pssssh old news let me know when we've colonized Uranus

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Outdated? It landed on Jupiter in July...

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

And has subsequently been posted here at least 1,000 times.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 16

I've never seen it so I'm happy he reposted it

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dont think it landed. Just orbiting.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

You don't really land on Jupiter anyway...you slowly merge with it as the weight of ~its atmosphere alone~ crushes you to oblivion.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

The calculations though. That's some nice timing.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

That's like 'BOOM Jupiter, headshot'.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Within 1 second of scheduled arrival

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I wish I could work with the geniuses that made this happen

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Everyday I dream about being a math wiz that can work this kind of thing out. Sigh. Maybe in the next life.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sir Isaac Newton is long dead, sir.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

That's fucking impressive. It always amazes me that people can work shit like this out so perfectly on a scale as large as, you know, space.

9 years ago | Likes 264 Dislikes 0

I basically can't use no burn gravity assists in KSP. Just a pain to theory craft it and work backwards to get a launch date.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's a mod, flyby calculator, that does that (although multiple flybys of the same body are not supported)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And they're scary accurate too. They hit projections within inches.

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

I would define the accuracy rather in the amount of fuel used for corrections.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Sadly some people still think that the world is flat.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They... flatter you?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Is both flat and round. Like a pizza.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Using mathematical calculations reliant on laws discovered in the 1600s. So awesome.

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 4

Feel free to try that. You've never worked with anything in space, have you? GPS alone is nuts trying to match orbits, curvatures, etc

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 8

GPS is probably harder to execute than something like this physics wise

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sir Isaac Newton's laws of gravity are the basis of nearly all those calculations.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

Yes the law of universal gravitation is absolutely critical for these calculations.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even more impressive is Kepler laid the foundation for Newton nearly 100 years earlier! Mind blowing

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It also requires relativity due to distances involved. As does space travel. If all you can calculate is a downvote, then I've made my point

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 7

Was not I that downvoted you. But the fact remains that the calculations would not be possible at all without Newton's laws.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

While implementing the plan requires relativity corrections, he's right that this simple diagram can be planned by Newtonian Gravity alone.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0