Effff You.

Mar 29, 2018 3:23 AM

DougSt

Views

135349

Likes

2268

Dislikes

77

I’ve been playing the lottery since I was 18. Which was 18 years ago. I’ve never won even a dollar.

Well if it's only $1,000,000, she'll be getting $1000 a week for the next 19.2 years. Hardly a lifetime, but still very nice.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Just fyi. Every lottery win in canada is 100% tax free. No exceptions ever. Anyone who says different is lying.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Possibility of this happening https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=95&v=DusdJI7R6F4 rather take lump sum and go from there

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Quit while you're ahead

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1000$ a week; no problem with what I give to who. Genius.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What a fantastic way to start your adult life. I hope shes able to take this opportunity and have an amazing life from it!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The small prints say that it is to a maximum of 25 years. Source: I'm from Québec

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

No it's until you die, also for a min of 20years guarantee to your successor

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good, now use it wisely. -sighs at student loans-

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I live in Montreal and need a new friend...

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's a better choice at her age. If she lives to 100 it could be over 4 million bucks

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

What was the lump sum?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Asking because it's usually a fiscally better idea to take the lump sum and invest because of inflation, etc.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I wish her a happy and long life.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That sounds really nice. Enough money for a stable living, not just a million bucks to piss away over a few months and end up poor again

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Now if it were me...v

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

what happens if she lives past 38?

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

Or the remainder if she dies young?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank you.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 nonetheless, 52K a year is pretty good

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

What if she just goes to work and lives a slightly elevated normal life?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Her joints start aching and she starts wondering what she did with her life.

8 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

As a 37 year old, ain't this the fuckin truth.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Im 20 and my joints ache damn my gene game's bad

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I demand you retract this comment and it's rock hard truthfulness. Actually if you make the aching stop the comment can stay.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hopefully she invest along the way, live past 38 with her work retirement and her investment. If not, she won't have nothing after 38

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Wow that's amazing. I hope she enjoys her newfound wealth

8 years ago | Likes 268 Dislikes 6

she lives in Quebec, not Newfoundland

8 years ago | Likes 145 Dislikes 1

Goddamnit

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was 3 hours too late

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Why must you hurt me this way ;-;

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean this in the nicest possible way: Bitch.

8 years ago | Likes 1563 Dislikes 13

Fuuuuuuck this bitch

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then dies while texting about it while driving.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

52k a year for maybe 60 years. Bruh

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ya.. I am going to have to ditto that.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hmm hope its a long while before her name shows up in the papers along with missing or dead....or overdose...

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 2

It might be, because the payouts may only apply whilst she, and only she, is still alive.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

It is for the rest of her life... *rubs hands Jewishly*

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I don't know about Canuck lotteries, but the last time I read the stipulations, a 'life' award was 20-30 years.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Preeeetty sure I need to marry her. Not for the money, but definitely for the money.

8 years ago | Likes 240 Dislikes 7

Hope you can speak French and Joual.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you wanna be a good digger, you should really find a wealthier mark.

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

If they both work that is 3 incomes, with only 2 people's worth of costs. Pretty sweet gig still

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Hey, no queue jumping.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's the equivalent of a decent office job. She'll still need to work if she wants to live comfortably.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It’s Canadian money tho bro, that’s like the women of money (75%/USD)

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Female life expectancy in Quebec is 84.5 / 4,394 weeks - 936 (her age) = 3,458 weeks = $3,458,000. Beats a million & keeps her grounded.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

That's cool..52k a year

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

did you do math in a crackhouse? that's 48k

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 16

Boy it’s easy to forget there are 52 weeks in a year...

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

4 weeks in a month x 12 months = 48 weeks. :)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And yes I'm joking

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why did you get points and not me with the correct answer in the first place? Was my snark level too low?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Holy shit that is strange.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I turned 18 on March 25th, the day before her, and I got a scratcher as a gift that won $100... It's something at least.

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

wishing you a belated Happy Birthday

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you vm.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now make a time machine to go back to the 1700s and buy 60 acres and a mule with that 100 dollars. Profit

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Get a job to pay all bills, spend the $1k on lottery tickets... every week. Odds Peeps, how long until she wins more than she already did?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

1K per week won't be worth much in 20 years.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

And what if she got a job to go with it?

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Maybe not, but if she saves even 25%, that's 260k in an account somewhere to accumulate interest. A 401k or equiv likely much better.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Sadly that barely cuts it now. Nice little chunk of disposable income though, especially if she invests smart + gets a decent job.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's trivial to live comfortably off 1/4 of that, don't waste money!

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm not sure how 1000 a week doesn't cover living expenses. I don't even have that much for an entire month and get by reasonably well.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Depends where you're living I suppose. I'm in Vancouver which is one of the most expensive cities in the world atm. On average about...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

$2500-$3,000 to live in the city. Throw in car insurance, gas, groceries, phone bill, hydro, etc.. $4000 ain't much.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Jesus christ. I get by on roughly 800 a month while still having spending cash, a car and a 3 room apartment not too far away from the city

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It would take the stress off,but it's a slippery slope into complacency, or wrecklessness. We're meant to feel this way so we can stay sharp

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

There's no evidence to suggest that's true. People still seek meaning in their lives.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This. All i see this meaning is a greater likelihood of her now being able to pursue something she is actually passionate about, with money

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

having less to do with it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Would be nice to get.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So lifetime is 19.23 years? (1mil / 1000) / 52 = 19.23 years

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

No it's a choice between 52k/y until you die, taxable since it's not a lump sum, or 1M tax free since we are not taxed on winnings in Canada

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ah in that case I misunderstood. Thank you kind sir.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She should have chosen to take one million. With just a little interest of 2% she would have 20k a year increasing each year

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 6

You should have more upvotes

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

The 1000/wk is tax free, the million is taxed. Besides which, by 20 years, she starts to make more than 1000000, and she can't lose it all.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

It's Canada. No taxes on lottery winnings.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

In the original article it pointed out that she would be taxed if she took the 1 million payout. The weekly 1000 was the tax-free option.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2%? Hahahaha, in what world?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

My savings account is 2.6% and its not even the highest percentage avalible to me

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Teach me master! The european central bank has lowered its interest to 0% therefore no account that gets drawn off of regularly gets any %.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Australia! 2.3-2.7% is the easy range for savings in aus rn. Some of those accounts with draw off and some are growth conditional

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wish I lived there. On one hand, it's like relaxed Brits in sunny weather. On the other side, insects, snakes and a harsh immigration pol.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But, she gets 52 thousand.....

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 3

Didn't see it was weekly thought it was monthly, my bad

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She gets 52,000 a year, instead of 1,000,000+20k a year

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But also no threat of being killed or having her entire wealth stolen or fucked with. It's just a lot of stable weekly cash.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think you overestimate how easy it is to kill someone for their money

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, but I'm not expecting greedy monsters to be stopped by not thinking it through enough. Less danger is always a good thing.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is double counting, If she spends the million then she won't have the 20k a year.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Assuming an 18 year old had the discipline to not touch it.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

At least around here, it is possible to "freeze" accounts for a given time.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I never stopped touching it when I was 18

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that always gets me about the keyboard know-it-alls. Statistically, far more people who win millions of dollars in lotteries spend

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the lump sum poorly than who spend it wisely or just invest it. At 18 years old, probably the best decision she could have made would be

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

to acknowledge that she'd likely be a bad spender so a guaranteed 1k per week for decades to come is a better option for her.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's only $52,000 a year. Hope she's not planning on retiring with that...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

plenty of people go their whole lives w/ less than that. She gets 52k a year on top of whatever she makes from working, if she chooses to

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's 52k clear. That's close to 100k if it were taxed income.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Shouldn’t gone for the million and invested. She would likely make 50K in the first year alone.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

well, at 1k a week she'd make 52k the first year so...yeah.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

yes, but if she invested she'd have the 1million + the 50k

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

2 points - 1 I imagine that taxes are less on 52K per year than a lump sum. 2- It is a smart way to stay out of trouble

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Boy you suck at math, she gets 52k per year.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Yeah, but making 50k per year profit on 1m of capital beats getting 52k with 0 capital, unless you do it for over 500 years

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

50k/year with 1 mil in the bank is better than 52k/year. The annuity still might be best due to the problems that come w/ huge cash winnings

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

One is guaranteed, the other depends on getting investments right each and every year.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The interest on even a super safe investment would be enough to live off, and she can still work and just let the interest compound

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Inflation will eat the 1000 per week. in 10 years time that's down below $850 at canada's current (historically low) rate of inflation.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I assumed it would be inflation adjusted, if it isn't then your right.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She can achieve the same results by going to a bank and getting a collaterized loan and allowing the payments to pay the loan

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I mean, until interest.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Know what a discounted cash flow is? Look it up and you'll understand everything. Getting downvoting just for trying to teach. Ridiculous.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It entirely hinges on "for life" If it is indeed for her entire life (No sane person would agree to that) then it would be better to 1/?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

take the life option. Unless the non lump beats the lump in amount in regards to the discount factor, it's better to take the lump sum. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You weren't down voted for trying to teach. Some people/person though your comment ought to be down voted, possibly out of ignorance,and 1/?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

then some other amount down voted you because tribalism. You were the group to be shunned and they didn't want to join you. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s a good return on one mil. Much better than a well performing retirement annuity. Seems the 1k/wk is the only option.

8 years ago | Likes 104 Dislikes 9

5% is not a great return on an investment. But it is better than those shitty retirement annuities, yes. However when you realize "life" 1

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Means 25 years you'll see the return is like 1%. Which is pretty awful. Take the lump sum and even with taxes you'll have way more than 1.25

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Million after 25 years in safe ETFs.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That changes everything then thanks

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

S&P 500 has an average growth of almost 10% over the last 90 years. 100k/y > 52k/y

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Did you project one million to her normal retirement age or just convert one million into an annuity?:

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can just go to a bank and get a collaterized loan so you can get cash up front and let the payments pay for the loan.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Good thinking. This way you can pay down your mortgage, for example, immediately.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why would you do that rather than the lump sum? You end up paying interest on that loan so that’s going to reduce your returns heavily.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I wasn't arguing about lump sum vs annuity. This is a strategy you would implement to circumvent the annuity if lump sum isn't an option

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I guess. But If you would do this option, why not get the lump sum? Unless you are saying that after the fact, if you need $$ quick?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wut?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When you get a loan from a bank you get a large sum of money up front and in exchange give the bank monthly payments.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So just use the 1000 a week (4000 a month) to pay off your bank loan.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its only for 25 years. Not really for life. I would get the lump sum unless I was on my way to retirement.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

it is a life if you kys at the end

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yeah. An extra grand a week sounds good, but I'd rather pay off my house and car straight away.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Idk know about Canada but US it's for life but they are only obligated to pay up 20 years if you are still alive.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Quebec has way different rules on contests/lottery then the rest of the country.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably waaay better for taxes, too.

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 3

Canadian lottery no tax. And 1000 a week it non transferable and cant be passed on to spouse/kids. Only one person can claim it.

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

The first post I saw said she took the 1k for tax reasons. No one commented this, so I thought maybe Quebec is an exception. Like always.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought the lump payout on the 1k a week draws was close to 7 million, in Ontario you take the 1k or the 7mil lump

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

You’d have to be a baby. Hers will pay out 4 million if she lives to 84, so that doesn’t make sense :/

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

she should put that into a retirement account and fuckin bank roll

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

wrong lottery, lol, my bad, the daily grand is 1000 A DAY, i didnt realize this was a cash for life ticket, daily grand lump is higher

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0