Theresa May

Jun 10, 2017 1:28 PM

0p000

Views

87061

Likes

4673

Dislikes

156

Theresa May

I don't understand the internet. Let's ban it.

Theresa may but I hope she doesn't

8 years ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 4

The ugliest wannabe dictator I've ever seen.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 9

I don't understand gravity. Let's ban it.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 165 Dislikes 0

She got what she wanted. Now she doesn't have to handle Brexit in her term.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

@OP Misread captions. "I don't understand the internet, Lesbian it"

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Isn't this the same bitch who just called an election and ended up deadlocked? Her sense of timing blows.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Considering she doesn't like human rights, guessing she doesn't understand those either.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Criminals are humans. How society deals with criminals refects how they respect the public also.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I ducking hate this cunt.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Just resign already you human version Jay Leno's 10pm talk show.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I'm from the States but I really hope she gets fired and replaced with someone from the labor party.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You could replace the May with Trump and the story is pretty similar. God speed England, we Yanks have our own window licker to deal with.

8 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 20

Can the rest of the UK have godspeed too? :(

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just U.K. Exit. Scotland you're up.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

........window licker......*slow clap*

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

She looks like she's wearing a mask that got left in the rain.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Good riddance I say. March 29 in the year of 2019 there will be one less paranoid nation to deal with. Next up, Sweden.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

And this is why i voted for Jezza

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That and the free unicorns

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Most of her Staff retired, by choice, because of the bad result. BUT she stays...what a bloody joke is this?

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

They would have been forced out if they hadn't resigned. Much to blame for all the fuckups.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

By most, you mean two advisers?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

if you got 100 u wont have time to get anything done...righ

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

All she had to do was shut up until after the election. Apperently that was TOO difficult. Fucking wanker.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Quite. And if you're going to appear a bitch you need to appear to be competent

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Spectator did a good article about how it's been a repeat of Gordon Brown where people were giving praise for being "plain spoken"

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When actually it was just that they were shit at politics

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wish she lost to Lord Buckethead

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

I voted for her, and so do I...

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Boo

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Don't forget she said if Human Rights laws get in the way, she'll change those too. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2017-40181444

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm quite fine with being able to deport terrorists despite their cats. The cats however can stay.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You... you might be on to something here.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Oh trust me, if you understand the EU, you have all reasons to ban it. Unless you're one of the politics maggots who gets all the benefits.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

She actually was neutral on the referendum.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Y' know. I've never seen a politician that has made me want to jerk off.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You've never seen Nicole Minetti then?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She even looks like a miserable cunt.

8 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 6

well that my friend is a very accurate description

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

thats because she is

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

If it looks like a miserable cunt and talks like a miserable cunt chances are it's a miserable cunt - and she is.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What on earth makes them think spying on everyone is going to prevent terrorism? Once it's lost they can switch to a bible code

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

They're afraid of what they don't understand so they want to kill it or control it.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They don't. They already have info on terrorists and they do nothing about it. This is purely spying on citizens for financial reasons.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

All about government control. Spying on all has many uses even if Terrorists switch to their own safe communication.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So we've lost our privacy and they carry on using a simple cypher

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Funny thing is how bad shes fucked herself. Basically any ruling just needs 5 tory MPs to disagree and it can't pass.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yep, back-benchers are in charge now.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hopefully the person who replaces her, won't share this view. Although that's probably asking too much of the Tories.

8 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 4

BORIS

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mog for PM!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Joining with the D.U.P. - The nasty party just got nastier.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Most of her Staff retired, by choice, because of the bad result. BUT she stays...what a bloody joke is this?

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 3

Not by choice. May was told by her party "get rid of your advisors or we remove you".

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

She's gonna have to step down sooner or later. She was the one who called the election, promised a majority Torie government, and fucked it

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

I predict she'll be gone by August

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Normally she would be but with the Brexit clock ticking there isn't time

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

royally she f*cked it. i am still amazed tha the Queen didnt slapped her for all women and stuff...

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

I'd pay good money to see the queen gift May with a swift backhand

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

As an American I'd pay to see the Queen gift anybody a swift backhand.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

SHE WANTS TO CLOSE IT DOWN? BUT WHERE WILL I FIND TENTACLE INCEST PORN?..

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Tentacle incest? I can only wonder how some octopus monster is related to a Japanese school girl.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

IT GOES BACK TO HIROSHIMA

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Japanese VPN.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

DOES VPN STAND FOR "VULGAR PORN JAPAN"? BECAUSE ID LIKE THAT

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No VPNs either.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

If there's one thing the internet will not abide by; it's taking it's porn.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Porn's already on it's way out. It's illegal to produce fetish porn in the UK. That was one of May's too, whilst she was Home Secretary.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh for fuck's sake.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

America will keep the porn industry strong. Home of the Free, Land of the Perverted ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What really gets me is that she has access to too advisors and technical experts and still comes out with something that sounds like your...

8 years ago | Likes 371 Dislikes 11

She is only wants Government control and don't care much about public rights and freedoms.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

two?

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Sorry, *top. (A combination of autocorrect interference and poor proof-reading.)

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Nick and Fiona have been kicked out of Number 10

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*top advisors

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Shutting down the internet wont affect her if she doesnt use it. Kind of like how its easy for non gun owners to say "ban all guns".

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They dont realize the trickling loss in liberty and freedom until its too late.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gotta appeal to rural old people to the exclusion of everyone else

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Mainly due to her incompetence

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#covfefe

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

They've both resigned now

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's supposed to be 'top' rather than 'two'. Autocorrect jumped in and I didn't notice until I'd posted and people started replying.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Great read here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/40232154 Explains how she absorbs so much bad advice (but not why she's so useless herself).

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Thanks for the article!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

..grandparents might say. There is no excuse for these people not to understand at least the basics of this technology.

8 years ago | Likes 303 Dislikes 3

She knows. She just dosent care

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

I suspect her aim is a great deal more sinister that just not caring.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Yeah big brother 1984 stuff

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

probably because it is marketed towards grandparents who a) vote and who b) don't understand how the interwebs works

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Generally that's true but I think with the internet if you don't use it you won't "get" it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As with most religiously brought up people, the solution is 'more punishment', and education/information is the enemy if it disagrees.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Grandparents are her main voter demographic. Gotta play to the base

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As someone who just spent 10 weeks really learning how the internet works, it's OK not to. Just don't legislate as though you do.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I don't expect them to be able to compare and contrast OSI and TCP/IP models. But they ought to consult with people who can before speaking.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Most gvrnments and so called specialist in the West have no real idea about Internet and freedom of news and info. It scares them shitless.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

Should've voted for the Pirate Party.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That would've been difficult. They weren't standing in (m)any constituencies. (Vale of Glamorgan? Manchester Central?)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What you noobs don't get is that people like Trump are actually talking more to older people, because it's them they're interested in. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

So it not "oh my God this person is so oblivious" but rather "This person has voters very different from me, and he's 100% aware about it".

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

So, firstly, not a noob - there's a good chance I'm older than you. Secondly, that's hugely patronising to young and old. Thirdly, bad...

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

..policy making is bad policy making regardless of the understanding of your audience.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

The government still uses Windows XP as their standard operating system. XP in the world of technology is fucking ancient!

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Updating cost money and SP2 is fairly robust. You can still see companies running on DOS. If it suits their needs, why change it?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I finally upgraded to Win 10 this year from XP. My friends were disappointed because I didn't act like I'd just seen God

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's less because they don't understand tech, and more because upgrading is expensive, time consuming and ultimately unnecessary for them.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah it's not even supported by MS anymore, so no security patches etc.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Actually, the government actually paid Microsoft to update XP after they discontinued support.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

So, does everyone get those updates or just the government?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This. It's cheaper to update XP than it is to update all the shit they have that runs on XP

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well then I appear to be misinformed

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

context?

8 years ago | Likes 328 Dislikes 2

They also want to make foreigners leave their electronics at the border because they'd contain secure software and that wouldn't be allowed.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Since it wasnt mentioned by anyone else. there was a mention of making the UK internet a closed system that cant access the outside too.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Once the internet becomes too regulated, we create our own network of interconnected computers and start at Web 1.0 again.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

really???

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 15

Yep. And she'll get away with it once she can rid herself of 'pesky' EU Data Laws...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

May said "Enough is enough" and detailed problems with Islam. But also called for internet censorship to deal with radical Islam. [1]

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Everyone chose to ignore her remarks on Islam being a root source of the terrorist attacks and focus in on the internet remarks. [2]

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

50% of what she said was conciliatory. 40% was anti-Islam. 10% was pro-censorship. Everyone only talks about the internet bit. [3]

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

I assume apologists are just exhausted from defending Islam after so many attacks. [4]

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

British politician wants to ban the internet

8 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 7

Leader of the British government **

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not 'ban', but heavily increase surveillance

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think by "Context?" he means "Source?"

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Context

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Ah.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Basically she thinks private businesses on the internet facilitate terrorism by providing communication platforms and privacy.

8 years ago | Likes 105 Dislikes 0

Maybe she should have a go at whoever is responsible for building the roads or the van the shitheads drove while she's at it then

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

And you can thwart terrorism if you just give up your rights. We all know terrorist will never talk in person.

8 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

Quick! Let's shut down Royal Mail!

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The British Prime Minister wants to force companies to provide backdoor keys into encrypted system (banks, ecommerce?), ban/limit/backdoor..

8 years ago | Likes 406 Dislikes 0

and wants to keep records of every single site each member of the public uses for up to a year

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And she has refused to rule out implementing a Chinese-style state run internet

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Britains privacy laws always looked quite dystopian to me, but I guess Germany isn't better.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, that sure is a good way for everything to get hacked.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Like what Comey tried to do here in the US after the San Bernardino shooting.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Only much, much more far reaching. US has 1st Am protections that don't exist in the UK. There's applicable legislation in that she wants...

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

..rid of. There's the ECHR ( that will lose jurisdiction) and there's legal and historical precedent - overruled by new legislation.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm not as versed but it sounds bad. I hate the direction world leaders are trying to push things

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People like her should be ridiculed and denounced as enemies of freedom. They should also be taught how technology works.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Remember when having a backdoor crippled the NHS, and fucked most of Europe? Lots of people WannaCry'd about that. She doesn't apparently

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

Theres a difference between an exploit and a backdoor. Wannacry wasn't a backdoor.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

It utilized DoublePulsar(backdoor) installed via EternalBlue(exploit) through SMB. http://blog.talosintelligence.com/2017/05/wannacry.html

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Governmental agencies developing the tools to gain, or demand, persistent access to a system leads to issues of unprecedented scale.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You could argue that an exploit is an unplanned backdoor. If someone gets access to the backdoor you could easily have another wannacry...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As someone who works in a company dealing with Internet security: 99% of people don't understand or care about it, sadly.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Until they get hacked, that is...

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

then they still dont, they just blame it on "the bakkdoor" and not the fact it shouldn't be there

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

She can already demand banks turn over details of customers. The issue is organisations that can't easily be forced to do stuff like that.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Like getting banks to turn over details of wealthy customers.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It isn't so much that individual's transactions aren't hidden from the govt, (that's another debate) it's that backdooring the encryption..

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

..or sharing the keys weakens everybody's protection. It's not just your govt that might have a use for people's bank details.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Only the media suggested backdooring encryption wholesale. The government said backdooring services they can't otherwise subpoena.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The difference is subtle, but important because otherwise you're fighting the wrong argument.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I clarified elsewhere that it was a combination of backdoors, shared keys and outlawing access to encryption software. I'm already long...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

..p2p encryption and encrypted communication apps, monitor and regulate Web access (deep packet inspection a la the great firewall?)...

8 years ago | Likes 284 Dislikes 1

In truth, it's kind of hard to know _exactly_ what May intends from a technical pov, because no clear details have been stated. But the...

8 years ago | Likes 232 Dislikes 0

..things she's mooted are quite frightening if you think about actually implementing them. There could be no www, just a govt approved net.

8 years ago | Likes 234 Dislikes 0

Becoming the new China?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So like a completely controlled net? Like a school blocking websites but country wide and at an insane level? Wtf

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Now in English.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Sounds like goofy Trump is back on the o.k. list...ouch

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I understand those words but not the meaning, would you put it into layman s terms for me please?

8 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 0

Thing is, if I was a terrorist i'd make my own encrypted chat program with no back door

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Sounds like someone worth putting a bullet in.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0