The media cannot be trusted and frankly neither can I

Mar 10, 2016 12:54 AM

geauxrilla

Views

108667

Likes

6916

Dislikes

124

I love the pissed off look he has throughout, to emphasis he thinks the baldy and his company are morons.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Always upvote Hans Rosling

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Always up vote Hans Rosling. Going back up to read.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's so strange how easy it is to talk about tragedy in casual conversation and how weird it sounds to share good news.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hans Rosling is a fucking boos among bosses. The dude knows his shit.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fucking yes we need this in America

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

A 6th of the world doesn't have electricity, a 9th has no clean water, and 1/4th doesn't have modern sanitation. That's no small number.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hans Rosling is an amazing savage. Look at his TED-talk about world statistics.

10 years ago | Likes 99 Dislikes 2

He is the best.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's not so much that he's savage, it's just that he never makes an argument that he can't back with incontroversial facts.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

That's pretty dope tho

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

back when ted was worth watching

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Congratulations, you are now officially old.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

shit didn't know that being 25 is old

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And everyday there is wisdom and courage is everywhere, take heart

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

His point is a little muddled. News companies aren't there to give you a constant, overall picture of Nigeria. They're there to tell (1/2)

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

you what has happened in a specific place at a specific time. His example would be like CNN covering the Boston bombings but then (2/3)

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

concluding it all by saying "but that's irrelevant because the US is still the richest country in the world." (3/3)

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Did you duplicate that picture just to see if we were paying attention?...

10 years ago | Likes 671 Dislikes 1

It wasn't even duplicated! The angle changed, so it's likely the screenshots were taken right after each other

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I read it twice like they were arguing.

10 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 0

( ͡ᵔ ͜ʖ ͡ᵔ )

10 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 0

saw the face. chuckled. read the username and loled. How did you make it to the comment section on a post like this?

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Perseverance and hard work.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I thought OP did it twice because it was at the peak of the debate and wanted to let us know shit is about to get real but im wrong a lot

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I'd like to point out the fact that Hans Rosling is speaking swedish and the other guy danish and they seem to have no problem 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

understanding each other. I mean they're similar languages but damn I couldn't do that. 2/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I saw him on a Dutch TV show explaining how the population isn't growing by childbirth, but actually because people are getting older.

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Hans Rosling holds nearly God-like status here in Sweden.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Well he DID until he said he doesn't disagree with what Sverigedemokraterna has been saying for years. Suddenly the media started hating him

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Must've missed that.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Poverty is not so black and white. In Kenya everyone has a cellphone, even if they only have a dirt floor.

10 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 3

Well sure, phones are a lot cheaper than flooring.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Common in most 3rd world countries. Some areas are modern, some dirt floor. Most have a cell phone and access to tv.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I bet some of them even have refrigerators.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

True - and they use their cell phones for secure, p2p and p2b payments eliminating cash and increasing security

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

They are trying hard to introduce phone p2p payments here in Mexico, hasn't picked up yet due to the general population distrust of banks

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I just traveled in Colombia for a month and unlike in Finland they had free wifi almost everywhere and it worked great!

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

We have a lot of free wifi spots here in Mexico too, most will ask you for your info to login, payphones also provide pay per-day wifi

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I still think that an internet connection that is free is something that more people should get

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was staggered by the 3g cell reception in Columbia. 3km altitude on a mountainside; full strength. Across the valley - blinking red dot.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's less about poverty than it is about ignorance, really.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 18

That isn't ignorance at all. Ignorance is not knowing. Making a choice to have a phone instead of a wood floor is a choice.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Phones cost a lot less than a wooden floor though, and phones meet immediate needs, nowadays the phone is prob more essential than the floor

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

A hard packed dirt floor is easy to clean and doesn't break. With a phone you can keep in contact with friends, work, and use the Internet.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Some say the world is doing great while others say the judgement day is coming... While statistics may prove not everything is as bad as (1)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

we think, the truth is that there are ton of things wrong with this world that need to be taking care of.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yes, but the entire planet is statistically better off than we've ever been in history- more people fed, less poverty, less fighting/war etc

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sure. But if we only make situational assesments without considering trends the world will always be in a bad state while possibly (1)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

overlooking opportunities for improvement. To clarify, a "perfect" (how ever defined) state is utopian. If we look at aspects of the (2)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

direction the "vessel" is headed. (end)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the positive development, which is all one can ask for and work on. Not the ultimate or current state is relevant, only the current (4)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

world and compare the observed status quo to the utopian ideal state we will always find it lacking. At the same time we may not see (3)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So what are the apples for?

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

I have no idea if the other guy is correct, but in these segments he uses them to represent the economic statuses of people.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the apples were a visual aid for a statistical example of immigrants vs. total population, different part of the interview

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

They are for throwing at doctors to keep them away.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

in case they got hungry?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

For comparing to oranges of course.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

do you want to banned from tv? cuz that's how you get banned from tv. truth doesn't sell

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 8

tv is now finally slowly becoming more and more obsolete he might get banned from tv but not the internet.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

that is from Danish state television, they often try to be objective

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's DR (Denmarks Radio), they don't have a single commercial and have 0 products they need to sell. Not a single one.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

DR1 still panders, to get viewers. But this is from DR2.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure they compete with TV2, but they don't have to. Viewership generates 0 income.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2…message. from bbc across europe n sadest of all, american outlets do it willingly

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

radio so advanced that it's got pictures! what'll they think of next?! but the state news 'curb' views that are counter to the progressive…

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's funny because most of imgur gets their news from a left-biased image sharing site.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Even funnier is that most people here rationalize their unwillingness to procreate with overpopulation in Africa.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly never seen someone do that here. Also doesn't matter. If I don't want kids it's my business. No one else should give a fuck.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

It's constantly brought up whenever someone says they don't want to have any children. Every single time.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are news on here?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Part of me wants to agree with this but I can't. It's just too dismissive, the media isn't the most trustworthy but shit still happens.

10 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 10

facts always exist, it's how the media chooses to analyze the facts to draw conclusions are what he's attacking. his shoe is not him.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Depends on where and how far he expects to walk.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

yes but the amount of shit that is happening is slowly and steadily declining.

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

This all seems very interesting and important but I'm somewhat drunk so I'll just favorite it and maybe read it never.

10 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 3

this is so fucking me right now, too. :D

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Oh behave!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Nigeria was a bad example. Ongoing conflict with boko haram has taken a huge toll. Homosexuality is illegal ...

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 9

only for a small percentage, its doing fine 'in general'

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ignoring social issues - he's referring to how their population grows, economy flourishes, life overall improves. perfectly makes his point.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

Yet again, not showing the whole picture, but focusing on the things he deem important at the moment.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 17

His point is how misconstrued the news is and showing the examples that combats it. He isn't declaring it a paradise.

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Bureau of Labor Statistics. Census.org. CIA Factbook. Learn how to use the numbers, and read between the lines. The world is not ending!

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Go to red.com and search for him, Hans Rosling. He has a few videos that explain this, and they are pretty entertaining, too.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Did you mean Ted.com?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

IMF & UN? I feel confident that they don't have an "agenda" but I'm not confident they can accurately compile & disseminate that much info.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

They can, though. Managing info like that is the main thing those kinds of organizations do. How else could they justify themselves?

10 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

This right here is another problem with humanity these days. "Oh, you have facts? Well I bet they have an agenda bias behind them!"

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If your facts come to you by way of liars, idiots or both, it tends to compromise their factiness.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Same goes for denial of facts.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well see that's the thing: if it's derived from questionable data from an unreliable source, there's no fact to deny.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This particular exchange comes off as pretty disingenuous on his part, unless there's a broader conversation I'm missing. He's omitting hard

10 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 9

I leave imgur for weeks, come back, first dumb comment I run into is graehall. Read Better Angels of our Nature. All stats are improving.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

As in war, assault, murder, theft, hunger, poverty, disease, etc, is ALL in sharp decline, globally. Yet the news is 90% negative.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Yay! My fan club is back, and first thing in, is to pretend I'm stupid and ignoring something well known :~)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

cocks.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

@graehall - What is being omitted in the conversation? He points towards underreporting of positive change. Not to mention negative (1)

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

supporting his argument (My simpelton understanding: Media reports focus to much on bad stuff and too little on good stuff) it is not (4)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the argument, which IMHO in this case it does not. [Sry, I had time at my hands] (end)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

source or citation at hand to back me up on this, but I say the medias focus on negative events is common knowledge. It can not be (6)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

disingenuous (his argument would not be negatively affected by stating it, and not positively affected by not stating it). And I have no (5)

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

expected of a speaker to reaffirm everything to avoid to be accused of (lying by) omission. Only if the omitted would negatively affect (7)

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

events would only be omission they would not be reported on. His argument is based on the premise that negative events ARE reported (2)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

*if

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

on. Sure, he could give examples of negative events the media has reported on to solidify his premise, but since he "omits" data (3)

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

To be fair though there is awful injustice in the world

10 years ago | Likes 156 Dislikes 29

And there is absolute beauty, too. It's just easier to be outraged.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that's why we have nations. Some nations are just better at becoming, well, good countries.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So? There's no such thing as justice. Not really.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not any injustice that affects us in any relevant manner, that is.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ah, yes so much injustice. I prefer bowing down and paying taxes to my local feudal lord rather than endure the corruption of today.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The world isn't getting better it is as violent and corrupt as ever, if not more so (google rhe myth of progress)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Do you have any data at all to support that? Nearly every study that looks at crime statistics shows that violent crimes and corruption 1)

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

are trending downwards. While the world may not be perfect, its abundantly clear that the world is far better than than 100 years ago.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is not abundantly clear that the world is far better off than 100 years ago. MAYBE if you're western it feels like it's better.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And in the animal world as well..

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it's slowly slowly slowly getting better though.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well yeah, the guy isn't saying that doesn't exist. He is saying that that isn't the only thing that exists, there is also good in the world

10 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

But it has gotten better. Thats the point. People don't see the progress because they only view the world through media.

10 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

How has it gotten better?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Try reading the captions.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

But there's the least amount of injustice than there has ever been in world history right now. Which is his whole point.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I disagree

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Yes but everyone focuses on that. What this man is proposing is something I very much needed to hear, and few people talk about.

10 years ago | Likes 117 Dislikes 1

Hear hear

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If we dont focus on it how can we fix it? How does that guy think those problems have been fixed? Because of people paying attention

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

We're you sad that bad things happen so you needed to hear something nice

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In Canada we have the cbc they do lots of positive stories.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

While its important to see the good in the bad, I believe it is much more important for the bad to be reported. If its exposed we can help

10 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 11

I think you are critically missing the point. This is not about the good in the bad, this is about substential positive change in regions(1)

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

in (metaphoric) hell, and it is bad news if a negative trend can be seen in paradise. But this is not how (most) media operates. (3)

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

of the world which are portrayed as steadily declining. The status quo is irrelevant. It is good news if a positive trend can be seen (2)

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7M8s2Y2zbsU the original. OP posted some of the events out of order. Indeed he cannot be trusted.

10 years ago | Likes 192 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"These facts are not up for discussion. I am right and you are wrong."

10 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 1

Is this some special kind of news program? As an American, I've never seen a caster let someone else talk, even in interviews.

10 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

As a dane, I shutter every time I hear what passes for political discourse in the US. Fox news is basically "yell louder"

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

oh, thank GOD, he's not american...

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

Why would that matter?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

He's a moron, that's all the reasoning he needs.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why dont these arrogant Danes learn English so that i can understand them!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Dot of pride

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Interested in his bigger point. There is a point there but it's also important and more so to report on conflict.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Okay, so I tried following what the man in the grey coat was saying in Danish subtitles... That language looks damn hard to speak or read!

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yes. I too think foreign languages are hard to read or understand. What an epiphany.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's easy enough to read, but it's infamously hard to follow when spoken.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The only problem with this I speak English, but I don't know any Danish

10 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Danish anf swedish* Hans rosling is swedish

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Subtitles are fairly decent

10 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Turned on the captions and it solved the problem

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Danish is a small baked glazed pastry, usually with some kind of fruit/jelly or cream cheese center.

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Are you suggesting we start calling it Daneshian?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

TIL I'm a small baked glazed pastry, with some kind of fruit/jelly or cream cheese center.

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

That's a chihuahua

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It amuses me it was possible to get so much wrong when foreigners first tried making something so simple.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hmm? What do you mean?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The whole cream cheese thing. I've never seen a 'danish' with cream cheese.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He has an awesome TED Talk from around 2006. "The Best Stats You've Ever Seen" Showed it to my students this afternoon.

10 years ago | Likes 206 Dislikes 2

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

His was the first TED video I ever saw and got me hooked on them

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

As a stats professor, commenting for later use.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

See if you can find "the joy of statistics" by this guy, it was on the abc a few years ago, an absolute treat!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

/

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Back when TED was awessome. Hans Rosling is amazing.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The magic washing machine is also a good ted talk by him

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

,

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Really pissed I had to google this. Here all you lazy bums. https://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_shows_the_best_stats_you_ve_ever_seen

10 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Had to click on that plus sign and drag all the way here to find this and now click AGAIN to watch?

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This lazy bum thanks you.

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Thanks.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"These facts are not up for discussion. I am right and you are wrong." - Saving that for later!

10 years ago | Likes 1445 Dislikes 19

I think his face is what makes it better.. that man has deadpan down to an art.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Just make sure that your facts are truly facts beforehand.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Too often people use that quote without actually having followed the instructions in panel 3.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just because he is right, doesn't make the other person wrong here though.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Unfortunately, people these days have a very hard time grasping the idea of facts.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You need to save that last image for effect

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Opinions, however...

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I only noticed recently that Swedish Chef as human hands, and it has honestly blown my goddamn mind.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The crumbs better be quiet when the cake is talking. - Sounds better in my native tounge

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The truth does not care if you believe it or not. You can argue it til you die, won't change it.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Ultimate mic drop.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

#12 is pretty good too.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have a feeling that that line is going to be misused a lot.

10 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 1

I have a feeling that line is going to be correct a lot.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I knew a very religious guy in high school whose been using that line for years.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All depends on whether your facts are truly right or not, but yeah, cocky SoBs will probably use it even with false evidence on their side.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

please don't ever say that. It's the quickest way to make someone disregard your facts whether valid or not.

10 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 4

In honest debate, eh. To a wall, yeah.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Unless you're Hans Rosling....

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Funny thing about certain facts: they're factual whether or not they are disregarded.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But people claim falsities as facts and misuse facts to jump to incorrect conclusions.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've had a professor do that once when I started poking holes in his argument. Sad thing is he was one of the better professors I've had.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That has always bothered the shit out of me. I am right, I have the facts that prove that I'm right and people go "LALALA CAN'THEARYOU"

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Problem is people do that with facts too, "HERE'S THE FACTS THAT SUPPORT ME AS i SEE THEM LALALA NOT UP FOR DISCUSSION I'M RITE UR WRONG"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Facts as I see them" are not, in fact, facts.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Reminds me of "The great thing about facts is that they're true regardless of whether you want to believe them or not."

10 years ago | Likes 285 Dislikes 3

.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

A staple of any discussion with a creationist.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The difficulty is that facts can be true but misleading. For instance, the oft-quoted "Most peaceful era since the 40's" includes WWII which

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

was very far from peaceful. It skews the statistics heavily. (thinking further I think it was "least killings" not "peaceful")

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Original comment is better imo. The word "these" is really important. Because some facts get debunked in time. e.g. "the world is flat"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except there was nothing even slightly factual about that statement. It was an assumption based upon ignorance. That's not a fact.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Excuse me, that maybe wasn't the best example. But you do understand what I'm saying don't you?

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes. Sometimes facts (the consensus) changes because of new evidence. The only thing we can do is to admit our faults an move on.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"These facts are not up for discussion. I am right and you are wrong." -Every religion ever.

10 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 45

Your neckbeard is showing.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Wow this is totally about religion! Better make comments about it on Imgur! Thatll show the world! HAHAHA THAT DID IT ATHEISM RULES!

10 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 13

And with my upvote, you now have more points than him. Do with that what you will.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Except there are very few verifiable facts in religion.

10 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

Try reading a Bible some time. Its *full* of facts.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

except even among Christians people debate what it means? Paul even encourages debate of the texts so long as it's academic...

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Same with science. There is always interpretation of results.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I'm sorry you got downvoted but I guess you already know that sarcasm doesn't translate well into text.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Sep 8, 2016 7:10 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That's a dangerous assumption. Science has been wrong many times. Assuming things are dogma gets in the way of progress.

10 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 4

The evidence for such things is virtually insurmountable. Evolution happens, its a fact. The origin of such is debateable but evolution isnt

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Science has been wrong, and admits that at times it will be wrong, that's the point of science. It's the exploration of everything we know

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No it doesn't. Science isn't a person. It can't admit anything. *People* can be wrong, and often pride prevents admitting it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Perhaps I worded that badly. What I meant was that the very essence of science, is the exploration of knowledge. When doing so, we will try

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

by trial and error, and other tests. But some things in science are indisputable, based on the fact they've been observed countless times

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for what they are. Evolution is one of these many indisputable things. Climate change is another. So on and so forth.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's not how the scientific method works though. That's why creationists and the like feel they have an argument. There are no "facts" 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

To be fair, a lot of people who worship science like the new tickle me elmo / furby / etc don't get that either.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

in science. If more information is presented, theories are revised or expanded. Problem is people don't understand what a theory actually is

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

There are facts in science, empirical evidence can be treated as fact. Gravity is a fact, the theory that explains it is not.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Gravity doesn't exist. Just distortion in space time. Science!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

So by your own example you've given evidence of the general lack of understanding of how it works. You claimed understanding yet did not.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5