The decision was unanimous?

Mar 4, 2024 3:27 PM

ubermonkey21

Views

1728

Likes

36

Dislikes

12

Fuck GQP & the 45 cult

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Does this adjust Maine whose Secretary of State made the call?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A bunch of traitors, who were appointed by the traitor in orange, did something completely in their own best interest??? Who would have ever expected this exact thing to happen without question?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This was an extremely stupid thing to begin with. Yes, lets allow State supreme courts to keep people off the ballot under nothing more than an accusation. Every red state will immediately move to ban Biden from the upcoming election, for whatever the fuck made up reasons they already tried to impeach him for. Criminally convicted of insurrection in federal court? Okay, maybe then it's okay. But otherwise, it would just dismantle democracy even further

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

The reason given though was that the amendment doesn’t apply to the president or the president’s office. The judge didn’t rule on an accusation, he ruled that Trump DID participate in an insurrection, but that it’s okay since he was the president.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shocked. Shocked I tell you. Incredulous. Completely without credulity.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

In university we used to sit up late at night contemplating deep questions like whether we'd like to live in the ascendance of a civilization or the descent. I honestly believe there's a chance I will have done both.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

At this point, Colorado and every other state should just pull the classic "they've made their decision, now let's see them enforce it" move and just refuse to put trump on the ballot or count any write in vote for him. The Supreme Court has, quite obviously, lost all legitimacy as an institution and their current decisions should be completely disregarded.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

The problem is liberal states aren't Texas ... We still have the rule of law.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 6

Texas doesn't listen to its people. It's gerrymandered to all hell and is an embarrassment of a state

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The liberal candidates basically agreed that allowing individual states to disqualify national candidates would be a bad move that could cause disjointed elections. I’m disappointed, but I get it. If only Congress wasn’t crippled and could do it themselves.

2 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 2

So a Democratic Senate and House, up to 2/3 , would pass it? Right guys?! Right?!?!

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

At this point I'm so cynical and pessimistic about any politician I fully expect the Dems to hand over control to Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, or Jeff Bezos were they to ever gain unilateral power.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You would hope that the Supreme Court would add an opinion that would define a mechanism to support the process. A basic decision like this is the equivalent of removing that amendment from the constitution.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The mechanism is Congress. A state can't decide on its own to kick someone off the ballot for violating the US Constitution. Congress has to do it

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So they’ve basically removed the14th amendment then?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, they are saying a state can't enforce it on its own against a presidential candidate. The amendment is still in effect

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0