r0cke5chle77
60087
1244
173
Mar 3, 2017 4:08 PM
r0cke5chle77
60087
1244
173
MrTigeriffic
MS Whitehouse isn't going to be impressed when she hears this
goofyfoot2010
Just ignore these fucking democrats. Speaking to people is not a crime. Taking their money like hillary, is.
pudf
That depends on what definition you have for have.
BenjaminT247
MoonYU2
Almost hate voting for this. Was at 666.
DV8HARD
I totally read this in his voice xD
TheRealGandaIf
FourCatsAndSevenMemesAgo
Well OP? Did he? We're waiting.
tigreblanc
im forgetting who we're talking about here
Briandavi
This video should help you out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGF5ROpjRAU
Bunches0Lunches
ImWearingLadiesUnderwear
ISayWrongThingsAndDontJustifyMyself
Russian, I hardly knew Iam
svon1
can confirm, he was with me all day listing to glorious USA anthem https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2jnX2y30DE
Flumpypumpy
I assume he didn't inhale... x
IFkWthmysckson
Ok so we're just not gonna talk to anyone anymore? Dafuq is wrong with you people?
jesusfuckingchristwhatnameisnttaken4
Fucking. r.e.t.a.r.d.
Chikanboo
It's good that you know what you are now kindly do the decent thing and euthanize yourself
9Fingers
Dumbass
Beelsebooob
The issue is not meeting with the Russians. The issue is stating under oath to congress that you did not meet the Russians when you did.
eroso
Well... meeting Russians is an issue too if they ask what they can do to help at the elections. That's a felony.
nabacular
The Russian that visited the Obama White House 22 times? okay
eroso
Obama didn't meet Russians during his campaign. That's a felony size of difference.
nabacular
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsFR8DbSRQE
eroso
2012... When he was a potus alrdy, and is not talking about the campaign. But still, I'm impressed you found that.
Nofuture123
Look at all the agenda in here.
BendOverAndIllShowYa
What is the agenda? Look at the facts and draw reasonable conclusions based on those facts?
Nofuture123
What facts do you see?
BendOverAndIllShowYa
What specifically are you referring to?
Nofuture123
You mean that same Russian that has met with many people, both Republicans AND Democrats? Open your eyes
Catfactory
Were they campaign surrogates? Did they perjure themselves in testimony about those meetings?
Nofuture123
Politicized technicalities is all this is, by a party on life support.
Catfactory
No, not when intelligence agencies say that the Russian government interfered with the election and Sessions is now in the cabinet.
Nofuture123
Yes, that's all it is. And now Obama tapping Trump Tower communications? Sad
Catfactory
LOL because the President says so, with no supporting evidence offered?
Catfactory
And even if it were true, you think it's good that a court found PROBABLE CAUSE to wiretap Trump? You've no idea how foolish his tweet was!
MoreLikeLawlSchool
I think the best part is that nobody asked him if he talked to the Russians. He just perjured himself all on his own. Guilty conscience?
Armourhotdog
Not defending him, but he was asked once verbally and once in writing if he communicated with Russia in regards to the 2016 election.
eroso
Verbal question was if anyone from Trump campaign was in any contact with Russians during the campaign. He said no. That was a lie.
eroso
It wasn't about regards to the election, it was about meeting at all.
MoreLikeLawlSchool
He was asked what he would do as the AG if he found out that anyone from the trump campaign had contacts with Russia. To which he replied,
MoreLikeLawlSchool
I've never met with any Russian officials and I'm considered part of the trump campaign. He wasn't asked if he'd had contact with Russia.
MoreLikeLawlSchool
He went out of his way to commit perjury. It's pretty bizarre.
MoreLikeLawlSchool
He was asked once in writing. He was asked verbally how he would handle knowledge of members of Trump's campaign communicating with Russia.
MoreLikeLawlSchool
To which he responded that he had not had any communication with Russia and was unable to comment.
Armourhotdog
Well ya, just wanted to make sure you knew he had been asked!
MoreLikeLawlSchool
I dig it. Just pointing out the strange way he phrased his answer at the hearing is all.
Armourhotdog
Oh yes, he was treading very carefully haha
Tapndarocks
Chuck S is calling people out but in fact eats donuts with Putin haha biggest hypocrites
Catfactory
Did Schumer perjure himself? Was he a campaign surrogate for anybody? Is Schumer affiliated with a campaign allegedly assisted by Russia?
Tapndarocks
You guys biggest cry babies, and when you're presented with facts you guys can't handle it so you riot and pout like a four year old.
Tapndarocks
The same schumer who cried about the "Muslim ban" but supported it years ago? Ha anything the news says you guys take it and run with it ha
Catfactory
Do you mean his comments about a "pause" in 2015? If so, you're wildly misinformed about his positions.
Tapndarocks
Russia hacks to assist trump to win! Haha you guys are crazy! Remember who wanted the voting done properly before Hilary lost?
Tapndarocks
And then when Hilary looks into it further she's finds out that some of the votes go in favor for trump! Haha why don't we focus on America?
Catfactory
2/2 many Americans think cuts right to the heart of the integrity of the country and the role of foreign nations in elections.
Catfactory
The problem isn't that Russia caused Trump to win. In this case it's that a Senator committed perjury about an issue that 1/2
Tapndarocks
It's called probable cause...basically our whole fourth amendment is on it....you should look it up
Tapndarocks
Was there a warrant to get that information when Obama was in office?
Catfactory
Do you understand the elements of the crime of perjury? Your comments suggest that you don't
Tapndarocks
I mean if we're breaking laws then we gotta bring them all the table
eroso
I strongly disagree. It is a huge problem if a foreign government is able to manipulate US elections.
Catfactory
I said 'in this case' because the jury is still out on the scope of Russian involvement and effect. The OP is about Sessions.
r0cke5chle77
If I have to tell you that this is meant to be a humorous play on Bill Clinton's "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" ...
kilroyishere
who?
RWebb00000
all well and goos, but you used comrade (in a russian reference) wrong.
kimsahobbit
You used goos wrong.
DarthSedition
Comrade is a common insult an American will use when referring to a person with Russian ties... It's used incorrectly on purpose
RWebb00000
what is this? 1954..... ?
DarthSedition
No, it's kinda been made a meme in the internet age
apercent
You act like you made this I saw the original post
GuyInTheBack
And silence....This is where OP would reply if he werent called out for being a bundle of sticks.
r0cke5chle77
I go out for lunch and come back to this shit?!
GuyInTheBack
Oh how convenient. Now you're back. Let me guess?! You also leave at the end of the day? Taking too many breaks, man.
r0cke5chle77
Own the company I can take as many breaks as I want
r0cke5chle77
I made it myself this morning
apercent
I saw this yesterday tho
ElectronicSharts
Proofs
r0cke5chle77
How? I used a meme generator and an image of Jeff sessions?!
shaaaaaaaaat
Why is being friends with Russia bad?
skwint
Because Russia is still using the local civilians as a human shield while they shell Ukrainians?
xmaneds
are you trolling?
shaaaaaaaaat
Nah just bored and class and wanted to debate
Fuzzynubz
shaaaaaaaaat
Yeah, last time we were allies we won a world war
DefinetlyNotARussianSpy
No clue. The Americans are just overhyping the whole thing
recursivealgorithm
Sessions voted to impeach Bill for lying under oath, and then he himself lied under oath when asked about contact with the Russians ...
RWebb00000
he didnt lie. read the question and answer again.
recursivealgorithm
Colbert breaks it down: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TdUqdh9D-M
giveintome
What goes around comes around
drubs
The funny thing is, the part he lied about wasn't even an answer to the question he was asked. Sometimes less is more.
rossimus
Because the US and Russia are at odds, geopolitically. Its not about friends or enemies. Its about interests.
beergolem
You can be friends with Russia without skulking about, perjuring yourself and refusing to talk openly about it.
jesusfuckingchristwhatnameisnttaken4
What a child-like question. Astonishing.
SunAnvil
Friends with Russia is not bad but it appears Kislyak and Sessions had discussions during the Trump campaign and Sessions said they didn't.
RWebb00000
he said they didnt discuss the campaign, which is what the question was. ish.
kinslayers0
It's not, for some reason Democrats want to go to war with Russia.
Orcus424
It's like your SO being friends with someone but explicitly saying they're not when you have evidence they are friends. Why the lie?
shaaaaaaaaat
I get that the lie is bad and don't know why he would lie but what politician doesn't lie?
chudtime
You're looking through rose colored glasses. It's the fact that sessions wasn't more forward with it and said no to a questionnaire that was
chudtime
Sent to him from senator Patrick Lehay.
shaaaaaaaaat
No I'm just playing Devils advocate. I really agree and think that criminal charges should be put fourth to people who lie to Congress
Orcus424
It's not ok to lie. Plus there are small lies and there are huge lies. Lying about connections to a foreign gov't falls under a huge lie.
shaaaaaaaaat
I know, I'm not a politician. What defines a huge lie though, is it that bad to talk with another country?
Orcus424
It's not what happened it's the lie that is the issue. Do whatever just don't lie about it. Especially not in front of Congress.
Orcus424
The lying is the issue. Any time someone lies about some meeting is because they're doing something they shouldn't and they know it.
RWebb00000
he didnt lie. the question was specific, his answer has not be contradicted.
Beelsebooob
Actually, it now has - one of the meetings was funded with campaign cash.
Beelsebooob
Also, "I did not have communications with the Russians" <- that's exactly what he said, so... he very much did lie.
maniacalmacaroni
It's not. But colluding with a foreign power who committed cyber warfare in order to influence our elections is. Also Putin is pretty evil.
shaaaaaaaaat
Where's the proof of cyber warfare?
maniacalmacaroni
https://www.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/publications/JAR_16-20296.pdf
maniacalmacaroni
https://www.dhs.gov/news/2016/10/07/joint-statement-department-homeland-security-and-office-director-national
shaaaaaaaaat
Thanks, I really didn't know about it
maniacalmacaroni
No prob. Most sources are either under or over stating things, but something's up, and this is what we know
v
maniacalmacaroni
The hacking and leaking of documents from the DNC & DCCC by at least two state-sponsored Russian spy agencies is what I'm referring to.
maniacalmacaroni
There's proof that the hacking happened, and that Russia was behind it. The only thing we don't know yet was if the trump campaign knew.
Nuanra
The fact that there was a hacking at all should make the election results invalid.
BendOverAndIllShowYa
Both campaigns were informed as well as the President. They all knew.
xmaneds
Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. ยง 953, federal law forbids unauthorized citizens negotiating w/ foreign gov'ts having a dispute with U.S.
BendOverAndIllShowYa
He wasn't an unauthorized citizen... he was a Senator!!!
xmaneds
it is simply not true that "all senators are authorized to speak on behalf of the USA." at the time, Sessions was a Trump campaign leader
BendOverAndIllShowYa
But he was a Senator at the time, right.
BendOverAndIllShowYa
He wasn't a Senator? Why the f*** would this get downvoted? He WAS a Senator. I understand he lied about it in the confirmation hearing.
bicycleracer
He was, but he was also largely involved in Trump's campaign. The question becomes whether the visits were Senate or Trump related.
BendOverAndIllShowYa
Copy that.
Nuanra
He was not authorized, AND he lied under oath about having any contact with members of the Russian government.
BendOverAndIllShowYa
Senators need authorization to speak with ambassadors from other countries? But that's common practice, no? I understand he lied.
Nuanra
Generally, they will meet but it's almost always in a group setting and part of a specific issue. Personal calls and meetings are suspicious