Dammit, just let the world have something nice you bastards

Jun 26, 2022 2:06 PM

TeflonTrout

Views

108564

Likes

1264

Dislikes

23

#patent #greed #3d_printing

I 3d print a bit and am really excited about this

The dream was to be able to print pieces, buy off the shelf parts, download their software, and set up a giant printer anywhere.

UPDATE: Thanks to @randomlyappointednsaagent for pointing out I should post the link to their gofundme:

https://www.gofundme.com/f/keep-hangprinter-free

If you are able and inclined to help them fight, that's where to do it.

But of course, we couldn't stand to let any good idea go unmonetized or locked away in the good old USA, the land of freedom.

https://www.techdirt.com/2022/06/24/ridiculous-govt-contractor-copies-open-source-3d-printing-concept-and-patents-it/

Yep. Ignore them. Let them sue, and then crush them with a counter suit since their patent is not valid. (And it really isn't)

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Getting a patent and executing its use by another party/person, is a long process. It will get invalidated. Patent office is over-worked.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There's a few dozen patents for toast laying around, the whole system has been busted forever

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The native americans tried to warn us about the dangers of 'owning' things. Colonists had far more grand visions on their mind.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The real lesson is that you have to patent things and control them to keep them cheap or free. Don't trust corps.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Doesn't prior art make it invalid

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

had to be tennessee

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Standard capitalist behavior. End it.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Edison would be proud.

3 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 2

I hate to say it, but this is the ultimate goal of capitalism. Anything that can possibly be monetized not only will be, but should be.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At it's best, capitalism aligns private greed with the public good. This kind of rent-seeking represents a failure of capitalism.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"At its best." I think we left capitalism's best behind decades ago.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I hate living like a Ferengi. I want to live in the Federation.

3 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 2

The material consortium provides!

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Even the Ferengi had rules

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Star Trek is the future we dreamed of. Warhammer 40K is the future we’re heading for.

3 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Minus the psychic powers.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I want to live in the culture

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes, but who has even heard of them? The only place where the Culture can actually have bite is in Banks's wishful thinking, anyway.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is how it feels that the cuban millionaire and the medicine will end up. That said it does feel like people should be better advised. I

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

f someone can come and patent your stuff and then own it then patent it first and then add legal mumbojumbo allowing others to make free use

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would make kickstarter and sue the shit out of them wtf is wrong with them its like taking 800$ /month for insulin

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good news! They made a gofundme for that same goal

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That is good i go to search it and give a little thisbis some edison shit and it has to stop, there should be a law aginst shit like this

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Patent Trolls should be criminalized

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

They have addresses, just saying.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Would totally be worth it to fight to invalidate the patent and make them pay for the cost of doing so

3 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

The term "non-profit" doesn't imply any sort of quality of morals, you can be a complete piece of shit company and still classified that way

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The local patent troll hive private college reclassified itself from for-profit to non-profit about a decade ago

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

but that's public domain, how was the patent even issued

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The USPTO doesn't bother doing serious review of patent applications.

3 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Litigating the validity of a patent is now left to the courts. Which makes it really easy to bully small companies who can't afford court.

3 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Is an open source patent a thing? Like, a patent that guarantees its in public domain?

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

WHy would lobbyists allow their pet politicians to make that?

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Pretty sure you can't just copy a CC licensed thing and patent it.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

isnt the point of open source that you cant just steal it and say "its mine now, you owe me money if you want to use it."

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you have a novel idea that you want to gift to the world, patent it so you can protect it from patent trolls.

3 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

IANAL but if there's an open-source version of it pre-dating the copy, I'd go ahead and manufacture the tech and cite mine was based on OS

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Engineer here. Read the patent claims. It is narrowly claiming a particular enhancement on the Hangprinter. Much less bad than it looks. 1/2

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

What’s novel in the patent is mainly a tension control winch used to preload the cables. Other Hangprinters aren’t affected. Still lame! 2/2

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Thank you so much! I always love having people with real world expertise share their knowledge. It's one of the best things about imgur

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Almost forgot! @EvilCatCreations , maybe you hadn't heard of this printing type, if so I'm sorry for not mentioning it earlier

3 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Whaaaaat this is neat as heck!

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

But also what the f to the patent thing that is so frustrating to read

3 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

1) I was once involved in a project that involved sending medical information between computers in remote locations.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2) The project was canceled because somebody patented sending medical information between computers.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3) I don't mind if someone patents a clever way of encrypting or compressing information sent between computers.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4) Patents are supposed to be for ideas that aren't obvious.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Without doing much research and read just the screenshots, did they not put any open source license in their project? ...

3 years ago | Likes 146 Dislikes 3

Like apache or GPL v2?

3 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 4

It doesn't matter. It is publicized prior work, which by definition prevents patentability. You can compare this with now patenting a wheel

3 years ago | Likes 148 Dislikes 0

AFAIK, it's no longer prior work rule, it's first to patent.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 36

No. If it is public information it cannot be patented anymore. Depending on jurisdiction even own publications can result in this.

3 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

That's trademark and copyrights, not patents.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 28

Are you saying I can go patent the wheel? Holy shit brb

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

you have no idea what you are talking about

3 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

That very much is _not_ trademarks OR copyrights.

3 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Just challenge the patent in a review, then it will be nullified.

3 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 6

Surely even if they didn't, any court case based on that patent would be moot because the patent is invalid at its core

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

“Just” -as if that’s easy and cheap.

3 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

No don't, wait till maximum invested then challenge and collapse it. Do some damage. Make stealing from the public a toxic asset.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's not how that works. Patent law also doesn't care anymore whether you have prior art. Whomever files first - gets the patent.

3 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Tons of sources out there but here's one https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/first-to-file-rule.asp#:~:text=The%20first%20to%20file%20rule%

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's not how it works. The patent review process is meant to whittle out situations like this. This can be challenged.

3 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm going to need some sauce on that, my course have covered at length when a patent is void due to prior art.

3 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Attached a source below my initial comment. Prior art used to matter, but made enforcement a nightmare. US Patent law is based on file date.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The US adopted the first to file system in 2013. Since then - prior art is essentially useless - in most scenarios anyway.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are also exceptions if the invention is from prior to 2013 due to the overlap in the first to invent and first to file systems

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's what they are raising money to try

3 years ago | Likes 102 Dislikes 0

IMHO thry should also sue the patent officer/lawyer that OK-ed the patent, as the design already existed (patent free) a patent should not h

3 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

ave been given. It’s sloppy work by patent officer!!

3 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Indeed. Part of the quite large costs of patenting a product are the patent lawyer checking it is legit

3 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

The lesson here is to patent your stuff and then you control it.

3 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 10

Patenting something in every jurisdiction on the planet is quite expensive.

3 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Well, you can take your chances. I can think of any examples where someone patented someone else's idea.

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 19

You only need the US, it's the biggest market.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 20

EU has 50% more consumers, and 75% of the GDP.

3 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

And a quarter of the consumption level.

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yup that’s why there are a ‘tiny’ bit more obese people in US than in EU!

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Open Source doesn't need to be patented. By definition publicized prior work (e.g. by open source) prevents patentability

3 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

That contradicts this article. Are you saying this post is inaccurate?

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

He's probably saying the patent shouldn't have gone through but it slipped through and now had to be challenged.

3 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Well they are contradictory so one of them is wrong. I'm more inclined to believe the inventions are different enough to be patentable.

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

ah, a quick search proves open source can be patented. https://www.upcounsel.com/open-source-patents

3 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1