Samwise Gamgee: The Hero

Oct 14, 2017 2:58 PM

NockLoose

Views

257796

Likes

8346

Dislikes

115

A nice ode to Samwise The Brave

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Loved the books. Home sick this weekend when supposed to be visiting KC, may just start em up again

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Never forget: "Simple" does not mean "stupid".

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I like how Tolkien described him as "slow but shrewd": takes him awhile, but his insights are spot-on.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

He's in the new season of Stranger Things. If they don't throw in several LOTR references, I will consider the season a failure

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

They play DnD its a possible if cleverly done I guess

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I hate how they portrayed Sam and Frodo as nothing but little bitches in the movies and how they treated Merry and Pippin as comic relief.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I agree. They all went with Frodo knowing exactly what they were sacrificing. Eyes were wide open

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dammit Sam

8 years ago | Likes 305 Dislikes 1

Sam cut his foot badly in this scene on glass

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Cutting onions too

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm a grown ass man and bawled like a baby during this scene.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh geez, me too!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Frodo and Sam are both heros and neither would've made it far without the other. If you want to see what Frodo's really like, read the books

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

To put it short: Everyone in the books is at least 10 times more badass than in the movie.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Tolkien didn't call Sam the "true" hero but rather the "chief" hero and he did't say Sam was the only such hero/ "chief" hero. Nuance y'all.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#2 *than

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

13 kids? Apparently he was the mayor of Hobbit Poundtown as well.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Po-tay-toes!

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Boil 'em. Mash 'em. Stick 'em in a stew

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

What's Taters Precious? What's taters eh?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Lotr is so amazing and Sam is such a wonderful character

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I see you there.... fuckin 9gag watermark.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I hate those guys!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Username relevant :D

8 years ago | Likes 160 Dislikes 2

Hooray!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yee

8 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

Can also be relevant when talking about sam weiss

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

The true power of the One Ring is that it enhances the inherent attributes of the wearer. So a skilled warrior becomes unbeatable,

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

and a sneaky thief becomes invisible. Sam was able to rescue Frodo because the ring made him utterly fearless.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Sauron empties out Mordor for the final battle because if Aragon or Gandolf had the ring, it would have taken that whole army to stop them.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Gandolf +1

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

To the Sams of the world , the humble, hard working, never surrendering, one step at a time accomplishing little battles I salute you.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Just to point it out: In the books he is willing to surrender many times as he doesnt care for the ring or the world.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The greatest story ever told. Tolkien is King.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Tolkien? DC comics? Did we just become best friends??

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Do you want to go read comics in the garage?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'll bring the pop. Race you there!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Goonies never die

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

blows my mind he is somehow in both movies so far apart

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The goonies and fellowship are only 16 years apart.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Up there it's their time. It's their time up there. But down here it's our time! It's our time down here!" Best scene of the movie. Mouth

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Taking his wishes back. So good.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

IIRC, he rejects the ring because he realizes that turning the whole world into a garden is dumb as hell.

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 2

Basically. His common sense is able to counter the ring. All the more impressive as the ring was growing ever stronger the closer it got.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Sam, fortunately, had not possessed the ring long, so he hadn't been worn down. Frodo had just been getting beaten down by the ring.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Smeagol had it for like 5mins b4 he went all OJ on his bro

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Smeagol also was probably a bit of a sneak before getting it. The ring had less work to do. Frodo and Sam were also already aware the ring-

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

-was evil and corrupting, that might have helped. Smeagol wasn't trying to resist. Frodo was.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Sam... Nevile Longbottom not the chosens ones rather the one who chose to be heroes

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Glad you said this. Neville's moment facing voldamort after they thought Harry died is the most epic moment of the books for me.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That and his leadership of Dumbledores Army.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I wouldn't say Frodo or Harry "chose" to be heroes

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Well... Frodo DID decide to carry the Ring from Rivendell. Although that was mostly because of the ring making the other races argue.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Exactly... Frodo and Harry were the chosen ones. Sam and Nevile chose

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

right. sam and neville, however, did not have any particular obligation other than their own honor, which is the point here i think.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Exactly.... they had the choice. They were the common individual who had to chose... which is what made their story so vital

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In the old wars you had a position of a Batman to the senior officer. Who was basically a very loyal (battle) butler of sorts.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Goofle it. I am explaining it rather badly with 140 words.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tolkien definitely patterned Sam as that position.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Everyone shitting on Frodo needs to realize that literally no one else could have done what he did. The ring slowly tore his soul apart.

8 years ago | Likes 99 Dislikes 4

In his deepest despair he still refused to give the ring to Sam because he saw what was happening to him, that says a lot

8 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 0

You must Frodo, or Frodonot. There is no try. He understood this.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Frodo's words to Sam at the Grey Havens attest to that. "We set out to save the Shire, Sam. And it has been saved... but not for me." Frodo>

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

>gave up everything he had and went through unimaginable suffering so other people wouldn't have to.

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Yup, Gollum is what Frodo could have become

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

That is the reason it was so important to Frodo to believe that Smeagol could be redeemed. He saw his own fate in Gollum.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's kinda bizarre, we all could have (no doubt would have) turned into a Gollum.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

The movies did a terrible job of showing the amount of time elapsed. Frodo had the ring for months, but Smeagol killed his friend after 1/

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

I don't get how Bilbo and Frodo didn't turn into something like Gollum, eh.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just a few minutes with the ring. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

In the film version, Deagol is dead ~90 seconds after Smeagol first sees the ring. Pretty sure you'd have to be braindead not to pick up-

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I don't think they actually did. People just did a terrible job of paying attention. It's all there.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I always hated how they didnt end the movies like the books, it's such a victorious ending that seals the character arcs.

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

The Scouring of the Shire isn't really feasible in movie form. By then everyone watching is tired and really needs to pee.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

It could have been brilliant! "Not possible", when they did the Battle of the Pellenor Fields?! Come on!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If it were, like, done as a TV series rather than a movie, maybe, but just as far as pacing within a film goes, it just doesn't fit.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I read LOTR when I was about 9, I fell asleep before I got to the end book. How does it end

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 17

What made you all asleep? Tom Bombadil?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

nah, the Willow

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wat

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

This is now both my most downvoted comment and most replied to, awesome ? apologies to all I upset by not finishing the book

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Saruman takes over the shire, Hobbitts come home start revolution.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Whoah thats big

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It is a shame it was cut, because it emphazises how the hobbits changed during their journey. It beautifully ties up those character arcs.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I loved the death of Saruman -at the hands of WT who he'd been a dick to for years, plus he gets the finger when his spirit goes West.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ya Saruman doesnt die at his tower, they meet him but then leave him after Gandalf breaks his staff. Then he goes to the shire with his

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Urukai and takes over (remember the vision of the shire burning Gladariel gives them). When they come home after everything they are so much

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

It ends about the same, however the Shire was taken over by a group of hired thugs controlled by Saruman. Merry and Pippin lead a quick-

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

It's a poignant representative of how the horrors of war come home with you

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is, but I can understand why it wasn't viable for the film, which was already incredibly long. They did take the time to demonstrate-

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

-that Frodo was clearly dealing with PTSD over the affair, however.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

-Resistance (They are technically representatives of Rohan and Gondor, as they are knights) which kicks the thugs out, Saruman is killed-

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

And the four hobbits set about restoring the Shire. After that the rest is the same as what you see in the movie, more or less.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Do people die in the undying lands? Silly question.

8 years ago | Likes 441 Dislikes 6

Not really, it's a bit like Dignitas only magical.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I know there is actual lore, but I always took it to mean actually dying but never being forgotten, thus "undying"

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

What he meant was, Monster Island is actually a peninsula

8 years ago | Likes 90 Dislikes 0

Classic ^^

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And the galaxy is a fidget spinner

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

from what i know is that the entities who spend their time there live way longer, but not eternal. i read that in the ardapedia somewhere.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Yes; the land did not make inhabitants immortal, it was named so because immortals lived there. But it provided a blissful end for Frodo etc

8 years ago | Likes 380 Dislikes 0

why do they go there?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a reward to ease the physical and mental pains coming from the Ring and quest. JRR called the visit "healing and redress of suffering"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thanks.

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

That misinterpretation actually has a role in the lore of LOTR. Sauron convinced the lords of men that if they invaded the undying lands,

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

they would live forever. So they left their kingdom and got wrecked. Only Isildur's family/followers survived because they refused to invade

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

... so... he could cross the sea on a one-way journey and find out his old buddy had drowned in the tub. And a bunch of old-ass elves w/ 1+

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

2/2 back pain who really didn't figure out that "starting the fuck over on a new continent" was always harder than "live with humans".

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

elves don't age past their prime. They are bound to the world until it's end, unless they are killed somehow.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sure! All the name means is they can't change their hair color while there.

8 years ago | Likes 525 Dislikes 5

Are you sure? I thought the land just had a huge Undertale fanbase.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I knew it had to be that.

8 years ago | Likes 73 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

I read all the comments, scrolled to 5 others posts, THEN I FUCKING UNDERSTOOD YOUR PUN. It's not easy being a dumb fuck sometimes

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So euhm my hair Color is white like pure white,does that mean I'm not allowed to enter? Cause that shit took me 5 bleaches to get

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Sure you're allowed, because you bleached not dyed.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Oh thank god

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Pheeeew!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, because death is the Gift of Illuvatar (God) to the mortal races. And even the Valar cannot take that from them.

8 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 1

One of the tricks of Morgoth was to make men fear this gift. The Gift of Men became the Doom of Men.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Morgoth's Ring is a fantastic read for the die hard Tolkien fan. His darkest deeds cannot be destroyed.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

True, and they did horrible things to the people of ME, but they also brought about some great heroes and sorrowful beauty.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It is said that even the Valar will grow to envy humanity for that gift.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Still separated by race though. No elves and humans in the same afterlife. Fuck Aragorn right?

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

Arwen chose to be human. Only the Half-Elven, aka the children of Earendil were given that choice. Arwen and Aragorn were reunited.

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Just to humans actually. Elves can never pass beyond the world, if they are slain their spirits go to the undying lands as well.

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Nice username sir

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Elves cannot die from old age or disease. They can die from injury or even a broken heart. If slain they go to the Halls of Námo (Mandos).

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They aren't mortal. Dwarves go to a separate place as well. But Halflings are considered "human"

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Where do dwarves go?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Drinking, mostly.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nobody knows. They weren't made by Iluvatar, but he gave them life. JRRT didn't tell us where they go, but dwarves have their own beliefs.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Dwarves were created by the Valar Aule, even though it was forbidden by Illuvatar. They go to his halls in Valinor after death.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Wherever whores go

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

Ofc sam is the fucking hero, he did basically everything.

8 years ago | Likes 535 Dislikes 29

he even Boiedl 'em, mashed 'em, stuck 'em in a stew.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

How else would Gollum know anything about taters?

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I completely agree. I just started the books and Sam is pretty brave and kind of a badass compared to his movie representation.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Except all the times he tries to turn around in the books. Fuckin annoying they left that out.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He is the R2D2 of the LOTR saga.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Frodo was carrying one of the most powerful and corrupted artifacs ever created around his neck as they marched in Mordor. Not his fault.

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

I'll trust you on that one, LoTRFanatic42.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not to mention the movies really ruined his character.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Films did literally 0 character development of hobbits. In books Frodo is a hero for the world, Sam for the Shire, Merry and Pippin for

8 years ago | Likes 111 Dislikes 1

middle-earthian network of weed smugglers and Aragorn used to be the top bouncer in town.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

Gondor and Rohan. It all makes a huge fucking sense, while in the movies it's just a shitfest.

8 years ago | Likes 87 Dislikes 0

A huge fucking sense! +1 good sir and/or madam.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I actually hated frodo by the end. What an asssshole.

8 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 30

Frodo tried to dump the damn ring on almost everyone he met.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

not because he was cowardly but because he genuinely thought he would fail

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Of the movies? Or the books? Because the characters are pretty different.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

Frodo spilt half the bottle of water when he was in mordor. What a prick

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

he really wasnt though. the actor/director made him look pathetic instead of suffering.

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Its not like that in the books though.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You'd be an asshole too if you were carrying around an item that literally makes you evil the longer you hold it.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I'm an asshole with out doing any of that. Precisely why I wouldn't volunteer for it.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I encourage everyone bashing Frodo to read the books, if they haven't already. Frodo is much less of a twat than is portrayed in the movies

8 years ago | Likes 2599 Dislikes 15

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Oct 15, 2017 1:59 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I think the movies just did a bad job of showing the struggle that Frodo had to endure. Still love them though.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I read those books in 1974

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah in retrospect the writing was generally weak in this movie. Props and sets were amazing though...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Same goes for the change of Aragorn's character. And Elrond. And, and and...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i think frodos suffering was touched on in the movies, but they portrayed it like they did because people who havent handled the ring...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

wont understand how it changes a person entirely until they showed gollums backstory and you see frodo is starting the same path

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That was the only real problem i had with the movies. They kind of made seem like a bit of a pussy. And not the Arrested Development kind.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

He's the freaking Lord of the Rings.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He commands Smeagol to jump into Mount Doom and then he DOES it, the crazy little bastard.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly, I'd rather not. They're a slog for me. I tried when I was younger and got maybe 3/4ths of the way through Fellowship. Gave up.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

When i first read them in 7th grade, I didn't read all the appendices, so for about a year, I thought Sam had the most depressing ending.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Peter Jackson was the twat....hate that man.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 54

I think it was immensely difficult to put everything in the books in 3 theatrical length movies the extended edition improved it.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Should have just made 9 movies

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

At a time when even trilogies were pretty rare, I don't think they wanted to take that gamble.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

True but he still sucks, Sam is the true hero

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 34

And also goddamnit it's okay for the main character to be a twat, it makes them more human.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Frodo is actually incredibly wise in the books. Very elfish in his thought and action, and powerful to resist the ring and to "tame" Smeagol

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

He unconsciously used the power of the ring to subjugate Smeagol.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bear in mind that "elfish" isn't necessarily wise. Most of the problems of the Third Age are the result of elven foolishness from past ages.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Even the very powerful Aragon and the very wise Gandalf couldn't control Smeagol without force. Frodo used love and pity.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I actually believe that given enough time without the Ring and in Frodo's company that Smeagol might have been redeemed (same w/Wormtongue)

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I think so too. When I read the books the first I expected him to become somewhat of a good guy.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One of the greatest fantasy books ever written. I find it hard to find any other author who could portray so much in that little of a story.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Gandalf : Leave the shire ASAP. Froday : ok I'll leave in 50 years. <-- That's a thing

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 2

I thought Gandalf returned after a span of years and told him he had to GTFO ASAP? When Frodo first inherited the ring, Gandalf only had 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the BAREST of suspicions, and even then, he believed it was a lesser ring of power. As soon as he realized the truth he was on Frodo 2/3

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

like shit on a pig that he had to run immediately. 3/3

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When I first read fellowship, on reaching this point I thought, so not urgent then.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Hey! It only took him seventeen!

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That is something that always got me about his books.Frodo is in the shire for years with the ring.It takes Gandalf decades to figure 1/

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

As I remember it, it was kind of dormant at the time, and both ring and master woke up somewhat during that time.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

that the Necromancer is Sauron. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Yeah! So much Frodo bashing. Everywhere I look.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Nov 19, 2017 9:44 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Nov 19, 2017 9:44 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

There's probably a lot of different ways to do it. This was just one. And it was a big production with a lot of money. All the landscapes ->

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

, the comic relieves and rarely a song-it was meant to satisfy a lot of different audiences and not the adaption of the book Tolkien wrote.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Nov 19, 2017 9:44 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I didn't like the movies. I grew up reading the books.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 14

Preferred the books but movies. 1 good. 2 ok. 3 atupid

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like the movies, I grew up reading the books. Your mileage may vary.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I grew up reading the books. I think they did about as well as could be expected making the movies. They had to make some tough decisions.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I can agree with that, they did the best they could and they made good movies. Just doesn't compare to Books + Imagination.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I never took him as a twat. Wearing the ring sucks. I didn't expect a cheery attitude

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yeah, in the books he suffered immensely, yet still persevered while Sam was unswervingly loyal and his strength saved them lots.

8 years ago | Likes 1033 Dislikes 2

Sam and Frodo were awesome

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Wat? He was clearly suffering in the movies. It's like you're watching him slowly drain of all life as they go on.

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

Who said he didn't? The point is that the book does a better job of portraying it.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

The way you said it made it sound like Frodo was just walking it off. Meanwhile I felt bad watching him deteriorate. I was confuzzled.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"We set out to save the Shire, Sam. And it has been saved... but not for me." Frodo gave up everything he had & was nearly destroyed for it.

8 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 0

This. Except he WAS destroyed by it in the end. Even leaving Middle Earth didn't 'cure' him. Frodo's journey always broke my heart, tbh.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

nearly? nah, in a sense he truly was destroyed. at the end he lost to the ring, and how many times do you imagine he woke up from...

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

a nightmare where gollum wasn't right there to try and take the ring?

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I was going to ask about that. I figured he was going through more than it seemed on-screen.

8 years ago | Likes 150 Dislikes 0

Basically they were starving, half dead, feet were torn up (remember hobbits don't wear shoes) wearing what they had scavenged from orcs,1/2

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

poisoned, and badly in need of a shower by the time they got to mount doom. In addition to the struggle against/over the ring.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Yeah the books do the inner turmoil justice.

8 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 0

Of course, that sort of thing is almost impossible to portray on screen to everybody, especially with so much else that needed be addressed.

8 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

yeah, that's the problem with turning books of more than 400-500 pages into movies. Too little time.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

It's also why GoT managed to pull it off so well, at least until they ran out of books. They had an episode per 100 pages or so

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

I have to tell my friends this every time we watch the trilogy. They can't understand why Frodo is my favorite. Yes, Sam was a hero, but

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Frodo's character was so much internal that it was hard to translate to film. Plus the "Go home Sam" basically broke any hope movie-goers

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

would like him from then on.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

This is the singlemost thing that bothered me from the movies, the almost complete removal of the 'levelling up' of the hobbits.

8 years ago | Likes 321 Dislikes 3

It would have been really tricky to do all the size effects for foot-taller Merry and Pippin though.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"levelling up" AKA character development.

8 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 1

Haha, I kind of like that more than character development.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

LITERAL levelling up. They came home to a band of baddies terrorizing the Shire, and promptly gave said baddies new orifices.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Said baddies were too scared to attack four strangers clad with chain mail, especially with two of them being exceptionally tall for hobbits

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, four heroes who had beaten Mordor were NOT impressed by some common thugs. It's like going back to the starting area at level 20.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Besides character development, Merry and Pippin were given ent-drought by Treebeard in his 'house'. Visibly changed their appearance.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

IKR? The part where they laugh their heads off at the band of Shirriffs, and then start a whole revolution!

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I think Jackson did a really shitty job of respecting the importance of the little people. Everybody short is also clumsy comic relief

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Exactly and the scouring of the shire demonstrated how much the journey had changed them

8 years ago | Likes 152 Dislikes 1

In the director commentary they actually mention how they had to cut that part out of the last film due to the length. Still is a shame.

8 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 0

They actually released the full version its long as he'll but has some really good details that got left out of the original movies.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

>due to the length. Just throw them in the Bluray extended edition, we weren't being productive this weekend anyways.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Well, he had to make room for the 45 minute goodbye scene at the grey havens.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Jackson never filmed that part. He never liked that part of the book. He did 40 different endings instead. That douche.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

All those conclusions were neccesary. But god do I wish the scourging of the shire was in there.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Best bit of the books imo, and I think I've read the full LOTR trilogy 25+ times by now.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

I'm on my 14th reading. I feel like a slacker.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

and yet he could turn The Hobbit into 3 unnecessarily long movies. HMM

8 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 5

It wasn't the same director though...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

extra movies bring in the $$$ extra scenes dont

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Nowadays LOTR would've been 6 movies. Each of the 3 books contained 2 parts.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You mean he turned the hobbit into 3 unnecessarily long cash grabs.

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 3

Same with Boromir.

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Really? I thought Boromir was way more pompous in the books.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I thought they did fairly well with Boromir - showed his kindness to the hobbits, his fall, and his attempt to redeem himself.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I don't know. I empathized with him even in the movies, and understood that the Ring was just focusing on him. Not his fault.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

FOR REAL

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I feel like the movies didn't really hammer in HOW he lives: in constant war against creatures that would kill his family and then eat them.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah he only got a couple of throwaway lines about "we could use it". How he felt about the gradual loss of so much of Gondor was not shown

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Tell me about it. The extended version gives him a bit more depth, but the movie's portrayal of him really is unfair.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Not as unfair as it was to his brother.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Could you tell me more? I stopped reading the books after Boromir's death

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Faramir's portrayal in the movie made him seem tempted, to the point of putting one of his quotes from the book in a sinister light. (The

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The only real issues I have with the movies are bad characterizations: Frodo, Faramir, Beorn, and Thranduil all get messed up.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yes! I was so upset about Faramir! Also the dwarves going to Beorn was such good comedy in the book, should've been kept.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well The Hobbit movies are a different (shit) category and should not be lumped together with LOTR.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The thing that makes it all the worse is that the things they did right were PERFECT, but then they screwed up so much so bad!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Urg they messed Beorn up so badly.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Stupid sad porcupine.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think it's hard in a movie to really, accurately show the extent of damage the Ring was doing to Frodo throughout the journey, 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 131 Dislikes 0

I have always equated the damage the ring does, to the damage addiction can do, at least that' how I felt, even being clean, it lingers.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Though I know Tolkein had the trauma of war in mind for the long term effects of the ring. Still I think it is a great rep of addiction

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

especially with other character arcs to complete. A lot of it, in the books, has more to do with introspection on Frodo that wouldn't BE 2/3

8 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 0

visible or possible in a movie. At least, not with the time constraints. They did well for what they could feasibly work with. 3/3

8 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 0

"with the time constraints" I think the Hobbit 9 hour extended edition trilogy makes a lie of this point. PJ don't know when to stop

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

mate, you realize that the complete LotR is actually 6 regular size novels, presented in 3 huge size novels? an 18h edition might get it all

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank yoooou, so many people miss this.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

The BBC radio adaptation managed it. Frodo rocks in that. Of course he's Ian Holm, which helps, but still! Sam's Bill Nighy.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that's a great adaptation.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry what now... radio adaptation? Where might I find such treasure! !

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Amazon/audible have it at varying prices. Or check around on youtube if you're skint. It's over 12 hours long, entertain you long time.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I actually think Harry Potter acted well in showing this in the films.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Just realised he was frodo. Its amazing how versatile an actor he is

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

He is a wizard afterall.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1