applesapplesapples
102273
1397
57
Into the Woods.
Feb 8, 2018 3:57 AM
applesapplesapples
102273
1397
57
Nearlyretarded
This makes me uncomfortable
DJBBT
I like these mirror pictures
ohthefunk
Not a mirror, either. Look at the trees.
thathyperguy
Would it be wrong to ask for at least a little head?
Ruprup
A youfie
youfoundjake
wait.. she's holding up a mirror, why cant i see myself?
grammargramma
That is original! I love it.
IWasDoingFineFarting
Not a flamethrower either
RegularRandy
I mean you aren't wrong
likehelly
I hate this
applesapplesapples
I love you tho
XCarter293
So your mother made love to a mirror and got you? Right.
TimeRyderAndTheChronoTeens
wait what
eddytor
Even without the mirror it wouldn’t be a selfie.
Bleppo
It's a selflessly
reddles
Is that how women see themselves? Must get the ring... my preciousss...
Hereliesmyexaccount
I wood
Cr0ssley
I AM ORDEALS OF CONFLICTED
JadeMcLeod
The trees and branches line up in the background. So it's two different photos from the same spot superimposed
DeusexNihilo
still neat
bamblebimble
I noticed that, its not really a mirror, its a frame with the background thrown in.
bamblebimble
Now of course it probably was a mirror, or a green screen.
Stormskythe
Or maybe double exposure if done well enough?
bbnestea
Nah it’s just two shots. First one used as a back ground. Second the model and mirror pop in frame. Done.
blueboy
Your photographer was is a vampire.
maighstir
Yeah, an ire of vamps. An intense anger of seductive and exploitative women. (And "vamp" comes from "vampire", so it's self-referring.)
ughthisblows
So was his camera
EroPero
*sung to tune of Smashing Pumpkins song*
PunjabiMacgyver
we get it, you vamp
optimusgoose
Or this person is missing most of their body
stvnto
“Sent to drain”
Blackairplanejohn
Was is! Huzzah!
AfoolishMantle
I thought it was two pics, one with the model in. Combined
RealRickC137
It is
Blackrain39
And will be... Unless you notice the mirror is at an angle.
ilo997
And you notice its 2 pics combined and not a reflection
eggimage
It’s not facing directly at the camera
Slvrable
Its two photos, the trees match up, they used the mirror to crop the person out easily
applesapplesapples
The vampire is not facing the camera,no.
eggimage
Vampire be vaping on the side
wemakeheroes
i'm confused.... the context and scenario suggests a photo shoot, yet the camera image quality suggests a 5 year old iphone?
GrissVioleGrace
Maybe that's the desired effect? Who knows, I certainly don't
cyanideremark
my money is on a dithered down repost
applesapplesapples
Yes?
ArdentSlacker
https://s1.imgs.cc/img/AZFeRNn.jpg have a few more pixels.
ButIWanttobeanonymous
Hardly. That bokeh is optical. Honestly, it looks like a picture taken with a classic electronic SLR using 400 ISO film under overcast skies
ButIWanttobeanonymous
Not digital. Electronic controlled shutter.
Steffn
Nikon D800 - Nikon AF-S Nikkor 50mm f/1.4G - 50mm/ƒ/1.4/1/320s/ISO 100
ButIWanttobeanonymous
Or possibly digital with a custom white balance, as I have so eloquently been told in as many words. In my defence, I'm on mobile 1/2
ButIWanttobeanonymous
and didn't think to reverse look up in any case. Still, I was right that it was optical and not an effect. xD 2/2
Steffn
Isn't every white balance "custom"? What do you mean by optical/effect? The low quality is due to the reposting.