weltscherzz
165
6
17
May be a little unpopular,but I think this is the way it makes logically sense...
I mean,if all those requests at completed,why not allow them to make tg love they both desire???
Sorr y,if there are some grammatical mistakes. English isn't my first language.
Hope I could make you think about this "issue" (it is only an issue if you make it one) and maybe even question or at least think about your current position regarding this. Or maybe you never though about it. Well,I think (and hope) now you do.
I am fully aware that there are people committing incest by rap in thei sisters,sons,brothers or fathers,etc.
But.....but.....if there is a bond between two people,regardless,what race,gender,sexuality,religion or,in this case,connection they have....if they have filled all requests,I think no one,no human being...should be allowed to destroy this bond called love.
#freelove
TheCrimsonComet
As long as it's not rape, pedophilia or bestiality, who gives a shit?
h0tdoglatte
Someone has a crush on their sister!
Dongle10000
Whoops, accidentally switched to usersub.
theonlybonehead
All the American posts today, and of course Arkansas had to chime in.
theboatsong
Gags
STARWARSjustkeepsgettingworsesince1983
its not illegal. but it certainly calls your functional intelligence into question
PrivateIsotope
I don't see how incestuous marriage will be opposed for long, when people use the same arguments against gay marriage.
Galfronon
"I have a mental disorder, but everyone else should change because I don't want to accept that I'm fucked up."
Aristolochia
Someone wants to boink their sister.
Reorder
You mongo, its the suffering of the genetically messed up offspring incest creates that is the moral wrongness, not the fucking.
PrivateIsotope
So, if they decided not to have children.
fadingtheory
It generally is allowed. Incest laws largely don't exist, and even when they do, are hardly ever enforced, only being rolled to pile more...
fadingtheory
charges onto people who have committed 'standard' rape against family members.
IrrelevantlyColorBlind
what about age?
kiayuki
He said adults, so I believe he's only advacating consenting adults
QuaqueNocte
Accidental procreation is quite common, though. Unless you want to force them to be sterilized but that's unethical. Not to mention grooming
PrivateIsotope
But do we say people who are carriers for a specific genetic disorder can't reproduce?
QuaqueNocte
My point being OP says as long as they don't reproduce but it's going to happen eventually to some couples.
PrivateIsotope
And if it does, does that invalidate the opportunity at such a relationship for others?
QuaqueNocte
That's what I was trying to ask OP, since s/he basically said it's okay if there's no procreation even though there will be.
PrivateIsotope
Gotcha, I understand.
goodbyeitwasfunwhileitlasted
partially illegal because of the increased risk of genetic disorders. not fair to the potential children, even if they're accidents
PrivateIsotope
So, if they decide to adopt?
goodbyeitwasfunwhileitlasted
adopting is different. also, I'm talking strictly about copulating, which can result in children despite precautionary measures
PrivateIsotope
Okay, so if they don't wish to procreate, is it okay?
goodbyeitwasfunwhileitlasted
there are probably some very deep emotional problems if somebody wants to bang a sibling. but given no children, I suppose it's less bad
PrivateIsotope
Isn't that the sort of things people said about gay people?