The myth that we only use 10% of our brains, explained

Aug 3, 2017 1:13 PM

Piornet

Views

189102

Likes

3691

Dislikes

117

"We only use 10% of our brains". I'm sure you've heard this "fact" for as long as you can remember. It's been floating around forever and is often repeated by authority figures - sometimes even teachers. Hell, they even made a terrible movie about it.

The reality of course is that we use 100% of our brains. So how did this myth come to be? I'll explain:

This is the performance tab of Windows Task Manager for my machine. Note that 9% of the CPU is currently being utilized. Now, if we were to apply this myth to my PC, even though 9% of the processor is being used, it's actually at 100% of the available processing power - and that the other 91% is completely unavailable to me. That would mean that the engineers at Intel created an 8 core CPU chip at 3Ghz, but made sure to lock it down so that only 10% of it is actually available to the consumer.

Does that sound dumb? So is the myth.

As I alluded to above, the myth got started when someone made the (incorrect) statement that we only use 10% of our brains. Instead of taking this as "We [usually] only use [around] 10% of our brains [at any given moment]", people assumed it meant "We [are] only [able to] use 10% of our brains [ever]." Like all interesting and intelligent sounding nugget-sized myths, this got spread around and repeated and entered the vernacular as an accepted fact.

In fact, we use all of our brains. But again, we don't use it all at once. Just like my CPU, usually most of our brains are sitting idle until we need it.

Think of it like this. This is the process list of my PC. Note there are 126 processes currently in use - however if you look at the CPU utilization column, none of them are currently using the CPU even though it's being used. They're sitting idle, waiting for something to come up that will require them - in which case they'll execute their task then release resources and sit idle again. Our brains are the exact same way (except Chrome isn't eating up 99.99999% of our memories).

When we need to start driving, or listening, or conversing, or debating, or concentrating, or playing a game, or arguing, or reminiscing, or looking for a lost item, etc. our brains begin switching on various sections to perform these tasks. Once the task is completed, the sections go back to idle.

Maybe this is why it's so mentally draining to be on an hour long conference call, or to listen to your incessant whining DEBBIE.

And if you think about it further, the myth makes even less sense. If it were true, we could sustain brain injuries and – so long as we didn't injure the small 10% that we use – we'd be totally fine and would show no symptoms whatsoever.

Instead, we know that any injury to any part of the brain will have unforeseen and sometimes unbelievable consequences. For example, some stroke victims are unable to recognize pictures of objects shown to them, such as a bicycle. Yet if you asked them to draw a bicycle, they could do so with amazing precision...then be completely unable to recognize what they just drew. Some stroke victims are unable to dream. Some people with brain tumors become sexual deviants like pedophiles, then return to being a completely normal person once the tumor has been removed. The list goes on and on and on.

Then there's the evolution factor. Our brains use most of the energy we consume – more than any other organ. (One of the reasons hypoglycemics have cognitive impairment and can even lose consciousness when their sugar bottoms out.) It would make ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE why we would have such a large mostly useless organ in our bodies taking up so much energy if it weren't being used. It would make much more sense that creatures with a large complex brain that actually USED 100% of it would live and thrive and those who sunk so much energy into an organ without a return on investment would simply die off. (Yes, I know there's more to evolution and natural selection than this – I'm summarizing for this post.)

I hope this post was informative for you – or at least, that you enjoyed the pretty pictures.

tl;dr: We use 100% of our brains, just not all at once. And if anyone tells you differently you punch them right in their goddamn whore mouth.

Cat tax

Great post, this is really well done s informative

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Best explanation I've seen of this. Comparing to a computer is very smart

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I can wipe my own ass!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

AWESOME summary, thanks for the scientific accuracy and the great comparisons! Some people just like to watch the world learn

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you. I hate those urban fact-memes.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Upvoting for the fancy (and clear) parenthetical wordplay.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well done in putting to bed what was a stupid meme.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Heh you made me use 2% of my true power

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Seriously though https://media.giphy.com/media/1Z02vuppxP1Pa/giphy.gif

8 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 4

That is horrendous

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Kind of like how Imgur's servers only ever seem to run at 10%

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

the lucy movie was so dumb

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think I used 100% of my brain that time I tried solving a math problem in Japanese while having sex on a roller coaster, that one time.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Although that is a bit of an anomaly in my life

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry but the size of your process list give me nightmares.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I believe we only use ten percent of our hearts.

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

And our penises.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

TIL that we do indeed use 100% of our brain...Just like Pluto tv is using most of Op's system memory. lol jk

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

this post just moved me down to 9%

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I took your advice, but the person who told me we use 10% was a woman, and now I'm am "abuser." Gee, thanks.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Good post. I might add though: the brain is able to learn the tasks of damaged part. There is a patient still self-aware with 10% remaining

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The misconception is amazing to me because the guy who said it was trying to illustrate the point that people don't pay attention 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

I thought I heard somewhere that the statistic came from experimentation with lobotomies.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And think about things, then people proved him right by saying this crap and spreading it as a fact 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Just like the myth about swallowing spiders in your sleep.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This comment is amazing because the origin of the quote isn't well-known, but some of the earliest recorded statements are pure, intentional

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

misleading bullshit with exact, specific claims for marketing purposes.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I liked Lucy...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I think the only time you're using 100% of your brain at one time is when you're having a seizure

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You're not really *using* it at that point though. It's just fucking with you.(Sauce: I'm an epileptic with almost exclusively GTC seizures)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fucking Debbie.

8 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 1

Debbie, I've had enough of your shit, stop talking now or I'm going to do something that will force A&E to wire your jaw shut.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah tl;dr for this post would be "Shut the f* up DEBBIE!"

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Lucy is a good film

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

I forgot about Lucy and originally thought OP was talking about Limitless.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Also a fantastic movie! :)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe not scientifically accurate but neither is lord of the rings.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

exactly. still fun to watcj

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Scrolled too far for this. Thought I was the only one.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yus

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Great post - I feel like I'm using 12% of my brain now.

8 years ago | Likes 663 Dislikes 2

9.8% for me

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dang, mine only goes to 11.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you masturbate at the same time you'll use even more.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What about the other 58%?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I use 100% of my brain 0% of the time

8 years ago | Likes 123 Dislikes 0

Your brain is like sex panther...works every time, 60% of the time

8 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

That doesn't make any sense

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Yes.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Confirmed

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I actually understand that phrase to mean we are using 10% of the CAPABILITY of our brains, which is a VERY different statement.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And I believe that was the intended original meaning: are brains are capable of a hell of a lot more than we're actually doing.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

While possibly the original intended meaning, it is still fairly inaccurate.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Great post! I know someone who can use all 100% of their brain- it's called a seizure.

8 years ago | Likes 143 Dislikes 3

I though you would use 100% during orgasm..

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

1% of my brain dedicated towards pooping. I would rather not be at 100% since I would always be pooping. This goes for other things

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Or using more than the necessary parts- synethesia. The color green tastes like lemons

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 3

That's dumb. It obviously tastes like apples.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For you? I hear a frequency for movements and facial expressions. Maybe common, but not particularly useful.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, pretty much this.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's literally not what seizures are, at all.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 20

Generalized seizures are a spreading, uncontrolled, repeated depolarization of the neurons. It's suffices colloquially to say 100% activity.

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

I take Lamictal for bipolar, which is popular for seizure patients. I wonder how much brain I'm using when manic episode makes me blackout.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's a certain part of your brain basically getting overloaded with electricity and sometimes little parts of it might die.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

That literally is what seizures are. It is such an apt description that in any psychology, neurology, neuropsychology, or neuroscience class

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you take there's about a 50% chance your professor will make that exact statement.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Okay, the medical terms be damned, as someone WITH epilepsy, I've never had a seizure and been like gee I feel like SO much of my brain is

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Being used right now.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I like your metaphor. I'm autistic and always use the task manager to explain how I think.

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

How?

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Notification

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In task manager you've got processes, these kind of resemble my main thoughts. An average user/I can manage these, however then there's...

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

the details-section. Details/Background thoughts (background as in how they feel not the technical term) are connected to the processes/...

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

main thoughts, however the average user/I can do little with it and they seem to come and go as they please.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I hope I explained it a little, English isn't my first language. This explanation is how I think, it doesn't say anything about others.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

This isn't where the 10% myth started. Only ~10% of the brain is made of neurons. The other 90% are mostly glia. Thats why only 10%

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

OP is just sucking his own cock

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Emerging research doesn't support the 10% neurons 90% glial cell assertion any more. A ratio much closer to 1:1 is becoming solidified.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also 2009 study utilizing new cell counting techniques which had a lot of influence: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19226510

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yummy peer review

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

True, It doesn't support it universally anymore. It does varies by species and brain region but some regions are still 90% glia.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even by tissue type 10 / 90 numbers don't hold up any more, white matter tracts are highly glia dense but 10 / 90 isn't correct there either

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I only watched that movie to see scarlett johansson in leather.

8 years ago | Likes 269 Dislikes 7

You could of bought a porn subscription with that money instead of supporting garbage. Yes, I know what I just said.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

*could have

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You could of bought a porn subscription with that money instead of supporting garbage. Yes, I know what I could have just said.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

And I enjoyed 100% of it for this reason. Also, gun fights and explosions. Didn't go in expecting anything more.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I honestly thought he ment Phenomenon, the equally terrible movie with John Travolta

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You should watch "Under the Skin".

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I couldn't do it. The soundtrack made it unbearable to watch. Turned it off after 20 minutes.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lol, well it's certainly not a "fun" movie, but I brought it more for the fact that ScarJo gets full on naked in it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Me too.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

thegif.gif

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that's one way to use 10% of your blood supply.

8 years ago | Likes 157 Dislikes 0

1% would be more realistic, see how they calculate burns: http://acuclinic.com.au/pocit/Rule9s.jpg

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

10%? You're making a huuuge assumption here.

8 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Gives new meaning to HULK SMASH!!!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I Love Lucy

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

(1951–1957)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

lmao gotcha

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We don't want to see Lucille Ball in the nudy

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And i watched GIS to see scarlett nude...

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

If you want to actually see her nude, watch Under the Skin.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

What is this GIS you speak of?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Ghost in the shell

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ghost in the Shell. And she wasn't nude.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Commonly abbreviated to GitS, btw.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Well.. Almost (she got a weird body suit thing)

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It's just like those drawings some guys post in here, that are not "really" nude, they are using "very tight suits" or whatever.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0