Piornet
189102
3691
117
"We only use 10% of our brains". I'm sure you've heard this "fact" for as long as you can remember. It's been floating around forever and is often repeated by authority figures - sometimes even teachers. Hell, they even made a terrible movie about it.
The reality of course is that we use 100% of our brains. So how did this myth come to be? I'll explain:
This is the performance tab of Windows Task Manager for my machine. Note that 9% of the CPU is currently being utilized. Now, if we were to apply this myth to my PC, even though 9% of the processor is being used, it's actually at 100% of the available processing power - and that the other 91% is completely unavailable to me. That would mean that the engineers at Intel created an 8 core CPU chip at 3Ghz, but made sure to lock it down so that only 10% of it is actually available to the consumer.
Does that sound dumb? So is the myth.
As I alluded to above, the myth got started when someone made the (incorrect) statement that we only use 10% of our brains. Instead of taking this as "We [usually] only use [around] 10% of our brains [at any given moment]", people assumed it meant "We [are] only [able to] use 10% of our brains [ever]." Like all interesting and intelligent sounding nugget-sized myths, this got spread around and repeated and entered the vernacular as an accepted fact.
In fact, we use all of our brains. But again, we don't use it all at once. Just like my CPU, usually most of our brains are sitting idle until we need it.
Think of it like this. This is the process list of my PC. Note there are 126 processes currently in use - however if you look at the CPU utilization column, none of them are currently using the CPU even though it's being used. They're sitting idle, waiting for something to come up that will require them - in which case they'll execute their task then release resources and sit idle again. Our brains are the exact same way (except Chrome isn't eating up 99.99999% of our memories).
When we need to start driving, or listening, or conversing, or debating, or concentrating, or playing a game, or arguing, or reminiscing, or looking for a lost item, etc. our brains begin switching on various sections to perform these tasks. Once the task is completed, the sections go back to idle.
Maybe this is why it's so mentally draining to be on an hour long conference call, or to listen to your incessant whining DEBBIE.
And if you think about it further, the myth makes even less sense. If it were true, we could sustain brain injuries and – so long as we didn't injure the small 10% that we use – we'd be totally fine and would show no symptoms whatsoever.
Instead, we know that any injury to any part of the brain will have unforeseen and sometimes unbelievable consequences. For example, some stroke victims are unable to recognize pictures of objects shown to them, such as a bicycle. Yet if you asked them to draw a bicycle, they could do so with amazing precision...then be completely unable to recognize what they just drew. Some stroke victims are unable to dream. Some people with brain tumors become sexual deviants like pedophiles, then return to being a completely normal person once the tumor has been removed. The list goes on and on and on.
Then there's the evolution factor. Our brains use most of the energy we consume – more than any other organ. (One of the reasons hypoglycemics have cognitive impairment and can even lose consciousness when their sugar bottoms out.) It would make ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE why we would have such a large mostly useless organ in our bodies taking up so much energy if it weren't being used. It would make much more sense that creatures with a large complex brain that actually USED 100% of it would live and thrive and those who sunk so much energy into an organ without a return on investment would simply die off. (Yes, I know there's more to evolution and natural selection than this – I'm summarizing for this post.)
I hope this post was informative for you – or at least, that you enjoyed the pretty pictures.
tl;dr: We use 100% of our brains, just not all at once. And if anyone tells you differently you punch them right in their goddamn whore mouth.
Cat tax
teddybonkerrs
Great post, this is really well done s informative
isthischosen8954
Best explanation I've seen of this. Comparing to a computer is very smart
AdamGenesis
I can wipe my own ass!
kirbyvictorious
AWESOME summary, thanks for the scientific accuracy and the great comparisons! Some people just like to watch the world learn
voiceafx
Thank you. I hate those urban fact-memes.
PresidentDonaldTrump69
Molotovbliss
EarlyModernDramaQueen
Upvoting for the fancy (and clear) parenthetical wordplay.
fartinacolander
Well done in putting to bed what was a stupid meme.
StaleMeme
Heh you made me use 2% of my true power
UltimatePotatoPunch
Seriously though https://media.giphy.com/media/1Z02vuppxP1Pa/giphy.gif
Donttouchmynuggets
That is horrendous
dsb5772
Kind of like how Imgur's servers only ever seem to run at 10%
owlest
the lucy movie was so dumb
IncognitoPanda
I think I used 100% of my brain that time I tried solving a math problem in Japanese while having sex on a roller coaster, that one time.
IncognitoPanda
Although that is a bit of an anomaly in my life
C0mtraya
I'm sorry but the size of your process list give me nightmares.
DaleDobek
Zokathra
And our penises.
Silvercypher
TIL that we do indeed use 100% of our brain...Just like Pluto tv is using most of Op's system memory. lol jk
Piornet
I've gotta watch MST3K somehow :)
Silvercypher
http://66.media.tumblr.com/0b42bf910c0948ab46fdf3f39f404086/tumblr_o8hn0kJfqU1v1zngbo1_540.gif lol
Memes4Cheap
this post just moved me down to 9%
ridureyu
I took your advice, but the person who told me we use 10% was a woman, and now I'm am "abuser." Gee, thanks.
TheGalacticLeprechaunwithtinynipples
Good post. I might add though: the brain is able to learn the tasks of damaged part. There is a patient still self-aware with 10% remaining
AngelhunterUK
The misconception is amazing to me because the guy who said it was trying to illustrate the point that people don't pay attention 1/2
MisterDictionary
I thought I heard somewhere that the statistic came from experimentation with lobotomies.
AngelhunterUK
And think about things, then people proved him right by saying this crap and spreading it as a fact 2/2
AnnaExMachina
Just like the myth about swallowing spiders in your sleep.
DirtRockets
This comment is amazing because the origin of the quote isn't well-known, but some of the earliest recorded statements are pure, intentional
DirtRockets
misleading bullshit with exact, specific claims for marketing purposes.
ChimiFuckinChanga
I liked Lucy...
azazyel
I think the only time you're using 100% of your brain at one time is when you're having a seizure
UsernamesAreStupidAnyways
You're not really *using* it at that point though. It's just fucking with you.(Sauce: I'm an epileptic with almost exclusively GTC seizures)
SexuallyImpotentTyrannosaur
Fucking Debbie.
orangatuan
Debbie, I've had enough of your shit, stop talking now or I'm going to do something that will force A&E to wire your jaw shut.
SwankyPotato
Yeah tl;dr for this post would be "Shut the f* up DEBBIE!"
bronypokey6918
Lucy is a good film
MagpieNI
I forgot about Lucy and originally thought OP was talking about Limitless.
MagnaAnimusMessor
Also a fantastic movie! :)
JHawke
Maybe not scientifically accurate but neither is lord of the rings.
bronypokey6918
exactly. still fun to watcj
MagnaAnimusMessor
Scrolled too far for this. Thought I was the only one.
jake96
bronypokey6918
yus
AgainstAllTodds
Great post - I feel like I'm using 12% of my brain now.
1mshadowbanned
9.8% for me
thefiberopticdistraction
Dang, mine only goes to 11.
dwilson0725
If you masturbate at the same time you'll use even more.
TrustMeImABassist
What about the other 58%?
Jowrdan
I use 100% of my brain 0% of the time
potatothegreat
Your brain is like sex panther...works every time, 60% of the time
cbjfan
That doesn't make any sense
CanadianFurr
Yes.
Jowrdan
Confirmed
TheBestRussian
I actually understand that phrase to mean we are using 10% of the CAPABILITY of our brains, which is a VERY different statement.
TheBestRussian
And I believe that was the intended original meaning: are brains are capable of a hell of a lot more than we're actually doing.
vidmagnuson
While possibly the original intended meaning, it is still fairly inaccurate.
figuringthisallout
Great post! I know someone who can use all 100% of their brain- it's called a seizure.
ryo0hki
I though you would use 100% during orgasm..
bpetersen
1% of my brain dedicated towards pooping. I would rather not be at 100% since I would always be pooping. This goes for other things
squashedblossoms
Or using more than the necessary parts- synethesia. The color green tastes like lemons
wizardboy24
That's dumb. It obviously tastes like apples.
RitzkinNeverCameBack
For you? I hear a frequency for movements and facial expressions. Maybe common, but not particularly useful.
StarkeRealm
Yeah, pretty much this.
thepurpletwitch
That's literally not what seizures are, at all.
figuringthisallout
Generalized seizures are a spreading, uncontrolled, repeated depolarization of the neurons. It's suffices colloquially to say 100% activity.
ilovegramsalot
I take Lamictal for bipolar, which is popular for seizure patients. I wonder how much brain I'm using when manic episode makes me blackout.
thepurpletwitch
It's a certain part of your brain basically getting overloaded with electricity and sometimes little parts of it might die.
DirtRockets
That literally is what seizures are. It is such an apt description that in any psychology, neurology, neuropsychology, or neuroscience class
DirtRockets
you take there's about a 50% chance your professor will make that exact statement.
thepurpletwitch
Okay, the medical terms be damned, as someone WITH epilepsy, I've never had a seizure and been like gee I feel like SO much of my brain is
thepurpletwitch
Being used right now.
Knillis
I like your metaphor. I'm autistic and always use the task manager to explain how I think.
Zokathra
How?
APieceOfFuckingShit
.
Knillis
Notification
Knillis
In task manager you've got processes, these kind of resemble my main thoughts. An average user/I can manage these, however then there's...
Knillis
the details-section. Details/Background thoughts (background as in how they feel not the technical term) are connected to the processes/...
Knillis
main thoughts, however the average user/I can do little with it and they seem to come and go as they please.
Knillis
I hope I explained it a little, English isn't my first language. This explanation is how I think, it doesn't say anything about others.
TheseAreTheQuestions
This isn't where the 10% myth started. Only ~10% of the brain is made of neurons. The other 90% are mostly glia. Thats why only 10%
BuntistdasLebenundGranatenstark
OP is just sucking his own cock
JustSayingYouHaventSeenMeAndBatmanInTheSameRoomBefore
Emerging research doesn't support the 10% neurons 90% glial cell assertion any more. A ratio much closer to 1:1 is becoming solidified.
JustSayingYouHaventSeenMeAndBatmanInTheSameRoomBefore
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27187682
JustSayingYouHaventSeenMeAndBatmanInTheSameRoomBefore
Also 2009 study utilizing new cell counting techniques which had a lot of influence: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19226510
MissaMac
Yummy peer review
TheseAreTheQuestions
True, It doesn't support it universally anymore. It does varies by species and brain region but some regions are still 90% glia.
JustSayingYouHaventSeenMeAndBatmanInTheSameRoomBefore
Even by tissue type 10 / 90 numbers don't hold up any more, white matter tracts are highly glia dense but 10 / 90 isn't correct there either
Indoorwindmill
I only watched that movie to see scarlett johansson in leather.
ZKrock
You could of bought a porn subscription with that money instead of supporting garbage. Yes, I know what I just said.
halabala33
*could have
ZKrock
You could of bought a porn subscription with that money instead of supporting garbage. Yes, I know what I could have just said.
pukeface666
And I enjoyed 100% of it for this reason. Also, gun fights and explosions. Didn't go in expecting anything more.
GodzillaHarddiskson
I honestly thought he ment Phenomenon, the equally terrible movie with John Travolta
blahblahghost
You should watch "Under the Skin".
IndyFoxBlue
I couldn't do it. The soundtrack made it unbearable to watch. Turned it off after 20 minutes.
blahblahghost
lol, well it's certainly not a "fun" movie, but I brought it more for the fact that ScarJo gets full on naked in it.
1mshadowbanned
Me too.
Methraton
thegif.gif
LurkMasterP
that's one way to use 10% of your blood supply.
CaptainoftheEmpire
1% would be more realistic, see how they calculate burns: http://acuclinic.com.au/pocit/Rule9s.jpg
Zokathra
10%? You're making a huuuge assumption here.
DarkestOfHumor
SergeiBoobtitsky
Gives new meaning to HULK SMASH!!!
DarkestOfHumor
SergeiBoobtitsky
DarkestOfHumor
meudig
I Love Lucy
meudig
(1951–1957)
meudig
lmao gotcha
fartinacolander
We don't want to see Lucille Ball in the nudy
meudig
https://media.giphy.com/media/KB49W1a1Ut2Hm/giphy.gif
fartinacolander
Exactly !!
vaultmeat7
And i watched GIS to see scarlett nude...
tiikuri
If you want to actually see her nude, watch Under the Skin.
BritishBatman
What is this GIS you speak of?
vaultmeat7
Ghost in the shell
MrJBK99
Ghost in the Shell. And she wasn't nude.
Maetira
Commonly abbreviated to GitS, btw.
vaultmeat7
Well.. Almost (she got a weird body suit thing)
markshneider
It's just like those drawings some guys post in here, that are not "really" nude, they are using "very tight suits" or whatever.