Do you think they are going to destroy all the documents that mention trump?

Jul 21, 2025 5:23 PM

SoggySour

Views

26393

Likes

1091

Dislikes

22

1000 fbi agents at 1000 typewriters with 100,000 Epstein documents…

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And it didn’t work, because everyone who wasn’t dumb enough to vote for him now knows he’s definitely on the list and definitely raped children.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#1 another failure of DOGE. Scan and let Grok pull the data... Oh... Now I know what ewong did!

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

sudo grep -i trump

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Mango Mussolini is no doubt not just a client but also a conspirator.

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Dwigt"

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Might" be.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Might? I dont think you know what that words means.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Duh.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We are going to see all kinds of amazing shit since the country is too weak to make Trump follow the law.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The fact they know they have to go through the evidence to flag and remove mention of Trump is proof that his name is there and they know it.
Otherwise all they would have to do is release the evidence.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

-(are going to destroy) +(could have already destroyed)

8 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's been years since Epstein's list was confiscated. I would think that, corruption being what it is, Trump is simply the loudest person trying to get their name scrubbed off it. Wouldn't other pedo-llionaires have tried (and maybe succeeded) before him? At this point, how reliable is that list?

8 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You're assuming they haven't done that already. The shredders are working beyond max capacity.

8 months ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

That would be a huge risk. For that to remotely work, you would need to have the complete and utter loyalty of all 1000+ FBI agents and be assured you would maintain that loyalty no matter what the see and read for the entire time. It only take one agent to not agree, copy/smuggle out some documents, and become a whistleblower. Every individual you put onto that task increases the odds of that happening, they're already taking a pretty big risk if there's anything remotely incriminating.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Going to? Already have.

8 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Trump: "Destroy anything in there that impicates me!"
DOJ: "... There's no Epstein files, everyone!"

8 months ago | Likes 160 Dislikes 1

"Oops, All drumpfs!"

8 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Fucking lol

8 months ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Ok and is this congressman going to do anything else about it other than mentioning it on bluesky/twitter if he has evidence of this?

8 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

8 months ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

https://www.muellershewrote.com/p/the-epstein-cover-up-at-the-fbi

8 months ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Was looking to see if someone posted this @op edit your post with this if you can

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

According to past experience, a secret shared between more than 300 people has 0 chance to remain secret

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well if this is true, and I find incredible, it's not a secret, someone already did talk. or else we wouldn't be talking about it

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#citationNeeded

8 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Raskin's a good dude

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why not just use AI?? - Every tech company rn

8 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I wonder how much fucking in the ass democrats need to understand that with people who enable people like Trumps there cannot be cozy and play safe.

8 months ago | Likes 113 Dislikes 3

were about to see just how deep their rabbit hole goes

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They stay in power regardless. That's what counts for them.

8 months ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

yeah, but that's the thing. They won't. This is the plan for trump. To remove any democrat power and sayso. To be a king with a legions of blind followers.

8 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

1,000 FBI agents working on 10,000 documents. Soon, they'll have written the greatest novel known to man!

8 months ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

Techwars 2?

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Yes sir, 1000 FBI agents for 1000 documents. 1 page per person so we can be extra thorough!" S/

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Let's see... "It was the best of times, it was the BLURST of times?" You stupid monkey!

8 months ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Why has Trump not threatened to sue Musk over him saying Trump is in the Files...Peace

8 months ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Probably because Musk is one of the few people on the planet that can afford better lawyers than Trump can.

8 months ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Trumps lawyers are usually dog shit, anyway

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and it needs to be false to sue for defamation

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A thousand FBI agents should logically (in a moral world) result in a fair number of whistleblowers / someone just straight-up leaking the material.

8 months ago | Likes 520 Dislikes 4

whats that online war game that keeps leaking documents? someone could try poking there until someone posts it... though I guess that's usually classified specs for vehicles

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well… we are hearing about it…

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Didn't the trump administrator "clean out" agencys like the FBI by fireing people who "aren't loyal" to trump... or something like that?

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I think the guys who do the whistleblower killing are probably not super likely to become whistleblowers themselves.

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You missed that post. Google muellershewrote, bsky.

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Isn’t that the assumed point? Someone in the know leaked that detail for the story. How else would it come to light

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yeah, but like the moonlandings, if it were really a conspiracy ONE of them would have talked

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are already multiple leaks of what's going on at the FBI. No wonder most of it is simply idiotic chaos due to shit poor management. And yes, there are Excel sheets merged daily with thousands of references to, among others, Trump.

8 months ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Except being in the fbi they probably know what happens to whistleblowers.

8 months ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 1

::laughs in bleak tears::

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Its means nothing if its leaked. It has to come from the DOJ to have any real weight. Someone already posted the "client list" and no one cares because its easy to just say its fabricated.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not if each of them was given 1000 pages that none of the others could see. It would be easy to find out who the whistleblower is if something was leaked.

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean idk if that man counts but it kinda looks like we are looking at one in the post no?

8 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

And Then will others turn on T?

8 months ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would also accept incompetence at this point.

8 months ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

With any luck they'll accidentally file them in court instead of the document they intended to submit

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Weaponized incompetence!!

8 months ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Kinda skimming over the fact that whistleblowers usually have their lives ruined at best and "commit suicide" at worst.

8 months ago | Likes 219 Dislikes 4

The rights response to snowdens leaks is kinda the standard set. Like imagine being safer in Russia than your home country.

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

especially among cops. and the FBI is all fucking cops.

8 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

And that's true even under less draconic administrations. The current one is obsessed with corpse-like obedience and petty revenge.

8 months ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They don’t necessarily have to be quite a whistleblower but a informant or leak and it will accomplish the same thing

8 months ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

I'm sure there's news organizations that would love the information without exposing their source.

8 months ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

"without exposing their source"
Ctrl- C on the text,
Ctrl - F in the document
Ctrl- V on the text
Boom, this is page 1234. Darrell had page 1234, fire Darrell, send him to El Salvador, no more loose lips

8 months ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yeah. One honest individual in a pack of thousand scum-sucking bottom-dwellers.

8 months ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 2

Nine knaves and ninety fools for every good man. A hundred good men for every wise man

8 months ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There'd be more than one in a thousand. Like a lot more. Even seal team 6, that you could argue would be the most disciplined group in all of the US military, sworn to keep their Intel secret, still blabbed about the Osama story. If they're tasking 1000 FBI agents to comb through documents, they're using the equivalent to paper work grunts, not top-position agents. There's no way secrets are being kept if that 1000 number is true.

8 months ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Snowden, Manning, Thompson, Ellsberg... The list goes on. When enough people are read in someone has a crisis of consciousness.

8 months ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0