SleepyGaryy
84967
1752
501
Mar 8, 2017 12:05 AM
SleepyGaryy
84967
1752
501
BlueberryAlarmclock
Wub a lub a dub dub ?
Xares
I mean if you like listening to experts, I would lean towards the views of the person with a doctorate.
EatinButtsAndBustinNuts
A = C and B = C, THEN A=B, RIGHT? Democrats are Republicans. MATH'D
CelestialDancerChick
Tiny Rick!
archKtype
Whomever compares themselves to Rick Sanchez is probably an asshole
Civikjm
Well, to be fair, the R's are much further along on the scale of idiocy.
mericanidiocracy
Another false equivalence post. Republicans represent the top 1/2 of 1%. Democratic don't. FDR social security. LBJ medicare.Stop the lies
littlegingerone
im here like: my country has a population of 4.5mil and 8odd political parties
ShartsoftheAllFather
.... I don't go by height or age, I go by amount of pain in my ass, which makes you both identical.
walkslikeaslug
Like a good kind of pain in your ass? You can't judge penis size by height or age. I'm the perfect amount, so I hear.
SloppyJimbo
Lol those two people are not equivalents Christ.
ImgurPhantomBlockedMyOtherAccount
The "And I'm just here like" makes this seem really pretentious and it would be better if it were replaced with the word "Actually"
Sinodio
e d g y
Volimar
Rachel Maddow is pretty awesome though.
HeadshouldersKneesandToesKneesAndToes
http://imgur.com/thNV4GE
seanvt
In fact, let me grab my whiteboard, this has been a long time coming
Kierbear2g
Republicans ARE idiots though. You can tell by looking at who they voted for.
thegoodnoches
Tomi Lahren is an insufferable gas bag. She really shouldn't be yelling all the time. Yelling doesn't magically turn garbage into gospel.
Butts2quench
Tell that to all the liberal crybabies who have been screaming, rioting, and freaking out since Trump's election
DavidMcclannahan
So are you ok with Trump constantly lying, alleged ties to Russia, denial of climate change, possible privatization of education?
tardis63
She speaks like she's never seen the script before and the teleprompter comes up 2 words at a time
GeoTeacher
I am pro people not yelling in general. Can't we all just use our inside voices?
pravetz
Pretending both sides are equivalent is how we got into this mess. They aren't.
SuspiciousCactus
Or, let me meta you one, pretending that both sides are not equivalent is how we got into this mess.
vjven
But they're not equally idiotic
jesusfuckingchristwhatnameisnttaken4
There is a DESPERATE attempt on the right to draw a false equivalency, but it's not even close. If it works, human kind is doomed.
BattloidKouji
It did work though. Dem turnout last year was abysmal. because of shit like this.
BattloidKouji
abysmal in certain traditionally democratic strongholds, i mean.
Cooverdam
I'm Irish and travel to the US a good bit and I can tell you that there are some very intelligent republicans who are so entrenched by 1/2
Cooverdam
Hatred of democrats that they believe anything FOX news tells them. But.... I know very intelligent democrats who just don't have a grip 2/3
Cooverdam
On how life and the world actuallly works and refuse acknowledge any valid points republicans have. This is why party politics doesn't work.
newacountbecauseanonymityisballa
Or maybe some people will never be ok with "how the world "actually" works" and they will choose to be better than it.
SleepyGaryy
Indeed
caukozoids
Lol ok man there are intelligent people on both sides and stupid people on both sides democrats have a grip on how the world works relax
DogSocks
I think they just need more parties. Even just one more.
UsernameOnlyAvailableToImgurPremiumUsers
Just be independent
TongueTiedLabourerfromtheLandoftheLittlePeople
Hmmm. How about we vote with our side for congress and vote third party for senate?
Cooverdam
Parties are developed so people can win an argument. There should be no parties. Politics should be a vocation.
AllHailTrumPutiNaMo
B careful wht U wish for. Speaking frm my country's experience, too many party especially if region based, will screw up Ur system evn more.
IsaacZehPanda
As a republican, I would have voted for Bernie sanders- but I'd never would have voted for that evil whore
[deleted]
[deleted]
TongueTiedLabourerfromtheLandoftheLittlePeople
Fair enough.
Phipsee
Rachel Maddow is a Rhodes Scholar who graduated from Oxford, probably not the best picture to use.
PorpoiseDriven
titles only have meaning because we apply them. her messages are often nonsensical
lfkhael
Bruh, Bobby fucking Jindal was also a Rhodes Scholar who graduated from Oxford. Just sayin'
merdock379
A guy who became governor of a state?
NukaWorld
The fucker thats the reason why Louisiana is 49th in education. Not even Louisiana republicans like him.
Believemefolks
I agree with a lot of her stuff but I hate the way she blinks at me lol
GeoTeacher
While they're both idiots, one group is actively denying science as part of their platform.
hookerpenis
They're not ordinary idiots, they're a special kind.
SoundFuture
They both deny science, one group is just substantially worse at it.
thisaccountisnotentirelyjustforsmut
Makes the whole "mathematical proof" thing kinda pointless eh?
notapreppie
You sound like PORPoise bait... https://partyofreasonandprogress.org/
[deleted]
[deleted]
lmagine
Thinking that liberals hate generalizing is generalizing. Fuck you man.
GeoTeacher
It was in the platform dude. The platform. The Republican party wrote and endorsed it
[deleted]
[deleted]
GeoTeacher
Curious, do you know what a political platform is? Because it's different than endorsing a candidate
[deleted]
[deleted]
emkev
Objection, relevance?
inikini
Sometimes science is more art than science. Lotta people don't get that.
jordanschlansky
Wow. It's literally a Rick and Morty meme and people still didn't get your joke.
dimvp
Wish I had more than one upvote for you.
GeoTeacher
When is science more art than science?
ThePotatoBandit
when rick says so
inikini
It's a purposefully ironic statement. Also quoting Rick, the cartoon character above.
Dmitry93
But who is denying the science behind gender?
GeoTeacher
What science behind gender? Because gender is really confusing in much of nature.
PlantainSuperNova
There is no science behind gender, because it's a social construct. You're thinking of sex.
emkev
ghsdkgb
Imgur
TheHourGrowsLate
Shut the fuck up. This "both sides" bullshit is why we have an unqualified, narcissistic asshole in the Oval Office right now.
Tunaccat
Amen
maniacalmacaroni
Lisossoma
I come from the future to tell you you have no idea how bad it´s going to get. The both sides bullshit is ridiculous.
SuspiciousCactus
No its not.
TheHourGrowsLate
Dems didn't get out and vote, largely because a bunch of idiots who don't know shit about dick kept pushing the narrative that Hillary...
TheHourGrowsLate
...was somehow as bad as Trump. And that's absolutely insane. But it kept turnout down and helped Trump win.
captainofthessdouchecanoe
Part of the reason that Cheeto-skinned fucktard got elected President is because of false equivalencies like this.
ZZhillTopper
A little roughly put but I think you are at least partly correct. Moderates who liked neither side were to apathetic about the election.
channelranger
I really did hate people saying that voting against someone isn't valid- sometimes you have to pick the least bad choice.
stickalwayswins
Well, aren't you mature?
jesusfuckingchristwhatnameisnttaken4
"we're electing a gas bag racist because people call us dumb and racist" That's mature, and it gave us the worst incompetent cheeto ever.
[deleted]
[deleted]
DavidMcclannahan
Something about how most Mexicans crossing the border are rapists with legs the size of cantaloupes from being drug mules.
[deleted]
[deleted]
SoundFuture
To be fair Maddow's not the hating liberal she's being portrayed as here.
SexualConsent
You mean to say Hillary Corrputin is any better? I don't particularly like either, as both are cretins who shouldn't be in office. 1
SexualConsent
But out of the two I feel Trump would give us less problems. At least with Trump his problems are pretty obvious and we can deal with 2
SexualConsent
them as they come up. With Hillary you have a history of corruption and lying, and covering it up. Not to say Trump is an angel either
captainofthessdouchecanoe
Have you turned on a tv or read a fucking headline in the year 2017? That gamble has already been proven wrong.
SexualConsent
The guy's only been in office for two months. I say we give him a chance. Though, I do agree, he hasn't been doing good in office thus far
maniacalmacaroni
YES, HILLARY WAS/IS OBJECTIVELY BETTER!!! FFS, she worked her entire adult life advocating for children's rights and the impoverished. She
maniacalmacaroni
understands how laws/gov't work, and was the most qualified individual to ever run for the office. Call her awful, but don't call her equal.
SexualConsent
For the exact reasons I said above, I would say she isn't anywhere near the most qualified president the US has ever had
MostSereneDoge
Rachel Maddow has a PhD from Oxford. She's not even the same species as Alt Right Barbie.
godlessheathen702
Alt-Right Barbie just needs to be tied up, naked and ball gagged in BDSM porn.
SoundFuture
I had to come back to this post when I saw that. Maddow deserves more credit than OP is giving her.
warick
It's also possible to be very intelligent and have idiotic positions.
Racheleatsfood
Scrolled down until I found a comment that pointed this out so I could up vote it. Thanks.
VonJaeger
You can be intelligent and still be a fucking idiot.
NotABadLookingNarcissist
Seriously. Classic false equivalency.
PorpoiseDriven
Plenty of well educated people are foolish, we shouldn't apply meaning to degrees.
trubblebot
Seriously, there are plenty of stupid loudmouthed liberals. Maddow ain't one of them. OP is dumber than a bag o' hammers.
andTestament
Does putting the hammers in a bag make them dumber?
StillNotYouTube
Honorary degree, or is her TV personality just an act?
SlipS321
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Maddow ... I can google that for you more?
guttwerk
She has fluff degrees in philosophy and public policy? Jesus, does that mean someone with a PhD in underwater basket weaving is a genius?
SlipS321
So basically you will keep moving the goalposts to agree with your ideology.
torthorse
As someone with a degree in public policy, I can assure you that it's not fluff. Entails learning stats, econ, econometrics, for example
walkslikeaslug
Facts are facts. One party takes them to heart. The other tell you to not trust all of the fact checks and just take their word for it.
newacountbecauseanonymityisballa
+1 for "fake" news!
newacountbecauseanonymityisballa
If you believe creation should be taught in schools, I respect your right to an opinion but you're worsening this country. Go fuck yourself.
walkslikeaslug
+1 for you.
IceFireXD
but creation should be taught in school... Creationism? No. Keep that shit out.
TheWhipLash
Since you believe that the theory of evolution should be taught in schools, isn't it fair to at least teach the other sides' theory?
walkslikeaslug
Once again for people that did not listen in science class, a scientific theory is not the same as a theory about faking the moon landing.
channelranger
The other side's isn't a theory, scientifically. It's a science class, not a theology class.
newacountbecauseanonymityisballa
THANK YOU. If schools want to add theology electives, I'm all for it!! But of course it would have to address all religious views.
TheWhipLash
1] True-I believe they should teach natural selection as fact. But to then throw the rest of it in the fact category(i.e. Random Mutations
TheWhipLash
2] along with NS causing all the ordered information we see in DNA) - that is not in the fact category anymore. It's a bait and switch.