Lifesaving

May 2, 2017 8:07 PM

kernburner

Views

544029

Likes

15304

Dislikes

572

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmWWoMcGmo0

http://abc7.com/entertainment/jimmy-kimmels-emotional-monologue-on-newborn-son/1943013/

There are people DISAGREEING with this statement. I'm not fucking kidding.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 7

*cough* Joe Walsh *cough he's an asshole cough*

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That was an emotional video. Glad the kid is okay.

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

I teared up everytime he got choked up. I'm glad he has this platform so everyone can hear this, it needed to be said with such raw emotion

9 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 5

I had a daughter who was born with the exact same heart defect. That hit me extremely hard. I know what he's going to go through.

9 years ago | Likes 104 Dislikes 3

I had a son with tetralogy of fallot and a brain malformation. Even though we got an earlier diagnosis, not all endings can happy.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I'm sorry.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm so sorry

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

How old is she now? My boyfriend has Tet as well and I can provide some pretty positive stories about her future.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Sadly, she passed at age 13, 24 years ago.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

I'm sorry.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

:( I'm sorry

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

That's what pisses me off big time - what's the point of any science progress if many many people will never have benefit from it?!?

9 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 5

It's not the fault of the workers, it's the institutions that set rates and charge criminally high prices. The silent terrorists.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Strong men also cry. Strong men... also cry. - The other Jeffrey Lebowski

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Mr Lebowski is in seclusion in the west wing.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a Dad, when I think of losing my own child, or hear stories like these it always sends me on an emotional ride. Congrats on the Son!

9 years ago | Likes 922 Dislikes 16

You robbed my mouth of these words you thief. I demand you return them to me at once!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also thanks Obama, for forbidding insurance companies from denying coverage based on preexisting conditions

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I go completely numb. Even physically. Fear and grief do different things to different people. My brain won't let me think of this.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Does it make you support single payer so that poor families don't have to take that risk?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Doesn't have a kid still got tears in my eyes

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My gf just told me about her 6 year old patient in hospice care. She has weeks two left before cancer eats her alive. The raw cruelty of lif

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You're not special all parents feel that fucko

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 38

Yeah, people should only express themselves if their emotional reaction is unique.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Take your meds ffs.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

My mom works as a neonatal nurse. She has told me some of the most heart wrenching stories. Major props to anyone who can do that.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

my mom, too. the stories she brings home terrify me. how she had kids while working that job is beyond me.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I have a now 5 year old daughter who was born with Tetralogy of Fallot, a heart condition where the net effect is not enough blood goes 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

To her lungs. She had a shunt put in at 7 days old and full corrective surgery at 12 months. I'm Australian, so her treatment so far and 2/?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Her ongoing care will never cost a thing. I dare not think of what it could have cost me to keep her if she had been born in the USA. 3/3

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

My cousins baby was born with heart issues. She needed surgery at 6&12 months. Our community got together and paid for it. 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"Heart for Haven". We did silent auction, bowling alley donated a day so all proceeds went to them. A 50/50 raffle. My mom won the 50% 2/?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That vid pulls all the strings. Parent or not.

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

Yeah, but what they don't tell you is you can't go back. When you have kids all of the "heartstrings" moments are visceral and personal.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Definitely! It's just something about the raw honesty and emotion in him. TV hosts (and people in general) don't usually show their (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

2/2 emotions, so to see him opening himself up on live TV about this awful time to help make good of it, is sort of amazing

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's so weird. I was in the middle of watching this and an invisible ninja broke in and started chopping onions all of a sudden.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Have my second kid on the way, something like this is my biggest fear

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

My kiddo (now 1) was born with the same CHD as Jimmy's. That pic of him post surgery had me sobbing (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

It's really amazing what these babies manage to endure and still have high spirits. (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

But being poor is the ultimate crime, right? :p

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

I have friends complaining that they're "paying for someone elses welfare" because being poor or in trouble is such a terrible crime? :(

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Thanks Obama. Fuck you Trump.

9 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 27

My friend's baby (13 months) died in March. Of a disease called Krabbe. A $5 test at birth could have saved her.

9 years ago | Likes 1088 Dislikes 28

Are you feeling it now Mr Krabbe?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

She would have just come down with Goyle later on in life.

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 16

Hunter's Hope is the Foundation started by Hall of Fame Football QB Jim Kelly and his wife when their son was born with Krabbe's Disease.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's purpose is to increase awareness to increase probability of early detection and treatement, support families, fund research.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That is the saddest thing I have ever heard

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

sorry to hear that, my friend just lost his newborn last month to some complications. he only got to live for 2 hours unfortunately.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

on an unrelated note i didn't know there was an epic intro scene to ff14 till just now. your name reminded me i had some free days to play

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

I changed my name lol but yea, ffxiv is my fave

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's terrible...I'm so sorry to hear that.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Krabbe is such a horrible thing for a parent t experience.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

My parents lost their second child to this disease (I'm the oldest). At that time they did bone marrow transplants but that didn't work. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

She lived to be 2.5 but those were hard years for her. From what I understand there is no cure yet, they can only be made comfortable.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I do hereby promise you I will contact the chief of OB/GYN at Memorial Hospital Systems in Hollywood and Memorial West to see if they will

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Add the test for Krabbe to the newborn blood panel taken at birth. These hospitals are located in Hollywood and Pembroke Pines, FL.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

<3

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've been a retired RN since 2005. I've never heard of Krabbe. Can you tell me something about. I have a lot of contacts in OB/GYN. If a

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

simple blood test can identify it, I may be able to get the test added to the panel of blood test a newborn undergoes. I'm willing to try.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Please tell me the symptoms. No mother should outlive her child. The pain, the agony will be with your friend forever. I want to help.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

My friend's dghtr was in AGONY for months with no diagnosis. By the time symptoms present, it's too late. The test could've saved them that

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As the mother of a toddler not much older than their daughter, I cannot even begin to fathom the heartache associated with losing your child

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

but they could have saved their infant daughter months of pain and agony had they known ahead of time. It's pure anguish. /4

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and she was in there for over a month before they reached a diagnosis. I understand her life may not have been prolonged by much /3

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She was in pain with no clear cause. Then she started to lose motor function. They finally got admitted to Miami Children's hospital /2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was an uneventful birth, she progressed and hit milestones sometimes ahead of schedule. Then at 7 months, she started to cry A LOT. /1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jul 28, 2017 10:56 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It doesn't help much. It slightly curbs the prognosis, but 3 year survival still remains below a fifth.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

She passed 8 weeks later

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

They tried but she was too far advanced. She was in the hospital for almost a month before they figured out the diagnosis.

9 years ago | Likes 100 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jul 28, 2017 10:56 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Krabbe's isn't newborn screening because the 3 year survival rate is 14% even with all available treatment. It's not economical at all.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 7

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jul 28, 2017 10:56 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Florida, we're working on Lola's Law for Florida

9 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 0

Missouri screens for Krabbe. Source: work at a children's hospital

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Why didn't they get it?

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

If you tested for every possible disease you would spend a lot of time money and resources doing it. But feasible when likelihood is low

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*not feasible. And when if discovered, the treatment options and prospects of survival are nugatory

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I understand the business side of it, but it's hard to tell my friends who just lost their baby this, ya know?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sadly even with treatment it's terminal. 1, 2 and 3 year survival rates are 60%, 26%, and 14%. Longest anyone has made was 13 years.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Can't test everything if there are no signs first

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's not a required test in Florida. Hospitals don't teat for it

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Profit margins, shareholder interest.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Test**

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

required tests, but they PA Dept of Health won't communicate with them to get the tests saying the actual testing is too expensive.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But the Dept of Health has not implemented it because "logistics" but the test exists and Hunter's Hope has volunteered to provide all the

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also not tested in PA. My friends' little girl died on Easter last year. She was 16 months old. PA has laws requiring the testing at birth,

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 8, 2017 3:11 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Don't joke when someone has lost a child. It's too cruel.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You seem krabbe

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

Was the milk bad or did he just didn't know how to use a straw?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 6

I was totally thinking it too, thanks for saying it. Ya heartless bastard.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 9

Not the time, dude.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

They do say laughter is the best medicine!

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Wowwwwwwww

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

ah fuckin hilarious bro i upvoted was the first thing i thought lol

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Interesting comment. Good luck

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 8, 2017 3:11 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Monster hunter is mediocre

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Lol

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As sad as it is, the test would have barely helped. The longest anyone has ever lived with Krabbes is 13. Treatment improves quality (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 234 Dislikes 7

A balanced article detailing the pros and cons. http://www.webmd.com/parenting/baby/news/20170309/newborn-screening-krabbe-disease

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

13 is old enough to fuck up your own life. Everyone deserves a chance to fuck up their life.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

13,years is a long time to make advancements in medicine or spend with your child.

9 years ago | Likes 112 Dislikes 15

Reading is fundamental. Your own research is even better.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

That is from my research, I got it from the foundation specializing in the disease...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

But we could develop a new drug that adds an extra 3 days and costs $70,000,0000.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

13 years max, and the kid is terribly sick the entire time. Lysosomal storage diseases are cruel. :(

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

According to people at the Krabbe Foundation, early detection can help minimize the severity and painfulness of the symptoms.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Months

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

The average is 2 years, with many living upwards or 5-7 years with treatment

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Many is 14%. Most people agree it's cruel to let a kid gain consciousness, then die so soon after.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

13 years was the longest

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

13 years is the absolute max. 1/5 of kids die before age 3. Most people think it's cruel to give a child such a short timeline.

9 years ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 6

It is.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Thats not a decision we are allowed to make for other humans.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

They have a short timeline without treatment. I don't think any of us have any room to judge a parents decision to treat this disease.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 10

I'm not judging any parent at all.I'm giving the reasoning for why Krabbes and any other disease without a cure aren't included in screening

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

(2/2)of life, but they still die. We don't test for Krabbes because we couldn't save the kids even if we knew they had it.

9 years ago | Likes 194 Dislikes 5

So there's no way off of Mr Krabbe's wild ride?.... I'm so sorry.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Sounds a lot like MS. Would MS treatment drugs help?

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

MS attacks the protection fluid around your spinal cord, og is left defenceless and can easily be damaged. Normal age you get MS is 20-30.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

We don't screen for MS, but we can provide symptomatic treatment and prevent flairs.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

So, just let the kids die. Really?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 16

There's also some promising work being done with stem cells: http://www.msra.org.au/autologous-haematopoietic-stem-cell-transplant-ahsct-ms

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Very different mechanisms that both lead to destruction of the myelin sheath. I doubt the overlap would help much.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

"No parent should ever have to decide if they can afford to save their child's life..."

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Most live saving procedures are too expensive for the average income.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 5

As someone with a congenital heart defect who is having a heart valve replaced next week, Jimmy is my hero

9 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 6

He didn't do anything though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Best of luck yo.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All the best on your surgery

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Cheers mate

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Guys from national review website have been calling him a liberal elitist because of this. No idea why... WTF is wrong with some people?

9 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 6

These people "That poor woman's 1 day old fetus has a right to live! It's a human being! Oh wait it's a 1 YEAR old!? Oh nm just let it die."

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

they don't care about what they say - they care about page hits and reaction. Like a monkey, throwing poo.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Elitist for wanting to have coverage for the poor? Republicans ideas of what's elitism are so backwards.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 4

It's because they're bastards.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

What was that quote in regards to?

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 5

Take some time to watch the video in the link.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Watch the whole video. It doesn't take long and the context is important.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If you're not American, TL;DR: we have crap healthcare and people die because they can't afford it.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

We actually have pretty decent healthcare. The problem is only a few can afford it.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Also, we wouldn't have to have crap healthcare if congress (looking at you GOP) got the heads out of their asses.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

People in that situation who aren't rich that are forced to choose between their child living and going bankrupt.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

his newborn needed heart surgery

9 years ago | Likes 58 Dislikes 3

Why was this downvoted?

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

It wasn't?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All I can think of is maybe not capitalising the H?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

I also didn't have a period.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Newborns dont have periods, specially not if they're boys.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Lack of health care and inadequate insurance for the poor and semi-poor in the united states.

9 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 3

Yup. I'm in my 30s and in need of seeing two specialists for neurological and gastroenterological issues. Can't afford either, so I wait.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I was born with Tetralogy in 1985. As a parent I can't fathom the emotions my parents experienced. I'm not sure about Billy but the film 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

'Something the Lord Made' is an excellent film about the BTT shunt that was performed on me and made future surgery possible & saved my life

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sadly, in the medical field it's only called the "BT" shunt. They never mention Thomas. Every time I call it "BTT" I get weird looks.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is true. I never called it BTT until I learned the history of the procedure.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As a person who leans conservative on most issues I really do believe that we should have some sort of health care system that helps every1

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 4

Doesn't matter how you vote (or don't vote) should be honestly let anyone die because they can't afford their treatment?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We need to find a way to lower costs first. Otherwise, not even the government will be able to afford covering people.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not just those who can afford it. I would pay more in taxes if more people in need could get good healthcare. It's a travesty that it takes

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

If you feel that way, so you still then vote for the people trying to take it so only ppl who can afford it, can get healthcare?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Are you trolling or genuinely asking if they're a single issue voter based purely on this topic?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A late night show host with a moving story is the only thing that seems get people talking about this

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

Lots of +1's for you :)

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

and in many models an increased tax for national healthcare would be less than many pay for their private insurance, but people don't >

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

think logically that they will save money, only that they don't want to support others expenses, which is exactly what insurance is anyway

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Just one thing to add, we don't even need to pay more in taxes. More of our taxes go to healthcare already compared to every industrial ctry

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We need to streamline efficiency, price regulation, price negotiate etc. More decentralized plans like in Germany for work

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's insane that negotiating price on meds isn't allowed. have friends in the US that use the same (expensive) meds as I do, and the (1)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am telling you right now that Kimmel fellow would make a terrible Republican…

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 11

Except now my parents deductible is 4k and my wisdom teeth are coming in. ACA still needs work.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 6

Absolutely

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unless I'm mistaken, ACA isn't insurance. Your insurance is what needs work.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I got mine out before ACA. Look up "Care Credit." Also be up front with dental surgeons. I paid in advance and got all 4 out for $1000 just

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

by shopping around and paying $200 a month.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, the system ABSOLUTELY needs work. Paul Ryan lighting it on fire and pissing in the ashes isn't work though, it's regression.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I never said he was the one...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly. Work on it. Its what they used to do. Congress do their fucking job. Not destroy and redefine 'healthcare' as a tax cut to the rich

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

It's a whole lot better than the current alternative---fucking nothing.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

Its better for SOME people, for others they get screwed. I have worse medical being middle class than when I was poor & I'm paying for it.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Also as a joke, if you had just died then you wouldn't need teeth removed now!!;)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The insurance companies play a huge role in how shit our system is

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

No.... my family's insurance was dirt cheap before ACA.The cost of an entire business and a $21k deductible later...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There's no denying the insurance companies jacked up our rates. They're for profit which is the problem

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well when you send one of the largest sectors out of business because you don't want a corp to be for profit as it should be, then you can

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Really complain about costs. Imagine insurance companies as mortgage givers. You can't give someone a house for free. And hospitals jacked

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Insurance companies didn't "jack up their rates" in a vacuum. The ACA mandated additional (some v good)benefits that cost a lot of money.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You really are fucking stupid America.

9 years ago | Likes 187 Dislikes 62

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

About half of us are and the systems in place allow them to impose their will on the rest of us.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Not stupid. Corrupt.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

We know.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Yes, we do don't we. I worked a county hospital that had to take pts in any situation. But that doesn't mean they won't get a great big bill

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

A lot of it comes down to American Operating Principle #1: [Potential for rich people to get richer]>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>[quality of humans lives]

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Half of America is. The other half voted Democrat.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 16

Wasn't it over half were for Hillary but it was an electoral college victory.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

I would say more than half voted Democrat-thanks electoral college!

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

Is that the same half that argues unborn children should be killed because lots of moms can't afford them.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

and those moms shouldn't have received birth control or proper sex education because thats a sin

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't see birth control as a problem, but it seems ironic that so many care so much once a baby is born but couldn't care less until then.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it's also ironic that the pro birth movement cares so much about a baby until they are born but after that point they are on their own

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The best part is total government expenditure on healthcare in the US is higher (per capita) than nations with universal healthcare.

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 4

So America isn't even doing it out of greed, it's not about saving money, it's just stupid.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

Well, no it is greed. Greed from insurance companies and hospitals. Their marked up pricing is why its so expensive to tax payers.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Not necessarily. Doctors upticked costs following ACA bc private practitioners were being sent out of business reducing supply. In my state

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Hospital costs are 2x the natl avg bc illegal immmigration costs. Even if gov spent on HC for citizens, it wouldn't reduce costs in my state

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

You could be from Mars, your hospital bill still gets paid by tax payers with no insurance. Hospitals still boon, so do insurance companies.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Greed is universal. The market is designed such that it allows for greed to fuck everything up. The gov needs to redesign the market.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but then enter the age old GOP argument "Get the government out of it!!". I agree, but their propaganda is just tiring as it is cruel.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Basically more of our taxes go to health care than other industrial nations

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So the Republican argument that universal healthcare will cost more taxes is malarkey.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's fundamentally childish, as if refusing to invest in treating the sick will just mean that costs disappears. It does not. It cannot.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

it would still end up costing more in taxpayer money and then larger taxes passed on to the public, but many people theorize that it >

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

would still be a smaller cost than most people pay for private insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

By "total govt... per capita" I mean factoring not just federal spending, but other government authorities like state spending.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

That's why St. Jude's childrens hospitals are free.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 6

It's not free, people have to donate for it to be free to the users... It shouldn't even come to that :(

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I had a friend that was turned away from St. Jude's because his survival chances were too low.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

St. Jude only accepts patients that fit into open research projects. There may not have been a study on your friend’s type of cancer.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And rare.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Not every kid can go to St. Jude's. Certainly an infant who needs surgery asap cannot go there. It's more for children with cancer

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

St Jude takes patients with cancer, blood disorders, and diseases/ disorders that predispose a child to cancer.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm sorry but congenital defects come under "pre-existing conditions" and our company has decided not to cover them.

9 years ago | Likes 1002 Dislikes 53

Wow username hitting close to home ;(

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:32 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Them and Joe Walsh.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You're not Canadian

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The AHCA in a nutshell.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

You cannot deny coverage anymore. It's the law.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

9 years ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 2

MERICA

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Per the HHS that's not legal unless the clause was grandfathered into an eligible plan. I hope your provider isn't rejecting these claims.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Thanks Obama

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 24

Some people are apparently not familiar with the joke.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

10 to be exact

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Username checks out

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 2

Defects? Don't those file under "should abort?" You lefties are confusing.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 129

Wow, even if this was sarcasm, you are an asshole!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fight for the right to protect babies, fuck 'em once they're born. Got it.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

You are a fucking moron.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

This is a very confusing response consider the right is supposedly "pro-life" and all that.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Pro-life but not quality of life you simply want that moral high ground but don't care about people once born. not pro-life it'spro pre-life

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Take a good long look at yourself in the mirror, reread the post, and ask yourself what is broken within you that made you respond that way.

9 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 2

I'm on the internet? No filter? Are you really surprised?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 39

A man talks about wanting his child to live. - "Snarky partisan comment." Fuck you. What fucking hypocrisy is being put on display here?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Keep throwing partisan shade on everything. Be the change you want to see in the world and all that, let's all make it a better place. Cunt.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No. I'm just sad for you. Even the most basic call to honor each others' humanity is met with your hate. That can't reflect a healthy heart.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Maybe you should have been aborted.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

I was a viable fetus, therefore by lefty rules it was my mother's choice as to whether abort me or not.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 29

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I have actually seen that argument from pro-choice folks, that the option should be there in case there are birth defects like heart problem

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

because it would save the child from a life of pain and misery.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Thats why I'm asking, and evidently I'm some horrible, simple minded human being for wanting some clarification.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 25

I guess people don't like their hypocrisies put on display like that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 23

So just murder it, right? My Grandma has cancer I should just go crack her skull and suck brain from it to save her pain and misery.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

How old is she? Euthanasia is reasonable in some cases when it's terminal.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Some GOP members think the baby should have done more to lead a healthy lifestyle.

9 years ago | Likes 194 Dislikes 9

I think I almost passed out from my pre-existing condition when I saw that. What a douche.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Rep Brooks “...and right now, it's the good people who have done things the right way that are seeing their costs skyrocketing.”

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

Because Republicans refused to budge on key issues that would have kept costs low for most everyone. They fucked it up then point out how

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

fucked up it is. I don't understand why people still vote Republican, all they stand for is to lower taxes for the wealthy. Unreal

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Those people will be wealthy sooner or later, so they just have to get the laws in place for WHEN they get wealthy. Plan ahead.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Well they don't want people leading good lives to have to pay for people who don't like Jimmy's kid.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Punctuation would have saved a lot of confusion here.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Looking at you Cigna. Assholes

9 years ago | Likes 192 Dislikes 3

You tell 'em, cuntpickles

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

and humana, and uhc, and aetna, amd paramount, and and and... they're all assholes. every last one.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Aetna left me with a 5cmx5cmx8cm wound and wouldn't cover a wound van bc it was "experimental". Took 4.5 months to heal to a huge scar.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Wound vacs are amazing. Can't believe they considered it experimental. How long ago was this? They suck for that.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just scabbed over. Surgery was Dec. 19, 2016. It took us 6 weeks to get a 'no, we won't do that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Excuse me,but Obamacare made that illegal. The Republicans want to allow it again. Thanks Obama,at least you tried.

9 years ago | Likes 120 Dislikes 11

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 3, 2017 12:55 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Nah. Didn't happen.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

"ObamaCare eliminated pre-existing conditions starting in 2014. No more pre-existing conditions means you can’t be denied coverage, 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

charged more, or denied treatment based on health status." this was a huge point ACA drove. I'm skeptical of your story. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I'll take never happened but posted by a faggot for a million Alex.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Trump claims the revised AHCA (released a few days ago) retains pre-existing condition protection, but it has no restriction on making insu

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

It allows states to opt out of that coverage.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

-rance prohibitively expensive for those with pre-existing conditions. Which makes the AHCA's version of the protection practically useless.

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

It allows the states to withdraw the protection. Wanna guess which states will do that? Hint: not blue ones.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

... but the emails.

9 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 4

I think they added a line in their that says "States can ignore any portion of this act" right under the pre-existing cond protections.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

If you have insurance before the baby is diagnosed it's not a preexisting condition. This entire speech was misleading.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 108

It's not a pre-existing condition as long as you stay with that insurance company. So if you ever change jobs, or your employer chooses...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

a different insurer, they're fucked. And once your kid gets old enough to be kicked off your insurance, they're fucked for life.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Under the Republican plan, if you let coverage lapse for a month you would then be subject to the high-risk pools which could cost 15+k/year

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 3

Yeah, that's not how it works.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

How about when the baby grows up and cannot be in his/her parents insurance? Or if the parents lose insurance? I thought he meant the future

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

But it got confusing as he was emotional and he seemed to jump from one idea to another. At least that was my impression.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

You are one of the few fine himans on his video comments section that decided to make that the point of the argument aren't you?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Plus you are absolutely wrong. Research before trying to sound like a know it all. It will be a PEC as it exists before birth

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

and it is going to stay with the person for the rest of their lives

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You are correct. When a baby is born they get automatically covered by the parents insurance. Also if he didn't have insurance, same outcome

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The baby won't be able to get insurance for their whole adult life though.

9 years ago | Likes 63 Dislikes 6

Everyone voting down ijustliketoargue when he's right. I have 2 kids with pre-existing and have one myself, always been covered thru work

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 20

So what if you are unable to work because of these conditions? How does it work then?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

You then get on SSDI -the government program for disabled Americans. That others upvoted you shows how little people know of our social prog

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

insurances. Helped that my sis taught me about insurance so before taking any job I reviewed their insurance policy.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 16

Imagine if you did not check? how fucked would your children be? No one deserves to live a life with out insurance from lack of knowledge

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

He said adult life, when the parents' insurance wouldn't cover them. And there's a pretty big % of Americans who don't have employer hc

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

1/2 Completely wrong. If you have a job at a company that offers group insurance, you are automatically accepted. Source: I've changed jobs

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 39

2/2 several times, always had group insurance. Daughter was born with an unformed kidney. Had it removed and she's still fully insured.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 29

1/3 You shouldn't have to choose your job based on where you can get good health insurance. Under that system no one with a preexisting

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

He said adult life, so your point doesn't really apply. And, in any case, a big % of people don't have employer provided healthcare

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

You don't understand. Your daughter now has a pre-existing condition. When she gets health insurance on her own as an adult that 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Insurance is betting you'll not use more money than u pay in, it's not charity... it's not an endless money pit

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 162

Aaaand we're off! Pretending that the rest of the world hasn't already figured out how to do this without insurance companies.

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 2

Which is why it shouldn't be for profit. If people are being denied health coverage because they're sick, then the system is fucking broken.

9 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 7

You would think ^ should be common sense but then you have ppl who think bad things only happen to "bad" people so they "deserve" to suffer.

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 4

And what's the point of insurance if it doesn't do the thing you pay for it to do? Seems ridiculous.

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 4

So you're saying a government system would be better? Yes, that's what you're saying.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes I am saying that, but their is definitely a better system than government out there

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

How about a Mom Coalition...we'd get shit done...and done right!! Lol!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The reality is that it is rare for an insurance company to make a profit through premiums.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 34

That would be like McDonald's not making a profit though food sales. Care to explain that assertion?

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

It sounds really weird, but generally speaking an insurance company merely breaking even on premium vs paying losses is seen as good.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There is a lag between when they collect premium and when they have to pay on a loss. During that lag, they invest the money.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not charity, it's insurance. If there is no assurance of coverage, what's the point.

9 years ago | Likes 75 Dislikes 3

It's insurance, protection from the unexpected. Healthcare is what you need if it's no longer unexpected.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 44

a practice or arrangement by which a company or government agency provides a guarantee of compensation for specified loss 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

damage, illness, or death in return for payment of a premium 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Who the hell plans to be injured? And for that matter, who (that can afford it) doesn't have health insurance because they don't expect 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

an injury to happen? 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

That's what insurance is for. Insurance from something that may or may not happen in the future.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 7

look but the most important thing is that we get rid of obamacare and then WE TOTALLY PROMISE TO FIX HEALTHCARE LATER YOU GUYS

9 years ago | Likes 251 Dislikes 9

I'm neither american or a politician but it feels like itd make more sense to come up with a new plan before getting rid of the old one, no?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

JUST TRUST US WE'LL GET ON IT GUYS

9 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 3

It boggles my mind how many people support these clowns, they tried to repeal obamacare for years and now they're trying to come up with a-

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 2

healthcare plan like a fucking college freshman doing his final project the last night before the due date

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 1

You just nailed the problem. The country is being run by people who downloaded their thesis papers and paid someone to do their homework.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

While hung over after going to a Frat party where he knew no one.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

It's like a house. You don't leave your existing house before you come up with a better solution (like renovating or buying another house)

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

But this house has a black man's name on it! We can't have that! (Sarcasm, if it isn't obvious.)

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Black and non citizen Muslim who took your guns and freedom.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

It's true, I used to have guns and freedom, now I'm chained to a radiator and I can't shoot the chains loose. THANKS OBAMA

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

IT'S IN THERE, I MADE SURE IT WAS IN THERE

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 2

It might suck for you guys for a while, but we promise to fix it. In the meantime, we'll exempt ourselves from the suck. -congress

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

How do they exempt themselves?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I'm seriously asking though. I've seen this mentioned, but I don't understand how they are exempt from healthcare?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

https://www.opm.gov/healthcare-insurance/healthcare/ government health insurance, among the best

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

By not being poor. Or middle class.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

^The realness.^

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

congressional healthcare is like the secret better version of the ACA

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What the shit? Why such a lame link? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmWWoMcGmo0

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

His line about how no parents should have to decide whether or not to save their baby's life because they can't afford it hit is the one 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 8

That struck me the most 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 6

Especially not in a developed country like America

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

That line alone might have been the final nail in Ryancare coffin.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Yea, but it's not a choice you make. The chold is treated, no questions asked. It's not like you think about and say no.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 13

Yeah. Treatment happens. Then bills.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

that's not entirely true. if a kid is in a hospital, they have to treat them. But if your kid needs chemo? Tough shit.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Right. Jimmy said it in the most basic terms. He didn't mean the doctor is standing there waiting for you to say yes or no to saving 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

your child's life in an emergency... I guess I thought it was pretty obvious. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Baby is getting treated and saved whether the parents pay or not. The statement does not make sense. Access and cost are separate iasues.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 25

It's not fair that you're getting downvotes.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Cost determines access, thats his point. Jimmy can pay for top medical treatment. Youre telling me a woman with no coverage gets the same?

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

They would get treatment in an emergency.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 16

he mentioned the baby needs surgery again in 6 months and as teenager. I can't imagine how much bills rack up for normal family.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Maybe not if they can't afford subsequent care and treatment. And you're missing the point. Someone with terminal illness needs 24 hr care

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I've been saying for a long time if the AC act gets taken away people will die. It's not perfect but it's better than going back to before.

9 years ago | Likes 170 Dislikes 23

Thought you were talking about air conditioning for a sec there. But yes, I totally agree with you.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, not perfect for the dead people and those that love them. But they're not donating to politicians.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

People not being able to afford other things, such as retirement savings, house savings, etc can also affect health. The people hurt the (1)

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 21

most by this are young people just starting their careers not old people. Germany has a nationalized healthcare system, but an almost (2)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 20

kinda sad that health/education are more of a business and not a service for everyone when a lot of countries have the resources for it.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

If the U.S. could drop it's role of World Democracy Superpower, and the military that comes with it we could spend a ton on health care. /1

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

like out do nothing NATO allies do.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

We already spend WAY more than any of them (I think 50% more than the next highest?). We could have amazing healthcare with a similar system

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We already spend a ton on health care, more than we do on military. Cut our military in half and give to medical still not enough.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

identical life expectancy. Its not necessarily better.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 27

Germany has an insurance system. They just also have a universal system so everyone can get treatment. That's what makes it better.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

US is ranked in 31 place by WHO in life expectancy. Almost all countries above have universal health care and all pay less per capita.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

this is true, and its a tragedy, im not sure the ACA does anything to address that though.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Ofc this is debatable but I think ACA is a small step towards universal health care. But the system in whole needs major reforms.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Hospitals provided treatment regardless of insurance before the ACA.....

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 15

Despite the idiot with the "dangerously ignorant" comment, you are correct. Astonishing how eager people are to get screwed, defending it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Obamacare did not change that. They'll still make you comfortable in the emergency rm while they watch you die of cancer just like before.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

One of the most dangerously ignorant things I've read today.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

this is patently not true. at best, the er had to stabilize you - nothing else really.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My mom had what she thought was the flu for about a week waiting for her ACA to kick in, two hours into having health insurance we find 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

That her 'flu' was a ruptured colon from an undianosed diverticulitis.She spent 2 weeks in the hospital just getting her septic infection 2/

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Cleared up, then had 4ft of colon removed. Then had a colon bag, surgery for a bowel obstruction, hernia repairs, and then uterine cancer. 3

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If it wasn't for the ACA my mom would have died. She waited a week to go to the hospital because was terrified of what it would cost. 4/4

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

And some of those symptoms could have probably been avoided if the insurance hadn't been an issue. The system is so counterproductive:(#Boo$

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They could fix the holes in Obamacare pretty easily, they'd have 90% of the democratic votes to add to their whip

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 4

How?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

they arent interested in it, the only ways to fix healthcare are to tax more or to cut out profits - period

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Yep. They weren't interested in improving it before it came into effect, and they're not interested in fixing what we got stuck with now.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But that would require spending more money, and Republicans value numbers on a ledger more than human lives.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

The Republicans know this. They don't care. Their followers want everything created by a Black President to be destroyed.

9 years ago | Likes 96 Dislikes 23

Bullshit, its not because hes black. Quit trying to act like every republican is a racist nazi or some shit.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

There are actually some holding out because the replacement must cover preexisting conditions. Not many, but a few.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And you just hate Sarah Palin and Betsy duvos because they are women! Misogynist

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lol, countless republicans agree with the ac act.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

No, It's definitely a very countable number considering they have run on repealing it since Obama became president

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

K

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

so they're doing it because he is black and that's the only reason?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 10

Only reason? No. But don't act like it isn't a factor.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

It's not a factor. There is literally zero reason to believe it is a factor.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 12

Literally zero reason. Literally. Wow. You have got to be kidding.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Only half-black. They don't EVER bring up that he's just as white as he is black do they? Doesn't fit the rhetoric.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

When was the last time you've ever seen a mixed-race person referred to as white?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Did you miss the news coverage of the George Zimmerman trial? Plenty of "half white" comments thrown around there.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

As of the previous version of the AHCA, 61 people a day will die, based on the number of people the CBO has estimated would lose insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

More Americans will have died because of the AHCA before the end of Trumps first term than died in the entire Vietnam war.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That's the equivalent of the Charlie Hebdo attacks ever 5 hours.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In 114 days, that will have been more deaths than all servicemen lost in combat operations in the War on Terror.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's a Pulse night club shooting every 20 hours.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1/2 Study is before the ACA when we had 24 million uninsured, found 122 people a day died, we have half that currently, the AHCA circa March

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/2 would have restored us to 2008 levels of uninsurance. This new version is worse, but the CBO hasn't scored it yet, so we aren't sure.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What so many don't realize is that people like myself and husband benefitted from the ACA because companies, like mine, kept me just 1/

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 3

under 40 hours so they wouldn't have to give me benefits. The ACA changed this and my corporation's hands were tied because I'm essential. 2

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 2

I love my job because of the kids (work in elementary). My husband's company is 6 people. When people yell to get jobs; we have them. 3

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

Corporations need to stop being assholes and the insurance companies need to stop being greedy. Off my soapbox. Thank you :)

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

This is one reason why I keep working at UPS despite being a professor. Union workers there get 100% coverage after one year. (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Neither of those will ever happen. That is why legislation is necessary to stop them from having the option to be said things.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Before ACA I could afford insurance and my low copays and got the help I needed. Now I can't even get the tests I need because I cant afford

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Exactly. Health care was affordable before they started calling it affordable. Lock down the damed greedy hospital corpoations and big1/

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

pharma who think they are justified with their extortion and set limits. This is pure bullshit. The real criminals have no consequences.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the huge deductible. I went to the Dr. last week and it was $140 for 5 minutes and blood work orders. The blood work will end up costing

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

@ $300. Just to be told what I always here "you're good". And we pay over $300 a mth for 2 people for this crapshow. Cant even deduct med-

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

ical from our taxes any more either.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

2/3 exchanges and the coverage mandate are the only reason I have insurance. It's expensive as fuck, and totally not perfect, but it's still

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1/3 That's neat story. Before the ACA I couldn't even get coverage. Pre-existing condition and I don't get insurance through work. The

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well, you and I are in the same boat. I spent over $6000 last year, single person, on medical and dental. Just hit my deductible at EOY.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3/3 better than taking my chances being one of the 122 people who died every day in 2008 because they weren't insured.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Its despicable that you have to pay for healthcare, a basic right in most first world countries.

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 22

Ehhhhh... no. *Most* first world countries have some sort of cost sharing. Single-payer systems are actually quite rare.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

1/3 Downvoting it doesn't make it untrue. Germany has a public option with private supplemental, Switzerland is fully private with a harsh

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

However, every other first world country does have universal coverage, and pays about half of what we do overall...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

3/3 savings account...thing. Single payer only seems widespread because it's common in the British commonwealth, and they speak English.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/3 mandate, France has several government-regulated nonprofits, Malaysia (yes it's first world) has a truly bizarre and fascinating Health

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 3, 2017 3:18 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Well i would say most.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

do you not understand the definition of the word most?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Meanwhile, my brain completely mishandles that comment. I have no idea where I was going there, my brain was on a different track entirely.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait. Do people actually die in America because they can't afford medical treatment?!

9 years ago | Likes 639 Dislikes 28

Yeah...shit happens dude. I can't afford the surgery to fix all my heart problems. America is fucked, check my FP post for proof.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

America is all about the money. Quality of life has no cash value.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

All the fucking time. A friend of mine is battling cancer. If ACA is repealed it will cost her $130k a year in health care just to live.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dying from lack of medical care is quickly becoming the American thing to do.

9 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

Dying of preventable illness - it's the American way!

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Yep. I refuse medical treatment for all of my conditions because I can't afford it. If anything happens to me - let me die. I'm poor af.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No. It's political theater.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 27

So all these people have crafted lies in this section, for political theater

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Have you been hiding under a rock?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm going to be one!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yup. People refuse to go to the hospital because the fear they would have to go into debt to pay for treatment

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

You underestimate the level of retardedness in the US political system!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Dude. I actually HAVE insurance and still spent over $3,000 to treat a kidney infection. 'Murica

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Kind of. If they're having a heart attack, they gotta get taken care of. But, they can either go bankrupt from the bills, or...

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

They'll die from not getting preventative care that would've prevented a heart attack.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

The US has higher infant mortality, more working hours lost, and lower life expectancy than Cuba. People are definitely dying because of it.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

We had a T.V. show about someone making shit ton of meth to pay for cancer treatment. What do you think

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

If you watched the show, that was an excuse.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

I don't understand the downvotes, he literally explains it in the final season.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

All. The. Time.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No people in America call an Ambulance for anything and everything

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

Yup. If you don't have insurance (and often, even if you do) it's a choice between medical treatment and endless debt for your family.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

My roommate in college skipped meals to pay for an ambulance he had to take. It's real

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sadly yes.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

its the american dream, everyone must fight for their own prosperity on steroids. draining the non rich slowly... so sad....

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes, we're a cruel and rapacious society.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

No

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

As a Finn I'm embarrased that I've never had to even imagine a situation like this. And at the same time I'm very proud.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes, and there are people right here on Imgur right now saying that to fix this means we'll become fucking COMMUNISTS. Ideology over lives!

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I live in Germany, and I was SHOCKED I had to pay the parking fee when I drove a friend at the hospital for a minor issue.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Parking fee?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In other related news, "Breaking Bad" now on Netflix!

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I love the American version of that show. The Canadian remake was so boring. His chemo was covered. Ended after one episode. Lame. 1 star.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Yes, as a dutch person I find it hard to understand to...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm an American and I don't get it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ditto as an Aussie.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes as the costs are obnoxious, yet still people are against universal welfare.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Because it causes a variety of problems

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not having it causes far more.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I personally don't think a socialist economy can prevent these problems that you speak of.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even though more socialist based economies like Sweden, Denmark and Norway have significantly less of these issues?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People actually die in America because they can't afford clean water, what is that medical treatment you're speaking of?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

There's a reason 101% of the GoFundMe links you see on this site are for Americans (sometimes their pets) that need medical assistance.

9 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 2

Pets would be the same here although you can get some pet insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

We should have single payer universal pet insurance. It's a right not a commodity.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I wouldn't expect them to be covered by a tax-funded system in most places. I can't have pets, so I don't have an opinion really.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I have a dog but I don't bother with the insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, like everywhere else on earth. In every country someone dies because to try and treat them would be too expensive.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

People rarely die here because of money. Everyone gets treated at least.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

People may not die because of a lack of *their* money, but that just means the rationing is done differently. Care is still rationed.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes and now they're fined for it. Thanks Obama.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 19

All the time sadly

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

In the USA, the Hippocratic Oath has an addendum stating ''Unless they don't have money''.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

...are you new? What do you think we've been shitting our pants over, since the election? Yes, ppl die here bc they're too poor for care.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 4

Not new but I kind of thought you'd get treated but lumped with a large bill. Not refused care for not being able to afford it.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You would be correct, yes.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Oh. No, they'll still treat you, but it's so expensive that many ppl don't go. I'd literally rather die than be saddled w/a million $ bill.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Thanks for clearing that up. Technically not turned away but will be bankrupt by it and left on the streets.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And then you'll die, but it will be slower and with more suffering.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To be clear, you can not just get all the healthcare you need. They'll treat you if you're dying on the floor of the hospital. Nothing more.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yes. I've seen ppl's lives destroyed by it. Before insurance, I embraced the old maxim: ignore pain, either it will go away or you will.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

A guy, who had cancer, robbed a bank for $1 so he could go to prison where medical care is free. That's fucking sad but true.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Also prescription medication. Capitali$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$m bitches.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

type 1 diabetic-i'm going through SHIT with insurance right now for blood test strips. $70 with prescription, $35 on Amazon for the same

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm sticking with online supplies from now on, and not going through my insurance for a lot of things

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Where I live (Finland) diabetes is on the list of 100% subsidized medications because there is simply no alternative. You can't live without

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Can I come live with you lol!?!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Makes sense, especially since we know like Jack shit about type 1 diabetes

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yep. 'Merica.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yes.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

I don't undertsand how you can call that a civilized coutry..

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Oh yes... or they go for lifesaving procedures and then have medical debt that can follow them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxUAntt1z2c

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's actually incredibly cruel when you really think about it...

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Sort of. Hospitals have to stabilize, but that's all. A baby in the hospital will not be denied treatment due to poverty.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

But in a case like Jimmy's, the parents would be asked for consent, and then billed.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's all pretty complicated, but parental decision-making ought to be accepted unless it is obvious to many that the decision is patently...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

not in the best interest of the child or adolescent.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thanks for the info. Loss of power to consent gives parents an excuse to go further into poverty at least.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah. It seems like the debate is framed as a choice between life and death. Really though, death is rare, but bankruptcy is common.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I've literally heard people yell, "Don't call an ambulance I cant afford it" after a bad accident. It's pretty terrible

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

(1/2)I'm a college student with perfect health who has never been hospitalized my rates in 2016 were 182 per month, in 2017 rates changed to

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

(2/2) $340 over night and I can't possibly make the payments I cancelled and still owe two months advance + I now have no health insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

That's crazy.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Are you joking or seriously unaware of this? I'm falling apart from several different issues because I can't afford treatment.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Not joking, I thought you'd still get treatment just be billed after the fact. I didn't realise people were actually not treated due to $$

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sometimes you can get immediate help for things like a broken leg or something at the ER.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That's madness

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Add insult to injury: most of the staff don't care about you and are callous toward your issues, rude, talking down to you.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I knew a guy who while bleeding heavily drove himself to a hospital cuz he couldn't afford an ambulance. It was crazy

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

yep. It's also not unheard of for people to die while fighting for their insurance to approve necessary treatment, because if you go ahead

9 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 1

Was in court 10mos. Said I made too much for tier 1 but not enough for tier 2. Tried to fine me for not having insurance...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

bastards

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

and get treated without their approval they don't have to pay

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 0

So these are the real death panels huh?

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Unbelievable!

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I had testing in January indicating a brain tumor (secretory adenoma) and a few days ago got approval for more testing to confirm.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Jesus, that's vile. Hope your treatment goes well.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I hope everything turns out ok for you.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Yes. My sister has many medical conditions and cannot afford to see a doctor or afford medication. She's slowly dying.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm so sorry.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thank you <3

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I had an asthma attack when I didn't have insurance and kept refusing to be taken to the hospital because I knew I couldn't afford it. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

Eventually a friend took me, and when I got to the hospital, I nearly collapsed. The doctors later told me that the level of oxygen in 2/3

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

my blood was so low that my fingertips were blue and I nearly suffered a stroke. I was 22.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

That's alarming. I'm glad you survived.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

When I see stuff like this I remember how lucky I am to be living in Australia, Yeah we have our fair share of problems but at least we 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Don't have to choose between life and bankruptcy.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Im 23 and in constant pain cause i was in an accident and was denied coverage, left with 8 herniated disks, woulda cost me close to $350,000

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Now that's crazy. Here you might have to go on a waiting list but you would be treated.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It happened 3yrs ago, its to late for treatment.. to much scar tissue.. as long as i exercise and workout properly i won't need a wheelchair

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I hope things improve for you.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Thank you

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes

9 years ago | Likes 194 Dislikes 7

That's terrible, where's the compassion?!

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 3

There's a "god helps those who help themselves"/"pull yourself up from your bootstraps" philosophy that is impervious to facts or figures.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In Australia our philosophy is "everyone deserves a fair go"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

too many americans believe tax dollars shouldn't be spent for silly reasons like "compassion" or "saving human lives" or "any reason at all"

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

IT'S INHIBITING MUH FREEDOMS

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Compassion doesn't exist in several American politicians' vocabulary, unfortunately

9 years ago | Likes 57 Dislikes 2

Yeah. Compassion isn't profitable

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

People vote them in.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

And keep voting them in for some fucked up reason

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

There is none.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

There's a big chunk of the US population for whom people suffering and dying doesn't seem as awful as government doing something about it.

9 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 2

I'll never understand that. Tax funded health care would solve more problems than not having it causes.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Decades of reductionist and slanderous polemic blasting universal healthcare programs have sunk into America's bones.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Taxpayer-funded healthcare would take profits away from the giant corporations that make money off the joke that is American healthcare.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

We prefer the freedom to die

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

45,000 a year.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

And that's not counting those who don't die but end up suffering immensely and cannot work b/c of treatable illness

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Sorry scrub that. There are 45,000 deaths a year?!

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Medical insurance costs $45,000 a year?!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

45,000 thousand people die a year due to bot having health insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's terrible.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Bots shouldn't need health care!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Absolutely. Somewhere between several hundred to several thousand a year. Also, impossible medical debt is a major cause of homelessness.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Several tens of thousands actually.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don't have insurance bc I absolutely cannot afford it. I need a particular surgery, I cannot afford it. I very well may die.

9 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 0

Gofundme?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just get insurance the day you walk in for the surgery then never make another payment.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

That would really work. I've been in health care for over 30 years. The only thing is you'd have to carry the insurance for at least three

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

months so as your bills trickle in they would be paid. Imgur' s can we help this person out?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

That's the beauty of forcing insurance companies to accept pre-existing conditions without rules or cost differential. Thanks, Obama.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Pls don't die!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So is it cheaper for you to pay the penalty for not having insurance? I've often wondered if people really do this since ACA was implemented

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It depends. There are some people that make so little they are not penalized because it is not affordable, either through work or the market

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes it was $2000 per year scaling with the time you were uninsured. That is what makes the ACA unconstitutional and why so many

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

The Supreme Court said it falls under Congress' power to tax, so...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

conservatives are against it. It is the government forcing you to buy a product. Take that mandate out, and you'd have a lot less opposition

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

The problem with that is you must have the mandate if you are going to force insurers to cover preexisting conditions, which was a huge(1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

part of the ACA to begin with. Adverse selection is a bitch. (2/2)

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

There's something called medishare. Its not health ins. Everyone shares the medical bills and it like 350/mth for a family. And you're

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Covered under ACA and won't be charged a penalty for not having health insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

What procedure do you need?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

How much is your insurance? It tends to be around a few hundred a month tops for one person, from what I gather.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 10

My stepfather is retired (collecting no pension because he was self-employed)and my mom is a minister (earning only 20k yearly. Not TD 1/

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2/ Jakes money) and they pay well over $800 monthly for his Blue Cross through the ACA Marketplace. So yeah, it's expensive af! Still

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3/ better than having NO insurance though! He survived prostate cancer 4 years ago. Now he has tumors in his spine they think cancerous.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For any of thousands of people living on minimum wage or even up to $15 an hour that's not feasible on top of bills and rent. Esp. students.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Then make a little extra on the side. $300/mo isn't hard. There are tons of options a lot of people don't look enough to find, or ignore.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 28

In the time you guys whined and DV'd, I finished several days' worth of coursework and made $25. Lol @ you.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 14

Ohhhh silly me totally forgot, my grandma always said I should strip!

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

"Wahh I don't have enough money, but god forbid I actually try something besides whining!" I'll be here with my easy extra income, lol.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 15

Do you people just enjoy struggling so much that you refuse to hear anything besides "you're doomed unless you're born rich"?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 16

Ahahaha this is what you are:

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Lol my 60+ hours a week of work grad program totallyyyy allows for me to work the extra 30 hours a week it would take to make that. Right.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

So if you get cancer and can't afford treatment they turn you away?

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

I had a friend who was born with half a fukn GI tract, her mom had to file bankruptcy in order to get all the medical treatment necessary.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

No they will always treat You if don't have money but it will put you into heaps of debt. They don't turn away people without insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Yeah. Cancer is not an acute condition. You go to the hospital and say you've got Cancer, they don't have to cure it.

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

That's fucked up

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That's a crime to me.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Do no Harm. Not "do all things you can to help everyone be the healthiest they can possibly be." That's the US System.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

In some cases, yes.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Breaking Bad. Seriously, that plot could not have worked in Europe, because you don't get broke from chemo...

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Would rather have the whole country go broke instead

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Dude, I have universal healthcare and our deficit is way lower than yours. And we don't let people die for not being millionaires.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Not just not afford. There are doctors in America that have their butt so far up their ass they dismiss lifesaving treatments and >

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

> will actually work to prevent you from finding someone who will give proper treatment.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I know from observation this is true.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yes. 61 people die every day because they can't afford insurance. Back before the ACA that was 122 people a day. The ACA halved uninsurance.

9 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 3

Well that's 43000 a year. So give him a second mandate and he may be a competitive mass murderer. Throw in a few wars and he gets top score.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And with Trump in office, we're gonna get those numbers back up. Make America Great Again!

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

Make America dead again?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The deadest! The most dead. You're gonna be so tired of being dead. Believe me.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thems rookie numbers, son. Aim for Holocaust levels!

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Make American Reich Again!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Too far man, too far.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Or not far enough...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The previous version of Republicare would have doubled it, putting us back to 2008 levels and killing those 61 extra people, every day.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

It is scary what they are trying to give you Americans as health care... In Europe the costs for everyone is approx 10% of salary. But works

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1/2 Almost every country in Europe has decent cost controls and universal coverage. All of them have strong government involvement to keep

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2/2 that way, but apparently about half of my countrymen would rather die than have any government involvement - until they hit 65 yrs old.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This new version is probably worse. I can't wait to see what the CBO says about it...

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

It's a real shame.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1/2 Non-rhetorical question. How is it when Islamic Terrorists try to kill Americans it's a crime against nature, but when Republicans try

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

2/2 to do it, it's just "a real shame". I'd like an actual answer on that.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

But don't worry. If you have a mental illness you can still get a gun, no problem.

9 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 12

If it is known that you have the mental illness you can't

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

That's funny because it's true.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

Hum... More it's not funny because it's true.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I'm pro 2nd amendment but yeah, people with mental illness or you know, investigated for terrorism repeatedly shouldnt be able to get guns

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Apparently you're not a big fan of the 14th amendment though.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Good thing I didn't say 'without due process of law' or you might be right.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Took my cousin who has severe depression and extreme anxiety six months to get into treatment. I bought a handgun in 10 minutes.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People in America will refuse to call or take an ambulance to get medical treatment because that alone can cost hundreds of dollars.

9 years ago | Likes 559 Dislikes 7

Yeah, a friend of mine got in an accident last year that broke both arms. He was sobbing in the ER over the cost. Almost turned down surgery

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But how does that work with the hippocratic oath? Would doctors actually not save the child in a case like Kimmels?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They would, but then the parents will end up going bankrupt

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Try thousands, with insurance

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Hundreds??? It's thousands dude.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I almost died in 2015 because I couldn't afford ANOTHER trip to the hospital. I suffered some mild brain damage, but ya know...whatever.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Broke my leg playing rec soccer, had signed a waiver saying they HAD to call ambulance, cost me $1000 on top of hospital bills to ride 5 min

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You guys are getting completely fucked over. And then your politicians tell you that the NHS is some kind of communist thing.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Well, it is. The problem is amercians are thoroughly brainwashed into thinking communist things are bad.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I rode in an ambulance once. They performed no medical services, just drove me 2 miles to the hospital, and charged me $850.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But that was 15 years ago, prices have likely tripled since then.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's a normal cost though, in Europe as well. You have to keep in mind how incredibly expensive an ambulance is, the cost of equipment etc

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Differce is, in Europe it's covered by insurance.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As someone who got in an accident and had what the officer thought was a broken arm, I insisted on no ambulance. Couldn't afford it.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 1

Must've been a tough motorcycle ride to the free clinic.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 15

Hasn't happened to me yet, but that'll be me. "Oh you're insured they pay the other 90,000" "No *WE* pay it, in time. I'll build a cast."

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

And yet, EMTs and Paramedics can't make a decent wage.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Why should we? We're just known as "ambulance drivers". Sad..

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lowest pay for the highest amount of training of any profession in the USA.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Uh, don't doctors require more training?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

And they get paid more than Paramedics.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then you have the people on the lowest end of the spectrum who will call an ambulance five to ten times a month to score pain meds from ER.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

After splitting my head open, I called an Uber.

9 years ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 0

Uber Ambulance™

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Ambuluber™

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I thought I was getting something else when I booked this ride.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This is ingenious.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

This is like a bad millennial joke except no one's fucking laughing because it's got 2real4me set to max.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Most uber drivers are told they are not allowed to transport to hospitals. Make sure the uber driver doesn't know your the one in need :)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm an uber driver now and was never told that. Must be a regional thing.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I didn't tell the driver I had a head wound, though. I wadded a heavy towel under the tightest beanie I had.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

How is medical treatment in America so expensive??

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Medical treatment is expensive everywhere - but usually an insurance covers it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yes and no. Healthcare in the US is more than twice as expensive as in other wealthy countries.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Hospitals are businesses here. The end goal is to profit.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

Gotta pay those CEO's somehow.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 2

And the beloved shareholders.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The supermassive black holes that we call health insurance companies.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Pharmaceutical and medical device costs are extremely high. So, care and coverage providers have to charge a lot of cover their own costs.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well, they also have to turn a profit. Hospitals are businesses. Drugs and equipment don't cost as much in other countries.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No free healthcare. That's the actual, raw cost of medical stuff without government intervention

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 9

Damn epi pens costing hundreds of dollars to make, randomly.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Plus a fat profit margin.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Your prices are also somewhat inflated by a system that incentivises overcharging

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Also, the system as a whole is less efficient due to competition. Two MRIs within 5 miles, neither operating at 50% utilization...

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Also, when I worked for a hospital group that merged, two of similar size were paying up to 10x difference for certain supplies. Same vendor

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No it's not. Your drugs are up to 1000 times more expensive than ours. Just because they can. It's a business, they rip you off. Healthcare

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In American on average is twice as expensive as anywhere else. Because they can. It's sometimes he exact same drugs that cost more.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bullshit. The US government spends more on healthcare per capita than most other industrial nations. And slightly more than that amount 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

is paid privately. So you end up spending 2.5 times as much as the OECD average, and twice as much as other wealthy nations. 2/3

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Capitalist economics, capitalist government.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yeah. Got into an accident and first hospital couldn't treat my injuries. Was only there 8 minutes before I was transfered.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Those 8 minutes though? My bill was 23k for basically being diagnosed and sent to another hospital. That first ambulance ride was around 3k.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Many epileptics will wear an alert bracelet telling people not to call an ambulance if they have a seizure because it's so expensive

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Also because seizures (as long as they are not new, nor result in serious injury) should not be a reason to go the hospital

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Fair point

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm Australian, we have to pay for an ambulance but you can get insurance for that which is about $100 a year for a family.

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 1

People can get a insurance in America too.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Holy fuck I'm paying $285 a month, because it's mandatory to do so

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I pay €20 a month for access to private hospitals with private rooms, nicer food and shorter waiting lists but I can still go 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

go to a public hospital and be treated for free. My right to do so is literally guaranteed by the constitution 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My silver family plan is $850/ month with a $6500 deductible. USA land of the free but only if you can afford it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We pay less than that in tax.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh I understand that, I am in full support of a national healthcare system, rest of the world does it no reason it can't work here.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's free in Queensland for our permanent residents.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That's good. I'm in Victoria

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I pay more than that for fucking Netflix

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And can you believe some people don't buy the insurance?!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 persons covered, I'm paying $125/yr. That covers nothing. It's literally just so we don't pay the penalty. I have to have an HSA just 1/

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

to cover things like office visits and medications. I have to spend $10,000 in a year for my insurance to kick in and cover things 20/80. 2/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's me paying 80%. AFTER I shell out $10,000. Co-pay doesn't exist in my plan and this POS is putting us in the red monthly. 3/3

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sorry, $125/mo. Not year. Stupid brain moment.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, HSA is a Health Savings Account. I have to take MORE money out of my paychecks and put it into this to be able to cover expenses.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Our family insurance is 214 a month and that is cheap. We would still probably have to pay part of an ambulance ride.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Here that's only for private insurance. If you don't have it you might have to share a room and be seen by a doctor not of your choice.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

$1800/month for a healthy family of 4. That's down from $2100. Just a normal $1000 deductible plan. Yes, California.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yet we have plenty of money to go screw up countries no one gives a shit about while Americans die from awful health care. Makes sense.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

$214 a MONTH?? who are you blowin' to get that rate! and is there a slot open?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ha! It is my husbands work. He is union, box factory. About to become supervisor (fingers crossed) and it will go up to 400.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

100 a year? please tell me ur kidding

9 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

Not kidding. I've never heard of anyone hesitate to call an ambulance.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

In America it is common to receive serious injury or be ill to the point of death and not call an ambulance or go the the hospital.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Considering a single ambulance ride is like... $3,000 minimum, you're guessing one person will need it in the next 30 years. Good bet.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

It's highly variable depending on your location. Parents work at a hospital, there's is ~600, in the town I live it cost my roommate $900.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's just for an ambulance not hospital cover because hospital cover is tax payer funded. You can also have private hospital cover 1:

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

2: which can cost $2000 to $5000 depending on single vs family and ages.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Can confirm. A 3 mile ambulance ride was $800. I hope my next car accident kills me. I don't wanna deal with bancruptcy or depression

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

Harsh.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Feb 7, 2018 1:22 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Not sure the govt should be paying for 19 y.o. who decide they want to ride a death magnet.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 111

why should old people be covered for it, then?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Then maybe they should make death magnets illegal instead of denying people basic healthcare. Seems less evil.

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 1

not sure you understand how much hospitals cost, i was 10, crashed my bicycle, 25,000 in bills, my family lost their home because of it.

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

the government shouldnt pay for any of it, but maybe figure out how to reduce the cost? an accident shouldnt cost you everything you own.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 17

No fucking wonder this country is going down the shitter with morons like you.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

u can't be serious

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Land of the free (terms and conditions apply)!

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Often cheaper to get uber or such to drive you to hospital

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Hmmm... new Service? Ambuluber?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That's a nightmare of a name

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You don't like it? :)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 25, 2017 9:22 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Basically. If you need heart medication, you won't get it. But they'll pop your heart back on if it stops.

9 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 25, 2017 9:22 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 25, 2017 9:22 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

That's shocking! Here(Australia) cover is tax funded. It's not perfect and you might need to go on a waitlist for some things. 1:

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

2: there are a few things that are not covered like experimental cancer treatments but for the most part it's pretty good.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

thats insane, my uncle had cancer and bit later heart attack. treatments, drugs and few months in care cost him under 10k euros.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nope. Hospitals treat. They just bill later. NEVER is a pediatric patient denied care. This is a big misconception

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 10

You should read the other comments in the same comment tier giving multiple examples of how you're wrong, it'll be fun.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Sure but then you are dealing with fatal illness, rather than providing preventative care to minimize fatal illness.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

exactly

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted May 25, 2017 9:22 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

(1/2)I grew up on Medicaid, as an orphan and was awful. My hearing aids weren't even totally covered because my impairment was "cosmetic"

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

(2/2) but get this, they cover more of the cost of braces than hearing aids. I may not be deaf, but cosmetic? Excuse me?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1