Yes. All of this.

Aug 2, 2016 6:24 PM

itsaMILSOlifeforme

Views

275169

Likes

10403

Dislikes

633

Would be interesting to see a magazine with regular women like this, and regular men who aren't all 6'+ and muscular.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

After looking at comments , I've concluded this whole post is stupid

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 2

Honestly, she looks photoshopped. Her head is small as fuck.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

No Cosmo, this is a plus sized model.

9 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 3

Wow, I didn't expect that :[]

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The plussiest of them all. And dearly missed.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

plus sized legend

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The problem is....ppl are actually paying attention to Cosmo

9 years ago | Likes 175 Dislikes 3

The same people who watch the reality TV shows on the E News channel - basic bitches.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yeah just seeing the front page of those shitty mags at the checkout isles is enough for me, sad people actually buy into all that so easy

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Plus sized MODEL not plus sized woman, i the think they need a new word.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I like my women 30-50 feet tall and equipped with giant artillery cannons

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

You sir have earned my respect.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not a perspective trick, she is -actually- that large. And equipped to match, if you catch my drift.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

hawt

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Woo Macross ^-^

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Some women are just really tall and buff

9 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 5

They look so much sexier that way I think. But that's just me.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Just like Gal Gadot in Wonder Woma---oh wait, forget what I said.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Snu Snu

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

True dat. Speaking as a tall girl and buff.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

uhmmm well hello there

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It doesn't matter, her top and bottom swimsuit don't match!

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Isn't it true that the modelling industry is mostly run by French and Italian gay guys?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I will never ever understand that. Women dressing how gay men tell them to to attract straight men.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So Cosmo thinks you're fat, Well I ain't down with that!

9 years ago | Likes 1752 Dislikes 8

Definition ==> Plus-size: individual of average to larger stature (sometimes but not exclusively overweight or obese)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

How is this not top comment

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 3

Best comment @Bakes72

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

You won the best comment prize today in my book. Gotta appreciate some classic Sir-mix-a-lot lyrics.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You can do side bends or sit ups, just please don't loose that butt.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cause your waist is small and your curves are kickin', and I'm thinkin' bout stickin'...

9 years ago | Likes 327 Dislikes 2

I like your username.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To the beanpole dames in the magazines: You ain't it, Miss Thing!

9 years ago | Likes 205 Dislikes 0

Give me a sista, I can't resist her.

9 years ago | Likes 169 Dislikes 1

Well I know what I want for dinner now, thanks guys!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Red beans and rice didn't miss her!!!

9 years ago | Likes 158 Dislikes 0

Some knucklehead tried to diss, cuz his girls are on my list

9 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 0

I chuckled, moved on, stopped, came back to up its this comment. Well played sir. Well played.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This woman is plus size not because she's fat but because she's big look at her normal sized head in comparison to her 6'2 body.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

People use "large" and to mean fat so much that people forget that some people are actually large. Lucy Lawless for example.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Exactly. People getting way too sensitive about body image these days and start taking shit personally.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Best comment of the day.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I wish I could upvote this comment a hundred times!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Best comment i've read in weeks!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Look how skinny her arms are!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why does it matter what they think?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All I hear now and forevermore is Jonathon Coulton's rendition. I'm too lazy to double check the spelling of his name.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Thank you for introducing me to that version! I know of JoCo from https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kCbD8nsxcd8

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The man is amazing. I've got his whole catalog, and love...just about every bit of it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You spelled it right, and his version is best version!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Uh yeah she would definitely be shopping at big and tall. She is plus sized being above average in height.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

she's not that fat

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Until the fashion industry/designers stop perpetuating the size 0 look anything above that would technically be "plus sized"

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Maybe people need to stop perpetuating the idea that plus sized is bad and being scared of it?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Maybe people just need to stop....hammer time!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

People need to realize plus size doesn't mean fat

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

Plus sized means anything bigger than a size 0 so I've been told.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 6

Well I mean, technically..that isn't wrong. Anything above 0 is a positive, or 'plus', size. Ain't saying it's sensible, but it isn't wrong.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Usually "plus" size refers to any model over a size 10, but they also have to be tall AF and not look fat, at all.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Definition ==> Plus-size: individual of average to larger stature (sometimes but not exclusively overweight or obese)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

does clothing come in negative sizes?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

love that my fellow dudes always find a way to make things about us. women having lifelong self-esteem issues? what a burden...on us.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

6'2" you say?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

The problem here is perspective. That model may indeed be "plus sized" simply because she's a bigger woman yet proportionate for height.

9 years ago | Likes 1113 Dislikes 53

I thought most plus sizers were indeed had bigger frames too

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I know a model that told me they only go by measurements. So wider hips = "larger" in the eyes of the industry.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Definition ==> Plus-size: individual of average to larger stature (sometimes but not exclusively overweight or obese)

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

plus-size adjective (of a woman or women's clothing) of a larger size than normal; outsize.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Guess it depends where you get a definition.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For men, that's called 'big and tall'...but not to be mistaken as 'big and/or tall', speaking from experience as a skinny 6' 5"er.

9 years ago | Likes 150 Dislikes 1

Hello from the future. Buying clothes is a pain for us tall skinny people here too. It's either to short but fat or too long but huge.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I feel that. Medium-Tall shirt sizes ftw.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Had to take my best friend's brother to the Big & Tall shop the other day, finally found pants longer than his 6'10" arse.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Same here. The only pants that fit me without a belt are my suit pants because I paid a tiny fortune for them.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Snu snu!

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

I'm ded

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The spirit is willing, but the flesh is spongy and bruisez.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

*d

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Same thing with fat chicks using "curvy".

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Word. I'm 6'4 and 18kg overweight and it's only now starting to show

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Thank you

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's not why. Plus sized models just mean they're bigger than most models, not that they wear plus sized clothes.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

You get right the fuck outta here with that logic of yours

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Right, just look at this tiny face. Looks like a monster now.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

no. they consider size 8 to be "plus size".

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Us sizing? Because I'm in Aus and that confused me haha

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not sure about Aussie sizing but I think they're the same as the UK so and 8 is a 12. So I'm still a size 10 in America?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Working on getting back to a UK size 10 which would be a size 6 in america? Wow...I understand now why people keep saying size 16 is fat

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't know who's feeding this crock but a size 8 is still a medium in US dress sizes. Source: My closet.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

it is a bit culturally confusing

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yep. 6'2" almost 170lbs. size 12. that is pretty damn big

9 years ago | Likes 394 Dislikes 15

Thats a big bitch!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 10

Not big for an amazon and honestly that's proportional. Most men at that height naturally weigh 170-190.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Perfect height and weight for this guy! Damn

9 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 1

BEST GIF EVER +1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Came back to upvote (and comment)

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Well damn....not really. Im 5 11 and like 200.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Holy shit, that's almost exactly the same size as me. I'm a guy.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

How is she a size 12? I outweigh her by 15 lbs and am the same height. Butt logistics.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

Just to add to the confusion about sizes: I'm 5'4", 170lbs and also a size 12.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sizes are different between manufacturers, are constantly getting "smaller", and are totally arbitrary.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Hence why i gave up on pants a long time ago

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Same here, 6ft, 180lbs and am also a size 12. And most of my mass is lazy flab. It's all in the hips/booty.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Man here. The taller you are, the bigger clothes have to be. Clothes can stretch alot easier to adjust for width rather than height, ..1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think a fair part of the sizing issue is women's clothing being very triangular the bigger they get.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As I am 6'1 weighing 145 lbs (skinny af) but I have to wear an extra large shirt because I am not a belly dancer

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm 6'2 and I wear a medium, sometimes even a small, you don't need an XL.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Size 12" is an arbitrary fucking number that means literally nothing in women's clothes. I could make some pants and slap a -24 on there.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

all words are arbitrary at that point. but in comparison to a 4'6" woman who weighs 90lbs, she is big and the other is small.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

There's a difference, and we all know it, between a dress meant for a tall woman and one meant for a "plus size" one.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I have simultaneously fit in pants sizes 1, 3, 4, 7, 10, S, M, L, and J-XL, most from the same store, some from the same brand.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Maybe do something for the prospective?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

perspective.... and for perspective, look at her head, it looks small because her body is so big. or go look at the other dozen photos.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In a world of black and white we only see skinny and fat. Tall being "plus size" in relation to this model makes no difference

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Oi! Why you gotta go & bring race into this?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Imgur only has 2 modes: self-righteousness and comedy. Don't make jokes when people are in outrage mode. (At least I brought you up to 0.)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You win some, you lose some.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But is there a reason to even differentiate them? Like, why label one "normal" and one "plus-sized"? Who is that for?

9 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 10

traditionally models are super skinny with very small breasts. So everyone who is not super skinny and not small breasted is plus size.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Models are meant to model things... so knowing what their "size" is allows you to compare them to yourself. Whether you like that or not.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

By that logic this makes no sense. Her size is not "plus". Calling her that just confuses girls. A normal girl wont compare herself to Plus

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

She's not plus by any definition tho. Plus is 18 (uk) up and her height still wouldn't qualify her for plus sizes.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I operate by a sizing system based on the Kelvin scale. ALL models are "plus-sized" by my scheme. It's the absolute zeroes that are scary.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

This. Not shaming but the size zero standard is just too absurd.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it's a size that exists for many women and they do not have an eating disorder. They should facilitate for all body types and heights.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But the implication here is that the standard is much smaller than what it actually is. Its a matter of averages. Nobody said disorder??

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because she could beat you at basketball probs

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

like men's big and tall. for big guys and tall guys. it is labeled for the same reason as the 'maternity dept' or the 'outerwear dept'.

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 4

While this makes sense, the problem is that anything that isn't off the rack small is considered plus size. There's only 2 variations.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

that is not true in any way

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The plus section in women's is bigger sizes, normally 14 +, where 'talls' aren't exclusive to plus sections

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Except you never see a big guy called "big and tall" while modeling. Only women get called something different.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 7

That's because you never see them model anything.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

you sure do, if you looked at mens big and tall catalogs. but you dont. like most other men. doesnt mean they arent real

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

what? they do model and are called big and tall models. but men dont shop that way

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But I've never seen a big guy called a plus sized model.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because big and tall is the standard for male models. Short and small would be for men like plus size for women

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

chubby guys, crazy tall guys. dismissing them because you dont think it matters and dont see it? tisk tisk.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Big is the standard for female models, if you're going by height. Next to no model is under 6 foot.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Plus-sized or normal, whatever, she's got a tiny head.

9 years ago | Likes 3227 Dislikes 49

That's just bad photoshop

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Maybe her head is normal and she really is plus sized

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

The real issue is her unusually long neck so her head is further away which makes it seem small.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, judging with the use of the size of her head, I can only assume that she's atleast 6 ft tall.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Boom.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's because she is in fact plus sized. She's very tall.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

speak truth to power, brother.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

She has a normal sized head and a huge body

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 8

Explains the "plus size"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well I'm glad someone said it

9 years ago | Likes 395 Dislikes 2

I know, what the hell photoshop

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I concur

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Here, here .

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

*hear, hear. Shortened from "hear ye, hear ye."

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I knew that. I was testing you.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Drat. I've been had

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's because she's extremely tall. I forget the model's name but she's 6-foot-something, that and solidly built so different proportions.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

cannot unsee, what the actual fuck?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I always say, there's Nothing wrong with a little head...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Beetlejuice was here

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I would love a little head.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

*subtle*

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or a big ol' body.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

All the damn upvotes for you, I have always thought this.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Its a bit difficult to upvote thoughts in your head

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just look at those sharp knees

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Nah she's just tall.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

ᴸᶦᵗᵗᶫᵉ ᵇᶦᵗˢˢˢˢˢˢˢˢ

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe her Head looks tiny compared to her plus sized body (:

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Most models do.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

She's 6'2", give her a break.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Who's looking at her head?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Yes! I thought it was shopped. Amazonian woman with tiny head.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hahahaha

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

'shopped.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Tiny Head model sounds cute

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Collect the whole set!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Maybe shes super tall and thats what they meant

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[censored]

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She can have my tiny head

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Was literally just going to comment this

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Looks like someone shopped 2 pics together. One where shes closer to the camera was the trunk and legs , one further away was head and arms.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Her head is normal sized. He body is that of a 12' Amazonian space warrior.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Death by snu snu?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are far worse ways to go

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't know about this model in particular but plus size might also reference her height, and many tall people seem to have small heads

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

maybe that's why she is plus size. She's actually 300lbs and 8ft tall and her head is normal size

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All of those are crazy photoshopped

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I think I remember her being like 9 feet tall, which is part of the "plus size" part

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, her head is normal, and her body is PLUS SIZED!! Helllloooooo, wake up America!

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Yep. I just realized when i saw your comment. Looks PS edit.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

hahahah I was thinking that too. Made me wonder how tall/wide she is. 6'2'' apparently.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

As someone with head size related self esteem issue I am Officially Offended. Per the Internet Accords, you must now kowtow profusely to me.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I've been trying to figure this out for a while, thank you

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Fuck I can't unseen that

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

And a belly.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Zika baby all grown up....

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 6

Too funny +1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

She must cry herself to sleep every night on a weeee pillow.

9 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 2

Yes! A Mike Myers classic.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

v

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I have the opposite problem. I'm almost 6 feet and I think I have a huge head.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

women with tiny heads need love too

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Maybe she is plus-sized, except tall-ways instead of wide-ways.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Awww I thought she was pretty awesome... more stuff for chicks to worry about, small heads

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

For the record. I also think she is awesome. Small head or not. We can't keep letting every little thing other people think/say bother us.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the head looks small since you're used to seeing these body proportions on a much smaller person. given her proportions, She's prob 6ft tall

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

perspective? idk though.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

That's what I thought. The camera is lower than her head and it's at a weird angle.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And toothpuck arms

9 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 12

That's why I like me some fitness models more, they actually work for their bodies (along with after effects) but it's not just trying to

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

To me it's a turn off

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Women being strong? I don't like bodybuilders, but I like fit women because it is a lifestyle I enjoy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Be skinny as a rail with no tone or defintion

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*toothpick

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 8

Sorry, he's probably Canadian.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Says the one that apologized for another person.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I'm so sorry he/she said that

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Based on all the comments I should be able to make an unpopular opinion puffin about being attracted to skinny girls....

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Its sad. Having chunky thighs and love handles is considered sexy now. Give me a flat tight belly and nice medium ass any day!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Don't get me wrong. I don't care what people are into but it's like I'm automatically an arsehole because of who I'm attracted to.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We can be assholes together

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also, the woman who takes care of herself now is likely to continue doing it 20 years from now.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Bingo!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Looks like I'm a chubby chaser then

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 5

good luck chasing her. she would be a challenge to chase down.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, you have more chance to catch the chubby ones, they can't run as fast

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Looks like we all are

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

She looks like a giantess, I think they mean plus sized as in she's 6'4" or something.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 5

plus size in the women's fashion industry has nothing to do with height, it's about weight. they're calling her fat in a PC way.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6'2''. Yes. Due to her size and fitness, she is quite heavy. It isn't wrong to say she is plus size. Those people are retards.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Would like to raise a glass you that guy, right there at the bottom. Him and so many men hate the media because of how they define women x

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

Seriously, it's impossible to pursue chubby women, they have so much self loathing they don't think I'm seriously hitting on them.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That & men feel a conflict between what they're 'supposed' to like & what they actually find attractive. That woman is objectively hot

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I don't think she is "objectively hot." Her arms are small as well as her head. Though other people probably think differently than I do.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

My point is that some may or may not find her attractive. Thus, not making her objectively anything.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

There is no conflict. I know what I like and I've liked it since kindergarten! I really don't think the media has that great of an effect.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All this could be resolved if women would just use inches/centimeter measurements.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Then they'll just associate certain inches with far

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well certain inches are fat for certain heights. People need to be healthy, nothing wrong with that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So? It is a quantifiable measurement. A woman could fluctuate fit +/- sizes based solely on the manufacturer.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Which is the most annoying thing on the planet. Pants shoping is the worst!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I agree. As a dude, I'll never understand the way women's clothes are measured.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

nominal sizing is easier to brand, which is why a GAP 36, Old Navy 36, and a Banana Republic 36 are all dif, despite being the same company

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Neither do we and every store does it differently which is why we have to try everything on.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And even within the same store, two pants of the same size and style won't always fit the same.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I was going to type something like that, but you said it way much better than I would have. Haha

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What the actual fuck......That is not "plus sized" by any stretch of the imagination.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 16

size 12. 6'2". 170lbs +/-. yeah, she is very big. not fat, but she is big.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

"plus sized" to me means "plump" 6'2 is amazonian

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

Lol. That should be the new category of models. Amazonian. And after that colossal

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

That is right, to you. Say whatever you want, her weight and size classify her as plus size. Those measurements use numbers, not appearance.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

She is plus size. People need to not be so easily offended. Taking offense to labels that allow you to buy clothing that fits you. Smh

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 19

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Aug 3, 2016 9:13 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I'm a size 0 in certain stores, and I can assure you I'm not overweight. It's usually based on hip size. I don't have wide birthing hips 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But sadly most plus sized stores don't have cloths that are longer. More of the stock is wider. You can go into most stores and get 1/

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A size 12 or 14 "long" pair of pants. That is why most people put plus sized with over weight. /2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I understand that entirely. Not every store has clothes for every size and certain women have trouble finding clothes that fit them. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Should they just put extra large on those pairs of clothing? Men have to wear xl and xxl. Some of them being the most for people I know. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not if you're short. My BMI is 24.5 and I'm a size 2. When my BMI is down near 22.5, I'm a 0 and 20 a 00. I'm 5'2.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So what you're saying is that dutch women have hard time being size 0?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In another comment. In the US, there's quite a bit more genetic diversity and range of sizes. N. Europeans are mostly giants.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The problem with that thinking is that plus-size labelled clothes are more expensive just bc of that label. It's like a "wedding" label.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's more material

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Size 0 to size 6 is also more material but 6 is not plus-size and the price is the same. It's not about the material, it's about making $$$

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah you're probably right. Isn't it always about money. I was just trying to make sense of it all.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The real problem is obesity is so rampant in our society that many can no longer recognize a healthy body size. Not just a random opinion...

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

We are all getting fatter. Its why "thick" Thursday and the girls in the pictures are all acceptable sizes now.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I do not accept obese thick Thursdays. But I always get downvoted to hell for saying so.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Me neither. I find it both physically unattractive and mentally. They got that way by having no self control.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Bingo.motherfucking.bango

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

This.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There are studies supporting that. And that's not to say anything about girl in picture...just a tangent

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Plus size doesn't mean unhealthy. That woman is 6'2'' and 170 lbs. She is Plus Size. Those measurements use numbers, not appearance.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

On this instance it doesn't because she's plus size but at a healthy body weight to her height. Commonly plus size is not that.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But is that model an unhealthy weight? Am I, at 5'2 and 129 pounds unhealthy? I feel like my weight is okay, for the most part...

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Thank you, I suffer so much all the time with the way that I look... At least science says I'm okay

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Depending on your body fat composition that is a healthy range for height weight. As is the model above. You can always check bmi & bf%

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don't eat a lot of sugar, bread, red meat and I love running and veggies but it's still not enough to look good

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your 'feelings' don't play into the fact of health or not. Your BMI is 24.4 the upper edge of 'normal'.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're right, I'm sorry. Thank you

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Weight is not always a good measurement of health. You could be heavier and healthier or lighter and less healthy.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I suppose

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But do you have a good personality?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I do try, I've been described as abnormally selfless but I don't think that's true. I do my best to always be kind and understanding

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love to help people and do volunteer work. It makes me uncomfortable to talk about this sort of thing, it feels like bragging.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe use some google. Robin is 6'2", so next to your average woman, yes, she is very big. size 12...170lbs approx.

9 years ago | Likes 596 Dislikes 53

I'm totally cool with calling a model plus size if she's over 5'11" lol

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 12

But that would be the tall collection, surely? As in there is usually petite, tall and plus sized options now

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

But I'm already outraged!!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But, is plus sized supposed to mean giant? I think the rest of us consider it to mean overweight.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

How do I buy this "google"? Will I find it at Walmart?

9 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 2

You can sometimes find special sales for google on Bing.com

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Thanks, yum yum cum shop!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh, Bing is branching out of Porn now?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

68Kgs, 189cm.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My friend have a similar stomach and average female height. She weighs in at 25% more than average models.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

This model can weigh MUCH more than average women.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Well call her plus-height if it unruffles FB's collective panties.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

it wont. it will be offensive to tall people probably.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The word you're looking for is 'tall.' Plus-sized implies someone bigger, not taller. She's normal weight for her height.

9 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 4

plus size in fashion industry means sizes 12-24, it doesn't mean fat. she IS bigger, her hips/bust everything is bigger but proportionate.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

im still laughing..is a giant big? you can call tall "big".

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Think "heavier" would have made your point more clear than "bigger." Just FYI.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

she is "bigger" for sure. proportionate? for sure (not one or the other) you get offended by a hot midget wearing kid stuff?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

You killed me on the midget bit. I actually snorted.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

She looks like a plus size model to me. Plus size and overweight are two different things. She does not need to lose weight.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Giselle Bundchen is 5'11" and 125lbs. That's a difference of 3 inches and 50 lbs.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But I feel gross now referring to a woman's body this way.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And if you put those numbers into a BMI calculator, the plus sized model is still considered normal weight at 21 BMI.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

So yeah, 125lbs at 5'11 is terribly thin and shouldn't be considered a "normal" by any stretch of the imagination

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Isn't this sorta like when bodybuilders are clasified as obese because of the insane muscle weight. Classification is screwy.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

It's more like calling a bodybuilder large. They *are* large, but "large" is so often used to mean "overweight" that it would cause offense.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

How is that not normal proportions? Cube law goddamnit!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it is normal 'proportions'. but she is still bigger than most women

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's not why she's a plus sized model. Plus sized models wear regular sized clothes, but bigger sizing than other models.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that makes no sense. regular sized clothes that are bigger sizes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Models are usually under size 4. She's a size 8. A regular person that's a size 8 is normal, a model that is size 8 is big. Size 16 is plus

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

She's tall for a woman, but not for a model.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

No, most female models are around 5'8 - 5'11, she is tall for a model. Hell most male models aren't even 6'2, although not by much.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If those are facts, she's arguably skinny.Height is waay above 95th percentile, weight is well below it. Source: cdc.gov growth charts

9 years ago | Likes 76 Dislikes 4

21.8 is in the normal range of BMI

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Growth charts? Huh? So, you think they're obligated to go by an average (whose average, then? the US?), rather than the ideal?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

Height is in the 99.99 percentile.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

One could argue, that they call her "plus-size" because she is very tall and needs plus-sized cloths.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

We all know that's not true

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Haha xD

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Plus size doesn't just mean fat. It means big in general.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 15

*when referring to models

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yay I'm just big in general then

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

If you're 6'2" you are a big girl... There's nothing wrong with that. But you are in the 99.99 percentile for US women. That's big.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm 5'11 But that's still pretty big I usually tower over everyone on the subway Except guys. I rarely see a woman the same height or talked

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

this is probably their "PC" version of not calling her "big" or an "Amazon". Some editor somewhere is saying "ummm, wooops"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

no, this is when it is known that large ladies that wear large clothes shop in the plus size department.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

both can be true. I'm just saying the wording had the unintended consequence of saying "women who look like this are fat"

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

maybe you could suggest the proper way to describe a model of plus sized clothing? big? large? not small?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

no, the wording says plus sized model....the inference by cry babies is that plus sized clothing means "fatty clothes".

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

the inference is made because there is no reference made to her actual size other than "plus size" and the industry preferring tiny women.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Holy shit, 6'2"? That makes het an Amazon goddess. A better representation of Wonder Woman than in the movies.

9 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 7

Gal Gadot is 5'10". Wonder Woman is 6'0". They are the same height difference apart.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

yep. the only people associating 'plus sized' with negative things is the people hating on it.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 12

Try telling some girls they are plus sized and see how positive they feel about that.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

try calling a man small and see how he...oh, he doesnt care.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 13

Yeah...that's not true

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Do they feel negative about being called minus sized?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

'Plus size' in women's clothes is a nice way of saying 'obese'. They're wider than they are tall, so, no; it has nothing to do with height.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Plus size means different things for modelling and clothes. Plus size models don't wear plus size clothes.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The only reason plus sized means something different in modeling, is they don't accept fat people.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They barely accept regular sized people.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

By the standards of the modelling industry, she's "fat", though.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

She is. But she's not fat by society standards.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But the classification of "plus sized" is misleading, considering the general public equate it with fat people.

9 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 11

'general public'? no, just haters.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 23

Why? Is there something wrong with being fat, besides personal health issues?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

well why would being called plus sized be a bad thing then?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

so because you don't understand it, it's misleading?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 10

It's not misleading. People are just ignorant of what plus sized actually means. They misunderstood and that's on them.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 28

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jun 24, 2019 10:35 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

We forced the narrative of the word "nigger" way back. Pretty much what I'm trying to stop here with plus size. Yay for sarcasm though!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's because a plus sized model wears regular sized clothes, but is bigger than most models. Plus size clothes are for fat people generally

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Generally they're for whoever has that measurement. Tall skinny and short fat can have the same hip measurements

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's true, but it's not directly related to her height.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would blame it on the marketing department for using an ambiguous term

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

It's a term that's been in place since before I was old enough to shop for my own clothes. Men have big and tall which is better imo

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

....no. Plus sized has always meant weight. She isn't plus sized. She's tall.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 8

Have you seen torrid or even ashro(I think that's the catalogue) models? They're plus sized but they're tall and slim with hips. That's plus

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought it meant not lower than like size 3 or something as there was a fad of models being size 0?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Incorrect. Plus sized means bigger than normal. A very tall girl with even great proportions will not fit in a size zero.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 9

No. Compare every other plus sized model with this one. They should have called her tall. Not plus sized.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

"You can be plus sized and attractive and healthy" "Plus sized models should look fatter" Pick ONE.

9 years ago | Likes 185 Dislikes 53

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Nov 11, 2016 4:21 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

No

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Definition ==> Plus-size: individual of average to larger stature (sometimes but not exclusively overweight or obese)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Plus sized" is never for a male. It's only for the females who actually believe they have to look like supermodels for some reason.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why is that? Why are there no plus sized male models? As a girl who loves big guys (virtically and horizontally) I'd really like that

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because models are used to advertise. And companies want to make money. Only girls cried about it enough to change what makes more money

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well that's just silly

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You have misunderstood something. Being slightly fatter than this "plus size model" is not still unhealthy.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 24

Being slightly fatter than this plus sized model is slight less healthy.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

It is if you're not six foot two

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, but the "embrace my fatness" people do not want to see someone *slightly* fatter ... that want what represents them; fucking fat.

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 10

You mean like that morbidly obese monument to our sins, Tess Holliday?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Those two statements are not contradictory...You can weigh more than this model and be attractive, and if you're ostensibly selling /1

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

clothes for fat people, it's pretty insulting to everyone to take literally a perfectly normal size for a woman and imply it's above /2

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

average in the weight category. 170lb is literally the exact ideal weight for someone her height. /3

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

What makes it the ideal, then? Isn't the "ideal" kind of the point? That's why they're called "models."

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

What makes it ideal is that it's the recommended healthy weight according to a bunch of doctor types.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The issue is the term plus sized. This girl is 6'2" and 170. Compared to the 5'4" 100 pound models you see a lot, she's "plus sized"

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 6

At 6'2'' she's "plus sized" to most of the people on the planet. Do you not realize how over average-sized she is?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why can't she just be a model without referring to her size since it really makes no fucking difference at all?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I understand that perfectly. Plus sized is just a term that the offended people relate to being overweight. Not tall and big.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I respectfully disagree. Women's clothing comes in standard sizes, and women use those artificial sizes to measure themselves.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Plus size is fat, or tall, or muscular... anything not mediocre.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Couldn't they just say model, or tall model?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Why?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

More clear? Plus sized sounds like some politically correct garbage meant to not offend obese individuals.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Who do you think pushes the use of such terms?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0