And Then There Were None

Feb 11, 2024 1:58 AM

Yupurineutah

Views

95510

Likes

1516

Dislikes

47

A new display at the museum.

Reminded me of this.

.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

*how every country in the Western Hemisphere

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

Came here looking for this. 😁

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Land O Lakes is the name of the city it is made from here in FL.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Really? Because that sounds like something made from margarine and the fat if alligators and retirees.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Minnesota, isn’t it?

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Land O'Lakes corporate headquarters is located in Arden Hills, Minnesota, just minutes outside of both Minneapolis and St. Paul. However, for years I thought is was Land O'Lakes, Florida. I live in Pasco County.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#1 won't ship international sadly. Anyone want to remail for me?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They had the perfect opportunity to change the name to Land-O-Calrissian.

2 years ago | Likes 119 Dislikes 2

Why the hell would they do that? It's a Minnesota company, we're known as the land of lakes.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And fuck with the mouse? He will end you and anyone who even knows your name.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The mouse would never allow it.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good old Capitalism Rat.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Land-O-Lakers, change the circle to a basketball.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The Land O'Lakes girl was painted by Patrick DesJarlait, a member of the Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians. He also designed the Hamms Beer bear. His personal non-commercial art was cubism inspired and focused on highlighting Native American industry, depicting fishermen, farmers, weavers, etc

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I use this butter. It is awesome

2 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

I use it for baking. Day to day I use whatever's on sale

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

As opposed to literally any other butter? What makes it different?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I use butter for a lot of stovetop cooking and Land-O-Lakes is the best for not just burning off in the skillet, almost like a fake butter but it's actually the real deal. Other butters may *taste* better, but if they fuck off halfway through the cook they're not doing me much good. So fancy Irish butters for when I want to taste butter, like spreading on toast, and cheaper L-O-L for cooking.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Compared to the generic wal mart brand butter, literally nothing. The product is produced exactly the same and the assembly line only verges at the end for different packaging. (From a previous land o lakes employee)

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I knew it! Thank you!

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the lakes

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's a good all around butter for baking and spreading. (At least compared to what was available growing up in the Midwest in the 90s)

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Asking the real question! Do tell, @pennypoohbear ? 😏

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm sure it's the butter that was used in Last Tango in Paris.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It has a very fine butter taste. It spreads pretty easy. It's pretty not high priced

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fun fact: the Land-O-Lakes butter and the generic Wal Mart brand butter literally come off the same assembly line and only verge at the end for different packaging. (From a land o lakes employee)

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Curious you said "use", not "eat"....

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, do you eat butter on its own?

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

He cut out the big O on the box for... reasons.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Do you want to know the complicated part , indigenous status is granted based on tribal membership and cultural affiliation, not genetics. So someone who is 1/32 indigenous can be indigenous if they have tribal elders sign off on it , but someone who is 1/4 indigenous is not indigenous if no tribal body will acknowledge them due to their grandparent refusing to acknowledge paternity of their parent. or the grandparent being disgraced and exiled.

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Weird. It's almost as if genocide and colonization by design destroys culture to establish and maintain capitalism.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

Nationality is not based on genetics but participation. An American of 1/4 Swedish descent will be less Swedish than a 1/32 Swede whose parents moved to Sweden, or many people who completely lack ethnical Swedish ancestry but integrate and become part of the nation. Thinking that it's primarily about genetics is pure racism.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

WTF? I'm an American of 100% Dutch descent whose parents moved to America. That was by choice. The Kalapuya, among so many other nations, didn't get the choice to integrate and become part of the "nation". And to this very day are not fully accepted as part of it because of genetics and pure racism.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

The absurdity kicks in when the person who is genetically 1/4 indigenous is required to attend mandatory racial sensitivity training course at their college delivered by the person who is 1/32 indigenous and learn about how to overcome their white privlige.

This is manifestly unjust.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

I think you left a couple of your pearls unclutched. Do tell, is that true or did you see that on Fox?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

The middle image where the Land O Lakes woman is flipping off McDonalds makes me wonder what McDonald's did to native Americans

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I zoomed in and I think it says "McColonizer speaks to the impact of the colonial diet on indigenous communities' health and wellbeing over multiple generations"

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Hey, seriously? Thank you. I appreciate it.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I was curious myself. Another commenter says:

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're welcome. I was curious too. I'm also slightly short-sighted so I'm pretty practiced at making words out of blurs.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean to be fair, Native Americans didn't have dairy so they appropriated the imagery to begin with.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

This. I think the original image invokes a "squaw" cheerfully hunching over a butter churn. Apparently the First Peoples and many other peoples cannot digest dairy in adulthood.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

If a butter logo affects your life significantly, maybe you should re examine your priorities

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

I like butter. But if forced farming involves the genocide of other peoples maybe you should re-examine yours. 😘

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

Fucking stupid. It's a logo. The butter company didn't kill anyone, fucking obviously

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Slave laborers are routinely denied health care and drop the fuck dead. So they kind of fucking do kill them.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#2 They make use of prison labor.

2 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

Damnit... I've already tried to boycott Tyson for their covid BS now eggland and land o lakes too?

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If you are trying to avoid corporations benefiting from the slavery I have bad news its pretty much all of them. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ILAB/child_labor_reports/tda2019/2020_TVPRA_List_Online_Final.pdf

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So can American companies be allowed to use said labor sources?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The US prison system is one of the largest uses of slave labor in the western world and all state sanctioned. And yes US companies use them quite a bit. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2022/jun/15/us-prison-workers-low-wages-exploited

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean the foreign ones. Like how is Nike still allowed to do that?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Pocahontas wasn't Kalapuyan, tho

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a Grand Ronde tribal member, I approve.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"And Then There Were None" Imagine making your book title so racist that you have to change it twice because even the second title was still racist.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 1

I like how they were called racist for removing the racist logo. If there's anything a Democrat hates it's a Democrat who isn't Democrat enough.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

It wasn't a racist logo. Depicting native Americans in a respectful manner isn't racist. It was removed because of white hysteria, not because of criticism from the nation depicted.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Yup them damn Democrats smuggling in uppity Injuns to stir up trouble for sorry racists. I think there's still a billionaire's fart you have failed to inhale.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 12

I don't like billionaires.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Well you don't look it right now.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Sounds like a 'you' problem.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They weren't called racist, it's a meme.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The original logo was an example of the Droste effect, in which an image appears within itself https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droste_effect

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Wow. We had at least one of those tins but it is long lost. I still have this one though. /gallery/Z0he0Ne

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Don't forget about Hawaii. We did the queen so dirty. She tried to keep their sovereignty by working with the American government. Now a bunch of rich people own the Oceanside real estate with most of the indigenous descendants financially struggling and pushed inland. And any number of other "territories" such as Guam, whose people fight our wars without the benefits given to our soldiers.

2 years ago | Likes 141 Dislikes 0

Such a wonderfull country this united states is /a

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hawaii was going to get taken over by someone because of their strategic location and inability to prevent it. It would have been much worse if Japan had invaded them. We at least let them keep some of their culture and didn’t kill all of them.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Preach!! As a native of Guahan thank you. We are never recognized and still colonized

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Hawaii also recently struck down the second amendment because it violated the Spirit of Aloha. That's obviously not going to survive challenges, but it means we're also responsible for every shooting death on the islands. Those guns wouldn't be there if not for MURICA.

2 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

I mean yes and no, Kamehameha bought guns and cannons from European traders to gain control of the islands creating the Kingdom of Hawaii

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Good. I'm sick of hearing about daily school shootings on the mainland. We have failed to be a decent country, even in regards to our own citizens.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The spirit of aloha might be a contributing factor as to why they’re a conquered nation. :(

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 5

You should read up on history, because that ain’t it. The real answer has more to do with capitalism and overwhelming military power against a tiny island nation. You can google “Hawaii annexation illegal” for more info.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Her queen even attempted to work legally with our government. They would have been better off fighting us.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

NATIVE. LIVES. MATTER.

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 7

Which is why they removed the woman, it was offensive

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

That occurred to me as well. Hopefully they will have enough insight to change the entire label to something less obvious that they only removed the native.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

They removed the woman but kept her land. Thats even more offensive.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

The point is they literally removed it out of respect for the natives and they get ripped on for doing the opposite

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

2 years ago | Likes 293 Dislikes 7

I don't get it.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

v

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Thiiiiiiccc butter

2 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 2

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

fuck yeah

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Still with the feathers thou, eh

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

“Double cream”

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well butter Mah tits.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

v

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh my god it’s even drawn to reference the cutout boob joke

2 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

Yes. Yes, they did. /gallery/uSToVLv/comment/1810653175 NSFW

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I cant see the content of the link. Can you explain it?

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Someone photoshopped the Poovey Farms image, to place her knees up at her chest, including duplicating the "bulge" on the one knee on both, to make it look like a pair of breasts.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

it doesn't count if you boof it

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Eatin' ain't cheatin' and soaking ain't focking.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Pam is sooo sexy

2 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 4

v

2 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

Wrong Pan but you got the spirit

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

wrong pan indeed

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We try not to sexualize Pam

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Mu favorite part about #2: They changed their image to zoom her breasts out of the frame (FOR REASONS) before realizing it was racist.

2 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 17

I remember as kids we would take it and fold it so her knees became her boobs

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

My dad showed me this in the 80s. I passed it along to future generations. Land O Lakes robbed us of our heritage.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

It wasn't racist. It was created by an indigenous artist and is in no way comparable to other tasteless depictions like the Redskins or anything like that. The "food mascot panic" basically removed all diversity from store shelves and put nothing in its place. But white people are fine, we've still got Orville Redenbacher...

2 years ago | Likes 95 Dislikes 9

"Red Lake Ojibwe artist Patrick DesJarlait updated Mia's image in the 1950s. Her clothes were changed to match specific Ojibwe styles, and the background became a specific location in the Ojibwe territory, the Red Lake in Minnesota."-Wikipedia

2 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 1

Hold up on the Redskins logo:
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2021/dec/07/a-native-american-designed-washingtons-logo-now-his-family-want-it-back

The logo was a composite of portraits of a Blackfeet chief named White Calf (who was marketed to wealthy tourists of Glacier National Park as Two Guns White Calf). Blackie considered the logo a sort of “unification symbol” among Native Americans.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I may have meant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_Wahoo

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, wasn't the tribe proud of it and said they wanted it to stay?

2 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

Well if you're going to say that, elucidate us of which tribe you speak.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 9

No clue, just heard something about how they were proud of it because she was from their tribe.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Ojibwe. And an Ojibwe artist drew it originally. I'm fine with it being gone obviously, but I don't think this depiction is the same as some others we've seen disappear. (Aunt Jemima...)

2 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Thanks. But don't get me in this mess. https://youtu.be/Rg4lpu_9iKE?si=h7lvuAR7ss89GoZq

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Awesome. Who?

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 12

He makes popcorn.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Thanks Orville

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

As a Native American seeing the "Land O Lakes" Indian woman on your butter package made my family and myself feel sense of pride and loved by your company. Showing Native Americans on such a simple and wholesome product as American Butter made us feel "honored" as a guest in everyone's home. The new package looks blank and lifeless. Instead of reminding us that Native Americans are honored at everyone’s dinner table, the blank container reminds us of the "erasure" 1/2

2 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 2

of the my peoples and culture, who where here long before the colonization of North America.”
Change.org
Erin Dixon,
Chair of the Wopumnes Nisenan-Mewuk
a Federally Documented, 1935 IRA Voting Tribe

I don’t know if that is all Native American’s stance, but it shows many didn’t want her removed

2 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 2

Who is responsible for this erasure? I mean I'm sure it's not the actual minorities themselves, rather people using you as "something" to morally elevate themselves.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'd say anyone that automatically assumes that depictions of Native Americans are racist holds a small part of the blame

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When do we get to hear about reparations for Native Americans?

2 years ago | Likes 370 Dislikes 27

Hah!

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That was a genocide America has decided that didn't happen or if it did happen it was the British and French and Spanish and not America. But if it was America those were savages that God said it was okay to rape and murder.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The very spirit of 'Manifest Destiny'.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

How about we give all state and national parks back to the native population? They should also receive the budget for the parks for any upkeep necessary.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 9

They’re doing this in Australia.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If you want the spoils of war you have to win first.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

In this economy?? /s

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Apparently reparations means allowing them to operate casinos and the ability to screw over peiple with tight slots, smoky keno rooms, and showrooms with C List Performers from the 80s.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 43

You lost me at "allowing them".

2 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

BTW username checks out.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Natives loving on the rez do get some money from the federal government.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

*living.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

We gave them a scrap of land and only killed most of them. They should be grateful! /s

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Doesn't matter the country, reparations to a native population always seems to be a tricky conversation. For the oppressors anyway.

2 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Because the people the reparations should go to (and from, for that matter) are no longer here. Many of their descendants are also mixed with the "oppressors". The most equitable way to do it is just factor in their background when figuring out wealth transfers.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I get what you are saying. But in Australia the fact that their decendants are now mixed with their oppressors was actually part of their oppression - the whites literally had a policy to "breed out the black" which included a great deal of rape and "the stolen generations". Besides, the successors to those that did the crimes have been profiting off that wealth for generations so hard to say they are no longer here when the material wealth is so easily traceable

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Problem is, it won't be the people who profited who pay, it'll be the average tax payer whose ancestors came to live slightly less shit lives than they had back home, or got deported, or fled world war 2 and got sent here by the red cross. People whose ancestors got rich by oppressing people are still rich enough that consequences don't exist for them.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Australië, New Zealand, Brazil, Israël the same fucking story. Consume the resources, exploit the people and spit them out.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

That wouldn't even be the next big step. The next big step would be to finally leave them alone on what tiny bits of land they still have and and not take any more every time someone wants to build a pipeline. Before paying reparations, first stopping to accumulate reasons for why reparations are deserved. That would already be huge.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I always vote for whatever casino laws the natives want to go through so I hope I'm helping.

2 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 4

It doesn't help that much, Yes it gives them money but there are huge problems on the reservation with the addiction to gambling and a lot of these people stay really broke because they're constantly gambling and losing everything. I've lived on these reservations before and they can get really bad to the point when you're bringing a little bit of money it is a high likeliness you'll get robbed, Even if you remember of the tribe.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Our local tribe’s casino is so successful they bought one of the Vegas casinos. That takes serious money. And everyone in the tribe gets a UBI of something like $3k. I sincerely wish this kind of success could be even across tribes.

2 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

I think a good start is upholding the treaty the us keeps breaking

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The removal of the native woman was apparently because the image itself was racist and the natives wanted her gone.

2 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 4

There's the catch. It doesn't make them removing it non-racist. The only proper course is to get educated on the matter and implement effective reparations to the members of the Native community.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 7

I had a daydream a while back where they had artists from various tribes do art for the boxes and they rotated the art

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

A better daydream would be to have the corporation(and the profits extracted over the past 3 generations, with interests) handed over to the Natives and the employees and get rid of the WASP capitalist cishet males that own it.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 10

Like the person who did that design of the logo originally, you mean? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_DesJarlait. You can't do that. White people think it's racist if it depicts native Americans.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

If someone takes a step in the right direction we want to encourage that not shit on them for it

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tiny steps 'in the right direction' without reaching the actual right policies are worse than worthless. Their purpose is to neutralize the pressure to change without changing and prolong the capitalistic, imperialist ice, racist, exploitative, unjust status quo.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

When does it end though? How far back can we ask for reparations for something no one alive today had anything to do with? I have a larger than average amount of Neanderthal DNA. Can I get some reparations up in here? đŸ€·â€â™‚ïž

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 23

At least a few generations after the last major injustice, I'd say. And since most countries with an indigenous populations are still committing injustices against them...

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

The last residential school (a place where they forcibly took First Nations children to "re-educate" them in the ways of the colonizer) closed in 1996. Why don't you take your racist opinion and shove it up your average white man from Mississippi ass? You PERSONALLY were likely alive, if not your IMMEDIATE FAMILY, you ignorant fuck-knuckle. You do realize the place in which you LIVE is a First Nations word that you assholes misspelled when your ancestors were killing the inhabitants, right?

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You tell em. The idea that people today have “nothing to do with” injustices to various populations is ludicrous. For christs sake. If you eat at McDonald’s that uses slave labor, you’re still part of slavery. The fact that “it’s ok because the workers ‘did crimes’” is idiotic when it is a crime to be non-white in most parts of the US.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I mean... aren't we kinda seeing that with the attitude shift towards Israel? A not insignificant amount of people I've seen say they have no right to the land but Israel did used to be a place and it's destruction is what led to the Jewish diaspora

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Then like the natives they should have fought harder. They lost, they should have gotten over it and move on like people always have.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Sorry, just want to be clear here:

Are you saying that you're ok with someone stronger than someone else just taking what they want without repercussions?

Or are you saying that it's OK to trick the less fortunate into moving from their generationally inherited property, relocating them by force if they refuse?

Or are you saying that a contract formed under false pretenses is legally binding?

BECAUSE. ALL. OF. THAT. HAPPENED. TO. THE. NATIVE. AMERICANS.

Read a book, you total dumbfuck.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

And he blocked me, but not before posting his opinion to make it look like he got the last word.

What a fucking waste of oxygen. Somewhere out there is a tree he owes an apology to.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I am saying that throughout human history the strong have taken from the weak. That the native Americans are still even around to complain about their past treatment is the exception not the rule. The people of today still alive are owed nothing for whatever happened to their ancestors.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You still have native Americans!?

2 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 11

You guys get Native Americans?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

In this economy? We had to get store-bought. It's a regular spaghetti-western around here.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We do, but their communities are battling extreme poverty, some don't have running water or electricity. We shoot them with water cannons when they peacefully protest against pipelines going through their lands and burial grounds. You know, we've really learned from our past atrocities and genocide. That last line is /s.

2 years ago | Likes 118 Dislikes 4

If anything, the natives should have a share of the profit from pumping the oil through their territory, at the very least. More than that they should be given actually farmable/usable land and significant government support.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And that pipeline they said would leak and protested about...it did in fact leak

https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/dakota-pipeline-protests/pipeline-spills-176-000-gallons-oil-creek-150-miles-dakota-n695111

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

When I lived in Omaha I was in the little Mexico part of town, which also had native Americans. They all received checks based on what percent native American they were.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Of course you did learn from the atrocities and genocides: they are effective and no one cares about minorities.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yes people do care about minorities. Imperialists, capitalists, and those in power do not. But many millions of us regular ppl do care about them.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So, why is there still oppresion? If you care about minonities, go riot whenever minorities are oppresed, and fight for their basic rights. Otherwise saying: "I care about minorities, so I always post on the internet how furious I am about their situatuon." Are just meaningless words.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1