This is awesome.

Oct 12, 2017 11:39 AM

tazlah

Views

146260

Likes

2582

Dislikes

49

Happy Not-a-Father's Day

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Money grabbing cunt

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

smart and rich, too bad I'm not into necrophilia.

8 years ago | Likes 585 Dislikes 1

Anyone can get into it, just need a shovel.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You dont have to be. You just gotta be a brave female with a turkey baster

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can't say you're not into it if you haven't tried it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Only one of the parts need to be into necrophilia for it to work ;)

8 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 1

HA!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Geeze, had billions but still too greedy and hateful to share any even after death. Maybe daughter did believe she was his, sex happens.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You are not the father dance

8 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 3

Seriously, once you're dead, what the fuck does it matter. Let her have a few million to keep her happy. What you gonna do with it?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Why does Imgur just fucking looooooove it when men don't have to pay child support? Like great, I'm all for justice, but you guys are 1

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

obsessed with this one specific example of it. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 12

Thanks for downvoting me to help prove my point...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Neat.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Every time I hear about a rich person challenging a paternity suit with good lawyer, I wonder how many child support cases Didn't have that.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I'd wager 90% of them

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Daniel, I get what you're doing but we only need a vial of blood not a vat of semen.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

70% of black american males dont live with their kids. Why do they act as if they won the fucking lottery every time they are not the father

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

child support

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sure... But that wasnt the point.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The capitalization in this post is very cringey.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

8 years ago | Likes 128 Dislikes 5

my friends call it Gilf since you can still verbally say it. how would you pronounce gmilf D:

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Brutal

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Zat is, a grandmas I woulds likes to *guitar squelch*

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

I gotta rewatch now

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Hey, Tokis, what is thats in your carts?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A library for food

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v her reaction when she found out

8 years ago | Likes 399 Dislikes 5

Hey that’s me! +1

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

That guy's mouth is entirely too large.

8 years ago | Likes 74 Dislikes 4

There is never a time where I see this gif where I don't think that

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Lawrence is perfect what are you talking about

8 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

You should see his boobs

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Inheritance is the antithesis of meritocracy, just for the record.

8 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 18

Well, no shit.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Alexis de Tocqueville had some interesting things to say on this subject.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

are you trying to tell me that falling out of a convenient vagina is not an accomplishment?!? nor the way one falls out

8 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 1

Convenient vagina is my new band name!

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Sounds Heavy Alternative. Like if Alanis Morissette went metal.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

wut?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And yet the party of bootstraps and personal responsibility wants to eliminate the estate tax.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

The party of personal responsibility would be the Libertarians. They want to eliminate all taxes, so yeah.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Well libertarians are bunch of idiots and I don't consider their political views legitimate if they truly want to eliminate all taxes.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Honestly only ancaps do, but they're anarchists so what do you expect. Most libertarians just want to minimize government and taxes.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I respect it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yes, but at the same time, most people want what's best for their children. So if I'm rich and have kids, of course I will want them (1)

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 4

I agree with you (in reality) but as a thought experiment, I think it would lessen entitlement and arrogance.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

to inherit my wealth. Not my job, or anything else, but why wouldn't I want to try to give them a leg up. (2)

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

Well we have the right to dislike them for that.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your wealth is the lessons you've learnt over the years mate

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Additionally, it's my money, and I am allowed to do with it what I want. There's nothing wrong with wanting to leave it for my kids (3)

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

Is that fair for people who aren't rich? No, but it would be equally unfair for anyone to tell me what I had to do with my own wealth (4)

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

I believe you just explained one reason why communism is antithetical to freedom. Not related to the content, but it's what came to mind. A+

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Just my two cents.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

True. But an actual meritocratic system is inefficient because it ignores heritable traits and the tendency of money to flow to some.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 12

Hmm. How does a meritocracy ignore heritable traits? If there is something good which is genetic, it would cause good results in each

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Because in a meritocracy parents would be taxed but their similarly talented/educated kids would re-earn the money. [1]

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's inefficient because workers, bureaucracy, etc, would all drain some of that money just to return it to the family. [2]

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Generation, no?

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Idea taken further: differentiate money from genetics.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think he's confusing meritocracy with... Whatever it is when those who work hard do well regardless of results

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

No. I'm saying that because intelligence and discipline are both moderately heritable and are the strongest 2 predictors of success... [1]

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Isn't doing well a result?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

.. that a meritocracy that prevents kids from inheriting money is inefficient because the money just returns to the family. [2]

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But it does not immediately return. It first gets cycled through multiple parties before the kids re-earn it. [3]

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Each hand-off between the parents and the their children siphons off a little bit of that money, to pay for the system and its workers. [4]

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0