Dern space plastic!

Apr 19, 2021 3:57 PM

WrongDonkey

Views

106881

Likes

2106

Dislikes

34

Energy is proportional to the square of the velocity!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Aluminium is a really soft metal, and that's a big piece of plastic. Thats about a solid cubic inch.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

15,00 mph???

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

?noredirect

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

15000 not 1500 mph

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So, 8 legos to take out the Death Star?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you make 'em go fast enough, yeah!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is why spacewalks always terrified me.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

15,00mph

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

F = MA

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its also kinetic energy, KE=1/2mv^2 the transfer of energy to that slab is what caused the hole

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Stop posting this fake bullshit.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean i dont believe it

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is why I'm convinced space travel is impossible. Unless we figure out wormholes. Or some kind of shield

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The solution to this problem is sitting at the right edge of the picture, called Whipple shielding it's stacks of thin metal sheets with

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

gaps between. It breaks up the projectile with each layer spreading the force over a larger and larger area, until each piece no longer has

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

enough mass to penetrate further, despite still maintaining most of it's speed. It's used on the ISS and other manned stations

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

so why do they have blocks of aluminium floating around in space, that sounds pretty dangerous in of itself.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What the fuck is a 15,00 mph?

5 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 2

Fifteen-hundred. 1,500

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

15 miles and 0 cents

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

A typo.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

In here that just reads as 15 mph.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was a Walmart bag

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's what Taco Bell does to my asshole

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shields up god damnit !!

5 years ago | Likes 185 Dislikes 1

We'll need them soon. the amount of space trash elon is putting out there will trap us all here.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is what happens when you lose your Bridge Deflector Shield

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

15 MPH or 15,000 MPH, I am confused ?‍♂️?

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

15000

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Thanks

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Looked it up, just under 15000 mph

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Looks like Lego is just as dangerous in space as it is here on Earth

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

One of the reasons why you can't leave your aluminium in space.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

One of the biggest holes in most sci-fi is that any ship usable for fast long-distance travel is also a WMD if you just point it at a planet

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

That's why I flipped out when they did it in Star Wars. I'd always thought "what if", but then they actually did it and it was amazing.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Not really a hole. The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress, Gundam, Mass Effect, Halo etc. all have kinetic orbital strikes. It was a trope in the 60s.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

The Expanse also has a book that deals with orbital strikes

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I liked this concept in G.I. Joe Retaliation. Just take a large chuck of tungsten and drop it from a satellite.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the difference is that would not be that destructive IRL, it looked based on Project Thor. not WMD more like bunker buster.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

AKA Rods from God

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

“That means, Sir Isacc Newton is the deadliest son-of-a-bitch in space!” Love that quote in Mass Effect.

5 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

And the guys being lectured run a couple of hard sci-fi websites.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Let's be honest, those slugs are the least of Earth's concerns.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

What if it was covered with bedliner? Seriously, has anyone tested it as protection for space vehicles? It can withstand explosives.

5 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 2

Water would get trapped under the bed liner and over time will rust the aluminum.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How would it react in a vacuum and at extreme temperatures? Not to mention it would add significant weight

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

KE=1/2mv^2, where KE=kinetic energy, m=mass, and v=velocity. KE dissipated via plastic deformation of Al block.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

hazarding a guess, bedliner is good for its elasticity, not its ablation. Concussive forces and kinetic forces are different. merits there.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Pentagon, sprayed the whole outside of the building with bed liner to make it more resistant to grenades and explosives like 15 years go

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you are serious, Google supersonic impacts and do some reading. I'm not smart enough to explain why not. I can only say "hahahahaha no."

5 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 2

Will do. Thanks.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Isn't every impact in space super sonic?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, because in space there is no air so sound can't travel in it!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The vacuum isn't particularly relevant, other then making those speeds sustainable. The speed of sound through the target and the projectile

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

are still relevant. Speed of sound through aluminum is 8-18x STP air (different speeds depending on metal grain direction).

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was supersonic as far as the metal was concerned.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, but everyone you are going to want to absolutely avoid, yes.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm pretty sure since soubd doesn't travel in vacuum all velocities are faster than sound.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes, you win. I was merely trying to point out where to learn that stuff gets to a new level of destructive when going especially fast.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you want to be that technical, an object has to be a sound source to be super sonic. It can't be one in space so nothing is super sonic.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Funnily enough, a cardboard box covered with bedliner would provide much, much better protection per unit of mass. Projectiles break on ⤵

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

⤷ the first impact, so the next wall suffers multiple smaller and slower impacts. At a certain number of boxes all debris will be stopped ⤵

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

⤷ and despite the space used you won't even approach the mass of aluminum, which is the most important metric in, you know, space.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Ah yes but what about the catches on fire quotient?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No air ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Once you reach ~1100 miles per second we have another problem. The object is now moving faster than the the force keeping atoms apart 1/2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

can overcome, meaning the atoms on the leading face of the object can now collide and fuse with atoms in front of it. Kaboom! 2/2

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Good idea but orbital velocities are mind boggling. The fastest muzzle velocity publicly available is 1,422 m/s, average orbital's 17,000mph

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

1422 m/s = 3180(,9) mph

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ewww, measuring in two different systems at once. Measure it in bananas per minute like the rest of us.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah I agree but 140 characters ?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I hate to shoot down your figures, but 1,422 miles per second is ~305 times faster than 17,000 miles per hour.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

m/s = meters per second

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't white knight the guy who mixed their units of measurement when they get mocked for doing so.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah sorry I meant meters per second vs miles per hour, problem with being limited to 140 characters.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was simply clarifying :)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How big is that piece of aluminum? Need banana scale.

5 years ago | Likes 691 Dislikes 5

About 4

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

treefiddy

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Big, there's a photo out there of a block hit by somthing a lot slower and lighter and it left a 30cm wide 10cm deep crater.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately this is fake.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

5 years ago | Likes 373 Dislikes 0

Ba na na.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not a banana but still good comparison.

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Thanks!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I always see goatsee

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's hard to unsee that.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Now I can't unsee it. My childhood memories of the early internet are returning D=

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

See I thought that crater was the size of a Dwayne Johnson

5 years ago | Likes 225 Dislikes 0

I estimate it would reguire roughly 100 grams to make a crater the size of one to 1.5 Dwayne Johnsons.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not sure is the same crater now that I think about it

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

I believe it is, but am not 100% certain.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

This one is full penetration, OP is not (though likely significant spalling)

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Without a banana could that not be the hand of a giant?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The real question is why use shitty aluminum as a basis of protection against speeding bullets?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Space is hard. Heavy is far more expensive to get there.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Aluminum plates are light enough to haul a pile of them into orbit. Heavy armor is, well, heavy.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

And also need to see what would happen if a banana hit it at that speed...

5 years ago | Likes 146 Dislikes 0

Probably worse because the banana would be frozen solid..

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now you're asking the REAL questions.

5 years ago | Likes 55 Dislikes 0

You put.... You put your dick in it?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I need to see how t f you get a banana up to 24000 km/h... Probably the same way they get a piece of plastic that fast, but I want to see.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I guess you could get 2U worth of banana going at about that speed for maybe $30K, not including camera to send the meme back to Earth.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought it could be done on earth, tbh. I can't afford that unfortunately.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The cannon needed to get it up to speed would be way too long on earth. A banana can't handle much acceleration.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I never knew I wanted to know that, Until now

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

For science and such...

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

About the size of a D20

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

Addendum: one that a usual DM would allow?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So about 15mm the.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Ish

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You seem like the one to ask: is there a DnD spell that either directly or can be bootlegged into "Railgun"?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Just get a long line of peasants..

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most DMs wouldn't allow it. Too shenanigans for play. Also wildly impractical because to achieve any respectable velocity you need roughly

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6000 peasants. Assuming you need this to do significant damage you need to be hitting 5,000fps minimum.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean, kinda? Xanathar's spell called catapult - launches an object at speed. My wizard would use it to fire bundles of dynamite at things.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Impact damage plus explosive. Otherwise you're on the peasant railgun experiment which few DMs would allow because shenanigans.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For those in the US 14g is about 1/2 an Ounce.

5 years ago | Likes 307 Dislikes 11

Haha stupid americans

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 11

Thats like calling someone stupide for not speaking "X" language when their country/area only speaks "Y" language

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or 14 wet eagle feathers.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

About the weight of three US quarters.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We know and use grams, liters, meters, but less so kilometers. It's celsius that fucks us up. People forget US is dual system.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Everyone in America can do weed math Bub....

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

we know we smoke weed

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1. We measure our illicit drugs in grams. 2. The GBBS taught me how to bake, and my recipes are metric. 3. Suck my eagle.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bald eagle feather

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Let them learn normal units.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But . . Americans use grams too . . Just look at the back of any food packaging. Or the scale your drug dealer uses. We all know half an O.

5 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

So glad I’m a science nut. I’m American, but think in metric. SOOO MUCH EASIER!!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or about 1/32nd of the weight of a football

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I buy enough weed to know the conversion

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

No for the US 14 grams is about the size of a canary. ;)

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or the size of a hot wheels car. Or 1/4 of a hot dog

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or 1/10 of a dual pronged pool que

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How many washing machines per hour as that?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

0.125 of a 0.25lb hamburger (precooked weight, may contain beef)

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Those of us old-school pot smokers were well aware of this particular conversion.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

All the Americans who smoke pot just not saying anything

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

We know what grams are thanks to pot

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And what kind of bullets goes to standard pistols?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or between 2 and $500 depending what ur looking for.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And 24.000 km/h is about 15,000 mph!!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

How many washing machines is that?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But how many washing machines is that??

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's exactly half an ounce. 1 oz = 28g

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

It's most likely *defined* as half an ounce by the experiment, then someone converted that to normal units.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

its like .49

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It’s 28.35 grams

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Technically correct, best kind of correct. +1

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

All this time my fucking drug dealers been ripping me off for .3 grams

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oh, I know what half an ounce is.

5 years ago | Likes 235 Dislikes 1

I zee what you did there.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

See you tomorrow.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I laughed and thought well drugs did teach me conversions so there is that

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Can confirm

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A chef I worked with would quiz people on conversions in interviews (ie. How many cups in a gallon, teaspoons in a quarter cup, etc) 1/?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If they didn't know, they'd get flustered, and then he'd ask them how many grams in an ounce. They'd get super excited to finally know 2/?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

One, and blurt out "28.2!". He'd just smirk, say "druggy", and continue the interview. Always funny

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

About $100

5 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 0

Jesus Christ... $100 I wouldn't pay that for half an ounce and I buy mostly from over priced rec shops..

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Dang. If I paid for it that would be around an ounce or more here

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only insulin is this expensive.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

My fellow American

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You must not live somewhere that it’s legal (or quasi-legal)

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Nope. And it's been a very long time since I was a purchaser. (Around 1975)

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Little more expensive for me.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As someone who lives in a legal state. Growers without licenses undercut the market. $100 an OZ for me.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I said that the wrong way, meant the opposite lol

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I can get an oz for $45. Your country scares me.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yah for mids hwads will be 300 an oz. Source. I smoke a lot and no its not legal in Ohio yet

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Heads* sorry

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your dealer's are going to hate legalization.. I remember $300 ounces. Now top shelf probably cost that much at a rec shop. Street is like /

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

40-50% cheaper.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One of the reasons why I loved the Expanse series, their usage of ballistic weapons in space!

5 years ago | Likes 149 Dislikes 0

You should look into battlestar next

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1) Railguns are standard faire in contemporary military scifi literature. The idea that a single ship with railguns can effectively destroy

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

2) or conquer an entire planet without defenses has permeated the mil scifi zeitgeist. And it is terrifyingly true. Orbital bombardment is

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

3) one of the scariest future threats.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Literally watching it now

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, All I think about watching the expanse battles is "Someone, somewhere, sometime, is gonna catch a stray PDC shell..."

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Niven was good about that also. Dropping a cloud of ball bearings or iron filings behind you to fuck up pursuers, etc.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

In the Revelation Space series, during a chase one ship released parachutes 1 atom thick that the pursuers had to dodge

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Photon torpedoes from star trek were actual ballistics

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Weirdly enough, there is a Star Trek ENT episode called ‘The Expanse’ where they used ‘photonic’ torpedoes, an upgrade of ‘spatial’ torpedos

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Putting a ship into a spin to maximize PDC coverage was a mind blowing moment to me.

5 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 1

And as the gif provided below, it also looks real cool

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Anakin was right. It IS a good trick.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That's the exact scene that came to mind.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

PDC?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Point Defense Cannon. Brrrrt but in space.

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

But, (naval) ships have always turned/maneuvered to maximize firepower via broadsides so its not exactly revolutionary. Just more axis.

5 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Wouldn’t anything spinning technically be “revolutionary?”

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

A+

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Dad get out!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The tactic itself isnt revolutionary, but depicting space combat realistically is uncommon. Often its treated like a 2d naval battle.

5 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 1

Ah gotcha. I feel like space combat in Expanse was good but definitely very close quarters with how massive space is. That said, we have no>

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

>> actual documented space battles to choose from and I prefer to see shit blow apart.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Jack Campbell's Lost fleet seies depicts space battles with absolute brilliant realism not just in direction & distance but also in time.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

In the books they regularly talk about thousands of kilometers distance during battles, but they consider that "close" quarters, relatively.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

because it looks better on screen, also why TV and Film scifi always does combat at visual range.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

space ships firing at sensor returns at light second ranges is just a submarine movie in space.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

With the weapons in the expanse you have to fight at close range, non-missile sublight weapons can be dodged more easily at greater ranges.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0