10 riddles for the weekend

Jun 4, 2016 9:44 AM

Gobobo

Views

56336

Likes

2421

Dislikes

118

#2 they are both 33 Boom! The "father" adopted the "son" cause they are gay and needed benefits before marriage was legal

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

No one has eyes in the last one, so no one is looking at anything

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Chess players are playing completely different people

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1: 10, 2: 51, 15

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

60, 06 I feel like that one has too many answers

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#10 they are lady doctors

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

the point is that no one is lying, they are his sisters.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#1 7

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Assuming they removed the dead fish from the tank.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

or were eaten...which is common.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thats got to be some retarded fish if they manage to drown

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 2

Improper aeration of the water? If it stagnates sufficiently, they can drown I believe.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well I guess its me who's the retard

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I guess technically there are 10...

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Mountaincroissant msheepsick. Easy.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

#11, doubledickdude holding a bucket of water. #nailedit

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

#11. Yes. If Sarah is married, she's looking at an unmarried person. If she's not, then John (married) is looking at an unmarried person.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Soooooooooo you're saying there's not enough information ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Yup. Correct. But the answer given on the pic is incorrect

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

That's #12, but I agree with your logic.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think 11 is a cloud?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sponge.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Where are the answers?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Dot

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Answers?

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

#8 Rock and roll music

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Mountain & Croissant Msheepsleep.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's clearly Peekandsnack M'lambfever

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's not a roll, it's a fucking croissant!

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

It's obvious that Julie and Sophie framed jason. Don't believe the media!!!!!0.0

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

1) 10 left in the tank 2) 42 and 24 3) 4100 4) Jason (numbers are months, first letters spell Jason) 5) The men are playing separately CONT

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

2) 15 and 51, or due to time dilation, 33 and 33

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

6) She is shooting and developing a photo of him 7) A road 8) Rock and roll music 9) Second 10) The doctors are women 11) A sponge 12) Yes

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

These are the correct answers.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

For #2, 42 and 24.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

and 51 & 15

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It also could be 60 and 06 or 51 and 15

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

33

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All the fish are in the tank still...right?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

one of the ones that died was eaten by one of the others, which is WHY four swam away

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yes

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No. Four swam away.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Away to where, they are in a tank?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't know. Through a pipe? Into the sky? It says "away," so they must, by definition, be away.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not with the logic used in bullshit riddles like these. They want you to say less than 10 fish because of "away", but the riddle teller 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

will be all smug and go "They can't swim away, they're in a tank, all 10 fish are still there!! LOLOLOL, I'm so clever."

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#12 Yes.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

If Sarah is married, she is looking at Paul so "A married person is looking at an unmarried person" if she isn't, John is looking at her

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

If Sarah is married, she's looking at Paul. If she isn't, John is looking at Sarah.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

No, there isn't enough information. John is Married, but he's looking at Sarah, not Paul. He can't see Paul. We don't know about Sarah

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

If she's unmarried, John is looking at an unmarried person (Sarah). If she's married, Sarah is looking at an unmarried person (Paul).

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Explain please!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

For this one to be true, Sarah must exist in a quantum state of both married and unmarried depending on which point you are observing from.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It doesn't matter if sarah is married or not. No matter what someone married is looking at someone not married.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sarah's looking at Paul, who is unmarreid. If Sarah's married, the answer's yes. Married John's looking at Sarah's, so if she's un, still ye

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If Sarah is unmarried, then John (married) is looking at an unmarried person. If she's not, then Sarah (married) is looking at Paul.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

How do you know Sarah is married?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It doesn't matter. If Sarah is unmarried, then John (married) is looking at an unmarried person. If she's not, then Sarah (married)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

is looking at Paul (unmarried)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You don't but that doesnt matter. If she's not married, John (married) is looking at someone not married (her) (1)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But if she is married, she (married) is looking at paul (not married) (2)

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#1, 10

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 1

They say there's 10 fish in the tank, but only say what happens to 9 of them (4+3+2), so I thought the answer was 1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

also, fish drown?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If there isn't enough oxygen in the water, yes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What happened to the 3 dead ones? Did they survive?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

No, but it said nothing about them being taken out of the tank, ergo, they're still there.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Doesn't away mean away from the tank?

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

If they're in a tank, it doesn't matter where they swim to, they're still in the tank.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I don't understand this. If the fish drowned they'd have to be out of the tank. I thought the answer was 8. How can a fish drown in water?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm no icthyologist, but fish need oxygen just like us, if there isn't enough oxygen in the water, they drown.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

By not getting enough oxygen. Throw some fish in a tank that isn't circulating and you'll have some drowned fish.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, ok. I just always think of a fish "drowning" as being on dry land.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Again, its 9 fish... not ten..

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

the 10th is assumed to be doing nothing. The claim is that there IS 10 fish total. If I do nothing, am I still here?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In my opinion, there's 19, because the picture says negative 3 fish died. So smart alec me is thinking that the fish gave birth to 3. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2 fish that drowned was actually 2 fish that was dropped in the tank by a bird. and 4 fish swimming away is just 4 fish that 2/3

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

swam back into the tank (The tank is underwater)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#8 High Croissant M'sheep fever?

9 years ago | Likes 206 Dislikes 0

The very best kind.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Mountaining croissant plus 'em sheeple.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Illuminati confirmed

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

M + Ewe & Sick = Music That is a female sheep.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

Maybe if they drew boobs on it you would be able to know the wheels gender

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought t was a llama

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Oh lol, not being a native I thought "ewe" was pronounced like "Eve".

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#1 is 6 right? I feel like I'm missing something?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

All 10 since the fish can't escape the tank, dead or alive. But question is ambiguous, as top comment said.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How many fish bodies actually managed to leave the tank? Where did the four that left go, and how did they swim away from the tank?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah and fish can't drown anyway.. I don't think

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nobody has worked out the 11th riddle yet *rubs hands and snickers gleefully*

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 9

A pool.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

A sponge?

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

The title says 10 riddles, but yeah it's a sponge.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Your first mistake was thinking anyone reads titles

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Cloud

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No matter whether she is married or not someone married is looking at someone unmarried. The answer is yes.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Yep

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

A massive sieve in orbit.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sponge?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is it a 3-way pipe joint?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm going with 12 riddles in a title that says 10.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Correct-a-mundo!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's not a riddle, just an incorrect title.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ew, get you and your dictionary.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A Dam

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

sponge.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#1 is trying to be clever with the vagueness of "left", but it's just a stupid question

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

and "drowned"

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fish can drown.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Theyre not being clever with "left" its assuming people forget theyre in a tank so swimming away wouldnt matter since they cant leave the ta

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And can't drown either. Even if they could, they'd be included in the 3 dead. Answer is 7.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Tank doesn't mean sealed. If the whole tank is submerged, they can swim away.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

At what point is a fish carcass not considered a fish, though?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Father and son are both 33 obviously.

9 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 5

51 and 15, and 42 and 24.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Due to time travel or incest?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Or adoption

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You can also do 60 and 06

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's Oedipus. He's 33, marries his mother, becomes his own father. Solved.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

best answer +1

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Amazing answer that will unfortunately not the get points deserved

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually that one has two correct answers, father is 42 son is 24 also equals 66, although I doubt the creator intended that.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

No the point is the 33 answer comes easy, and that clouds your ability to continue looking for new answers.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But it doesn't saw that the father is the father of the son. Only that one is a father a done is a son. So 33 is both logical and correct.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It has 7 "correct" answers, especially if time shenanigans are involved. 60+06, 51+15, 42+24, 33+33, 24+42, 15+51, 06+60.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

also 51 15

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also 60 and 06

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Damn, Didn't even think of that.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Also 51 and 15

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

This is a pretty weak riddle

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

True

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

51 15

9 years ago | Likes 89 Dislikes 1

60 06

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

42\24

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

17 38

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5/7?

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 6

A solid 5 out of 7

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

So, a week?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

It could be so many combos. 60/06 51/15 42/24 33/33 adopted joke

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

24 42

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that one's really not a good riddle. Both 51/15 and 42/24 work as does 33/33 if they aren't related (typical of riddles)

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

33,33

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

24 42

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

60 06

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 2

I thought of this one

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

33, 33. They were not each other's father/son

9 years ago | Likes 72 Dislikes 4

He is the father and the son ;)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Out of the box, I like it.

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

ONE OF THEM IS GOD

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I am my own grandpa?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And i bet one always lies and the other always tells the truth.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Adoption

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

24/42?

9 years ago | Likes 125 Dislikes 1

then the father wouldve been 18 years old when his sun was burn. not impossible but unlikely.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

The sun has been burning for a lot more than 18 years

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I am an idiot. Son was born, not sun was burn... Sorry english isn't my first language.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

60/06

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

XY+YX=66| X(Y+Y)=66| 2Y=66/X| Y=66/2X| X(66/2X)+(66/2X)X=66| 66/X+66/X=66| X(66/X+66/X)=66X| 132=66X| X=2. 2Y+Y2=66| Y=4. 24 & 42 via Maths

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

Wow did you came up with that bullshit yourself?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

My thoughts too. Horrible math. It made literally no sense.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Exactly. Even the approach is wrong. XY would imply it's X*Y. A better approach would be (x*10+y) + (y*10+x) = 66. x,y natural (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it is because sarah is fat

9 years ago | Likes 229 Dislikes 4

Mean +1

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Either way if Sarah is married or not a married person would be viewing a unmarried person

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

But we don't know if she is married for not so it's not enough info

9 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 11

Says no at the bottom, OP should a removed that.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's what I was thinking

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Doesn't matter; if she is married, she is looking at an unmarried person. If she is not, then john is looking at an unmarried person

9 years ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 2

In this example, then the answer would be yes either way. Only true answer is "not enough info"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Wait I get it! I'll see myself out.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Wow you're smart

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So the answer is yes and Sarah is still fat

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

She identifies as semi-married, so she's neither. it's not a binary thing like gender

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Then the answer to the question would be no

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

she's "marriage fluid" so it depends on the day

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why does the small text say the answer is no? The answer should be yes as you explained.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's just clarifying that John cannot see Paul, there's an asterisk by Sarah's name

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I thought the same until I realized it's a poorly written disclaimer about the positioning of the people and not the actually answer.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What if she's neither married nor unmarried but lives in a previously unknown middle state?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So matrimonial-queer or fluid or something? :) If that was the case then the answer would be no.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How the fuck did 4 swim away? They were in a tank!

9 years ago | Likes 219 Dislikes 7

Same way two drowned bro

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I noticed that -3 drown, so that means that there's 3 additional fish. There's actually 19 left

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's a 'riddle', not a word problem on a math test.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I say fuck these riddles. 4 swam away, only 6 left. Where did they swim to? I dunno, but that's what the text says.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

The other side of the tank

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, that makes them 4 fish that are right, not left! But nah I just hate riddles that focus on nonsense like that. It feels lazy.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Maybe the tank was connected to another tank via a pipe.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Have you never watched finding nemo?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're not going to ask how a fish drowns? Lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I still have 10 fish, except now I need to flush 3 down the toilet cause they are dead.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

How could they drown...?

9 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 4

When a fish suffocates in air it's called drowning

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Dissolved oxygen. If there isnt enough in the water the fish cant breathe. Just stir the water to add more. Filters do this with the bubbles

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The point is that the number of fish never reduced. They're all still there.

9 years ago | Likes 143 Dislikes 5

Well that depends on how we define a living being. Their body is still there, but the spirit is gone.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bullshit. If the four fish that "swam away" didn't leave the tank, then what the fuck does "swim away" mean in this context?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oh well physically yes! But some of them went to fishy heaven dammit!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If the riddle says 4 swam away, are you supposed to just assume there's no way to exit the tank and ignore that part?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My fish used to eat their dead roommates

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But for of the fish left

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Four*

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They weren't taken out. Even though 4 died, all ten fish (dead or alive) are still in the tank.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Left* lol

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can we please just agree that it's a stupid ass riddle?

9 years ago | Likes 99 Dislikes 2

That was my first thought when I read it

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, because fish don't drown in water. Like most riddles posted on imgur it's either bad or lying and thinking it's being clever.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

Well... Unless your in a Red Dwarf episode...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Some fish are obligate air breathers which means that they can drown if they don't have access to the surface.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Reminds me of The Usual Suspects

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But this puzzle is probably older than Imgur

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But it was posted here.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not all, 3 died

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

but the dead fish are still there.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They died, but they're still in the tank

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

Ooooo

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

not if the other fish ate them

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

And that's where the law of conservation of mass kicks in

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0