sharing some of my actual opinions

Jun 28, 2016 2:25 AM

thefatlonelyjew

Views

1483

Likes

410

Dislikes

174

#4 I try to quit smoking but always start back up,I like seeing the smoke come out of my mouth I crave it when I see people smoke in movies

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Maybe homosexuality is one of nature's way of population control

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That ending though...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#3 Just because they think it is the right thing to do doesn't mean it is. Dumbass.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What the fuck do you have against star lord and guardians of the Galaxy!?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

LOL well done!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

During bad times in early human history, when resources are scarce, having a gay uncle means more resources for you. See: kin selection.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Further, "I can't think of x" is not the same as "x doesn't exist."

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm hoping the gay thing is for over population

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I feel like your gay for chris pratt... Just saying

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And your having trouble coming to terms with it.. Please dont turn into onther Orlando guy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Its interesting to see which of these congregates the most responses!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean... I'm not sure how something not having evolutionary purpose = unnatural.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And what are you implying by calling it unnatural...?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I think chris pratt is an overall great guy thus his acting feels more real, thats why he is really likeable.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love how everyone is going insane over the homosexuality one but no one gives a shit about suicide one.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

To me that's the one that stands out. But what do I know?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that last one

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The.... unpopularity... is overwhelming.... ?noredirect

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I agree with many of your points.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Smoking is pretty fucking disgusting.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The gay one is wrong. Differences in individual traits are vary natural and are what make the world full of variety in nature.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

It's not wrong, it's an opinion. It is however a stupid opinion and he's wrong if he ever acted upon it.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Let's aknowledge that him thinking being gay is un natural since it goes against evolution does not mean there's anything wrong with it.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I have only ever seen Discworld in the YA section. It is definitely written for youths but is so good, it's easily enjoyed by adults.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Actually, there's a fertility factor: there's a connection between gay men and fertile sisters. If we're going strictly evolution here...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Soo should I take this post as serious? Only half of it? Only some?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You've got a lot of serious topics here but fuck, I really liked Guardians.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yaeh, I notice the womens line up for U. O. Puffin with they legs spread apart.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

well the last one is blatantly not true...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not sure which is worse: stance on homosexuality or Guardians of the Galaxy.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 7

I'm kidding. Clearly it's Guardians of the Galaxy.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Oh my god, Chris Pratt! I saw you on the movie once! Oh my gooooodd!!!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There could be an argument to be made that homosexuality could be an evolutionary response to overpopulation.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Which would be wrong however, as homosexuals do not pass on their genes to the next generation. There would need to be 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That is not to say your wrong, because obviously sexual preference has nothing to do with evolution. I just like to nitpick terms sometimes.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

an advantage in homosexuality that would make more children, not less and well... yeah. It's simply a variable in sexual preference.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I thought evolution was about survival of the species not the number of children. Indeed some species need more children but others less.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Evolution favors the traits that are more likely to increase your chances of reproduction, as this is inherent in such a system.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I was a little loose on that in my wording, but it's not even about survival. Evolution has lead to quite a few dead ends because it has no

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fore thought, totally possible for a trait to evolve in a species that seems favorable in the short term but lead to eventual extinction.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My thoughts on homosexuality and evolution has always been that it's natures way of population control.

9 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 8

That's called starvation.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That's an antiquated solution to a very modern problem. Most people can eat enough to survive with 711 and Walmart on each corner.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

No, it's simply a sexual orientation that can happen, the problem with your hypothesis is that homosexuals do not reproduce. 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

And therefor how can such a trait be passed on to the next generation to help with population control. You're also ignoring the spectrum 2/3

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Um. That's not at all the same thing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

of sexual preferences that exist. Bisexuals are a completely different thing from homosexuals. More of a slide instead of man/woman/both.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

I'd say true homosexuality is just an extreme end, directly opposite to complete heterosexuality, while bi and whatnot fall in lov between.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like the part where you prove his point for him

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Somewhat. I think they're going for if they can't pass on the gay trait, we'll run out of gay people

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, there is no gay gene either, so.....

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Smoking really does look cool though

9 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 8

Case in point: Boondock Saints

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ever since I quit smoke, I just don't feel cool anymore, even my friends and family think I'm not cool enough for anything now.. :(

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I never thought it did. Sure ok cool when say Johnny Depp pretends to smoke, but everyone else is sucking on a stinky, tiny, dirty dick.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 23

Johnny Depp actually does smoke.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I meant specifically in movies.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You mean he sucks a tiny dirty stinky dick.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I'm not gay but just because theres no evolutionary purpoose doesn't make it unnatural.. animals in the wild practice homosexuality as well

9 years ago | Likes 94 Dislikes 18

Actually there is scientific research on how the relatives of homosexuals have a higher chance to bring their children through

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Evolution doesn't make things a certain way, it provides an explanation for why things are the way they are. Random mutation create....

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

the differences and mother nature sorts the good ones out to keep and discards the bad ones. Homosexuality is sort of a triumph of a...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

modern civilization. Our way of telling our mum she doesn't get to decide what's best for us any longer, whether or not it carries on our...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

genetic code. It's really the next step in human evolution. And that's coming from a heterosexual christian/creationist! Whodathunk?!?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Pleasure. Evolutionary necessity. Can prevent suicide/ homicide

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 4

Curbing reproduction helps the species survive in cases of overpopulation.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

This person makes a good point

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

We are communal animals and don't require everyone to be producing babies. You can be useful evolutionarily and gay at the same time.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Some idiots would be better off not reproducing...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Animals in the wild also murder each other and eat each others babies.

9 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 10

We also kill other animals and eat their babies

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

And rape other animals of their species

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which makes it natural. Everything within nature is natural.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

We already murder each other, and I wouldn't find it hard to believe there's some baby eaters out there

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Oh shit, I've been found out.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sounds good. Never had infant meat. is it tender?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Today's special sir.....milk fed human

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just like some humans

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

The murder serves a purpose. Killing others and their offspring helps ensure that your genes get passed on.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It's also the reason for multiple partners.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So are you saying that, just maybe, being"unnatural" isn't so bad after all?

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

Chris Pratt is that you!?!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I draw the line at trans. That isn't "individuality", that's a mental problem. You are what you are, you can't change that fact.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 18

Body dismorphia is the proper name for that

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who gives a shit where you draw the line? It's not even remotely your job to judge or even care. Worry about yourself man.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I draw the line at caring about shit that doesn't effect me

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm not convinced on the mental issue there, and my go to example here is what about hermaphrodites that had their sex assigned at birth?

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

This is more about the people that have a definitive single gender. They have a 100% functioning penis, but claim they're a woman.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But if you can convince yourself you're something you're simply not, I don't trust that your head's in the right place. (Sorry for"you")

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 8

They're not hurting anyone by seeking to switch their gender, they are not monsters looking for camouflage, they want to feel like we do.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

They do when they scream at you for not psychically knowing their prefered pronouns. (that actually happens.. Not often.. But.. It does)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not saying they're assholes or anything. I just don't think they're completely healthy.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's different. What I'm saying is if you're born male or female, you can't just change that. Gay is fine, that's just what you want.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 8

But there are people who are born with physical features pf both or neither gender.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

But sexuality has proven to be more fluid than you're making it out to be. Sexuality and sex are two different things.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

Yes, there's no evolutionary purpose for many things. Evolution doesn't get rid of things because they lack purpose, doesn't work like that.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

Actually, there is evolutionary purpose. Often gay animals raise young of deceased parents in the animal kingdom since they can't reproduce

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Really ? Do you have a source please ?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think people are a bit overconfident claiming to understand the "purpose" or "function" of a behavior or trait in evolution.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dude it actually works just like that

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 6

Not always, just because something doesn't have a purpose (anymore) doesn't mean it decreases a chance on survival and thus procreation.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The system "evolution" gets rid of things that dont serve procreation. Imagine still having a tail like our ancestors did. It wouldnt (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How can gays procreate ?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

By helping their relatives to raise their children which have similar genes. It also may be that being gay is not exactly a 100% (1/2)

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

genetic thing. Through history, gay people procreated like heterosexuals but maybe maintained due to their gayness some benefits

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

really be "harmful" to us, but every complex element that isnt needed can only cause complications thats why they slowly "de-evolve"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually it's more likely that either random mutation and/or selective breeding lost us the tail. Didn't matter because we didn't need it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0