They truly aren't afraid of us

Jan 11, 2025 2:43 PM

ComradeBinch

Views

53999

Likes

2318

Dislikes

47

To paraphrase a wiser man than I:
Violence is never a solution?
Wrong.
Violence is ALWAYS a solution.
Violence may not be the best solution. Violence may not be a good solution. In fact, violence may be a TERRIBLE solution, but it's always A solution, and sometimes violence is the ONLY solution.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Based.

1 year ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable -JFK

1 year ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 1

John F. Kennedy — 'Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable'

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I didn't think o I could Love her any more than I do.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Scrooge only change his mind after being threatened with death as well.

1 year ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 2

In the game of Capitalism, sometimes you have to flip the table.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Violence, historically, has been the most effective answer all throughout all history when negotiation fails.

Violence rarely should be the first answer but it'll never be taken off the table as long as people exist that wish to abuse others, especially in an inequal world where different people wield different amounts of power to change things without explicit violence. Note that denying healthcare, price gouging, excessive rent, monopolies, and other abuse are all types of implicit violence.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

It will get no easier as time goes on. The system will become more and more oppressive until we really are too weak to fight back. We need a leader and we need them now

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

violence is not an 'answer'....it is a means to an end. Usually, it is a very effective means.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm not one to condone violence, but I approve cops/military using deadly force to stop murderers if absolutely necessary. If CEOs are legally killing, what options does that leave for their victims?

1 year ago | Likes 138 Dislikes 11

Either financial ruin for all those that care for them, or wander off into the woods to die alone before they get to the family nest egg.

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Go after the lawmakers

1 year ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

Violence is like antibiotics. It doesn't solve problems; it makes them go away. You won't be any more equipped to handle the problem if it comes back, and if you rely too much on it it might fail you when you need it most--but if you take it off the table, and imagine you're a better person for ignoring it as an option, you're a fool and you might well die a horrible, preventable, medieval-peasant-ass death.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Watched an interview with a billionaire who said the average person has reached a point that they are unable to live without finqci stress & it's his fellow rich people's fault for being too greedy. More CEOs will die unless prices lower so the middle & poor can afford more, but knows they won't. He also said that we should all talk about how much we're earning so we know who is being screwed, because it's the rich who tell us not to say how much we earn, while they always say how much they have

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I’ve wavered on this back and forth, but I’m at the point where violence IS the answer. The people we vote in won’t do anything and peaceful protests haven’t done anything. What else do we have?

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

We have a convicted felon as president, a bought and paid for Supreme Court, and Congress that has been studied and shown that it only really works for the wealthy.

System is fucked fam, violence is an expected outcome when societal safeguards fail.

1 year ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 4

The CEOs are just the working class elite, really. The upper middle. But their power and influence is what's really dangerous. They're still generally operating within the system that lawmakers created based on the input from the owners of said businesses. CEO is just your alpha Chad hype bro archetype m or f

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

A child raping convicted felon

1 year ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

"Force, my friends, is violence, the supreme authority from which all other authority is derived. Naked force has resolved more issues throughout history than any other factor. The contrary opinion, that violence never solves anything, is wishful thinking at its worst. People who forget that always pay." -Professor Rasczak, Starship Troopers

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

If they don't want violence to be the answer, they shouldn't exhaust every alternative.

1 year ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 2

"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." --JFK

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The stupid thing about the ideology of pro-violence like this is it's like a sword that so many don't know how to wield. You want "justice" but your propoganda here is attempting to give the sword to a lot of sloppy idiots who are going to end up murdering the wrong people. Don't believe me? Look at how pizzagate worked. The above post is basically the blue-pill version of pizzagate. Innocent bystanders & misidentified targets are the future victims to this bullshit.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 14

As far as Pizzagate is concerned, the right person got shot.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I fail to see the connection. This seems like conflating some very distantly related things, similar to seeing Israel's genocide of Palestinians and concluding that all militaries everywhere are genocidal. We know who the problems are, and it's not workers in pizza restaurants.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 97 Dislikes 1

We can always start with those with an MBA

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

That's a weird way to spell depressing. . .

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

Also a strange way to spell "Be rid of".

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

you are right.. its just sad

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not sure why you are getting downvoted. Unless dead children are a fun thing to weigh against dead monsters.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's always weird to me how "violence is never the answer", but the US spends nearly a trillion dollars a year on our military with weapons that either threaten or enact violence.

Then you got the US giving weapons to Israel who is just causing as much mayhem and death as they can.

But, sure tell us that violence is bad.

1 year ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

"Go get an adult", the US didn't go get an adult, the US convinced a bunch of its friends to go beat the shit out of Iraq.
It's amazing how much overlap there is between juvenile problem solving and global politics sometimes.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

There may be a day where we are advanced enough as a species to solve our problems without violence. Probably gonna take a few millenia, though.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They are forgetting that the negotiation that came from democracy and unionisation was the established alternative to being shot by the angry, disillusioned mob.

1 year ago | Likes 304 Dislikes 5

THIS.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And thanks to their brethren and fellow member of rabid unchecked capitalism - the NRA - which has been supplying the masses for decades with plenty of firearms.

Yes most of those firearms are concentrated in the bootlicking inbred Maga world, but the oligarchy can only trick the redhats also into believing poor people of other color are the cause of their suffering for so long.

1 year ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 1

And some of the MAGAS have been waking up.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Wild - that’s been the case right in front of their eyes for decades, and only now some of them are questioning their dogma, with one CEO unalived.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

We have to fight back. They are and have been killing us.

1 year ago | Likes 156 Dislikes 5

Laws are meant to curb bad behavior. The threat of punishment (prison, fines, etc) doesn't stop crime, but it keeps most people relatively honest.

But what device is there to curb bad behavior by the rich & powerful? Not Prison. Not fines. So what else is there?

When they do not care about the people they kill by their actions, it seems turnabout is fair play.

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

The stupid thing about the ideology of pro-violence like this is it's like a sword that so many don't know how to wield. You want "justice" but your propoganda here is attempting to give the sword to a lot of sloppy idiots who are going to end up murdering the wrong people. Don't believe me? Look at how pizzagate worked. The above post is basically the blue-pill version of pizzagate. Innocent bystanders & misidentified targets are the future victims to this bullshit.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 19

Your comment is absolute bullshit.

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Completely unrelated events, and even the context isn't relative. CEOs killing people with their greed is factual, far from the conspiracy theory that fed pizzagate. Innocent bystanders and misidentified targets? People want CEOs, it's simple. This isn't dropping a JDAM on a street in Iraq. Everything about your comment is stupid, including accusing the original commenter of pushing propaganda. Which you misspelled. Go back to Facebook or Xitter w your incoherent babbling.

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

people on imgur will really be like "the only way to fix our problems is to assassinate some CEOs" and then not go assassinate any CEOs

1 year ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

To be fair its the opportunity to do so will never come up for the average person.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It’s true. We love to call for violence here on the margins on the left, but it’s only right-wingers who actually make it happen.

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Yeah well how many murders have you done this year so far!

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Fewer than the average CEO!

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

We're alternating. It's billionaire season until we get one, then it's CEO season again. You can bag a billionaire CEO for extra points.

Yeah but seriously guys, don't be pussies just go murdering. Throw away your life to end another's c'mon what are you waiting for? /S

No but really there are a lot of depressed and suicidal people that say they have nothing to live for. Don't kill yourself. It's a Luigi time!

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

shut the fuck up with "we" like you're out there killing billionaires and CEOs

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You shut the fuck up. You're probably a CEO

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

yeah the only people who could think you're a basement dwelling pathetic failure trying to steal valor from people actually out there making a difference are CEOs. in fact I bet all those people who cross the street when they see you coming are CEOs, and also so are your parents probably which is the only reason they're so disappointed in you

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

"they're not afraid of me! do they even know how many memes i've posted and how many upvotes each of them got?"

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

Can't blame the CEOs entirely. Have to blame the voters in this country who have voted for Republicans who deregulate everything and refuse to give us universal health care.

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 3

There's a fuck ton of blame to go around. Calling everyone that contributed to blame out is excessively worthwhile. Don't really need to nitpick percentages though.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes we can. The CEOs are the ones behind every single New Deal program being repealed. They benefited the most from that.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Not just refuse, when the Democrats gave us universal healthcare they successfully wrecked it.

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Obamacare was not universal healthcare, it was a private health insurance mandate that only expanded access to it with restrictions.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Single payer healthcare is universal healthcare. Singlepayer does not require insurance, because everything is insured and paid for upfront.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

The ACA as written provided insurance to every American regardless of ability to pay using almost the exact model the universal system in the Netherlands uses, except unlike the Netherlands the ACA used our existing single payer Medicaid system to cover people up to 140% of the poverty line.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Have you ever googled ACA family glitch?

At my former employer, the cost to add one’s spouse to the plan was over $900 a month. This being unaffordable, the spouse was still not eligible for an ACA plan because they had “access” to the plan at their spouse’s work.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No it did not. It provided a marketplace that people could buy health insurance on. It did not guarantee healthcare access. That is what you're mistaking here. There were still bills from the healthcare providers, there were still hospital bills. Universal healthcare is free at the point of service, its like Canada, or the UK's healthcare. If money comes out of your wallet at the point of service for the doctor, it is not universal healthcare.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

There are still copays/fees in countries with universal healthcare.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

The only significant change Obamacare made was affordability of health insurance plans, and refusal to insurers to deny coverage to people with pre-existing conditions, and the ACA marketplace. Money still changes hands, and there are still hospital/doctor/testing facility bills that have to be paid by the patient, it is not universal healthcare, at best it is similar to a voucher system. We don't need diet single payer, we need fucking single payer.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Violence isn't the optimal answer, the problem is we have no meaningful and substantial paths to have grievances actually considered by the powerful.

1 year ago | Likes 519 Dislikes 9

Violence is the optimal response to those who respond to nothing less. The problem is that violence is not an easily controlled thing, and tends to lead to a lot more violence. And if you don't think the other side is capable of incredibly savage acts of violence once provoked, you're insane.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Tell me you've never read a history book without saying you've never read a history book "violence is never the answer"

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

They love when we're violent towards eachother. It creates revenue in healthcare, home and car insurance, gun sales, etc. Now the violence is filtering up the chain, and while that was ALWAYS going to be an inevitability, they always figured that was a problem someone else would deal with.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

You seem to forget there is 2700 billionaires on earth and 8 billion non billionaires. You dont need violence. You just take it. Form a union. Demand better shares of the fruits of your labour. Demand more taxes for the rich. Until we band together in numbers and organise ... nothing will change. Talk to your coworkers.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Democracy is the peaceful option. We all agreed on using democracy as a tool for an orderly, peaceful, civilized society but the obscenely wealthy perverted it into the profane thing that it is today. The fools have forgotten that without democracy the citizens only recourse is violence.

1 year ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yep, exactly. The people in power have forgotten why we have checks and balances and accountability. It's because there's always at least ONE way to hold them accountable, if there aren't any others.

1 year ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Violence is a negotiation tactic when all others have failed

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Read the peoples history of the United States.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

We are living under a system built on violence. It's only a question if we're ready to answer

1 year ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

You mean voting? Pffft. Real good thats done us.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm going to re-explain the comment for you: we had non violent solutions. Unfortunately for them, those weren't heeded. Violence isn't the optimal solution, but, if you ignore the better solutions then people aren't left with others. Ignore the peaceful protest and welcome the violent one.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, violence is never a *good* answer, but if it's the only answer left then it's the best answer you've got.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Violence is the option of last resort.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Something impossible, something inevitable.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The optimal answer? Not at all, I'd say almost never. Sometimes it's the only remaining answer, though, and we are nearing that limit. If it is a life or death situation, you need to absolutely open a box, you need a Torx screwdriver to open it cleanly but you have only an hammer, you use the hammer to break the box.

1 year ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 1

It is precisely the optimal answer - because it's the only one available. No, whatever long winded idiotic take you (yes, you, you know who you are) wants to drown out the enthusiasm with, no. It won't change the reality. Violence against the rich is the literal only option left and if we don't take it the human story will end when the last rich filth dies in some luxurious hole long after the rest of our species is gone.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The only remaining answer is, by definition, the optimal answer. The rest would be wishful thinking or missed opportunities, or dangerous mistakes.

1 year ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

This was what I meant, thank you for making it explicit :-)

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Even if you meant a more succinct thing, this comment provides insight into why we must never forget that there are always options. Violence is never off the table.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Talking of tables, there was someone that made a scourge and poured out the changers' money, and overthrew the tables... and if I remember correctly he was a well-known pacifist. So, yes: it's always an option.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is an optimal answer for them, why shouldn't it be for us?

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Because we're not sociopaths?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

They do it because they don't care about innocent lives. We're not the same.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Because according to them, it's already been an acceptable answer to let us die in droves if it effects their bottom line.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I agree. "Violence is never the answer" is a terribly simple, naive, and reductive stance that is frankly just plain incorrect.

1 year ago | Likes 1212 Dislikes 22

Violence should never be the first answer. It is a saying for children to keep them from mauling each other over petty disputes. Adults should understand that violence has its place. Non violence in the face of tyranny is admirable and should be explored to it's fullest, but with the understanding that it can and will fail as the situation escalates.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

"But the CEOs only pushes the (human grinding machine) buttons, they don't grind humans themselves!" / S

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

1 year ago (deleted Jan 11, 2025 5:11 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

It's really just propaganda

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The only time anything has ever gotten done to the benefit of the masses in this world is when they start killing the rich until enough of their friends go "Well, maybe we should help folks instead of hunting them for sport?"

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

violence is the question and in this instance yes the answer

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I can take the violence. But I want to know what the goals are before it just turns into chaos

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

"Violence is never the answer" is written by those who'd rather you didn't protest the injustice done to you. Once words fail, what other recourse is there?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"violence is never the answer" says the world's largest military power, whose police are trained by the country that use the Dahiya Doctrine & the Hannibal Directive.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Violence is, technically, always an answer
It's usually not the right one, but sometimes it definitely is

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It’s just a catch phrase used by people who want to use violence against you

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I used to think that. I really did not want to use violence at all and tried to avoid it. Then I went to Cameroon for 9 months and I won 7 fights because that was the only way I could get back safely. Now... I am much more comfortable with a fight when needed

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

In the history of the human species, violence has almost always been the answer. This is because as much as people don't like it, it is VERY effective. Fear is a powerful motivator, which can be the only motivator for people without morality that can motivate them like a civilized person.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I was taught violence against your fellows is never the answer. Violence against those who are violent against you is self-preservation. The rich have already decided to be violent against the non-rich.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

violence is not the answer. It's the meaning to an end.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Frankly, violence is the first and original answer. Is it sustainable? No. Have we been forced into a system where more enlightened methods of resolution have been engineered into obsolescence? Nobody knows, my fbi guy might be listening.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It's the answer when it's about oil, but not when it's about human rights to live a decent life.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And it rings especially hollow when said by those in power who regularly deploy a deliberately violent police force against the common folk.

1 year ago | Likes 227 Dislikes 1

Not to mention the social murder they are responsible for as well.

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

We should just change it to "Violence should not be your first answer"

1 year ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Violence is never the answer to a personal problem. It is almost always the answer to class problems where you have to punch up.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

it a sham, it only benefit thoses in power , they dont want you to use violence, since they want the monopoly over it since that strenghten them, just a bunch of cowardly bullies that fear retribution, but since the start of time change come from violence, you want things to get better ? you better start breaking some teeths

1 year ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

The ruling class does everything it can to demonize violence, because they can simply use institutional powers (such as the police) to enact violence for them.

1 year ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

the republicans/corporations/fascist media always r the first to state "Violence is never the answer" unless it is them that want to kill citizens in Philippines, SE Asia, Asia, Middle East, Central/South America who stand in their way of making corporate profits and ability to install fascist dictators. or creating a GOP/Trump coup on jan 6

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"violence is not the answer" Philadelphia's Police department after bombing and leveling an entire black neighborhood in 1985.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Violence is the last answer but should be used sparingly when all other fail. The most galling part is that the Americans ignore the fact that are very existence is due to violence. Our country literally exists due to the Revolutionary War. The real answer is hate cruelty and apathy are never the answer.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It also relies on the premise that violence is NOT ALREADY BEING ENACTED.

Violence is not the answer to peace, but if someone has voluntarily chosen to put their gun to your head, the time for polite discourse has passed.

Every day, these people knowingly make choices that will cause people harm and death for the benefit of shareholders, and they do it not because they're forced to or obliged to, but because they want to.

1 year ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I always remember the quote from “strangers with candy” dumb shoes on Comedy Central twenty years ago: “Violence never solved anything. Except conflict.”

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I object when the violence doesn't serve the purpose you intend, destroying your neighbors home or business does nothing to big corps and corrupt officials.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's not the answer. It is, however, often a vehicle to get you there.

1 year ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 8

upvote for you because it's true. A means to an end.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Violence has been the answer to something like 99.999% of all problems faced by life on Earth.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bullies respond more to getting punched then anything else.

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I will say the phrase "Violence is never *the* answer" is more accurate. It's always *an* answer. It's seldom the right one or the best one. But when all other answers are ignored or retaliated against, violence becomes what's left. Eat the rich.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Violence is not the answer. Unless left with no other choice.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Agree considering wars exist…

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It was a stance parroted by the people who knew violence would be the only eye to dislodge their corruption. Make violence sound more evil than them so we'd not see it as the moral high ground against evil.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Violence is the question. The answer is yes!

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Said by those whom usually the violence is target at.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

A shame that they're forever immune to "equal or lesser force" given the fact that someone can only die once.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's as far-fetched as "The customer is always right."

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

"In matters of taste". The full quote is much better than the bastardized version that has been created.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

We did have ways to solve this without violence though. Through politics and the justice system. Then the rich corrupted and bought both of those, to block anything that could dampen their profits, and cut down more rights and regulation to make even more obscene amounts of money, at the cost of even more human suffering.

Violence returning is just the natural consequence of that. "Last resort" doesn't mean "never", it means "when everything else fails".

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"Dr. King’s policy was, if you are nonviolent, if you suffer, your opponent will see your suffering and will be moved to change his heart. That’s very good. He only made one fallacious assumption. In order for nonviolence to work, your opponent must have a conscience. The United States has none."

- Stokely Carmichael (June 29, 1941 – November 15, 1998), also known as Kwame Ture

1 year ago | Likes 157 Dislikes 2

yeah his strategy doesnt work against sociopaths

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Violence is actually the only thing that has ever, historically, successfully challenged social power problems like this. Billionaires to the general masses, it's probably not much different in economic scale to the French Revolution, or medieval life before that

1 year ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 2

Maybe the French Revolution isn't the best example.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Anyone who's ever managed to get their school bully to stop pestering them usually achieved this by using violence of some sort. You can't reason with people who lack basic empathy, plain and simple.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I like to say violence is never the first answer.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It may not be the answer for the question but it's one of the multiple choices. Definitely an answer for a different question...

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I subscribe to “violence is never the first option” rather than “never the answer”.
Give reason a chance; but once it’s shown the other side won’t listen to reason, or they started with violence first?
Never throw the first punch, but make sure you throw the last one.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Violence is never the answer, violence is the question. The answer is yes.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

By all means! Name 1 working alternative!

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Violence has, throughout history, very often been the answer. Like all the time, really.

1 year ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

If someone attacks you, you defend yourself. The rich are literally killing us for profit. Violence is THE answer.

1 year ago | Likes 65 Dislikes 0

Waiting around for a kid to die at school is the option b people are going with...

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Almost all important social change has been enacted (partly) through violence.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's an aphorism brought to you by the same minds that say money doesn't buy you happiness. Tools of control

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Violence is not the answer. Violence is a question, and if the other methods fail, then the answer is yes

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Historically it has frequently been the answer, on all sides

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Commander Data agrees with you.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

So does Major Kiera

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm beginning to learn that "Violence is never the answer" comes from those who have never experienced a systemic injustice that threatens their livelihood.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The people who claim violence isn't the answer are the ones with enough privilege to think that the people choose violence as Plan A, and not Plan Z, after everything else fails. In almost all situations when citizens as a group turn to violence it's because they've appealed to the ruling class in all the 'proper' ways and got nothing but condescension.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah thoughts and prayers work while waiting for your kid to get shot at school...

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That was made up by SHITE parents who didn't want to raise their kids and just wanted some peace and quiet. Same generation that would suspend victims and bullies because they were too lazy to ask questions. Y'all wanna use Jesus, Gandhi, MLK jr as examples, REMIND US HOW THOSE ENDED MOTHER FUCKER

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Violence is never the answer on the playground. The rest of us have decisions to make

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Considering world history, violence is often the answer.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Data notices that terrorism works.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That Statement was build up by rich and powerfull people in the hope that the Union would stop come to them and beat them to death after they let the last strike be shoot down by cops

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's because you're not using enough

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Violence is the last resort, because after the violence worked out one needs tot get rid of the violent.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

"Violence is never the answer until it's the *only* answer."

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

On the basis of history violence has always been the answer no matter what civil rights violence slavery violence the literal founding of America violence civil war violence workers rights violence in every instance violence is the only thing that puts the rich where they really belong deep deep in the grave

1 year ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

Always remember, the first Pride parade was a fucking riot.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

"Violence is never the answer" -Usually said by people with VERY punchable faces

1 year ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Also, people who have no problems that need answering.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Often said by people who co troll state violence such as police or military personnel

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That saying was definitely started by corrupt power mad CEOs/politicians

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It sure is answer. Problem is, people tend to use it wrong.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

We tried peace.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's exactly the sort of thing someone doing violence to you might say to keep you from fighting back.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

However it's just as simple, naive and reductive as "Violence is the only answer."

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 12

The stupid thing about the ideology of pro-violence like this is it's like a sword that so many don't know how to wield. You want "justice" but your propoganda here is attempting to give the sword to a lot of sloppy idiots who are going to end up murdering the wrong people. Don't believe me? Look at how pizzagate worked. The above post is basically the blue-pill version of pizzagate. Innocent bystanders & misidentified targets are the future victims to this bullshit.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

Good thing that asshole got his dumb ass killed .

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Guns are a lot easier than swords. Just point and Bang bang bang. Super easy to point it at a billionaire.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The “war on terror” currently costs the US taxpayers $25,905.56 per second. Source https://www.nationalpriorities.org/cost-of/category/military/

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Self defense has always been an acceptable form of violence

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Violence is usually not the answer, until the powers at be make it the only resort left.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It depends on who's saying the answer. They have no problem using violence to ensure their wealth. Yet it suddenly becomes wrong when anyone else uses it to secure their lives.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Violence isn’t the answer, it’s the question and the answer is yes

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Violence is never the answer. It is the question.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Nonviolent protests are a tool of the oppressor

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Soo... Violence is *sometimes* the answer.

1 year ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 1

When all else fails (and it has), yes.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I personally like the saying “the only good fight is the one not fought.” That doesn’t mean violence is never the answer. It just means violence represents a larger failure.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It really depends on what the question is.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes. Violence is not *always* the answer, but it’s also not *never* the answer. Sometimes violence is the correct move. The people who study this shit have basically proven that violence works better the more support you have and once you have the active support of about 20-30% of the population, violence becomes an increasingly effective strategy. Less active support than 20-30% and it’s counter productive.

1 year ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

(I use ‘proven’ pretty loosely. In sociology owing active studies on this stuff kinda doesn’t work, you have to instead look to historical records. It’s important to note that a lot of changes happen without any violence at all! Less than a third of major changes in law happen with violence historically.)

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

(… Mind, 100% of the major changes in law that they teach in highschool history class involved violence)

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Violence in self-defense is sometimes the only move that is not self-destructive.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Yeah but the US is way past that point, Democrats are essentially lying on the floor in a fetal position trying to read Anne Frank to survive.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

most* times

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Violence is the question... follow the flow chart: if thriving the answer is no if barely surviving by no fault of your own than the anwser is yes

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I’m wondering if the people who came up with “violence is not the answer” are the one who are responsible for causing all the pains but afraid of us retaliating and thus propagandizing “violence is not the answer” so they can get away with it…hmm

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Sure is

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's always the answer. The few examples of major change from peaceful protest still held the THREAT of violence. A million people outside your door are effectively telling you "We're here and we're rational. Give us what we want before we stop being rational. You can't shoot us all." Compare that to occupy where they sat around with a handful of people. There was no threat there, which is why rich assholes felt at ease to smear them as dirty hippies. At their peak the NYPD outnumbered them 3:1.

1 year ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Indeed!

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

When everything else has been tried, violence is the only answer that remains. Always.

1 year ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

School shootings only happen in US kids dying seems worth the violence.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This. Violence should never be the first answer, but it is the last.

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Especially when one side uses violence, like, ALL THE TIME.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You are right. Violence has almost always been THE option. That doesn't change the fact that glorifying a mentally ill shooter with quasi religious poster is messed up.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 27

Nah. People need a hero. Luigi is player 1 now.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wish it were that simple. Until we attack the root problem of capitalism nothing will change. That CEO has already been replaced. They'll do a little dance and maybe on the surface change a couple things but they won't get caught a second time.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're correct. But it's not about that. Being the face makes them a target. Kill enough of them, that's how revolution happens. Make it not ok to be corrupt again by violence. If the judicial system is failed, it's up to the brave to make the sacrifice like Luigi and end the nightmare one billionaire at a time if needed. There's roughly 2780 of them out there. This only needs to happen roughly 2780 more times. Let me tell you, there's far more of the working class than that.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Revolutions are never pretty and always bloody...

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

i mean the Founding Fathers certainly didn't think so. SO....if we go by the standards of the past why should we ? ( just pointing out the hypocrisy of ppl who want to go back to " how things used to be " )

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I went looking for this. Have an upvote.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Star Trek used to go so much harder than it does now. You would never get a good faith debate over the morality of terrorism on the corporate-approved Trek of today.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

v

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The insurance company CEOs literally cannot do anything about our healthcare system. If all of them disappeared tomorrow nothing whatsoever would change. Our *politicians* need to enact single payer healthcare, and half of them are ideologically opposed to it because most of their voters are opposed to doing anything that will help minorities.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Fk me you are one vile corpowhoring apologist. Unbecoming of a human being to act this way.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

It's the fucking reality of the situation. We're completely screwed because half the voters want to kill brown people to solve our problems, and now the other half want to kill "the rich" to solve our problems but no one fucking wants legislation that would ACTUALLY solve our problems. Populist propaganda has doomed us. But sure, it's totally unbecoming of me to fucking realize that.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You're not gonna be allowed legislation. Not if 99% of all amerimorons wanted it, voted for it, protested for it. You're not. Things are far too gone for america to try and pretend to be a functional society with values in 2025. You either kill the rich or they kill you.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Nope. Again, that won't do anything. What the fuck do you think will happen? The GOP will magically decide they're ok with providing healthcare to people that are different? Because no, they won't. In fact their voters will even more strongly support dictatorship to control the evil leftists that are causing violence. Btw peaceful change is actually a fucking thing, and you do it by convincing a majority of the population to make those changes. Remember

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

CEO’s set policy. Had this particular CEO set the policy to be “fulfill our role and pay for the healthcare as we are supposed to rather than make billions for ourselves” we wouldn’t have a problem would we?

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

If he just set a policy of always paying but the company would go broke, his competitors who didn't would grow. We still wouldn't have healthcare because the only thing that does work is socialized medicine which the politicians need to implement.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Never said that did I? What I DID say was that perhaps if they didn’t have a policy of outright denying 1/3 of all claims regardless of validity they wouldn’t have pissed off someone to the point of killing them.
Or are YOU saying that the only options for insurance companies is to either go broke or pay out literally everything?

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I'm saying that that killing people doesn't do anything and that POLITICIANS need to fucking enact single payer healthcare. Did I stutter?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I mean fucking seriously, do you think it would be better if they accepted 10% more fucking claims? 20%? While millions are still completely uninsured? Like, fuck all the way off if you think murdering people to get a FEW fucking more claims approved is worthwhile while millions of uninsured are sick and can't get treatment.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Go ahead and find me one example in all of human history where violence solved the problem AND didn't just replace it with lust for vengeance. I'll wait.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 13

Any time someone tried to murder another person and was killed by the defender.

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

... anytime someone defends themselves ?

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

> gets attacked
> defend myself
> attacker forgives me

lol

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

... World War 2.

1 year ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Yup there's definitely no connection to modern day Russia or anything...

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 7

Provide for us, if you will, an alternative solution to *checks notes* Nazi Germany that would lead to fewer negative outcomes.

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Slavery

1 year ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Yeah the south is clearly over that one 🙄

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 9

Yeah because the aftermath of slavery is totally worse than actual slavery 🙄

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Did you lose the plot somewhere? That wasn't at all the discussion taking place. It isn't about justification, it's about the reality of imposing your will by force leading to retaliation 100% of the time.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

There's a bit of nuance to it. The amount of violence you have to do to get real change is so much that most people will ball at it because they will recognize that it can and will spill over on them, especially as the working class who don't have any protections whatsoever. This is the cruz of the problem. I've made the argument that violence on its own isn't that effective, because it's not. That's why so many people are in prison. The threat of harm does not in and of itself make people

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

follow the rules. It doesn't change people's minds about which rules should be followed either. We see this is recidivism rates, in talks about legalisation of certain drugs etc. we even see it in anti-drug media. The follow-through is important. And there's not that many people willing to follow-through.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Additionally if we're gonna burn it down, we gotta have a plan that's more than self righteous blustering and a hand full of random policies in a trench coat. This is down to more than just 5-6 hotly contested topics on social media. If it wasn't, more people would get involved in politics which, by the way, is another area most people don't want to have anything to do with.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

Since y'all don't like what I have to say, I'm just going to point out that for the thousands of you advocating for violence on this platform everyday, not one of you is out there living that dream. Why not?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

.. america has the highest rate of incarcerations in the world. They are also the most corpowhoring culture, extremely unlikely to do fk all to so much as inconvenience their oligarchy (including when their prisons are for-profit institutions of entirely and exactly literal slavery). The sort of "harm" and "prison" you speak of isn't even relevant to the discussion.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're missing the point. I'm talking directly about recidivism rates and how people who are criminals (looking at the oligarchy you speak of) are likely to not only not be bothered much by the threat of violence or indeed by the threat of consequences so long as they can continue their way of life. Which is why threats from regular people) are so ineffective, and why every single time this happens regular people have to go so far (violently) to make any changes. The violence is a medium for

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Good grief dude. You can write your corpowhore apologist paragraphs to your fking self.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

You think it's "corpowhore apologist" because you didn't read. Not my problem. Have a good one.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

quick change but it doesn't last. We do this every 50-70 years somewhere on earth because people who want things that go against the common good or society do so by playing the long game. That's how we lost abortion rights in America. It's how we've lost workers rights, and social programs. Because it's not just about the violence. It's more about how we come together after the violence with a plan to do something good and what we can agree on going forward. People always love to bring up the

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Violence part and how "effective it is" but neglect that there is absolutely way more to it than killing off the people who want to take advantage of the masses. You'll never kill them all and this is why shit like racism and slavery still exist at all. They go into hiding, rebuild their numbers and use the systems already in place to reclaim the things they want or change the systems to give them what they want and then we get to go killing them again 50-70 or so years later. Then add to this

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0