North Korea Threatens Guam In Response To Trump's 'Fire And Fury' Threat

Aug 9, 2017 2:44 AM

President Trump threatened on Tuesday to unleash “fire and fury” against North Korea if it endangered the United States, as tensions with the isolated and impoverished nuclear-armed state escalated into perhaps the most serious foreign policy challenge yet of his administration.

In chilling language that evoked the horror of a nuclear exchange, Mr. Trump sought to deter North Korea from any actions that would put Americans at risk. But it was not clear what specifically would cross his line. Administration officials have said that a pre-emptive military strike, while a last resort, is among the options they have made available to the president.

“North Korea best not make any more threats to the United States,” Mr. Trump told reporters at his golf club in Bedminster, N.J., where he is spending much of the month on a working vacation. “They will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen.”

“Will only the U.S. have option called ‘preventive war’ as is claimed by it?” the Strategic Force of the North’s Korean People’s Army, or K.P.A., said in a statement. “It is a daydream for the U.S. to think that its mainland is an invulnerable Heavenly kingdom.”

“The U.S. should clearly face up to the fact that the ballistic rockets of the Strategic Force of the K.P.A. are now on constant standby, facing the Pacific Ocean and pay deep attention to their azimuth angle for launch,” the statement said.

Mr. Trump’s stark comments went well beyond the firm but measured language typically preferred by American presidents in confronting North Korea, and indeed seemed almost to echo the bellicose words used by Mr. Kim. Whether it was mainly a bluff or an authentic expression of intent, it instantly scrambled the diplomatic equation in one of the world’s most perilous regions.

Supporters suggested Mr. Trump was trying to get Mr. Kim’s attention in a way that the North Korean would understand, while critics expressed concern that the American president could stumble into a war with devastating consequences.

“This is a more dangerous moment than faced by Trump’s predecessors,” said Mark Dubowitz, chief executive of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a nonprofit group in Washington. “The normal nuanced diplomatic rhetoric coming out of Washington hasn’t worked in persuading the Kim regime of American resolve. This language underscores that the most powerful country in the world has its own escalatory and retaliatory options.”

But Senator Dianne Feinstein, Democrat of California, said it would be counterproductive. “President Trump is not helping the situation with his bombastic comments,” she said in a statement. Senator John McCain, Republican of Arizona and chairman of the Armed Services Committee, also took exception. “All it’s going to do is bring us closer to some kind of serious confrontation,” he told KTAR News radio.

North Korea has accelerated its progress toward a working nuclear-tipped missile force since Mr. Trump, who has vowed not to let that happen, took office. Last month, the North successfully tested for the first time an intercontinental ballistic missile that could reach the continental United States.

The Washington Post reported on Tuesday that American intelligence agencies have concluded that North Korea has miniaturized a warhead that could fit on top of one of its missiles. The Japanese government also said in an annual threat assessment on Tuesday that “it is possible that North Korea has already achieved the miniaturization of nuclear weapons and has acquired nuclear warheads.”

But experts said the main problem for North Korea is not miniaturization; the bombs are already judged small enough to fit on a ballistic missile, as a famous picture of Mr. Kim with a warhead seemed to make clear. The real test is whether a warhead can survive the intense heat of re-entry as it plunges through the atmosphere from space, a hurdle North Korea is not believed to have overcome.

The United Nations Security Council unanimously adopted a new sanctions resolution against North Korea over the weekend, the eighth since the country conducted its first nuclear test in 2006. Backers of the resolution said the new sanctions would cut North Korea’s meager annual export revenue by about a third, impeding its ability to raise cash for its weapons programs.

The sanctions ban the import of coal, iron, iron ore, lead, lead ore and seafood from North Korea. They also prohibit United Nations member nations from hosting any additional workers from the North above their current levels. Washington called the restrictions “the most stringent set of sanctions on any country in a generation.”

But strong doubts remain over how rigorously China and Russia, the North’s two neighboring allies, will enforce the sanctions.

Even before Mr. Trump’s comments, North Korea’s militant response to the sanctions on Tuesday was the strongest indication yet that it could conduct another nuclear or missile test, as it has often done in response to past United Nations sanctions.

“Packs of wolves are coming in attack to strangle a nation,” the North Korean statement said. “They should be mindful that the D.P.R.K.’s strategic steps accompanied by physical action will be taken mercilessly with the mobilization of all its national strength,” it added, using the initials for the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea

Mr. Trump’s “fire and fury” response echoed the kind of language the North Koreans themselves have used in the past. In the last few years, North Korean officials and the government news agency have repeatedly warned the United States and South Korea against any pre-emptive attack, with “sea of fire” a favorite phrase.

At one point, North Korea vowed that “everything will be reduced to ashes and flames the moment the first attack is unleashed”; at another, it vowed to “turn Washington, the stronghold of American imperialists and the nest of evil, and its followers, into a sea of fire.”

This week, after the United Nations vote, North Korea’s state-run Rodong Sinmun newspaper said, “The day the United States dares tease our nation with a nuclear weapon and sanctions, the mainland United States will be catapulted into an unimaginable sea of fire.”

While Mr. Trump’s statement was among the most militant a president has made about North Korea, it may have been aimed as much at Beijing as Pyongyang. By discussing military options, the administration may be trying to convince China and its president, Xi Jinping, that the status quo is dangerous because it risks war.

“It may be a message to Xi Jinping, that you have to be doing more than just sanctions at the U.N.,” said Joseph S. Nye Jr., a Harvard scholar who once ran the American government’s National Intelligence Council. “It may be a very rational, thought-out message,” rather than an emotional outburst, he added.

But after so many warnings of a trade war with China and other belligerent statements, Mr. Trump’s threat will most likely be interpreted by Mr. Xi as “another thumping-the-table” exercise, said Shi Yinhong, a professor of international relations at Renmin University in Beijing.

“I guess Xi would not believe it as more than 30 to 40 percent true,” Mr. Shi said of the possibility that Mr. Trump would unleash a nuclear strike on North Korea.

While Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson has kept the door open for talks with North Korea during his travels in the region, other administration officials have said Mr. Trump is being presented with options for war. “The president has been very clear about it,” Lt. Gen. H. R. McMaster, the national security adviser, said in an interview aired on MSNBC last weekend. “He said he’s not going to tolerate North Korea being able to threaten the United States.”

General McMaster added, however, that the administration would first explore “what can we do to make sure we exhaust our possibilities and exhaust our other opportunities to accomplish this very clear objective of denuclearization of the peninsula short of war.”

In South Korea, some conservative politicians and analysts have called for the reintroduction of American tactical nuclear weapons to establish a “balance of terror” against the North. The United States withdrew nuclear weapons from the South in the early 1990s, but it occasionally sends nuclear-capable bombers and submarines in exercises.

But President Moon Jae-in on Monday warned against military action. “Above all, President Moon emphasized that South Korea can never accept a war erupting again on the Korean Peninsula,” his office said in a statement describing a 56-minute phone call with Mr. Trump. “He stressed that the North Korean nuclear issue must be resolved in a peaceful, diplomatic manner through a close coordination between South Korea and the United States.”

Sauce: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/08/world/asia/north-korea-un-sanctions-nuclear-missile-united-nations.html

CNN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VX7pK53PD2g

FOX: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cURY3SEbsn8

Isn't a strike on Guam the opposite of preemptive?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Part of me wants this to not end in blood shed. Another part is curious if the US's ABM missiles work as advertised.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Kim's only viable option is to strike SK or Japan. He will want to wreak as much havoc as possible once instigated. Trump is a fucking idiot

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 12

Trump's calling Kim's bluff, and backing someone like Kim into a corner's probably gonna make him do it. Fucking egotistical morons.

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 10

I'd be mad if someone gave me that haircut too.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

This is just a distraction orchestrated by Trump and Kim to draw our attention away from their tiny hands.

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

There will be no "stumbling into a war" with NK; it's an inevitability. The only question is when and how it begins. Pray for Seoul.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

I feel bad for the people born into North Korea. What a shit life! Now their gonna get bombed over their inbred leader.

8 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 3

Yeah, not only do they work incredibly hard for very little money and even less food, but now their fat leader is going to get them bombed

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

By another inbred leader no less

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I almost wish NK would actually just blow up the White House and capitol building if only to evict the current crop of shitebags.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Little Boy and Fat Man. The irony.

8 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 6

They are both rather rotund.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Y'all can say what you want about Trump or Kim however the conditions in North Korea are absolutely atrocious and something needs to be done

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Bombing the shit out of them will surely make things better.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Does NK actually have nukes? cause i remember the yanks saying the exact same thing about Iraq years ago....

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

NK isn't going to attack, The #1 Goal of a totalitarian state like NK is self preservation. 1/

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

They know the fire power they are up against. They know it'll be there end if they do attack. They only reason they are advancing their 2/

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Arsenal is so they have (in their mind) a voice at the negotiation table and to give them more weight when they make threats. e.g Guam. 3/

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

The real fear is how Brash the man-Child in The white House is going to react to threats. So far he's acting as if it's a pissing contest.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Jesus. This is nuts.

8 years ago | Likes 334 Dislikes 7

I'm literally leaving for Guam on Saturday... bit it's okay I'm just going so I can work on base

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nuts. This is Jesus.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

its like 2 online players fighting over mic so nothing will happen until you meet that one french guy who flew to us to stab the guy

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

Jeez nuts?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

No, it's just Trump being Trump.His"base" wanted this,someone"unpredictable".Too bad the North Koreans can't selectively target Red states.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 10

Funny that your comment gets downvoted but the "kill them all" comments about N Korea get upvotes

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yeah "funny", in a Trumpish kind of way.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v .

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

What's nuts is the world let a hellhole like North Korea get to this point. If nothing's done now it'll only get worse, mark my words.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well, on the upside, if things do kick off they might rid us of Trump and Congress at the same time.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 24

The world's entire economy rests on the United States. If that kid Kim manages to put a dent in the US the entire world will be fucked.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

As well as the entirety of the west coast.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

He's on vacation?

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 8

His life is a vacation.

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 6

How much of his Presidency HAS he spent on a golf course so far? Seems to be most of it.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The rants of two fat, crazy, stupid little kids with goofy hair styles!!!!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I did not think this idiocracy would lead to such a immediate doom.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Wtf why fuck north Korea. Little spoiled brat needs to just die already. Then no one will worry about a nuc war

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Great, we have 2 screaming shitgibbons that each control a nuclear arsenal and are eager to use them. This is the way the world ends.

8 years ago | Likes 134 Dislikes 35

Shitgibbons. I am now forever in your debt. (Until the bombs go off)

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Not with a bang but with _____________

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

shitgibbons.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Covfefe

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

butt sex.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Whimper

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Time to stock up some guns and food storage. This is scary.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How much do those bunker busters cost and how soon can we put one through his living room ceiling while he's watching a Friends marathon?

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Meanwhile they let loose with 1000s of conventional artillery pieces pointed at Seoul. But it's OK right? As long as the US looks tough.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

With modern technology, that would be easy. Pinpoint accuracy on his palace, then accidentally also hit any schools, hospitals or weddings.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Because let's face it, that's just tradition now.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"Oh shit! ISIS is nearly done! Need a new distraction..eh Venezuela? Nah no threat to US... North Korea? Hmmm. Perfect! Get them missiles!"

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 11

Murica

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

A war with NK is seriously the only way for Trumptard to get his ratings out of the toilet.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

Member when everyone laughed at bernie for sayin nkorea is a serious issue

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 9

Lol right? He was right about pretty much everything so far

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

Nothing***

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Like Trump or hate Trump, he didn't start this problem..and at this point I REALLY doubt his "tweets" effect Kim one way or the other.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah but i would like a president who doesnt tweet

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

<- WTF? Fess up.. who was it?

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

There's 43 now.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Lol Kim seems like a user sub kind of guy.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I down voted. the title is sooo.. biased. its not even funny.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How do you see that

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Press S

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They threatened Guam because we have bombers stationed there and today we flew those bomber over the Korean Peninsula for joint drills

8 years ago | Likes 189 Dislikes 4

Not because of what Trump said

8 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 9

No

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 43

Yes. Go to the white house and deep throat Trump some more bud.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 10

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yep, NK threatens to destroy America and its allies on almost a weekly basis, regardless of who was President at the time

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

But we didnt have a President poking ol Kim Jung with a stick either lol

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Lol bombers... And 2+ ballistic missile submarines in the Philippine sea that could erase N. Korea totally

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

So you're ok with some random city getting hit with a nuclear bomb before you wipe them off the map?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But can that happen before NK does the same to Seoul? Thats the only thing that stops us ending Kim, basically South Korea is a hostage :(

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Millions could die because of two manchildren that inherited power

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 17

Trump being an idiot clearly isn't helping, but there's a very good chance that it's only accelerated Kim's chance of doing something stupid

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Trump may be a manchild but he didn't inherit his power/position...he was elected.

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 3

He certainly inherited the economic power that got him on anyone's radar to be elected though.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 11

I always find this funny. I don't think people realize how much 10 billion is. Yes his dad gave him a 1 million dollar loan BUT... 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The amount he increased it, would be like me giving yo u$500..and then 25 years later its worth roughly $5.5 million. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The guy is a really smart investor.. he didn't just "inherit" 10billion.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Trump was elected under the rules that we all abide by. He may be a shitler who was supported by external forces but he still won.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Holy shit...this isn't even funny at all. What the fuck is going on with the world right now?

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 4

Scary shit. Especially since it was reported today that North korea actually has mini nuclear bombs

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

I've been following the news more recently, I read about North Korea and their huge leaps in nuclear tech, but suddenly it's hitting. We're

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

In reality it's probably best it comes to a head now before they advance further in nuclear tech.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Would be nice, but as long as they're puppets used by China and Russia to "keep us in check", it won't happen.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Given that lil kim killed all the puppets china had in place, i doubt they will be protecting nk anymore.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dancing around nuclear war. I've got family on Guam too. Fuck. This is insane.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Well I hope their safety isn't truly in danger. Hopefully China will final step in and place hasher sactions.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is China and Russia's fault. They are responsible for this rogue country and now NK is out of control. The US will protect Japan & SK

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

China doesn't want to go there. If Kim can hit Guam, he can hit Beijing.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How can a preemptive strike possibly be considered a last resort? It's not a last resort if it happens BEFORE an attack

8 years ago | Likes 133 Dislikes 20

I saw it as: NK fires, we shoot it down, the full force of the US military crushes them to preempt further missiles.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

We probably will need to end them before they get the capabilities to nuke the US. Get our Asian allies to invade them while we artillery

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Last resort to stopping a nuclear war which is what this is all about

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As opposed to waiting for North Korea to finally launch the nukes they've been regularly theatening us all with?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Regularly threatening, yes. And how many times have they actually launched the nukes? In the international community you want to be (1)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

very clear about what you're doing and why you're doing it (2)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So you suggest we just sit and wait while North Korea constantly threatens to destroy us all and hope they never follow through

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

before it hits home? (2)

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's not really an answer. Plus it's South Korea who is most at risk and they don't have an Iron Dome like Israel

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

The US military budget passed morbidly obese several billion dollars ago. And there's nothing in all that that could stop an attack (1)

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

NK wants to protect itself, atm M.A.D. is the only way.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Why shouldn't North Korea preemptively strike the US since the USA is regularly threatening North Korea?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Holy shit are you trolling or really that dense?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Well until now the us has been involved in more wars and the actual use oc nuclear weapons on civilian targets, kim may be a dipshit , 1/1

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But statisticly he is the lesser threat

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Shit are you unable to apply a bit of lateral thinking and see things from their side and understand what a hypocrite you are?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Believe me when I say Im far more likely to have a better understanding than you of their side and also the other side of their fence

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

I think it's meant as if all other peaceful avenues of denuclearization fall through and an attack is imminent.

8 years ago | Likes 59 Dislikes 1

NK won't give up nukes. And objectively seen they need them. Internally to project power, externally to protect themselves against the US.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

No, US has never sought to invade N.Korea. N.Korea needs nothing for defence against the US.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not sure where the leverage is. NK quit the NPT 15 years ago, where is the justification?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Maybe? I mean that's a good thought, but a preemptive strike is also not the last resort of peace, it's the first resort of violence

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 10

Semantics.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

I disagree. The last resort of peace means it is still a peaceful measure. Bombing somebody is not peaceful

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

If my original guess at what they meant was correct, then you are indeed arguing semantics.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Everyone needs to calm the fuck down...

8 years ago | Likes 245 Dislikes 10

YOU CALM THE FUCK DOWN! I DON'T GET RILED! HE DOESN'T GET RILED AND NEITHER DO I!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm so glad the fate of millions of people is in the hands of a pair of petulant fucking toddlers.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Media hype up isn't helping...

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

As a soldier I've been training for the KPA mission for years. I've been to war before. I'd gladly do it again to dethrone this asshole

8 years ago | Likes 86 Dislikes 33

As a former Marine, same here. I'd get on a bus in an instant if they called me. But I fear that wouldn't actually solve the problem.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The asshole in Pyongyang... Or the one in DC?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Which

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No you haven't...wtf are you talking about bro?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Afghanistan twice. Fuck off

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

Great, I've been there too. You made it sound like you've been training strictly for a NK mission.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

I have...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm a part of the Korean idiot watch force. I'm terrified of war with North Korea. Most won't come home from it

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I hope you're referring to Trump...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

You do realize that if there is a war it's strictly to distract from Trumps failures at home? NK won't attack anyone without provocation.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

Failures at home? LMAO. Trying that old ploy are you?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

what did dethroning sadaam hussein achieve? anything good? over 10 yrs later, over 1 million dead. people still dying. war is not the answer

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

War never changes...

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

The nature of war does

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

I disagree.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I love fallout but not enough to play it in real life.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I appreciate your willingness to sacrifice for the greater good but if nuclear war breaks out there won't be a Korea left to invade.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

There won't be shit to invade at all. Or invaders, for that matter

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

As someone who lives on the west coast near a relatively big city, I'd rather not have anyone slinging nuclear weapons at me...

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

Nuclear weapons are 1940s technology...it's not hard if you have the resources

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

A guided missile or an ICBM is another story. And there huge differences regarding efficiency - modern bombs are more powerful.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Exactly. That's why we have to get rid of it right now.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

Even if they are shitty and likely to fail.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I get that and thank you for your service, but a nuclear war isn't what anyone wants... Trump needs to dial it down. All Kim Jung wants is..

8 years ago | Likes 98 Dislikes 13

What the fuck do you know? Are you privy to the intel he gets? NK has miniaturized nukes capable of fitting on their ICBMs , they have 60.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

A bigger penis

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

A war is not de facto a nuclear war.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They have said over and over again that they WILL strike the US. Do we have to wait till SF is a smoldering heap?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why do you people think we are going to let him launch a nuke ? Or even need to use a nuke on them ?

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

to stay in power. He fucks around with anyone and he knows he'd get erased from the earth. He ain't preemptively doin shit except slow clapn

8 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 7

Unless he is backed into a corner with nothing to lose

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not sure he knows. People start believing their own hype. In his country he is treated like a God. I wouldn't be surprised if believed i

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

They feign love so they don't get killed or worse. Since tech boom they are aware of their situation and the truth about S Korea and USA

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Stay in power and develop long range nuclear weapons

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yea, to become a major player on the world stage. Problem? Yes! But not to the extent everyone is freaking out about it. Cool heads prevail.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I hope you are right. In fact I pray that you're right.

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 2

This is the word from DIA (who got WMDs wrong about Iraq) and not general consensus from all US intelligence agencies...

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

This isn't news. The Washington Post released the information recently specifically to start a frenzy, but it's been known since 2013 →

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1