.

Dec 3, 2016 11:21 PM

facesyphilis

Views

52058

Likes

1110

Dislikes

457

Which is why the world's oldest safe spaces aka churches are supposed to be separate from the government.

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 2

Every guy I've seen that's said this kind of thing seems to just want attention, but doesn't have enough of a personality to get it normally

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

So bored with this shit - this horse is so beat it had a restraining order at its funeral

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Being a human among humans at least suggests emotional protection.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ouch, the edge on this post.

9 years ago | Likes 114 Dislikes 5

Im going to take a wild guess and say the OP overuses the following words: Triggered, safe space, snowflake, fee fees, offended, PC

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Holy shit go suck off Richard Spencer while you're at it. We get you don't like the 10 people who want safe spaces and shit

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

"Article 4, sec 4: guarantee ... shall protect each of them against domestic violence." Freedom from abuse inferred in constitution.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

Yeah! Especially in theatres!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Nobody has a right to not be offended

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Including offense at others' offense?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck your emotions

9 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 5

It does guarantee bear arms.

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 3

To think that one small spelling mistake in the passage that guarantees the right to wear short sleeves should cause so much controversy.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Right? I still haven't received mine

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

You have the right to bear arms. You don't have the right to a free arm. You came with two anyways.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

...and?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

And the forgotten text of "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state," but that is none of my business.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Well regulated". Aha.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Ensure domestic tranquility" if you have a bunch of people being cunts you disrupt tranquillity and undermine the purpose of the 1/

9 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 7

Constitution. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 4

The Constitution guarantees almost nothing

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes the constiution is just one law documemt that can be amended like any other.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except equal protection under the law.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It is staggering the number of people that fail to realize that your constitutional rights only extend as far as your neighbor's rights.

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 8

I have the freedom to ridicule my neighbor, hurt him emotionally. But I can't threaten him or restrict his rights.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 3

Depends on how far the 'emotional hurt' goes. Eventually it's going to slip into harassment, and that is, in fact, a crime.

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Not consitutionally is it? Which is the point. Thw consititution is just the oldest law document not a holy book.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and the bible tells us nothing of motorcycle repair

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The constitution also doesn't guarantee you won't get mauled by a bear but we still take steps to prevent it.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No but many legal systems have protection from nervous harm or emotional damage as a reclaimable head of damages

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Way to go out on a limb with your "unpopular opinion", OP. Pretty sure this one is neither.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

True. But it's also a good idea to avoid being an asshole, if you can help it.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Is it? What exactly makes it a good idea?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The part where you're not being an asshole? Seems like something we should all strive for.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly. Flag burning bans, safe spaces, censorship of gay couples and T&A in media, all are equally incompatible with the First Amendment.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think people misconstrue "safe spaces" sometimes - what's wrong with a place where for exampleLGBT youth can feel free to be themselves?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It depends on the example. It has been used for silencing policies.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Universities have been denying right wing authors and media personalities a chance to speak on the grounds of being "safe spaces."

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I believe that we should let them air their views, debate them, and prove them wrong, rather than simply suppressing them.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What about the whole "pursuit of happiness" thing? Y'know, it's one of those inalienable rights thingies?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

You're free to do what makes you happy as long as it doesn't infringe upon other people's rights... And I can call you a window licking twat

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

But being called a twat doesn't make me happy. Seems like you just want to talk like a childish bully without being called out on it.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Doesn't matter if my words make you sad, you can ignore me... But partially I haven't called anyone a window licker or twat in a long time

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

it's the pursuit of it, not actual happiness

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This isn't really an unpopular opinion... please meme correctly

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 5

It's not an opinion at all, is it? It's presumably a fact.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It's unpopular for the 25 and under crowd.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 12

You do realize that like 99.9% of Imgur is under 25 and still circlejerks the fuck out of this shit, right?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Hell, we got kids suing the government because of allowing climate change.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Being on here for 20 minutes has shown me that with the things posted in usersub

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What's your point?

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

that the real world doesn't give a damn if you're a whiny baby

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 10

My school recently started a policy that everywhere on campus is a "safe space," this was my opinion in light of recent events

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 29

It's not an opinion though

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm confused do you think people shouldn't be safe?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Your school is allowed to enforce their own rules.

9 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

I can have an opinion though. Does my opinion hurt your feelings?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 26

it isn't an opinion, its a fact

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

No, it just means you're an idiot. "Safe spaces" have ALWAYS existed, and you use them as well. Everyone does without realizing it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it just means you're an idiot. The idea of, and using "Safe spaces" isn't new. They've always been there.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't know. I haven't heard your opinion yet.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

No, it just means you're an idiot. The idea of, and using "Safe spaces" isn't new. They've always been there.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This reeks of "The constitution does not guarantee your emotional protection so shut up so my fragile emotions are protected"

9 years ago | Likes 202 Dislikes 23

... What?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In short, the people who rail against "safe spaces" talk in a way that suggests they want the world to be their own personal "safe space".

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think you may be lumping a vast number of people into a narrow category in order to stereotype them.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's 1000% what it is.

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 7

this sounds like projection

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 9

You don't need to have fragile emotions in order to point out that others have. It just becomes an idiotic back and forth of "no, you".

9 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 45

True, but I've seen a recent trend of the "fuck your feelings" crowd proving to be painfully oversensitive.

9 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 5

Mention little dicks on imugr and prepare for the down votes. Definitely sensitive people here

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Trump begging for a lack of political commentary in theatre, for example...

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

Or the people who yell "facts not feelings" to the "SJWs" get caught up in fake propaganda and run 100% on cognitive dissonance...

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

It was nothing more then a cheap distraction from his trump university case on the very same day and most most of the media fell for it.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Yep. Wish others saw this too

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But it does guarantee all persons equal protection under the law.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Protection of rights, not feelings

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

A lot of people seem to be under the impression that expressing displeasure is somehow not protected speech for some reason

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

That's the funny thing. It seems more that one side wants their free speech while deeming the other side as bigotry and intolerant. -->

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That not having to hear a side that offends them or hurts their feeling is something that's a right and is being infringed. That is BS to me

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't think you understand how few people do that though. Most don't want to be one of those crazy college incidents.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0