good question!

Jan 25, 2019 5:35 AM

Fatimatn

Views

135706

Likes

5241

Dislikes

299

Soon they can build a wall from deceased government employees...

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

r/politics

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

That might actually work

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I say we put walls around all the schools.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

I went to high school with this dude. A dude from a predominantly republican state throwing some shade. Gotta love it.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Except that they banned thoughts and prayers from all public schools, those gun free zone signs have always been a prime target

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

How about instead of a wall.. we dig a pit with spikes and or alligators..with lasers

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Every school I went to was surrounded by at least a fence and had at least one armed cop on campus.

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 11

I have never been at a school with a fence, or a security guard, neither armed or unarmed. Where do you live?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

LMAO this is the first valid argument I've seen for the border wall LMAO

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Can't they just hire thousands of people that do a worse job than the hundreds of people who did it before? Like TSA?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh it’s one of these, where if you accept either implied premise it falls apart and makes the author look stupid to everyone.

7 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 35

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

I just finished reading a fantasy book. At one point they talk about securing their border with a wall. 1/?

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

They instantly dismiss it as impractical because people will just go over, under or around it. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Protect our borders AND schools with impenetrable walls? Got it. No ones getting in either.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

make sense!

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

They're much cheaper.

7 years ago | Likes 282 Dislikes 6

Obviously, you haven't been to church in a while.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Worthless

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

McConnel would still block it

7 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 1

Only after a lunch rich in lettuce, bugs, and maybe Trump feeds him food pellets.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Side note: Prayer helps Spirituality, not Physical activity, you can't pray to God the Spirit and expect a Jetski. Now you know

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Side side note: Prayer is no more effective than the placebo effect.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Side Note: Prayer is bullshit but if it makes YOU feel better, go for it.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If cost is the primary concern why not simply nuke the entire southern border? The radiation there will certainly kill anything passing by.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

Then use undesirables and criminal citizens to clean the land up? Perhaps call it "Colonizing" the area? The Colonies for short?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nukes cost far more. Russia isn't selling them cheap anymore.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Fuck it, lets call putin and tell him to nuke us.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

You know "thoughts and prayers" are just one cultures way of saying "I hope you get better" or "my condolences " right?

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 4

7 years ago | Likes 114 Dislikes 8

A wall of garbage would have even more chances

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

v

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Tis what we do in the UK too. Cut Police numbers down to the bone because only thoughts & prayers truly save us from terrorism and crime.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No the UK is a holy place that can do no wrong, & must constantly tell americans over the internet how to run their country just like theirs

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Oops, I triggered Jerry

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Well, we'd use guns to protect both, but you squealed like a virgin bottom when we suggested it.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 10

projecting your own homosexual desires, you have a very big brain.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

... it helps when you argue in complete thoughts. Use your words.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

These are full words fucko

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Well then I expect you to either say "thank you" and be on your way... or grab a rifle and stand a post.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Either way, I don't give a damn what you think.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"We're 21 weeks into 2018, and there have already been 23 school shootings where someone was hurt or killed." Protected huh?

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 8

also its january 2019 i dont know if your confused or not.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

does that count the teachers suicide that happened in a bathroom or the other suicide that happened in a abandoned school parkinglot?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Yes it does

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Of course. How else theygonna pad their numbers? It includes any shooting where school assets or employees were tangentially involved too...

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

People use dumb kids bringing a BB gun and shooting their friend in the face in a lot of those shock value statements, so sauce plz.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Sometimes they also include any incident that happens within a certain radius of the school, even if it's unrelated to the school itself.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Or if there was a school vehicle near the line of fire or a school employee involved. Sauce.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Hey, it works for Poland! https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/07/world/europe/poland-rosary-border-prayer.html

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To be fair Poland has a shit ton of wizards and stuff.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So you're saying we should protect our schools with...guns?

7 years ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 29

No, we should protect out schools with walls

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

No, it’s ascam to build walls around schools!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's almost as if security is a thing that requires physical actions and objects.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Gasp, this person spoke about real stuff! Be gone, your facts hurt people!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If everyone has a gun pointed at them all the time there will be less crime. Real simple.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 5

"Very weapons talented"

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

As a Brit can I just ask.. are you actually going to build a wall? Is that actually going to happen?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

One can only hope.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

probably not. If we do, it's going to be a massive waste of money going into whichever construction company senators just bought stock in.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Not if we can stop it. About 2/3 of Americans do NOT want the wall. And almost all of us don't want to pay for it.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

How did you make that leap? Clearly they are saying schools should be protected by a wall

7 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 3

Pretty sure some of the border is also protected with guns.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stopping those drug we outlawed. So making guns illegal will work just like that? I get it now.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Build a Wall around Schools and make the students pay for it!

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Trump did suggest arming teachers.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But walls don't work. (Unless they're around the house of the rich democrat telling you that, then they're ok)

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yes. The obvious dolution to having too many guns is to use more guns

7 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 8

Make teacher have a gun, so he'll be first one to die before attacker kills unarmed children...

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

Imagine applying for being a teacher and being told you may have to shoot a student

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Imagine applying for school security and being told the same. What's the difference? Can't fight violence with more violence...

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Because security's job involves violence, a teacher shouldnt have to

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Imagine applying for being a teacher and being told you may be shot by a student

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, imagine that

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why do politicians think it's cool to post snarky shit on Twitter like the rest of us monkeys? You have real problems to solve, be an adult

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 9

It's a way to communicate with your supporters without having a pesky fact-checking filter like the watchdog press in between.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He can't solve gun violence because of America's retarded gun laws so he may as well post snarky comments about it

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

You say it as if the american politicians are really trying to solve shit.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They have to do whatever makes them look current & informed. Even if it proves them stupid. Yeah, I'm talking to you AOC

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Uh... well your government is shut down, right? So what exactly else is he doing?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I know it's misleading but 'shut down' really only applies to some 'non-essential' personnel. He should be busy fixing the budget, instead

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

of spending time on Twitter being queen bitch

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think at 8PM he's already gone home for the day dude.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd guess it's difficult to act like an adult if you're not working with adults.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Yeah! He HAS TO call women fat and insult world leaders on Twitter! It makes the country great again and has nothing do with penis envy!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No it's not. He's in charge of his own actions.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

If Trump cared about protecting the border he wouldn't have kept the fed. gov shut down so long that includes border guards and coast guard

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You do know he CAN'T open the govt until the house & senate give him something to sign right?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There were very few if any school shootings 20 years ago when i was in school. Less gun laws back then too, so what changed?

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 12

Actually there were more. The "Assault Weapons" bill was in place at that time.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Perspective. Some dude blew up a school a hundred years ago. People just like to act like their time is the end of days

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

Columbine was literally 20 years ago.

7 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

Oh wow guess his statement was completely false then....

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 4

Columbine happened. The media feedback was so big that we briefly had shootings in Europe too. Now it's a way to gain notoriety

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Relevant youtube ahead: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-D3YoW3Hxg

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Once they became a phenomenon you got a lot of copycats. The media should report on it more responsibly

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Angry teenagers found out they could use guns to more easily direct their rage at the people they hated.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Culture for one

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Drs. hand out psychological meds like candy, break down of the family structure,unstable home life,children aren't taught coping skills, etc

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oversaturation of news coverage and ease of access to information through social media are things that have contributed to it.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Theres fewer school shootings now than in the 1990's but we hear about them more now social media etc. So no correlation in what you said.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This is a tough one for me. When someone I know has a bad thing happen I want to tell them something like this - but I’m 0% religious...

7 years ago | Likes 117 Dislikes 8

What if I'm totally super religious but also a garbage person in every aspect of life? Can I say it then?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure. SOME religious people I know are the biggest hypocrites you’d ever meet!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not very Godly to be a liar!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Belief has 0% effect on whether or not the thoughts and prayers do anything.

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 3

Prayers have 0% effect too!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Even as a religious person (however slight), knowing someone is there to be there for me at my worst is better than "thoughts & prayers"

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Eh, a lot of times, someone going through something bad doesn't need sympathetic words, they just need you to be there for them.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Thoughts aren't specifically religious. Give them your thoughts on drive-thru BBQ, it may help.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Go full new age dork - "sending good vibes your way"

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

so I say or write (in a card), my thoughts are with you. I wonder if really religious people are wondering why I don’t say T&P.

7 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

No we aren't.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, anybody religious or not is probably just touched that you care. You're a top dude/dudette

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I think what you say sounds sincere. That’s what’s important. How others take it is not your problem.

7 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

They don't. Just thankful you care.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

As a relegious person, I would be wondering if you really were praying or just lying to me if you said T&P. Writing thoughts is perfect

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

You're doing better than me. I just say "wow, that sucks"

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

LMAO

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or, “Damn. Hey, it could be worse, it could’ve happened to me.” JK

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you put this level of thought into it whatever you say will be right. You sound like you’re generally empathetic. +1

7 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

I am. I’ve seen some shit in my 65+ years.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

53? Man, you're exactly 65, grandpa. Do I get a cookie?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sure. It’s included in the Imgur software... whether you like it or not. TBH I’ll be 66 in a couple months. Olde af.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I AM CORNHOLIO! I NEED THOUGHTS AND PRAYERS FOR MY BUNGHOLE!

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

ARE YOU THREATENING ME?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I heard on Fox News today that Trump is now demanding 7bn for the wall to end the shutdown. +40% in just a few days; yikes.

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 4

They released their draft for the national emergency to see how it world play.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why is there even a shutdown? Mexico is going to pay for his wall, he said it.

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Trump should ask Mexico to shut down their government until they have paid in full for the wall. That would make as much sense.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

It's a common haggling tactic. Raise your price when the other side won't budge.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here's the thing that saddens me the most. If Republicans would just open their eyes, they'd see that there are methods that are far cheaper

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

As long as it comes in under $100+ billion it's still cheaper than what illegals cost the taxpayers on a yearly basis now.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A wall is estimated to stop roughly 50%. Stopping 50% of any problem seems like a step in the right direction. 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 9

Illegals cost about 116 billion per year in gov services. 7 billion seems like quite the deal.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 8

Illegal immigrants cost the US 130 billion a year involving wellfare healthcare scams. Tax evasion and court costs 7 billion aint shit.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 13

Gasp, facts? Oh no.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

lol

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

False. The study that produced the $130 billion a year figure said none of the rest of what you just said. But they did count border 1/

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

security costs in that figure. So that estimate would actually increase under Trump's wall plan, since that would also be calculated in. 2/

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Additionally, the study has not held up very well to scrutiny. 3/

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just call it immoral and refuse to negotiate. that will solve it.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and much more effective at cutting illegal immigration than a physical border wall. Most illegal aliens enter the country legitimately and

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Nope. That about 42% of the illegals, visa overstays.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So 42% that the wall won’t keep out.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

overstay their visas. It's THEY who should be tracked better and--potentially--targeted for deportation. I'm not anti-immigration but to me

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Myth. 42% of illegal immigrants are here due to overstaying visas (which is still huge minority) but NOT majority.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Only 42% are overstayed visas

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Which is nearly half.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Republicans would look a huge margin more intelligent if they would just acknowledge those simple facts.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Corporations pay them to ignore simple facts

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Getting rid of "sanctuary cities" would help.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

When have republicans ever believed in facts? They still don't accept 9th grade science like evolution.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Cos they generally don't actually give a shit one way or the other about it, they're just putting on a show for their rabid base.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Britain has strictest knife laws on the planet, knife crime just went up by 19%. Do with this info what you will.

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 24

That's mostly because the Government in the name of austerity keeps cutting the police in favour of passion projects and the banks.

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

Lucky we don't have guns isn't it.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Not at all, currently people who want to use guns for illegal purposes still do. The only people penalised are innocent people.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Nope. The people penalised by guns are those killed by guns. No innocent person is penalised by not owning a gun. It's not a right.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Not being able to own something isn't an impingement of freedom?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Nope. Peoples lives are a more important whiny "Waaahhhh I want a gun" pricks

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Crime tends to go up in times of instability. Brexit is the definition of instability.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

I agree with the first part, but it's nothing to do with brexit.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

To astonishing 272 casualties in 2018. In the meantime USA got highest gun casualties since 1968, almost 40000

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Some of those are justified homicides and police shootings.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Most are also suicides I believe, so the actually homicide rates are quite a bit lower.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And how many of those are suicides where they use a fire arm. At least try to be intellectually honest

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

Also, take out the places where gun control reigns. Cant blame me for NYC, Chicago, or LA.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Most of UK knife crimes is illegal possession of a forbidden knife. Care to check which crimes actually went up 19%?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What's the population of the US?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

66m vs 325m, 5, not 30 times bigger :)

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

However before we got so strict on guns have you compared the numbers? Gun crime continued to increase and then only by fudging figures 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

and removing certain types of guns from what was deemed to be 'gun crime', which makes no logical sense, did we start to see a 'redution'2/2

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Crime Survey for England and Wales...indicates that overall levels of violence have fallen by 25% since 2013.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

New figures were released yesterday showing an overall 19% rise

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Violent crime in general in most first world countries has been on a steady decline for decades.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Us gun crime has been on a steady decline too.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Good to hear!

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or has it stayed the same and the population has just increased to make the per capita number look smaller year on year

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fudging the figures is how we in the UK determined that banning guns reduced gun crime by removing many guns from what is 'gun crime'

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Care to tell which guns were removed?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought they were protected by 'Gun-Free Zone' signs.

7 years ago | Likes 802 Dislikes 82

That & taking guns from the law abiding as the solution to stop the criminals.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

My USA friends tell me that they worked just as well as saying NO! to the local drug dealers protected them from their crippling alcoholism.

7 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 4

Yeah, the "Gun Free Zone"... A visual representation of a naive and childish mindset. The empty headed belief that nanny garbage works.

7 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 15

The result of political manipulation by those unwilling to put in the Resources to form a proper rehabillitating prison system.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

No no, they're for speed limits, which ironically, also works for bullets.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

We need do not enter signs, that should work.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

But the real question is can I bring my crossbow or my Trebuchet?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

the fact that your country, somehow, got in the situation of needing "gun-free zone" signs in a fucking school is so absurd, it truely +

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 16

prooves that the difference between the US and yogurt is, that the later developes culture after being left alone 200 years

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 12

Yeah, America has no culture. The largest culture exporter in the history of the world.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

Gun free zones are there to allow places like high schools to punish kids who intimidate others with them or might escalate fights, etc 1/2

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 14

it is already illegal for a teen <18 to possess a firearm, the actual people charged under that law is overwhelmingly adults.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

... it's usually illegal to posess pistols under 21, most places.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I don't know where you get that from, I'd love to see links to back it up

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

they're not there to prevent the mass shooter scenario, but to give institutions another tool to help fight defang gangs, drugs etc 2/3

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 9

which are much more common than mass shootings. 3/3

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 6

... but it's already illegal for anyone under 21 to own a pistol most places. Tell me another one.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

I'm a gun owner and am embarrassed every time some idiot pretends that gun free zones are useless because they don't stop mass shootings.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

Yeah, they make it so much easier for the criminals. Nobody will be shooting back.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 9

Brandishing weapons is already illegal

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

That's true, but can be harder to prove. It's easier to say so and so has a gun in his backpack and get him kicked out or confiscate it.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

... but that's already a crime. No gun free zone required.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Bringing a gun onto a school campus? Having it be illegal to bring a gun on school grounds and making it a gun free zone are the same thing

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, That's never been the intent.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

That was always the intent for schools

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The signs are for sentence enhancementz, not prevention . Jesus how stupid do have to be to think signs stop killers?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Somebody didn't see the sarcasm...

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gun free zones only pertain to law abiding citizens. Doesn’t stop criminals.

7 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 15

which is why law enforcement exists. How they enforce it is up for debate.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well obviously we need even stricter gun laws and even more signs then!

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 10

It works in Chicago...

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Same goes for posted speed limits. Might as well just let everyone drive as fast as they want, since criminals do it.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

We need to ban sober drivers so that they don't get hurt by the drunk ones. That's how gun control works so it should work for that too.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

That's how laws work; people that break the law are inherently criminals. Laws are to punish & discourage an action, not make it impossible.

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Except for guns. Making laws that take them from the law abiding is supposed to stop the already criminals.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Look America, face facts, it's too late. Your going to have school kids regularly shot and there's nothing you will do about it >

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 22

At least be honest & admit you care more about guns than kids… AND STOP TRYING TO RUIN OTHER COUNTRIES GUN LAWS CAUSE THEY MAKE YOU LOOK BAD

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 23

If you honestly think that people on the right don't care that kids get shot then you are a horrible person and very wrong

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 12

Yea. We know you care. You send all those thoughts and prayers....... thanks.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

"If you don't agree with my radical proposal than you clearly want kids to die" that's basically your logic

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s a thoughtless argument, and the fact that you’re leveraging the dead for political gains is abhorrent. I respect that you are 1/?

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 8

Spare us your fake outrage. You gun nuts are as transparent as fuck.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 11

Uses the dead for politics, groups opposition and dismisses their arguments without considering merit. Youre definitely the reasonable one.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

the position of an outright ban. That’s a less deceitful argument. The right to bear arms is meant for defense from all threats. 2/?

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

Nobody likes kids dying, but there are ways to combat these problems that don’t involve registries, or outright bans. 3/?

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 6

America has ~320 million people. ~1000 kids get shot in schools. That's honestly not worth changing our lives over. Numbers should matter1/2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

A LOT more when making laws than emotions or feelings. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah but I'd rather they were protected by comprehensive gun laws that weren't shaped by a lobbying group promoting gun industry sales

7 years ago | Likes 99 Dislikes 71

Go suckle on the hype and narrative, clearly it's all you can really understand.

7 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 15

[deleted]

[deleted]

7 years ago (deleted Jan 25, 2019 1:53 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Nice buzzwords, care to explain what "comprehensive gun laws" are? Are they banning guns from the law abiding & hoping it stops a criminal?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

It's funny how many of those criminals that killed people were law abiding right up until they killed people

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Yeah, basically none. Most criminals using guns use an illegally obtained gun. They’re already breaking the law, more laws won’t help

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

We need to ban sober drivers so that they don't get hurt by the drunk ones. That's how gun control works so it should work for that too.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Except cars are a lot more necessary for our function than guns, thus it's an acceptable risk

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'm pretty sure if someone is psycho enough to shoot up a school, stricter gun laws isn't gonna stop them. I'd rather have armed police.

7 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 38

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 12

Why? Are psychos known for their black market connections?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not any less than all the homeless people who still somehow get their illegal drugs. People who want it will get it.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Lot easier to smuggle drugs than guns

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or maybe we need a prison system that actually rehabillitates criminals instead of making them even more likely to commit more crimes.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

If they can't get the gun it does. A kid here in Aus tried it. Handgun was gonna cost him 5000 on black market. So he couldn't afford it.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

We've been going about this all wrong. We should just jack the prices of guns up. Problem solved!

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It’s not gun industry sales, they don’t need help. You seem knowledgeable, you just don’t care that lawful citizens rights are being removed

7 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 27

Sorry for not being American... But why would you need more than a pistol/hunting rifle?

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

I don’t need to justify it, that’s the benefit of the second amendment, the right to bear arms will not be infringed.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

There's more to firearms than just hunting or self defense. A lot of people only ever use them to shoot paper targets at gun ranges.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That sounds like a great reason not to have stricter gun laws

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hu, I guess. Those are just not as popular where I'm from.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why do you get to decide what a hunting rifle is and not me?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

Exactly. AR-15s and other sporting rifles are legal for hunting in some places, so technically they would be hunting rifles.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

I’d rather they were protected by big scary guys with guns.

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 42

Metal detectors with one dude would do fine.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 8

One guy and a metal detector to stop a shooter from entering a building?

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

These people are cowards. Head them off early, show resistance, they fuck off.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

Yes. Let's put the army in schools. That'll be good for the kids.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 4

I agree. They’d be alive, for one. And preferably exposed to guns in a safe way at a young age, so they aren’t so afraid of them.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 7

How do you guys still think putting in more military and more weapons everywhere will solve the problem? It hasnt worked the last decades.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Yeah, and we could call them kinderguardians.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Statistically 57% of Mass shootings would be stopped by cracking down on domestic violence in America. Gun laws would have little effect.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

We don't actually know that. The CDC isn't allowed to investigate gun violence, so they can't even figure out what would actually help.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

The CDC did so in '13 when Obama have them money to do so.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This article from 2016 suggests otherwise: https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/gun-research-cdc-congress-1.3394110

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They also recommend firearm restrictions, but the meat of their paper shows that Domestic violence has major correlation.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

"In 57% of mass shootings between January 2009 and June 2014, the perpetrator killed an intimate partner"

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I feel this is wildly inaccurate.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

They also recommend firearm restrictions, but the meat of their paper shows that Domestic violence has major correlation.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

"In 57% of mass shootings between January 2009 and June 2014, the perpetrator killed an intimate partner"

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Yes they partially are. I mean they are in Australia. But we have the added bonus of not having so many guns in the hands of nutters.

7 years ago | Likes 172 Dislikes 70

"In the hands of nutters" is a misconception. Most "news shootings" are people with no prior serious mental issues or criminal back grounds.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

How do the boots taste? I haven’t licked one yet.

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

You're not special, Australia. You're normal (well, in that respect). America is the one that isn't.

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 19

Australia is a bit special because they used to be very much like the US, but became normal again, proving it can be done.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 11

Australia is VERY different from the US. Both culturally and politically. And there are no parameters for 'normal.' Everyone is different.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Thought it was pretty obvious I was referring to gun laws. And relatively US and Australis is very similar.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah but then you look at the Australian government and see why those governed should have the guns.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Lol, it's funny that you think having guns will take down a developed country's government.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Lol, it’s funny you think politicians could somehow resist millions of armed citizens. Or that the military would side with tyranny.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Or that even if they did, that the military could defeat millions of armed citizens. In the USA: 100 mil gun owners vs 1 mil army personnel.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's funny you think people are coordinated enough to pull something like that off. I remember the "American Spring" during Obama's term.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Y’all have more violent crime than America, and that includes all gun violence in America. I wouldn’t consider that a bonus at all.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 38

No, you're thinking of the UK

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Pulled that topsy-turvy estimate out the arse, I suppose. Not even within tossing distance of realistic.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Got a source for that fun fact?

7 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

Not a big fan of how they mix absolute and per capita rates. Makes it even more apples-to-oranges than comparing two countries normally is.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I’ve watched that video, their stats are twisted. It draws on your emotions, and then twists facts to fit their ideology

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

You'll have to provide your own source. I generally don't listen to Vox, but without a counter source the other sources here support Vox.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Video? I was just reading the article.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Never been threatened with a gun or in any gun crime, don't know anyone who was shot with a gun. Have a scar near my eye from a kangaroo

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

How's that special? I live right by all those dangerous LA street gangs, and neither have I. Anecdotal evidence isn't evidence.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That should count as a violent crime right?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But at the cost of not being able to defend yourselves from all the big scary emus.

7 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 9

Lol 2 guys a rifle and a bizillion emus is literally a joke. Kinda like the American political climate .

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 7

Even with guns the emu's won. YOUR FIREARMS ARE USELESS AGAINST THEM!!!

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Lol, the emus taught the Russians/Japanese their strategy for WWII: throw bodies at the machine gun until it overheats, then you win!

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It worked pretty well for the emus and the ruskies. Not so much for the japs.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Upvoted, assuming this is sarcasm. Rest assured that the Australian populace does not dread emus the way we do firearm-related violence here

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, the emu part is sarcasm lol. But, I am pro gun ownership. Just having some fun joking around

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I also support gun ownsership, generally. We just need to figure better ways to keep them out of the hands of criminals and nut-jobs.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So we're gonna ignore the gangs with P.A. Ludy guns they easily made themselves in Australia?

7 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 15

It's nice that criminals in the US don't have to struggle with making their own guns.

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

Pretty much, yeah. Gotta worry about real dangers like everything breathing.

7 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 1

U.S. = 4.62 firearm related homicide per 100k people. Australia = 0.18 per 100k.

7 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 10

A lot of those are janky single shot makeshift zip gun type things too. In Ausstrelia.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

Not trying to downplay the horror that is US gun violence but Aus does only have like 25mil people in an area lager than the continental US

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

I’m guessing there’s some correlation between violence and population density. Although it’s not like the US is the most densely populated

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Guns in the hands of gangs isn't actually something that leads to school shootings though.

7 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 8

Yup, armed gangs are totally fine. They don't sell those guns at all to people who couldn't normally buy them...

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 15

It isn't "totally fine", but you would be completely correct in that they don't really sell them to other people outside of criminal world.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1