When Germany realizes they'll be on the allied side in ww3

Apr 6, 2022 12:30 AM

WristDeepInaBook

Views

203261

Likes

3446

Dislikes

89

that's a bingo

Judging by the performance of Russia's military, it's not going to be much of a war.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

How Germany feels about Russia f*cking up their nice and accurate >30 year plans :

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

I watched that for the 1st time last week. It was so good. Like amazingly good.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The funny thing is that christoph waltz is actually an austrian everybody associates with germany

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

OH NO SIR

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hopefully von Stauffenberg will have better luck offing Putin.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

Maybe they'll make it to Moscow this time

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Germans :

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

How about 2nd Oktoberfest? ?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And they will not be blamed for starting this one!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"blamed"? Germany literally started WWI when it declared war on Russia and WWII when it invaded Poland.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

WWI was technically not their fault, but WWII was.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I think the opposite. No one could live under the treaty they were forced to sign. War was inevitable

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 3

Lol, I lost it at flossing, in public

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dude is such an amazing actor

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

They're both incredible man

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

-Poland (probably)

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Sadly doubt it. No poc allowed in Poland...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That's a Bingo?!?!

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Bad news...the Italians are also on our side at the start.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Like game matchmaking working in favor of you and you have 4 high elo teammates

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 399 Dislikes 1

What scene was this from? It’s on the top of my brain

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I thought it was when she recognized her own shoe in the jacket pocket? & he told her to try it on?

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

I *think* the opening sequence when he’s fucking with the Frenchman. But it’s been a hot minute since I’ve watched bastards.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Basterds*

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

*Bastardos

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

can't remeber if it was this scene or the milk scene

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Yeah, I it's this one. Right after she realizes that he found her shoe at the inn. https://youtu.be/kDPlQDUi3Sc?t=102

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

holy crap that was a leap, i can't believe my 2 braincells got it done.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh yeahhh

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I mean England and the vikings were on the same side for the first two. No wait, not Denmark or Sweden but, at least Norway and England

4 years ago | Likes 138 Dislikes 9

Only sweden was neutral

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Most of Denmark is Germanic.. just with more pigs. The clues in the "mark" bit

4 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 3

Denmark, Sweden, Norway and Iceland are all completely Germanic.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What... do you think the vikings are?

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Mansplain for a dumm murican?

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

No idea what he is talking about, but mark is danish for a field, where you can have pigs i guess

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh, hi Mark

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Denmark was entirely on the Allied side in WW2. There just wasn't much they were able to do...

4 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

We small, yo

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

That's kind of what I meant. You did all you were able to, but you smol.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Now those damn lazy Swedes, on the other hand …

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Imagine being happy WWIII is happening, just imagine it.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I think part of the problem here is, Americans have a hard time imagining war at their doorstep. They just export war.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This. The one thing the USA really learned from WW2 is how to make profit from war.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is basically Red Alert 1 now. The only good thing about it is that it leads to Red Alert 2 and...

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

KIROV REPORTING

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

After a major EQ i helped some germans out of the rubble at night. Destruction was everywhere and they were shouting . It felt like a ww2

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Movie. It was like the blitz. We are still friends after 12 years

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Little do people know, the last official action of the Wehrmacht in WW2 was against the SS, in conjunction with allied forces.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

They had a few. One of my faves aside from Castle Itter: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Battel

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"And it's American troops, and the Germany Army, fighting together at last~!"

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

"One last fight, it’s the death throes of the 3rd reich
Justice shall be done, the final battle remains"

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Do you have any reading on that? I'd love to learn more about it

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And then we realize, that we are probably be used as the spearhead.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Nah, we're going to be the battlefield

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Again.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

for now..

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's a bingo!!!

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

[Erika Intensifies]

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I mean with enough nukes you could change that to [Akira intensifies]

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They should have joined the allied side after WW2 and crushed the Soviets.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Yes well the 2 700 000 tons of bombs the allies dropped on Germany had just a part in making sure there was nothing left after capitulation.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Guys... That might mean we're going to be on the losing side... Germany doesn't have a great track record at this

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

TBF, the last two world wars were a bit of an anomaly. You had the War of 1870 and the Napoleonic Wars where Germany was on the winning side

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No, but Canada does and we'd all be on the same side as them.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don’t think the “good” and “bad” sides are gonna be as clear as WWII.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

How come?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

On a normal day we’ll complain about how america is ran by corruption politicians who have their pockets filled by large companies…

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And all of a sudden we trust america and the large companies to not somehow do this for their own gain?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Everyone in the western countries are being told to donate to Ukraine, but the IMF (international monetary fund) is giving Ukraine loans…

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ukraine is a college student in country form. So…in summary Russia is fighting a physical war against Ukraine, but the western countries

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

v

4 years ago | Likes 1019 Dislikes 3

I love this character so much. Ugh, so good (Christoph waltz amazing but I don’t “love” landa)

4 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 0

You’re supposed to hate Landa, which is a testament to how well Waltz portrayed him.

4 years ago | Likes 68 Dislikes 0

He was also fantastic in Django. He Is just a great actor.

4 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 0

The bar scene... Nice!

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Au revoir Shosshana!!!

4 years ago | Likes 69 Dislikes 0

I love how he says this line!

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Great film!

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The world needs more Melanie Laurent

4 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

She was really badass in 6 Underground

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

You mean 5 Underground?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4 underground?

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

3 underground?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I agree. She is beautiful to look at and a badass in that movie.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

There’s a lot of hotties in that movie

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Considering that the entire northern hemisphere would be a lifeless radioactive hellscape in about a day, I doubt they're super jazzed on it

4 years ago | Likes 672 Dislikes 22

I live in Melbourne. I might go watch “On The Beach” for a few tips.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Don't get my hopes up

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Don't fall for Putin's fear mongering.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We're at the double dare stage of negotiations.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Actually Germany expected to be bombarded from both sides during the cold War gone hot.. Google Fulda gap

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's one possible outcome, but assume people won't escalate that far, and we live to see what happens

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box."

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We're super duper unjazzed by this. That's why we are outspending Russia in military expendeture temporarily to get our shit ready. Not fun.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't worry, most of us will die long before the radiation does anything from the breakdown of supply chains due to the EMPs

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Fallout 5 New Zealand will be totally immersive.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If Russia's nukes are as maintained as the rest of their army equipment I wonder if they'd even make it off the ground

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

as of three years ago they had around 1500 that international inspectors thought were functional. let's not test it.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So what its better to just let them do whatever they want? Just look the other way?

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 10

No one is looking the other way, the west is literally doing everything short of starting WW3 to aid Ukraine and it is clearly working.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Not entirely lifeless but yeah, a couple billion dead is a reasonable estimate.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

No, it's not. A couple hundred million at most, assuming they only target big cities, all the nukes work and none are shot down.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Sure. Do you want a nuke on Chicago? New York? It's only a couple hundred million. So what does it matter? Are you stupid?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Tbf he's responding specifically to an estimate of "a couple billion dead." Which would be EXTREMELY hard to pull off, you'd need to nuke

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

huuuuuuuge areas.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but would it really? Russia was supposed to have a Superpower class army. It's budget for armed forces is equivalent to US just for

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

strategic forces, aka maintenance and upkeep of nuclear arsenal. They are supposedly maintaining *more* weapons then the US... On what is a

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

small fraction of their military budget. I don't wanna call the bluff, but it's definitely a bluff.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You only need a few to launch, and a few to get through.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Those weapons need regular replacement of weapons grade materials, electronics and mechanical upkeep etc Again the US spends

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

something like 60+ billion of a 800+ billion military budget on this. Russia's *entire* military budget was like 65+ billion. There is no

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's not the nuclear explosions or even the radiation that kills the most people in a nuclear war, it's the carbon soot darkening the sky...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

... causing worldwide temperatures to plummet so plants die, causing mass starvation not just for us but for most animals as well.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

We're all positively charged about the prospects.

4 years ago | Likes 249 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lol lethal ionizing jokes

4 years ago | Likes 35 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes we'll all be positively glowing in our first military photos.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Christ I need a citizen defense package just to handle this joke.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Radiating confidence. Among other things....

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

They're not

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Kann ich bestätigen.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I never heard of a war scenario against Russia where Nato had a defense line in Germany. Usually more at the Iberian peninsula

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's not enough nukes for that in the world. Millions dead? Yes. Half the world destroyed? Not even close.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Dude theres enough nukes between russia and US to destroy the planet multiple times. In the hight of the cold war they could do it 14 times

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

That's simply not true. There are fewer than 14k nukes left in the world. If all of them worked and none were shot down, you could just 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

about hit all the cities with that. That's about half the population and negligible area. And most nukes would be shot down. 2/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Nuclear winter, ozone depletion, emp, radioactive fallout, firestorms? And all the domino effects on food productions, ecologica, 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Don't need to get directly hit by a nuke to be affected. Nuclear fallout can spread on air currents after the explosion and you're still f'd

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Fallout is not nearly as bad as people think. There's a reason nukes are measured in kilotons of TNT and not area contaminated or something.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Just let him know - we wont be the first to use one, but when he does, we're nuking him flat. Im fine with that. Better than allowing this.

4 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 17

The worlds gone mad

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And fuck all the civilians too, right? Shit, man.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

You want to die to stop atrocities in Ukraine I got some good news for you: you can! Get over there and do it!

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 4

You sure about that, Hoss? https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0085404/

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

That is the idea behind Mutually Assured Destruction, but it would still end very badly for the entire planet: https://youtu.be/CxkvsrSUyOU

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At least it'll be the most interesting day on Earth for the last 60 mil years.

4 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

What about the day Kim K’s book came out??

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And possibly the next 60 million years as well.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Specially because Germany is the 2nd highest priority target after the US. Flatten Germany and you have a gate to western Europe

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

Germany's probably actually target #1. It's where the US has a bunch of nukes, and Germany hosts American airfields, army bases for EU land-

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

based logistics & more.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

IF the US got hit by long-range nukes it's very, very likely Germany would be hit at the same time.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Russian army is not the same thing as the Soviet army. That gate to Western Europe is useless if you're too incompetent to capture Kyiv.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fair point, but it probably won't change the target list if it's all out nuclear war

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Oh probably not, the russians will jist breakdown in the middle of their newly occupied wasteland xD

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

just*

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

you dont need to take Berlin if its a flattened nuclear wasteland.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Don't try to shoehorn Cold War logic into the current conflict. Russia has clearly stated its goals. Steamrolling France isn't one of them.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Careful you might get downvotes by a bunch of kids who are sure none of the Russian nukes will work...

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Land based? Possibly not, the money hasnt really been there for maintenance, but that doesnt matter when you have boomers that do.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Spoiler alert, nukes are pretty much foolproof. Apply moderator > watch boom

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

It's like putting a gun to your head and hoping the rusty old bullets are too old to fire. They might not fire, but it's smarter to not.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

its more like putting 6000 rusty guns to your head and hoping NONE of them fire

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I suspect Russia don't really want to use nukes given their megalomaniac fascist ideas for a "Greater-Russia" empire. Nuclear war kills that

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

So if they ever were to launch nukes, they would effectively kill themselves. Why do that?

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

“some men just want to watch the world burn….”

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The idea that that pissant little gas station thinks it's going to run the world is so fucking delusional. Just bizarre people.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Yes it's incredible.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pissant little gas station is my new favourite insult to Russia

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It's not about if they *want* nuclear war. If it comes to a direct NATO vs Russia conflict, Russia WILL lose the conventional war. They 1/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

stand no chance at all, and everyone involved knows it. So once they've lost the convention war and driven into a corner, they are left 2/

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

with no option but the nuclear one. That's the only way for them to fight back. Then once they fire, we fire...everyone dies. 3/3

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Removing Russia from Ukraine involves no corners whatsoever. They are free to go back to their country. No invasion will happen.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Is anyone confident that their nukes work or even can be launched?

4 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 8

why do you think their armed forces are so run down? they spend most of the bidget on their nuclear arsenal..

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Even if only 25% work, that's bad for millions of people

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Of course they work.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

guessing at least one of them will

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Even if they can't launch and just prematurely ejac- ahem, detonate, in the silo, that's still pretty bad for the planet overall.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Eeeeeh...it's honestly probably where all the money for military goes to instead of troops/equipment

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

No, most of the money earmarked for the military was laundered by the oligarchs. Russia's own corruption has corrupted their war waging. 1/

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Oh look, I've been given 1 trillion dollars to modernise the air force. I'm going to spend 200 million on 40 year old drones and 2/

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

40 year old bomb detonators and pocket the other 800 million. Hey boss, I spent that 1 trillion on the air force, now how about the army?...

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Because that's how ALL wars end now? Like how we nuked Afghanistan and Iraq, and Russia nuked Ukraine?

4 years ago | Likes 123 Dislikes 59

This is an ignorant take.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Literally how the last world's war ended. And that one didn't even start with nuclear bombs.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

I'm guessing you aren't too familiar with the word "nuked"

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

None of the defeated nations had nukes. Believe me, If there is a war between Russia and NATO, Russia is going to lose and then Putin and>

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

his circle won't have anything left to lose. When the war turns against them, that's the card they have left. Very not good.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Did America consider nuking them?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thank God we have president grandpa and not president spraytan... he would have nuked Ukraine for pootiepie

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

He said WW3, not all wars.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If NATO got involved, it'd be the first major conflict between nuclear powers. I think odds are low, but not worth the risk.

4 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

Not to mention India has like the 2nd or 3rd largest and most modern army in the world.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Depends how you define "major"...India and Pakistan have had engagements since they became nuclear states

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

When you’re fighting against nuclear powers, yea, it could. Those wars were nothing like what this could end up like. Naive post.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Russia doesn't wanna nuke Ukraine because what's the point in owning a wasteland. We didn't allow Afganistan to weaponize.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Russia is fine with that as long ass the oil and iron can be mined within a few decades. Moscow turning to glass is what stops them.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Afghanistan doesnt have a nuclear program because they dont have the kind of co-ordination, facilities or money for one.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The point is for a country obsessed with its image of military strength to save face. If can't conquer them, destroy them.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

For which they did a tremendous job by being absolutely incompetent on show that "strength" by no fuel, no trained soldiers, gear from '60..

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Who are we?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

UN

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Not all wars no, but it's how half of the world wars have ended.

4 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 2

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Depends how you count world wars. If the definition is all major powers involved and fighting on all continents, the 7 year war would count

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A lifeless radiosctive hellscape for a whole hemisphere? Not at all. Even in Hiroshima/Nagasaki, most people survived, and most people ☞

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

later in life died of natural causes (i.e. not because of cancer/radiation). Most radiation (80%) disippated in a day, background radiation☞

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

levels normalized very fast, and the radioactive area was pretty small to start with; dropping 3~4 orders of magnitude in 3km or 2 miles.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

On the other hand, it literally happened only once. So… maybe it’s not likely to ever happen again now that everyone knows the consequences.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And imagine how it would have ended if Germany had nukes in 1918, USSR had nukes when the Nazis stood in the suburbs of Moscow in 1941, had>

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

the Nazis had nukes when they had to draft 80 and 12 year olds and threw them into street battles in Berlin. Nukes are always a far off >

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

hypothetical until someone gets cornered and they start to look very pretty to him.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Can't even count ww1 nukes weren't even an idea yet, so 100% if world wars while nukes existed ended in nukes

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

Still a pretty small sample size

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Concerning how WW1 was conducted, you can be 100% sure that if they had nukes back then, they would have evaporated the entire continent.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Germany surrendered before the nukes

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How many nukes did Afghanistan, Iraq and Ukraine have when they were invaded? That plays a role, just saying...

4 years ago | Likes 149 Dislikes 3

None, none, and none?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Bingo.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Afghanistan, not that we know of, Iraq were developing nukes, that's one reason why they were invaded, and Ukraine did but they're Russia's

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

The US claimed Iraq had WMD's several times yet noone ever found any. Makes you wonder.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Ah I personally believe that the US gov is more evil than anyone they've attacked or been attacked by in a while. Global military overlords.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Right? Its like nukes aren't offensive weapons according to long standing proliferation doctrine. Anyone who has them

4 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

Can usually throw hands so if doesn't matter unless if its madness.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Not for lack of trying though. US generals wanted to drop nukes on Korea, Vietnam and Iraq.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The Iraq nuke "scare" was over blown imo.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

Hahaha holy FUCK could you imagine if MacArthur got his way in Korea??

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0