These two are sus AF.

Oct 13, 2021 7:27 AM

Vantahku

Views

110940

Likes

1185

Dislikes

51

The 2 party system is destroying America.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Hear me out. Kick them out.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Manchin doesn't want to be a Republican. He would be vulnerable to being primaried by someone farther right than he is.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

535 people effectively rule the American People. Remove them ALL. Clear the whole lot of them out, get rid of PACs and start anew.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They have more power as secret morons. If they switched, they would be primaried for not being MAGA enough.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Remember vote in 2022 and in primaries. If the democrats expand their lead in the senate, these two cant block bills on their own

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Joe Manchin is the only Democrat representative in WV (state or federal). He swings right because that's what his constituents want.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If he voted the Dem party line he would likely get replaced by a GOP true-believer.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sinema is corrupt. Full stop. People talk about her like she's an enigma. She found out she likes the taste of money. It's that simple.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck both of them but they're not Republicans. They SHOULD be Republicans, but Republicans are full on fascists now.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Republican plants

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You’re looking at the new Mitch, gang. As soon as he’s turtle soup, the next safest seat is the Munchkin from WV.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

…and then he’ll shed his skin, show his true colors as a republicant.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So frustrating. Stacey Abrams and the democrats of Georgia fought tooth and nail to flip it, just to be undone by these fucks.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

And if they hadn't we'd be having different conversations and the whole situation would be worse.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Whoa whoa whoa. They caucus with the dems, which means that if they switch parties, republicans would control all comittees and comitee ->

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

chairs. This is HUGELY important, because the committees control the legislative process for 99% of the "invisible legislation" that goes on

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Go read your government text books from high schol

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People have no idea how much these two morons are literally f-ing our future. When bridges start falling in floods it will be their fault.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

As a Arizona resident that voted for Krysten Sinema…I’d like to say I’m sorry. She isn’t doing what she said she would do. Never again.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

From what I read about her, personally, she is a prime example of a liberal. So somebody probably bought her over.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Yeah. Manchin is a known commodity. She just is either a total turncoat, a loon, or has been in on this all along.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

If GQP takes control again, these two will be the villain's in that story. They are derailing everything for the sake of "cash," DINO's!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Closet Republicans

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

**republicants

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

good one!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sinema is a snake. she will not be getting my vote again

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So will you vote for the Republican if Sinema wins the Democratic primary (assuming there is even one)

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It will depend entirely on who they come up with.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm so pissed I had to vote for her.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The real problem is that Dems have a 0-vote margin of error even though GQP policies are broadly unpopular. We need to win more states. >>

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

>> It's actually a healthy sign if some party members occasionally vote with the opposition. When the margin is so small, though, and the >>

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

>> opposition party is so violently opposed to good-faith leadership, swing voters gain outsized influence.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Though you disagree on blind loyal to the party rather than the people, neither of these politicians are doing that. They support corruption

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They both make me sick!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Everyone is saying name them and shame them; but for real only have heard them referred to as those two. Who are they?

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

They have no shame. That's why they vote Republican.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Manchin and sinema

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Manchin who? And sinema wat?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_">_Manchin">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Manchin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyrsten_Sinema

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia & Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

If they did Mitch would be majority leader again, that would be worse, not by a lot but it would be worse.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

The Senate Dems are hanging onto the edge by their finger tips and people are railing on them for not doing jumping jacks.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Don't get me wrong, I strongly dislike both of them. I think the complaints are entirely valid as an average democrat.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This. I'm frustrated they won't vote for a progressive agenda as well, but having them as Ds is still worlds better than if they were Rs.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

It's a shit sandwich but it's the lesser shit sandwich

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

More like, it's a bland free meal from a very underfunded school, but the alternative is having to pay for lunch and get literally nothing.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They are as useless as teats on a bull

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 784 Dislikes 7

Slavery is still not ended. Now if you are branded a "criminal" you can be a slave

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

In Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith argued that slavery was inefficient as you had to house. feed, and guard slaves. He argued that low wages >

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

> and debt was a better method for keeping workers coming back to the fields. Our modern day wage and debt trap system is exactly this.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I was referencing the clause in the US Constitution admendement that left a loophole where some slavery was not outlawed

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

More like "I'm from the north but keeping slavery is profitable for me, but opposing it is bad optics, so I'll just refuse to vote."

4 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Most of us just decided based on whether we liked Cap or Ironman better.

4 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 6

#TeamAntMan v

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

artist @ingoadwetrust Instagram

4 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 1

funny since cap dies at the end of civil war in the comics.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah this reminded me of that a lot

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ah fuck... which one is which?! I don't really care.

4 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 2

these two undercover worthless RATpublicans need to be fired

4 years ago | Likes 150 Dislikes 12

You sound like a republican, don't go full circle

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Remember - Manchin leaving office tomorrow means a GOP Senate. It’s currently shit, but better than Mitch and utter lawlessness.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Sinema could be primaried. Manchin however... He is from West Virginia. The state that went 38+ to trump in 2020. Its either him or a

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

republican, I just assume keep him so the GOP doesn't have a majority. which is very important

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

As soon*. Regards, your friendly neighbourhood pedant.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I voted for her. Most people who did are very unhappy with her in Arizona. Well, Phoenix at least. She's not very popular right now.

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

It was her or McSally, we took a risk and she stabbed us in the back. All I can hope is someone challenges her or we are screwed.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Perfectly said

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Arizona is very purple (blue cities obvs) and i could see you easily vote another dem. Manchin is the best hope for WV though.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Sad

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

It is but you been to WV though? Half of it looks like Mordor.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Lol!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I really wish people would stop saying this shit. It 100% DOES matter that there's a D beside their name. If they switched, Mitch would be>>

4 years ago | Likes 93 Dislikes 2

You know political parties aren't actually engrained into law, right? Listening to a majority leader or not is purely convention.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The Majority Leader position *is* part of the law, and it goes down party lines. Parties aren't spelled out in the constitution but they >>

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

>> very much are part of the government now in a very real and legally impactful way now. Whether we like it or not.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

>> the Majority leader for the Senate and no D legislation would ever get a vote. That's a *massive* difference, even if these two fuckers>>

4 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 2

>> were to vote with the Rs every single time. If they actually wanted to switch, they'd have all the money in the world from grateful Rs.

4 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 3

THANK YOU.

4 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

A democrat being elected in West Virginia in the first place is weird. Not a shocker that he leans right compared to the rest of the party.

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 2

True! While I wish he voted progressively, he's broadly doing the right thing as long as he represents the wishes of his constituents. >>

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

>> (Note: Some exceptions apply, and also I'm not so sure he's even really doing that in this case.)

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Good for confirmations, but not much D legislation getting thru anyway now. Basically only signature D agenda passing is confirmations now.

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Not many in number but the covid relief bill and the two bills floating around now contain a shit ton of policy. It's the stupid...

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

...reconciliation and filibuster system that makes all these bills packed and obscure as to what they do (and take ages to pass)

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1) That's still enormous. The Rs have prioritized confirmations and judges for the past 20+ years and look where it got them: power even >>

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

>> as the minority party with minority views. 2) Forcing Rs to vote "no" on popular bills hurts them at the polls, whereas simply not >>

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They can't, the funding structures are explicitly set up such that they need to be registered as Dems to keep getting campaign funding.

4 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 5

I cannot imagine that would be true. Switching would win them an avalanche of contributions from Rs happy that they'd flipped the Senate.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

So it's de facto fraud, then. They pretend to support a platform for money and then obstruct it.

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Essentially, yes.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm sure these things are throughly punished. Like with Rep Boebert LOL

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They are refusing to go with their party. They switched sides as far as action.

4 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 7

The Democrats have never been one solid group. That's a good thing. We don't want to play follow the leader like the GOP did

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Unfortunately That's why we're getting the ratchet effect

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They vote more often with the DEM side then the GOP side, just not on any of the big things we want

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

They voted for COVID relief

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

He is a coal baron, and you expect him to vote on clean energy? Save the planet vs pocket lots of cash?

4 years ago | Likes 369 Dislikes 2

I'll get another temp ban for saying this but these kinds of people need to die off. Profiting off and enabling pollution like that deserves

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The death penalty

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Someone more liberal than Manchin would never win in WVa. If Dems need more liberal senators they have to win them elsewhere.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

@OP His daughter is the one who jacked up the price of Epipens.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Parasitic bastards and traitors.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Say what now? Any sauce?

4 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

He started a coal brokerage 'enersystems' his son runs it. He owns millions in stock and collects roughly 500k a year in dividends.

4 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

Oh yeah, he's super Deep and personally vested in coal. Also major coal companies are his biggest donors

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I'm almost more shocked that you didn't know. Manchin is so deep in coal money you'd think he was a miner.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Isn't he just doing what his constituents want? Coal is huge in West Virginia

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 5

it's not for the people of west virginia, it's for the rich coal barons that pay his salary.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

if he wanted to help his people he would support the infrastructure and reconciliation bills.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

13k workers in coal in WV, annual compensation of $1.5 billion, mines and support for em spend about $5.6B in the state

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes, plus families & the towns around them. Also the companies that own the mines

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm the sense that his team constituents are coal lobbyists? Because there aren't THAT many coal miners. Hardy's employs more people.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

In* the sense. Real* constituents. Autocorrect really got away from me on this one.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

0.1% of the population is coal miners. But add in the companies built around it, the families of the workers, & the towns that exist (1)

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(2) solely because of the coal mines and it adds up to much more.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They can want it all day long but that's about as good as eating your foot when you're starving.

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Sure, but it's better than starving to death

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 5

You might not be living much longer without a foot after eating it. A temporary postponement of the issue.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that means a longer chance to figure out the problem or get saved. If you want to live, you take it every time

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

That take is dumb - both fit the analogy and the actual situation. There’s food at the table.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but someone has to serve it to them

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0