Damn. The cubes....

Aug 25, 2020 9:03 AM

R0NNICK

Views

118153

Likes

2193

Dislikes

50

As someone in purchasing, it is always our fault. Even if the engineer gives us the wrong specs, it’s on purchasing. Sigh...

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Work intelligently should've had him moving that cube with a Jack or dolly

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fucking asshole didn't even clean up his mess

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But carving one of those blocks down id gonna tale a while.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm more of a fan of the KISS method. KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So much wasted material

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Put the cubes on a fucking dolly. Jesus, if you're a cube manufacturer you should have the equipment to transport them

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So cutting corners is a good thing?

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

*intelligently*

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Better yet, don’t wear a suit and tie for manual labor

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Farao was not pleases by this slave's "intelligence"

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

when they get to the pyramid, someone is going to be pissed.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I had this visual basic textbook.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How about a board with wheels under the cubes?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Boy is that guy gonna be in shit when he finds out they need cubes over there.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

Yeah. Those cube people were hired by the sphere person to make him look good.

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Ah yes, the ancestor Trump

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

Work hard and smart

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 5

“That’s how I roll”

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I agree they all should have asked for spherical thing, but in life we are not given choices, like everyone would have us to believe.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Over analyzing a detail and shoving in aspects that aren't at all implied or related.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

How's he gunna build a wall with a ball?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends on the surface.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Where's my fuckin cube?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'd be pissed if I ordered cubes and got a sphere

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sure, but that was not really the point of the picture. It's been over analyzed.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But I ordered 1000 bricks for my pyramid, and I got 999 and one sphere.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Work intelligent sounds stupid. Work smart would fit better imo

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

Context is everything, sometimes the "dumber" way to do it is more efficient, you'll spend more time designing when the job could be done.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's because it's supposed to be intelligently

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Work brain

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Use brain for smartmaking.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Everything is better in context. I'd like to see you build a wall with the spheres.

5 years ago | Likes 166 Dislikes 1

Technically the atoms that make up the material are spherical

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

Once you get to the destination just carve it back into a square

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

That’s how they built the pyramids ya know.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A square that’s much smaller than all the other blocks going into your wall. A mini block!

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You know the image of Wojak sitting on his own brain? Imagine I posted it.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I hate that 'work intelligent' picture so much. "If your work is hard... just cut corners!"

5 years ago | Likes 1375 Dislikes 5

And who gets to clean up his mess?

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Lazy vs. Efficient

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Customer is like, I ordered cubes. Why dis you send this sphere?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also leaves out the ball has an increased chance of rolling away from your control.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I mean, that is how rich people get rich.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Get a dolly, premade. 'Right tool for the job'

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If he made a cylinder it would still roll but takes less material to remove....

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you hard, then you hard

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The grammar pisses me off. It's work intelligently.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Right?? Fucking up their own point in more than one way

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I liked this extension version

5 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

As a manager of Engineers. Yes. Most "Corners" aren't missed. Provided you remember Safety and Reliability aren't "Corners."

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Should be 'intelligently' anyway. And what if you roll it there and want to build a wall?

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

There's not enough context to know if they are working intelligently/being intelligent. I'll just stay stupid

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I don't understand shouldn't it still be an adverb? Isn't work hard technically incorrect too? If being super nitpicky

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Give a lazy person a job to do and you’ll find the easiest way to get the job done.

5 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 8

Or get it extremely late if he/she is getting paid by the hour

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The easiest way to get a job done is to pay someone else, from a poor country, under the minimum wage, to do it for you.

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 2

Or you won't get the job done at all? You might also get the job done REALLY badly.

5 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 0

Found the programmer.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I hate that it's used to bash the dude with the sphere. If your goal is simply to move the object to other side, he's working smarter.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 17

He's moving less object, though. Because he cut corners. Literally. And he still did more work than he needed to do.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Unless moving the object to the other side also includes all the bits he left behind..

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

But he didn't move the object. He moved 52% of it. A sphere with the same diameter as the side of a cube has 52.3% of the cube's volume

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes that is the point it's not about the literal object.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Too bad everybody takes it extremely literally.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This image is just badly crafted, really. A guy literally cutting corners to deliver less product more easily is not what you want as the>

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

>example for working smarter.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Once again it is not meant about delivering actual cubes. It's about thinking outside the box.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not arguing that it's intent is about cutting corners. I'm arguing that it's bad at illustrating what it intends to illustrate.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Literally cut the corners off

5 years ago | Likes 138 Dislikes 11

?noredirect

5 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 0

all of it

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

In Bsg the papers all had cut corners too

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Much to the regret of the crew. It looked cool but then they had to cut every single book and piece of paper on set for every episode.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So in a weird turn of events, cutting corners was less efficient

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Not even smart too. Would've been quicker, easier and less waste to make a cilinder.

5 years ago | Likes 285 Dislikes 2

Even less waste to make an octagonal prism.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 3

That's one I haven't seen before.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Haha ok then.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Just roll the fucking cube instead of wasting time carving that shit.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

5 years ago (deleted Aug 26, 2020 1:53 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Operative word, "eventually."

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah but it's quicker and easier for the guy drawing the picture to draw a circle. Gotta think outside the cube.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Cylinder! And for the next comment, waste! There. It's done.

5 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 1

I'm gonna downvote this with multiple accounts so the comment is underneath the one with waste written wrongly.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

i was asking myself, how can one write waste wrongly.... and then i saw it...

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But not as efficient. You can't turn very daily with a cylinder. BUT-this is also implying the rolling isn't some Sisyphus level punishment.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You probably wouldn’t need to turn much in that environment. Hell, it’d probably help if it just went in a straight line.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One might say, a sisyphean task

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Intelligent"? Why cut it into a sphere when it would be faster and easier to make it into a cylinder, which would roll just as easily?

5 years ago | Likes 526 Dislikes 4

Or.... Put it on a dolly

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

you don't even need to cut a perfect cylinder

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But... The order was for cubes. Why you trying to change it again? (I'm a machinist, and changing the order specs is a big no-no)

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

or just put the cube on a cart?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Or just don't even push it.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Came here to post this, so as per Imgur law, here is your +1.

5 years ago | Likes 88 Dislikes 0

I just came.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Maybe a cylinder would be too low so he wouldn't be able to push in a comfortable angle? Back pressure from pushing a lower cylinder

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 10

It would be the same height as the sphere

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Ah I got it lol as someone who has pushed cylinders (carpet rolls, rolls of sheet metal) cylinders are far harder to control and steer

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Corners better?

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

For storage, yes

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or use one of the many techniques theorized by scientists and historians on how ancient Egyptians moved the blocks for the pyramids.

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

But slavery is illegal now.

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 9

Good thing the pyramids weren't built by slaves.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 3

good thing, the great pyramids weren't build with stone blocks either.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Aliens?

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

working class

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Bcs it is easier to roll a rock ball then it would be a cylinder

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 21

Only if he has to turn at some point

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

To explain why you're being downvoted - a cylinder has a round side that you can roll it on, like a barrel.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

However, if it begins turning the wrong way (which WILL eventually happen), a cylinder is much harder to turn.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

I would argue you could pivot it to realign the curved side to the direction in question, but you are right that it would happen eventually

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's definitely doable and I am by no means arguing that shaving it to a sphere is a better idea... just that it is indeed the easiest way.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0