Come on in!!

Jun 29, 2021 10:23 AM

LifeConfessionguy1

Views

68328

Likes

2623

Dislikes

84

#7 Well if you squint just right, it technically can be magic... sort of.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm still confused by the picture..

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

Yain’t ready for yaren’t yet.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

#2

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As someone who works with ventilation that is spot on. Also firedampers would stop you from even pass through.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

#20 nah. 4, 5, 1, 2, 3, then 6.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

#23 *y'all

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It's bothering the shit out of me, too.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sadly, not much to the story: https://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/01/29/faked.death.arrest/index.html

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Lol 1989.. yea thats about 20 years ago... hahah

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Sounds right to me don't know why we're laughing

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Y’all’er just now learning about complex contractions?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#23 Also Y'all'd've You all would have

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

i'd've never thought of that.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Came here to say this

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Whomst’d’ve.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

'nt.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

if Taco Bell affects your bowels like this, then your bloodline is weak and will perish

4 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 0

You're absolutely right, but I love it anyway cause it's such a classic cheap shot at Taco Bell.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Taco Bell has never done me wrong. If I so much as drive by a Jack in the Box though.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Right, I've never had an issue with Taco Bell. Maybe some people are lactose intolerant and the sour cream is causing the poops

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's y'all*, though

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

And y'all'd know that if y'all'd've spent any time in the south, but I guess y'all'dn't've wanted to expand your horizons like that.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#1 So what did he actually get arrested for? Why the mugshot?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Faking your death is illegal.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

‘..hands on sight’ is my new go to

4 years ago | Likes 217 Dislikes 4

If this was reddit I would say r/suddenlycaralho!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yoink

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I like "hands at dawn"

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's been 8hrs and I'm still baffled as to what that could mean.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That’s been around since before I was a teen over ten years ago

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Well look at you Mr/Mrs look at me I'm young

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

That’s done wrong. It should be “y’all” not “ya’ll”. Also, you can throw multiple apostrophes ‘cause this y’ain’t in English class.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

"Y'ain't in English class" love it.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

#20 And completely ignore 7, 8, 9.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Y'all'd've.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#7 unfortunately that's just math, math when it runs out of both Latin and Greek letters

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Bayesian statistics, specifically

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Pretty standard probability theory, by the looks of it.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Statistics, specifically. I think there’s only Latin and Greek letters in there?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Bayesian statistics, more specifically. Based on the description of the problem and the stuff inside the integral 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think they are proving that the exponential likelihood has a gamma conjugate prior?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#20 4,5,1,2,3,6

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because I don't think 1 is actually bad enough to completely skip

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I mean why only 4 n 5 and then the prequels? Like what does it change :'D

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Both trilogies have a twist part way through. 5 has the vader twist and 3 has the Palpatine twist. This order preserves both reveals.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also most versions of 5 don't say the name Palpatine or show his face well enough to give it away. But I wouldn't be surprised if the newest

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the plural of y’all is all y’all, is the plural of yain’t “none yain’t”?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*none o'y'ain't.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ah, yes. That’s it. Thanks. ⬆️

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

of course, my dear doctor.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#16 This is absolutely my favorite one of that meme format so far, hands down.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#20 4, 5, 2, 3, 6

4 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

The correct order: 3.5, 4, 5, 6 — that’s it. Nothing more exists.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Machete order!

4 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

This is the way

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't hate 1. But I agree with the order. Especially if using a cut other than the newest one

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Would you start with Rogue One?

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Episode 1 gave us Duel of the Fates so it wasn't all bad. Also the best lightsaber battle until later movies.

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

sigh, fine... 4, 5, last 1/3 of 1, 2, 3, 6

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Note the (very important) lack of 1 in there.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

This is why it's reffered to as the Machete method. Just chop that turd right outta there. (I like 1, but it is a turd)

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Missing Duel of the Fates is a shame though.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

#21 I just can't believe they're all the same size.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

#6 I still haven't figured it out

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#6 can't figure it out and now brain. angry.

4 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 3

There's a baby on his back.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thank god I’m not the only one

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Ah so the dude just has a tiny lower body!

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Siamese twins that share a head

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You’ll see the baby’s head more clearly if u focus on the hair. His face blends with the adult’s.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Scrolled down for this - still confused....

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It looks photoshopped to me. Like the line between their faces has been intentionally blended in.

4 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 2

Really bad cameras can do this.

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Here's the cutoff that I see Baby's looking more straight ahead than the adult is.

4 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 0

Wow! Thankyou. That was making me frustrated. DOH

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I agree, except that the very lower end of the red line should go rightwards - you can see a change in tone near the kid's shoulder,

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

and that would make the kid's head the right shape too.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

How does that baby have exactly the same skin tone as his dad?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Genetics probably

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

you're the best, thanks +1

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#20 actually it goes 4, 5, 2, 3, 6. 1 can either be skipped or thrown in before 2

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#20 and stop right after that.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Eh, TFA and TLJ have lots of enjoyable moments despite massive flaws. ROS is the only one I suggest avoiding at all costs.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

TFA was OK-ish, but TLJ is a complete disaster. It was impossible for ROS to recover from that.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

#20 4-1-5-2-6-3 preserves all secrets

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

415263, Rogue One, Mandalorian.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Alternatively, Star Wars Rogue 1 very last scene-4-5-a phantom edit-6-mandalorian

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Not 100% sure on the phantom edits contents, but I can see skipping 1 and just having 2/3 as a flashback makes sense after 5.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Phantom edit has barely any of 1, just enough to make the 2-3 parts hold better. Sadly, the original one is hard to find (have it).

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can find recreations or remix, however, but your mileage may vary. Still, the original dwells in a few places.

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My friend doesn’t understand this

4 years ago | Likes 149 Dislikes 1

my username is relevant

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right?

4 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 0

That's me, I'm the friend!

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

My friend either.

4 years ago | Likes 40 Dislikes 0

Thank you, kind that you asked for me? Is this you, Tony?

4 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I don't understand this and I don't have any friends.

4 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 0

Its missing the top , my bad. The title is does revove around captain America and the guy is always showing the way

4 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 46

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Who hurt you?

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

v

4 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Gonna need more than that bud

4 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

I'm more lost than before. Did you use Google translate ?

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Wait, what? Not helpful, sorry.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 125 Dislikes 0

Weeeee wooooo weeee woooo

4 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Did you have a stroke? Or autocorrect victim?

4 years ago | Likes 104 Dislikes 3

call a bondulance

4 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 2

3 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

?

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

That didn't help, I'm afraid.

4 years ago | Likes 205 Dislikes 0

Hi Afraid, I'm also confused.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Hello Also Confused, nice to meet you. v

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It's very simple. The title is the captain of the America is showing of the revove. The guy!

4 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 0

Mamptain Camerica is having a stronk! Call a Mambulance!

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

It's y'ain't. They got it wrong.

4 years ago | Likes 480 Dislikes 3

Thank you, came here to say this.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yaren't

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Depends on geography. Some places say "yaint" as one syllable, some say "yuh-aint" as 2 syllables.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ya'lln't

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ayuh.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Maine?

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

just read a lot of Stephen King, actually.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Its actually y'allint

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nnnnunnnchuckssss

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's y'ain't, actually

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Y'oink

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oi you! Don't you fucking start!

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And it's y'all.

4 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Y'all'n't

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Truth. Also, ain't is am is and not. Are not is aren't, a legitimate contraction.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

You ain't right about that.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ai is not gonna do it! Good ole southern talk, not proper, but real nonetheless

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

4 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I thought it was the rat guy from one of the Harry Potter movies but it's that tiger guy people used to care about.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

This dude makes me extremely uncomfortable.

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

also y'ain't is still "you are not". the "all" doesn't really fit into there, so that chart is wrong

4 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Y'a'in'st'd've

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You all are not coming to my party

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You are not would be Y'aren't.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Y'all'd've know that if you grew up in the south

4 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 0

Beautiful

4 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Jun 30, 2021 12:36 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I was going for known but I'm incapable of writing without typos.

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Y'all'dn't've known unless...

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Anyone who contracts you all to ya’ll and not y’all deserves prison time.

4 years ago | Likes 204 Dislikes 3

In any other contraction BOTH words are shortened though, ya'll makes more sense.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Ya'll is ya will.

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or just yall

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Wrong. It's a contraction. It needs the apostrophe... according to Mr. Johnson from 3rd grade. I wonder what he's doing now. Hell, probably.

4 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Yal'l need Jesus

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

He'll probably what?

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Damn dude and all my 3rd grade teacher did was teach us the n word.

4 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Somehow I imagine "y'all" and "y'ain't" were very common words in y'alls' school.

4 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

4 years ago (deleted Feb 1, 2022 4:48 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Because apostrophe is for the missing letters (the o and the u in "you". Ya'll might work if it contracted "Ya" and "all" instead of "you".

4 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Won't?

4 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Non-native english speaker here. What's the reasoning behind "ain't" then?

4 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

In a single contraction the apostrophe takes the place of the rightmost chain of removed characters. Note it does not replace *all* missing

4 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's a bit of reading for the etymology. Comes originally mostly from "am not" and "are not" > "an't". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ain%27t

4 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Good point! It's all slang and not proper English but the apostrophe is for missing o in not, but ain't is not really based on specific 1/2

4 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0