Meanwhile, in Australia

Feb 18, 2018 9:20 PM

psuedon

Views

3206

Likes

106

Dislikes

46

in a land where everything wants to kill you.

2002 monash university

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

yes please stop suggesting ways to stop this. we're trying nothing here and happy with it.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

American gun owners are pussilanious snowflakes.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If Sandy Hook and the massacre in Las Vegas didn't change anything, nothing will.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Does the Australian constitution have the right to bear arms? I imagine they would've faced more opposition passing reform of it did.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

Entitled. That's all that comes to mind...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@OP it doesn’t matter, this argument was won a long time ago. Nut jobs get to keep their ability to buy lots of guns, and all it costs is

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 6

a bunch of children every few months. NRA and GOP are fine with paying that cost apparently

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

K

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now tells us about the stats in Mexico

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

Mexico? maybe 4 school shooting over the past decade. the USA has it's own wiki page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_shooting#Mexico

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Look at Mexico's crime and homicide rates, baby

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 5

comparing Apples to Apples. We are talking school shootings.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 5

Oh, so murder on the streets isnt as bad? Cartels kidnapping and raping is better?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 7

They also changed the definition of "mass" from 4+ to 10+. Otherwise the number would not be 0. source/

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

The text above was specifically referring to mass shootings. Family murders/killing don't usually get counted in this type of attack anyway.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the list includes mass shootings since then too. There have been 2, although one only killed 2 people and wounded 5. Still more than 0.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

3 not 2, a family annihilator killed his family, and the lindt Cafe siege. Although 2 of 3 deaths there were caused by the police. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is a total of 12 people in 20 years. Compared to America, with 30 deaths from mass shootings so far in 2018, it's a big difference

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Didn't hit the standard of 4 or more killed or wounded for a "mass" killing. So I didn't include it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_massacres_in_Australia they have had the same number of mass killings in the 22 years since the Port/

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

/ arthur shooting as they had before its just its much more arson, knives, and cars than guns.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

1) That's about 40 people killed since Port Arthur. The latest school shooting in the usa left 30 dead. Correct?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2) That's the 18th shooting in the usa this year. You still debate that guns aren't the problem? You don't care enough about yourselves

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

No, there have not been 18 shootings this year. Google it.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

US population is about 12 times Australia, so your death toll is like 480 Americans dead. Still pretty bad. US is worse, but still.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Honestly i would rather it be shootings. At least then its fast. I would hate to think of a knife attack where kids bleed out slowly.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So you think it's always a quick death from shooting? Too many films kiddo

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No i think theres a higher chance of it. Rather than bleeding out for hours.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And yet your former prison colony still has a higher murder rate than us well-armed Swiss.

8 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 15

I thought you had to be smart to live in SwitZerland? Maybe not

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

And?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most Swiss only own a service weapon and for a limited amount of time and aren‘t given ammo to go with it. Not quite the same as owning one

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 6

Ammo can easily be bought at a store or even easier at a gun range and many decide to keep their rifles after service. Also, the 1

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

current service rifle is a minority to weapons owned with most being older service rifles which are unregistered. 2

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

This comment is intentionally misleading and you know it. Firearms are heavily regulated in Switzerland, which is what the US is calling for

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 6

Are they? Gun rights in Switzerland are protected by law and can be easily bought with a background check and requisition form (which can't1

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 4

be denied for no reason). Swiss males serving in the military have the option to take their service rifle home and keep it after service. 2

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

A background check is also mandatory in the US on a federal level for every gun bought at a store, and just like the US private sales do 3

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

not require a background check be presented but that the seller has no reason to believe the buyer is breaking the law and report to the 4

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

authorities that the weapon was sold if it was a weapon that was registered in the first place, which are the minority here. 5

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

"The US" is calling for fuck all, least of all heavier firearms regulations.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Fair. Character restrictions truncated my comment but many American CITIZENS are calling for it which I acknowledge is different.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Many, but not all. And I'll leave it at that.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Agreed.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What works for one country might not work for another one

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 17

And we're not even going to try.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 10

Probably not

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 7

No, but it probably will... since it's a tried and tested method of most civilised countries in the world...

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 10

Well as that would go against our constitutional rights it probably won't

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 7

banning automatic and semi-automatic weapons isn't against anything in the constitution

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

But that is not how people in the United States view it

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

The constitution was written by slave owners. Stop pretending they were gods. They were just men trying their best.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3