Passive aggressive Snowden is the best kind.

Jul 13, 2016 5:56 PM

GoneBerserk

Views

69587

Likes

3435

Dislikes

284

I wish I could write in his name for president.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Putin said he supported Trump and now Snowden, as a resident of Russia, is dissing Clinton...seems sketchy?

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

Well Hillary cared about her privacy, and everybody hates her because she didn't leak government secrets to ENOUGH people.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 4

Will the circle jerk ever end? Its not even funny anymore its sad to see people still at it.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

The mans a traitor for giving state secrets to Russia but hes right.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

I don't know who Edward Snowden is and at this point I'm too afraid to ask.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

yeah, he released secret files without reading them first, and gave them to people too careless to properly vet them. it's hard to be a fan

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 8

The files he released were records of data mining, specifically records of contact time & freq. Not actual transcripts of communication.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Help! I can hardly read this, am I too stoned?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nigga you jus dumb

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A person under Russian protection is criticizing the presidential candidate whose policies are less beneficial to Russia. Coincidence?

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 6

I seriously hope youre trolling because what youre implying is idiotic.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 4

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

Fucking love this guy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Said it before, incompetent

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I don't know how many times this has to be spelled out. Zero. Z E R O of the emails on Clinton's server were classified when sent/received

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 11

"Hwhat?" - Hank Hill Snowden.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 8

Attention whore continues to whore attention.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 11

Can we get an Edwarn Snowden for President write-in campaign going?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

And this b want to be our potus??

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I'd have more respect for snowden if it did anything but leak some PDFs and go live in russia and do fucking nothing.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Exiled"- bitch, you ran to avoid prosecution, don't act like you were told to leave

9 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 19

you should get you shit straight...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I think political refugees are included in the definition of 'exile'... Being sent into exile is not really practised anymore, is it?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

I suppose like Idi Amin. But that was probably for good reason...

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don't know that I consider someone charged with treason a political refugee, but fair point. I also don't hate that he did what he did 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

But that doesn't make it less illegal, and the whole martyr complex when he didn't face the punishment rubs me the wrong way. 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

If the last quote were not an exaggeration, then wouldn't he have leaked all the dirt they had on himself (or anyone) to prove it?

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

Snowden by nature is passive agressive. If it didn't mean signing your own deathsentence, he would have sued NSA and gov. w/ info he had.

9 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 14

Not being killed is passive aggressive?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

That's not what passive aggressive means

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

His approach was passive aggressive, vs active aggressive, is what I meant.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

NO IT WASN'T. Jesus. Look up the definition of the term.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Ok mom.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I hope Snowden is enjoying his freedom in mother Russia. People forgot he released classified intel to wiki. Hillary was just stupid.

9 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 20

He released classified info as a whistle blower. The dude's a hero.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 11

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Apr 28, 2017 8:17 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

almost like the classification of "good" and "bad" isn't that easy in reality...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You're thinking of a completely different person, Julian Assange. Do a little reading next time.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well, Assange runs Wikileaks, he got info from various sources. None from Snowden though.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He isn't wikileaks, he didn't leak to them, he used reputable journalists, and was the whistle on domestic and international surveillance

9 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

Yeah, anybody who was surprised that the NSA spies on other countries was naive.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

There's still a difference from believing to knowing

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the end result is the same though, russians hacked hillary's email server, and all of those emails can be found online.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I hate ehen idiots hear sonething and then act like experts on the subject. Wikileaks and snowden have nothing to do with each other.

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

Let's praise the man who compromised government security in the first place.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 18

I remember my first election...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Oh look, the savior complex traitor who release hundreds of gigabytes on FOREIGN intelligence operations and techniques.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I have only one problem with last one "they" who? Who specifically is they? Passive voice is bullshit. Name a corp a person or a faction

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 17

He was referring to the NSA

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

so does that make the NSA the most powerful agency in the Country?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exactly what Snowden's trying to prove I guess

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Are you kidding? The only bullshit here is how lazy you are. Not even a moral judgement about the issue-your point is 100% moot.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's a quote from an interview with a journalist.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

gotcha I just wish some individual names of specific people could come out so that everyone can put an actual face to these shadow people

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

you don't really get enough characters to write a whole treatise do you. In a nutshell I'm 100% against spying on the public

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Seriously? He's in Russia because the US Gov't wants him dead.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 5

If they wanted him dead, he'd be dead. Right now, his 15 minutes are up, and he's just trying to capitalize

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 8

I dunno about capitalizing, but you're right about him being dead if they wanted him dead. He just doesn't want to get an unfair trial.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The only issue in his trial would be sentencing, which would most likely be relatively fair. It's pretty blatant he's guilty.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Actually, it's clear that he's innocent. Revealing secrets showing others are in violation of the law is a legal defense.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The U.S. Government is huge, not everyone affiliated with it believes he should be living in exile. Might be a specific group responsible

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I don't know if I'd say dead. I believe he would be put on trial. Would it be fair and public no. Or they would hold him forever at gitmo

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

I mean the chances they would try and punish him for treason is HIGH, and treason is punishable by death...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Treason hasn't been used a lot in us history. It is possible and I'm not saying it won't happen in just saying they arent actively trying

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The first quote bothers me, because I don't think those two are equivalent. Free speech is something intended to be shared publicly, while 1

9 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 13

Well if you're saying you have nothing to hide them you should question how much you are willing to share

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the exact opposite is true with regard to private. The purpose of speech is being shared while privacy defines its purpose in being kept 2

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 7

Do.. do you not understand how analogies work? "gravity don't come from rubber trees! not rubber sheet durrr"

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

to oneself. Anyone think differently? I don't mean to sound aggressive or to offend anyone, just offering an opinion on a topic to discuss

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

I think he was just illustrating that both are nice to possess regardless of their use. I think it's pretty gross that every text I send,

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

7) chiseled at. -- For funsies, google "orwell quote" and click "images".

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

6) for unscrupulous means. And they're the same in the sense that we've been completely deprived of one, while the other is being steadily

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5) many ways. Where they're the same is that they're very basic rights. People deserve both, even if a small percentage of people use them

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

4) it's a far more ingrained right for people. --- Getting back to your original observation, speech and privacy are obviously different in

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

3) government. It doesn't directly affect me, so there's no outrage, just annoyance. (Mostly) free speech, imo, is only still around because

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2) every search I perform on google, actually every keystroke on chrome regardless of whether or not it's entered, is logged by our

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

People want to compare what he did to HC, & I am not HC sympathizer, but in the eyes of US law what they did is completely different.

9 years ago | Likes 91 Dislikes 15

Just saying, read the comments of: StroneDog>CollMaggie>StroneDog>Dingus for the best joke ever.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

What he did is undeniably not comparable to Clinton's fiasco.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 3

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jul 21, 2016 1:19 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Hillary Clinton

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

[deleted]

[deleted]

9 years ago (deleted Jul 21, 2016 1:19 AM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

No, Lewinsky does the blowing for her.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

This is absolute gold.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

In the eyes of anyone who isn't a blind partisan hack they're 100% different. Imgur is surprisingly conservative I have to say.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

No I'm (was) a Bernie supporter and I agree with him. I was also against him doing what he did though, FTR. Doesn't take away from his point

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Nah, using a private email and fucking up 100 emails out of 30k is not similar to intentionally disclosing thousands of files of class. info

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Did I say that? Or did I say that just because its not as bad in comparison doesn't mean its not still breaking the law? pretty sure the 2nd

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I think that's his exact point. They shouldn't be. He did what was right.

9 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 13

Leaking government secrets because you think a legal intelligence program shouldn't be is not something we should encourage.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 9

"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so." -Thomas Jefferson

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

And in the eyes of morality, what he did was a great thing, and what she did was despicable.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Whose morality? He took it in his own hands and possibly endangered lives of Americans. And despicable!? Seriously?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Despicable: deserving hatred and contempt.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Not sure what she did was despicable. Let's call a spade a spade. You don't like her. And will grasp on anything to fuel that hate.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

You have no idea what either of them actually did, do you?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That is not at all what he did. I think you're thinking of Chelsea Manning.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No he took state secrets and inappropriately put them out to the public. Possibly handcuffing US investigations.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

2) by their government, ehhh... anyone criminal who's worth the NSA's attention already suspected this and didn't use cell phones.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If by "handcuffing investigations" you mean "let every law-abiding citizen know that every keystroke they type on the internet is recorded

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You are literally to stupid to operate your email so you are cleared to run the country.

9 years ago | Likes 958 Dislikes 57

Thats so bad ass, you corrected someones grammar. He's not writing a fucking book report you tard.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 17

"You are literally so powerful the head of the FBI is too scared to cross you, so you are cleared to run the country" FTFY

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"I'll clean up ISIS with a washcloth."

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, seems logical.

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 1

Love the Username

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Because you're too stupid to stand up to them.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

The American Way...

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

You have to remember - Comey is a Bush-era Republican. He'd let Bill fuck him in the assif it meant he could drag a Clinton through the mud

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 11

Are you saying Comey lied and slanted his investigation for political reasons?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Exaggerated and no different than claiming he slanted his investigation in Clinton's favor for political/monetary reasons

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can we do the thing where we start the election over with all new candidates? I don't think we can get any worse.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I'm all in favor of handing the reigns over to Canada until we find better candidates.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bullshit, if she knew enough about email to get her own server she knows how to use email. He's backtracking to try to cover his ass.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

He's not covering his ass, you made his point for him

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

She didn't set up the server herself, she hired somebody.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

To be fair, the vast majority of our elected representatives are too stupid to operate email. See: Series of tubes.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

See, now, I always thought that was a good layman's analogy... Yes, inaccurate, but not a bad way to describe it to someone who doesn't know

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The metaphor wasnt the issue, the entire speech was. Go read it, and tell me if you think he's qualified to vote on net neutrality.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Oh, GODS no. I never, ever thought that. :) Just that the analogy wasn't that bad. The speech was a pile of poo and deserves derision.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Do you know anything about our politic system or have ever meet an elected politician? Grow up...

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 10

It's a joke man. Take your blood pressure pill and go back to bed.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Most presidents send a total of like 4 emails during their term. most messages to the president are handled by aides, phones, and paper

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 42

That's not the point. Emails aren't exactly the most sophisticated of tech. If she can't figure something like that out what makes you 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

think she has the critical thinking skills necessary for presidency where she will encounter new and far more complicated issues 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Have you ever seen a classified email? Because I'm guessing that you have no idea what you are talking about.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 4

Agreed. Also, using email is way, way, WAY easier than running an email server. You expect your server admin to know what they're doing 1/2

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

I dont think that excuses the fact she will likely encounter similar/greater measures as president,so your point is moot,condescending as is

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But that makes it ok?

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

If you judge a fish by its ability to climb trees you will deduce that the fish is a moron

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 19

Fuck that useless fish

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You would. According to your username anyway.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The problem is not that she was unable to do it, the problem is that what she did was illegal. .-.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

If you cannot trust a person on small issues, you cannot trust them on large ones.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Said fish is running for president.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

and how often do presidents need to climb trees or send emails? rarely if ever.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

So are we judging its ability to run then? If so it's still not very good.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Snowden put out a music video lately, I think russia is turning him insane.

9 years ago | Likes 186 Dislikes 22

No, he always was.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 8

That was literally just 4 minutes of techno beats with a clip of Edward Snowden talking in the middle from a previous speech.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

the source I originally found the song from said snowden had teamed up with jean-michel jarre

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 6

jean-michel jarre, oh boy I haven't heard of that one in awhile, I got vinyl of his on my shelf - oxygen if I remember right.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I don't actually know how much he was involved with it, it seems like the musician (Jean-Michel Jarre) just used clips of Snowden's voice.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Jean-Michel Jarre is a legend though (I have no idea about that snowden video, just in general)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

the source I originally found the song from said snowden had teamed up with jean-michel jarre

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Oh, damn. Yeah, Russia's turned him crazy. It's essentially edgy Darude meets edgy Snowden. The music video is mildly cringy.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Somewhat reinforces my suspicion that hes an attention whore

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 74

If you're not from Ars, you should be.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

what?

9 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 10

I don't know what part of that you don't understand. Snowden put out a music video and I think russia is turning him insane.

9 years ago | Likes 99 Dislikes 6

HE DID WHT?AT

9 years ago | Likes 43 Dislikes 2

HE PUT OUT A MUSIC VIDEO. how many times do I have to say it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YNESMafb5ZI

9 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 4

.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ok so. He did what!?!

9 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Famous electro pioneer Jean-Michel Jarre collaborated on a song with Edward Snowden. Not quite the same thing as Rebecca Black's Friday.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You might have some anger issues dood

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

holy shit, this thread blew up while I was away!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You could have just posted the link the first time...

9 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

Fucking finally! I don't wanna look around the internet for a jam sesh with exiled glasses dude. Bring it to me dammit!

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I'M NOT A WIZARD I'M JUST HARRY!!!!

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

HE SAID HE'S SELLING CHOCOLATE.

9 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 0

I REMEMBER WHEN THEY INVENTED CHOCOLATE!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

CHOCOLATE????

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0