Forget Gif Wars, upvote Panda Candy

Jan 12, 2017 10:48 AM

RandomUpvotes

Views

98605

Likes

1727

Dislikes

124

sauce: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-3Xe7RMg3w

But do they have broads in Atlanta?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ohhhhhh... thought it was spring onion.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought they were chopping cables and i was scared for a moment

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why are they using a knife? The candy is hard, they're just dulling the blade.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Canda Pandy

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

When does the gif stop? That vine is infinite.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I'm confused. Is it candy for pandas, made from pandas, or just resembles pandas?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Can someone edit this and turn the candy into upvotes?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They really missed the boat by not calling it, "Pandy Candy".

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Some say he's still chopping to this day.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Looks like someone needs a SlapChop!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

'You're gonna love my nuts'

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The last time this shop was featured in the news it crashed their website and back ordered for months.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This loop pleases me

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Finger Ling Ling good

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No wonder they almost went extinct

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought they were Spring onions

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

9 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 0

And that's why he got made into panda candy.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

How do they fit the pandas into the candies? Modern technology sure is amazing.

9 years ago | Likes 225 Dislikes 1

How do they fit a pumpkin into those little coffee mugs.. Am I right?!

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What a time to be alive!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Okay Ken M

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Crazy how nature do that

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

It's a secret, magical, hugely inhumane process. But it does explain why there are so few pandas....

9 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

That and how utterly useless they are on their own. If they weren't cute, they'd be extinct.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Okay Ken M

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Why don't they just have a machine to do that?

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Cause its hand made candy. Look up "Lofty Pursuits" on youtube.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Good stripper name

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Pandy candy!

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's bamboozling

9 years ago | Likes 109 Dislikes 1

Ha

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's come full circle

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I see what you did there

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Boozebambled again

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

"Lets play BAMBOOZLED!"

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought it was green onion until I read the title

9 years ago | Likes 196 Dislikes 1

Oh, it's not?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No, it's Pandy Canda

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Bamboozled again!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh thank god, I thought it was just me.

9 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Same! Then I thought it was bamboo because that's what pandas eat.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Green onions are so tasty!

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Put the bottoms in water, free green onions for life!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Ooo thanks for the tip.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Change the water regularly, though, or it goes brown and slimy and gross.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They really couldn't get a machine to do that?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's the point. Candy made by hand tastes way better.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

True

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that's a job which can be easily automated.

9 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 6

as an employee of said business, i sure as hell wish it was

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

However this person is likely multiskilled and this is probably only one tiny part of the job they do.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

But should it be?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My thoughts exactly.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Chinese workers are faster than machines and they don't need to bed fed or paid. :)

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Automation is way more expensive than a laborer in places like china

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Not really, you could rig something up with a vacume engine and two wheels. Just MacGyver the hell out of it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

An entire chef's job can (and has) been entirely automated, but it's expensive.

9 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Automation will lead to the collapse of the world economy

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

That's a big ass statement not supported by the last 200 years of history. Care to make an argument?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If you are so naive to think that jobs aren't being lost to automation, and the the need for laborers is deacreasing, then bless.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

And the response "someone has to fix the machines" is invalid. You don't support an entire world population on repairing machines

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

A cutting machine is actually way cheaper than an operator

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Watch the video, they do a lot more than just cut.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Cutting is only a part of production. You can easily put operator that make candy sticks all day and a cutter at the end that do his job in

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

seconds, without that someone lose time doing a long, repetitive operation. The time gained can be use to do other less automatic operations

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Sure...If you assume this person earns an average salary doing nothing but cutting, day in, day out. This is probably only a small 1/?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

A good cutter for that purpose will cost a hundred dollars and it'll be WAY faster than an operator, like this is a bottleneck on production

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And you can spend the operator's time gained in other less implementable operations

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Part of his duties. Seen from this perspective, it is indeed cheaper and easier to have a worker cut some bamboo 2/2

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Humans need sleep, machines don't

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Its not bamboo, its actually panda candy. Look closely at the cross section. Not arguing one way or the other just saying.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0