Swing-wing airplanes: how and why

Feb 11, 2018 5:20 PM

Astroblitz

Views

235974

Likes

4429

Dislikes

65

You may wonder why some aircraft can adjust the angle (sweep) of their wings. I'll try to explain that in this post.

For each flight phase, one shape is optimal. Straight wings are preferred for slow flight, as they are far more efficient. However, when flying close to or beyond the speed of sound, straight wings will suddenly produce a lot of drag. This is where swept wings come in handy, they allow you to fly faster with less drag.

Pictured above is an F-14 doing tests with asymmetric wing sweep.

As with many technologies, a prototype with swept wings was first made in Nazi-Germany in 1944. This is a Messerschmitt Me-P1101. Its wing sweep could be adjusted only on the ground, but this was only meant for testing. Its actual purpose was to be a cheap fighter which could turn the tide against the allied invasion. It was never completed before the war ended.

When the Me-P1101 was found, it was shipped to the United States, where it formed the inspiration for the Bell X-5, pictured above. This prototype could change sweep angle in-flight, and tests revealed a number of problems. One was that when the wings were swept backward, the airplane would dive nose-down because the lift shifted back as well. The pilot had to compensate quite a lot for this. Also, the mechanism to sweep the wings was quite heavy.

However, in general the concept was found very useful, enabling an aircraft to fly very slow and fast in the same mission.

Another early prototype was the Grumman XF10. This prototype was made for the U.S. Navy. Having good low-speed performance was essential for carrier-based aircraft. To fix the problem of the shifting lift, the wjng itself would translate forward when the sweep angle was increased.

A solution to get rid of the heavy and complicated mechanisms, was to make the wings fixed at a certain angle and just accept the problems this caused at low speeds. The best example is the F-86 Sabre. It was a formidable fighter, and its swept wings allowed it to reach Mach 1 in a dive.

However, the swept wing required a high landing speed, and when the wing stalled, the aircraft would pitch up and make things worse. This phenomenom is called Sabre Dance, there are some videos of it on Youtube.

Because of the succes of the Sabre, the United States wanted to feature swept wings in a high speed bomber. However, to make the landing speed acceptably low, straight wings were preferred. The solution was variable geometry, and resulted in the F-111 Aardvark, the first operational variable sweep aircraft. It was meant to fly under the radar at high speeds to destroy high-profile targets behing the lines.

The Soviet Union meanwhile also saw the advantages and created the Sukhoi 17. Based on the Sukhoi 7, which had 'ordinary' wings, the outer portion of the wing could be adjusted. Because only a part of the wing was movable, the changes in pitch were not so dramatic. It also allowed to carry weapons on the non-moving part of the wing.

Somewhat later, the MiG-23 followed. It was more focused on long-range missiles and a short take-of distance, so it was given a large radar and the extra weight of the sweep mechanism didn't matter that much. A dedicated ground-attack version was also made.

In response to the F-111, the Su-24 was made. It was also meant to have a long range, for which the wings would be unfolded, and be able to do a high-speed dash towards the target at low level, for which the wings would be fully swept aft.

In Europe, the Panavia Tornado was made by England, West-Germany, and Italy. The focus was again on low-level, high-speed attacks to bypass ever more advanced surface to air missiles. In order to let it use short runways, not only wing sweep could be adjusted, it also had thrust reversers, quite unique for fighter aircraft. The wing pylons could swivel to keep the weapons pointed forward and thus reduce drag.

Because the F-111 was also meant to be developed into a carrier-based interceptor, the F-111B was developed. This failed quite badly however, and the iconic F-14 Tomcat was born. It had an excellent range, and a great top speed of over Mach 2. Although it was meant as an interceptor, it was also a maneuverable dogfighter and it has 135 kills on its name.

This is the B-1B Lancer, a heavy supersonic bomber. Originally it had a top speed of Mach 2, but in later versions the emphasis was laid on stealth. This reduced the top speed to Mach 1.2, which is still impressive given the size; it weighs 87,000 kg (190,000 lbs), which is comparable to a Boeing 767 airliner.

This is the Tupolev Tu-160. Although it looks similar to the B-1, it's larger and heavier. Its mission is also a bit different, it mainly carries cruise missiles. Because it is less focused to be stealthy, it is a lot faster. Only 36 were made.

Sadly however, variable sweep wing seem to be a thing of the past. More advanced flaps allow airplanes to fly slower, and stealth technologies has taken away the need to fly low and fast for a good part. I personally think that is a shame, since variable sweep wings look sexy as hell.

Prototype tax: NASA Oblique Wing concept.

FP EDIT: send me what makes you smile! Also: if you want to see more of these, check my favourites.

v

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Great overview. Detailed yet not too long.

8 years ago | Likes 71 Dislikes 1

F14 tomcat the bad ass fight dog of his time.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I LOVE fighters, both the piston and jet variety, but especially the F-14 Tomcat. Dogfights was my favorite show on TV for a long time.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Omg. Swept wing craft are my absolute favorite things

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I love the f-14 *not an f-14 but I share the guys enthusiasm*

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So what you're saying, is wing swept back was riding into the danger zone?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Negative ghost rider the pattern is full

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

F-14 is still my favourite airplane.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even Star Wars has 'em now. v

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

We're not 'England' we're the United (for now, thanks dumbshits) Kingdom. Let's give the N. Irish, Scottish and Welsh due representation

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 4

Love it!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I like the shape and the sound of the Tornado since I grew up with it.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Wheres this video taken?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

At the German Alps

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

DCS: F-14 will be awesome!

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Anytime, Baby

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's the Mach 0.8 to 1.2 range that plays merry hell with straight wing aircraft. Sub and supersonic is easy, in between is a bitch.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

F-104+Delta Dart are great examples of this, they have foibles outside of their targeted design envelope such as stupid high landing speeds

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And then there's the SR-71, for a fantastic example of Stupid-high landing speed. And Stupid-high stall speed. And the need to push the 1/

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

tankers to their MAX speed to keep from forcing the SR-71 out of the sky. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thanks. I made a model F-14 as a kid and I loved the variable wings. Great to learn about the history. v

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Love the Tomcat and B-1B

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The F-14 is the most beautiful aircraft that ever flew. I wish swing-wing airplanes were still a thing. Thank you for this post, OP.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Swing wing design will unfortunately probably never come back, and with sam’s i think that manned aircraft will eventually become obsolete

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Thats just my cynical opinion though, it’s undeniable that they are sexy

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unmanned seems to be the future regardless of sams, US 6th gen fighters are planned to come in both manned and unmanned versions afaik

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unmanned is just more efficient. Smaller craft, longer holding times, load up an airship as a flying missile rack, and use the drones to see

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Sam's Club closing stopped manned fighter production? They were right, the Chinese drones will defeat us all!!!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

What is this from?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stargate Atlantis, from the second last episode https://youtu.be/JmF3lyIZ8KE?t=151

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That episode is 9 years old now but looks like it came from the late 90s.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

oh wow... that last flyby is really so glaringly soddy animation >.<

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

gawd... looks like a neil breen movie

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Tornado was manufactured by the *United Kingdom*, West Germany and Italy. Please don't ignore 3/4 of our country. Also, the Tornado >>

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 5

>> was a family of aircraft including a dedicated interceptor with a different airframe, the Tornado ADV.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

ADV, short for Air Display Variant.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Air Defence Variant

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was called Air Display Variant by people cos it never actually fired any weapons in anger.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Talk to me Goose"

8 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 1

I LOST HIM IN THE SUN

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

“You’re gonna do what?!”

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Got to see the opening of Top Gun with an audience of Grumman employees and Navy officers and test pilots. I’ll never forget it.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

See you at the front page ;)

8 years ago | Likes 50 Dislikes 2

Who knows... :)

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Don't be so modest.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

(welcome)

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thank you for the information Mr. Airplane man

8 years ago | Likes 434 Dislikes 1

Domo arigato, Mr. Airplane-o.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I mean. It's no @DeathStarWasAnInsideJob but it's definitely a great read lol

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why do some people have to judge other people by their loved things in unfavored ways? Don't these people have souls?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Bullies deserves their own bitterness, and most of them do.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Indeed, i agree. What has brought this on?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

There's more in my other posts and my favourites, if you're interested. :)

8 years ago | Likes 64 Dislikes 3

Looked through your favourites, one of mine is there!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Fuck yes I am!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Do you have any that compare the latest US jets to the Russian Horde

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I may do that some time, it's interesting stuff of course.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

Saw NASA Oblique Wing plane in person, cannot stress enough how small it is, look at the people towering over it: https://imgur.com/Th7LoOz

8 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Neat

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Visible @ Hiller Aviation Museum. Tops out@170mph, shorter than Lebron James, same weight as a Scamp: https://imgur.com/wvO6ghD

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Whats the point of it?

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I know the point is at the front

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Same core concept as a sweep wing (reduce wave drag from high speed airflow), but is mechanically simpler. It suffered from control issues

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Nice! I'm right there with you. The day the F-14 was fully phased out was a sad day

8 years ago | Likes 196 Dislikes 2

My favourite jet fighter by a mile.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I was at the official retirement ceremony they had at the air and space museum by coincidence with my dad who worked on them

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

I was at Grumman for the last one that rolled out. My Dad worked on them too.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Iran still has, and flies, a squadron they acquired before the fall of the Shah.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And they have serious maintenance issues cause they aren't us.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's still in service. In Iran.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Airways struck me how big they were. Parked next to a B17, other than wingspan, nearly as big as the bomber.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ever see it from the back? It's like a beautiful frisbee with giant engines.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Computers replaced the variable geometry wing. The F-18 has better low speed capability than any Tomcat ever had.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Better aero helps with that significantly. For instance the canted vert. Stab. Is right in incoming airflow at high AOA.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

All us Brits were devastated at the loss of the Harrier, I just hope the Lightning II lives up to its name.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Oh it will. My word may not be worth much to you as a stranger but it will be. If you want to know more just ask

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm an AF guy, but the worse day was when they ordered all the f14s in the boneyard shredded. That was a day for onions.

8 years ago | Likes 29 Dislikes 0

Just curious, what is the day-to-day for an As-F*ck guy?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Everything, to the extreme. When he wakes up and his wife asks how he slept, it wasn't just good...

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It was to keep the Iranians from getting the parts :(

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Meh, Hydraulic Hell Hangar Queens - all of em. Do you use a car designed in the 60's and built in the 70's as a daily driver today? Nope.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 10

My foreman does. But it's a classic, and he likes it.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

If I knew how to repair/maintain it - Yes.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

F14 is one of the coolest fighters ever made. But paired with the wrong engine and a missile system that has 0% effectiveness with the navy.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Take it back ????

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The Phoenix missile did everything it was intended to as a standoff fleet defense interceptor, outperforming the sidewinder and sparrow

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

All specs on the missile were truly impressive except for one: out of 3 fired in US naval service, 2 failed to ignite and one missed.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Except that 3 is a statistically non-valid sample size.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Allegedly Iran had a lot of success with them, but we don't have any data from that. I'm sure it was an excellent missile in practice, but..

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also the engagement where the two AIM54s failed to ignite, the two MIG29s also dodged 3 AIM7s and 1 AIM120

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If you get down to the nitty gritty of it, at the time of the F14/AIM54's main use there was nothing in the US arsenal that even compared1/?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

to the phoenix in either success ratio or sheer capabilities. In 1974 the AIM54 was boasting a BVR .78 hit/launch ratio whereas the 2/?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0