Nature always seems to invent the best shit first.

Sep 9, 2017 10:48 AM

romicra88

Views

130655

Likes

1858

Dislikes

53

Humans just haven't discovered where yet.

This is the only known set of working interlocking gears in nature. They belong to the plant hopper bug issus. It uses these gears to synchronize it's legs for jumping, which can make it reach 8mph and 400 Gs. http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/this-insect-has-the-only-mechanical-gears-ever-found-in-nature-6480908/

And now we wait for the intelligent design nitwits to swarm in...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Aa

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah, but no one ever talks about all the gears nature keeps trying to make that *don't* work.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

That would be interesting to see failed evolutions that are still present

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I thought it was ravioli

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

its

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Ya ain't kidding: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_nuclear_fission_reactor

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

(not even going to mention naturally occurring fusion reactors ;))

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And then came the Gear Wars. So, how much do you know about the Gear Wars?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In 10 years time we will discover a an animal with mini guns and rocket engines then?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well... the only ones larger than a folded protein anyway.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

My dumbass thought those were greyscale smucker's uncrustables pb&j.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

"You know what really grinds my gears?"

8 years ago | Likes 92 Dislikes 0

Asynchronous jumping legs?

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Motherfuckin predators

8 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

*pterodactyls...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

First set of gears my arse. Look up flagellum mechanism.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Duh, nature made us.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What happens when they slip a tooth? They might need to get their timing tuned

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

After we found it once, we started finding it in a bunch of other arthropod species, in all sorts of gear varieties.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 5

Do you have a downvote version of this

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

making your way downvote, walking fast, faces pass?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

v

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@TheMajesticHarpyEagle

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Read an article about these once, fuckin neato.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Lazarus rises once more... v

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

this is why I loved studying biology in college. Other people sat in rooms and read books. I played with animals in fields/mountains/streams

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Should have carried on studying it dude

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's only on the juvenile form though, right?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Training wheels, basically.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If I understood it right, it keeps them, but after it quits molting it ends up wearing them off.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

You really like that thing don't you.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Strangest thing about this is how it could have evolved. A half formed set of gears would have given the animal no advantage in the wild.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A lack of imagination on your part does not a logical flaw make. Lots of insects scrape ridged parts against each together for noise.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 billions years against 10 000, we're a bit faster than "nature" motherfucker

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 7

I think this might be a 'tortise and the hare' situation.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

except the hare waits at the start line until the tortoise is 3cm from the finish before the hare bolts past it at Mach 72

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

He just said first not fastest. Motherfucker

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

nature had a hella head start

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nature still usually does it first though. And we have a knowledge driven mind versus natural selection

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

We put a retroreflector on the moon so we can shine lasers at it and have them bounce back. Nature can suck my dick.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Technically we are a product of mother nature so everything we make is kinda her invention anyway.

8 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 5

Father Physics has something to say about that

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Until I see patents I'm calling her out on her BS claims.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Nature invented an inventing machine

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

That fucked me up for a whopping 3 seconds.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And we've achieved so much more than seems naturally possible.. Just wait until we invent inventing machines of our own!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

400 fucking gs... the power of small exoskeletons is ducking crazy

8 years ago | Likes 520 Dislikes 1

You don't make love to Max Power, you strap yourself in and FEEL THE G's!

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

When you spot the Canadian in the crowd.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Human organs start to tear loose as low as 10Gs

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Helps if you're already liquid inside.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Less gooey insides too

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I found the 8mph but was a poor partner to that fact.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Even if this bug is a full inch long that speed would be like a 6 foot tall animal going over 500 mph in speed relative to size.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

It's more an issue of mass versus acceleration but the point is valid.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At what point did autocorrect decide that ducking was the word people were trying to type?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

having less mass also makes it less of a challenge

8 years ago | Likes 165 Dislikes 1

Less resources too

8 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

Fewer

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 5

Minimal

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Fewer if it's the number of resources, less if it's a continuous amount of the resource, so less can still be used.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Fuhrer*

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Crazy duck you say?

8 years ago | Likes 62 Dislikes 2

I'm so interested in where this is from

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Probably an old DuckTales advert.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Nope. NO SIR

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here you go https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bp-V8kmBM3A

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I could not be more not disappointed. THANK YOU

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What the duck have I just witnessed?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Natur has an advance of some million years and does not have to think about how. Science says it’s not conscious so it has to be pure magic.

8 years ago | Likes 56 Dislikes 18

And thus, young readers, is the sentiment of organized religion the world over. Alms? Alms for the poor?

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I feel like there are more options than "conscious" or "magic".

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

If ten thousand bugs hatch each day, and one in a hundred gets a mutation, and one in a hundred mutations are slightly helpful, (1)

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

then you get one newly-mutated bug every day. If that mutation gives a 1% advantage to survival, that's 3 helpful mutations per year (2)

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Fuck, so that's how natural selection works. I'm makes a whole heck of a lot more sense now

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

which reeeeally adds up over millions of years, mutations on top of mutations until it becomes something significantly different. (3)

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I mean yes I know the theory but it does not feel right. How ‚slightly useful‘ does a mutation have to be to stop a bug from dying or ...

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But gears? It's hard to see how the in-between steps would have been useful, no? So interesting

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I would guess any friction is more useful than no friction. So mutations that made them bumpier would let them jump higher

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0