156625
10153
82
Star trails
At first these spectacular swirls of color may look like clever computer graphics. Actually they are the product of hour after hour of painstaking night-time shooting by photographer Lincoln Harrison. His stunning pictures of star trails across the Australian night sky were taken over periods of up to 15 hours.
Source: http://www.lincolnharrison.com/#/0
Airplane takeoffs
By Terence Chang.
Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/exxonvaldez/
Photos from ISS
This is a composite of a series of long exposure images photographed from a mounted camera on the Earth-orbiting International Space Station, from approximately 240 miles above Earth by Expedition 31 Flight Engineer Don Pettit.
Source: http://webodysseum.com/art/long-exposure-photos-from-iss/
Steel wool light painting
Steel wool grade 0 and finer (00, 000) are flammable. You can attach a pad to a wire or string and spin it around and create a shower of sparks. Here is the trick, it only showers sparks when you spin or move it so some kind of spin works best. The air gets in it and fuels it so the faster you swing the more sparks you get.
Source: http://wildammo.com/2011/05/10/insane-steel-wool-long-exposure-photographs/#14
Roomba paths
Roomba is a robotic vacuum cleaner that is able to autonomously vacuum the floor while navigating a living space and avoiding obstacles. It also comes equipped with color-changing LEDs that indicate things like remaining battery power and dirty spots. The LED lights combined with a seemingly random cleaning path has led some intrepid photographers to take long exposure photographs. The results are a kind of ‘light painting.’
- Seven Roombas operating simultaneously, by IBRoomba
9 dancers in flowing motion
By Bill Wadman.
Source: http://www.billwadman.com/motion/
Fireworks
By David Johnson.
Source: http://www.daveyjphoto.com/fireworks
Jamspots
#3 is absolutely beautiful
cpbowser
busdriverdan
Best wallpaper dump ever.
Gglop
THIS is how you do modern art!!! Not some bs like putting a "chair" label on a chair.
strangledbyaturtleneck
The waterfall one was taken at Multnomah Falls, Oregon. It's amazing, and the hike to the top is definitely worth it!
Mari47d1
This is amazeballs.
yippeekiyay801
I did something similar to the dancing one with an ND filter at a baseball game, shit the pitchers w/ long exposure. Was cool.
twfeline
"Are we supposed to be using runway 2a or 2b?" Other pilot: "I dunno. What airport was this?"
SchitzzPoppinov
As an astronomer, only one of those star pictures is a true long exposure
DoTheToothsTeethHaveTeethToo
I NEVER read ISS as ISS. It's always ISIS and I always get so confused
Hornethappy
I'm surprised Smokey the Bear didn't show up and slap the shit out of the guy burning steel wool in the forest.
KarmaRaven23
I get minor motion sickness watching the first few. I don't want to stop looking, but my tummy can't take it.
NotOnTheRugMan
Wo
togersauraus
Steel wool spinning is fun, just remember which pocket has the wool & which has the battery. It can get messy otherwise.
aidanz910
DJ ROOMBAAAA
IWBA
WOW
ASmallSockFullOfSNAKES
#1 is hyperdrive in the Falcon
shenanigans30
Boobs :)
vampirerunner
so its stars. great.
Sauroctonus
Hit the hyperdrive, Chewie, we're going home.
AnswerLady
I can never get my fireworks pics anywhere near that clear.
anthaneezy
No shame in setting your camera on the ground or a rock and using a delayed shutter. I rarely take the tripod out now.
TheDauphin
Get a tripod
ProjectPablo
oh god please make them wallpaper size im dying
ProjectPablo
not really dying ofcourse
banned2
No long exposure porn pics?
coldbloodedpomodoro
according to rule 34, those pics should exist
nombre11
Or when you take a regular picture with a Samsung phone.
TheDauphin
Actually they are made in the computer. Each one of these photos is a composite of multiple long exposures, there's a lot more post work 1/2
anthaneezy
Actually you're wrong. Super long exposure could benefit from compositing, not not necessary. Some of these are long exposure zoom shots.
TheDauphin
The spirals are most definitely composited. When I viewed this post on mobile I missed the ones after the spirals, which are just long exp
anthaneezy
Ah gotcha. My mistake.
Sustenai
Love these. I've done some long exposure myself. /a/n5lx1
[deleted]
[deleted]
Sustenai
I need to try that. Creates pretty awesome effect.
mrbochiangles
I 100% expected this to be a flashing joke
Sustenai
After I read this, I re-read my post and a salacious tone naturally occurred.
SluttyToast
Very nice!
changedusernamecosmykiddiscoveredmyrudeone
I wanna see the metal sheep he got that steel wool from.
guhguhguhguh
That's metal
SpecialContainmentProcedures
Dad, when did you get an account?
TendieLover
Is that a joke from Scrubs?
ogg149
Whoa... Long exposure is like seeing the fourth dimension!! If time were a spatial dimension that is
slartifartfest
time is a dimension, you can't specify a point in space with out specifying when as well.
ogg149
there are timelike dimensions and spacelike dimensions which are different in ways we don't understand, especially in thermodynamics
slartifartfest
k
brap
The swirls ARE computer generated. That's not how stars move.
TheHK013
Ur correct, stars dont move, we do. (Im aware that stras do move araound the galaxy but so do we)
brap
Here's how you do the swirls: http://www.sgarciarill.com/vortex-star-trails-tutorial/
TheTomEGunn
It's a multi exposure, motorized zoom during a time lapse then Photoshop all frames into one; use largest foreground element above all other
arewethebaddies
Please people, even with the North star in focus, stars don't spiral towards it! They rotate around it, yes, but not spiral towards it.
teeph
Everyone knows this. You're not saving the world here professor obvious. It looks neat. Chill.
alchemist12345
Unless you are at the north/south pole and angle the camera perfectly, no?
brap
Why would they not move in a circular pattern at a pole? The circle would just be directly overhead.
alchemist12345
Right, my bad.
quantummaster
You can get those swirls by slowly changing the zoom whilst taking the pictures
Photofaggins
But wouldn't the tree in the foreground be disoriented?
quantummaster
Yes, the tree and terrain have been exposed separately from the stars and later combined into a single image.
ContradictingAnswers
Photographer here, if you love in the US, the north star, we use it; stars revolve around it. Promise homie. The only faked one is the first
[deleted]
[deleted]
ContradictingAnswers
The colors are way to unreal for my taste, so it just looks faked.
brap
I love ALL around the world. *wink*
WhatsMyLineAgain
1st isnt faked, he zoomed in while doing the pictures
Imghurrr
You're only partially right
previoustopcomment
Stars don't spiral towards the centre, they form circles around it.
KukuloPhoto
The third (and others like it) make no sense. They don't spiral to some point
RabiesMcTavish
The North Star is always directly north no matter which nationality you are, it's visible anywhere in the northern hemisphere... 1/
RabiesMcTavish
1,3 & 4 are all composite images... 2
ladylancelot
Yep, the second one is accurate if it's close to a pole. the others don't make sense bc stars "move" as the earth rotates, they have a 1/2
brap
I've taken dozens like the second photo.
ladylancelot
Path just like the sun because they are fixed like the sun. They in no way spiral, it doesn't make any sense. Still pretty pictures though!
360Tableflip
The spiral are made by zooming, apparently... but why? It gives people a dumb idea of how stars move, which used to be important knowledge.
360Tableflip
...for navigating, knowing the time of year, etc. Sure this looks pretty, but it just deepens the disconnect between people and nature.
teeph
But . . . It looks cool. This is art, not science, dumbshit.