Long Exposure Magic

Mar 27, 2016 8:55 AM

Views

156625

Likes

10153

Dislikes

82

Star trails

At first these spectacular swirls of color may look like clever computer graphics. Actually they are the product of hour after hour of painstaking night-time shooting by photographer Lincoln Harrison. His stunning pictures of star trails across the Australian night sky were taken over periods of up to 15 hours.
Source: http://www.lincolnharrison.com/#/0

Airplane takeoffs

By Terence Chang.
Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/exxonvaldez/

Photos from ISS

This is a composite of a series of long exposure images photographed from a mounted camera on the Earth-orbiting International Space Station, from approximately 240 miles above Earth by Expedition 31 Flight Engineer Don Pettit.
Source: http://webodysseum.com/art/long-exposure-photos-from-iss/

Steel wool light painting

Steel wool grade 0 and finer (00, 000) are flammable. You can attach a pad to a wire or string and spin it around and create a shower of sparks. Here is the trick, it only showers sparks when you spin or move it so some kind of spin works best. The air gets in it and fuels it so the faster you swing the more sparks you get.
Source: http://wildammo.com/2011/05/10/insane-steel-wool-long-exposure-photographs/#14

Roomba paths

Roomba is a robotic vacuum cleaner that is able to autonomously vacuum the floor while navigating a living space and avoiding obstacles. It also comes equipped with color-changing LEDs that indicate things like remaining battery power and dirty spots. The LED lights combined with a seemingly random cleaning path has led some intrepid photographers to take long exposure photographs. The results are a kind of ‘light painting.’
- Seven Roombas operating simultaneously, by IBRoomba

9 dancers in flowing motion

By Bill Wadman.
Source: http://www.billwadman.com/motion/

Fireworks

By David Johnson.
Source: http://www.daveyjphoto.com/fireworks

#3 is absolutely beautiful

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Best wallpaper dump ever.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

THIS is how you do modern art!!! Not some bs like putting a "chair" label on a chair.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The waterfall one was taken at Multnomah Falls, Oregon. It's amazing, and the hike to the top is definitely worth it!

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is amazeballs.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I did something similar to the dancing one with an ND filter at a baseball game, shit the pitchers w/ long exposure. Was cool.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Are we supposed to be using runway 2a or 2b?" Other pilot: "I dunno. What airport was this?"

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As an astronomer, only one of those star pictures is a true long exposure

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I NEVER read ISS as ISS. It's always ISIS and I always get so confused

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm surprised Smokey the Bear didn't show up and slap the shit out of the guy burning steel wool in the forest.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I get minor motion sickness watching the first few. I don't want to stop looking, but my tummy can't take it.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wo

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Steel wool spinning is fun, just remember which pocket has the wool & which has the battery. It can get messy otherwise.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

DJ ROOMBAAAA

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

WOW

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

#1 is hyperdrive in the Falcon

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Boobs :)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

so its stars. great.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Hit the hyperdrive, Chewie, we're going home.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I can never get my fireworks pics anywhere near that clear.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No shame in setting your camera on the ground or a rock and using a delayed shutter. I rarely take the tripod out now.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Get a tripod

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

oh god please make them wallpaper size im dying

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

not really dying ofcourse

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No long exposure porn pics?

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

according to rule 34, those pics should exist

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Or when you take a regular picture with a Samsung phone.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Actually they are made in the computer. Each one of these photos is a composite of multiple long exposures, there's a lot more post work 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Actually you're wrong. Super long exposure could benefit from compositing, not not necessary. Some of these are long exposure zoom shots.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The spirals are most definitely composited. When I viewed this post on mobile I missed the ones after the spirals, which are just long exp

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ah gotcha. My mistake.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Love these. I've done some long exposure myself. /a/n5lx1

10 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Oct 21, 2024 11:42 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

I need to try that. Creates pretty awesome effect.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I 100% expected this to be a flashing joke

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

After I read this, I re-read my post and a salacious tone naturally occurred.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Very nice!

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wanna see the metal sheep he got that steel wool from.

10 years ago | Likes 77 Dislikes 0

That's metal

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Dad, when did you get an account?

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Is that a joke from Scrubs?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Whoa... Long exposure is like seeing the fourth dimension!! If time were a spatial dimension that is

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

time is a dimension, you can't specify a point in space with out specifying when as well.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

there are timelike dimensions and spacelike dimensions which are different in ways we don't understand, especially in thermodynamics

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

k

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The swirls ARE computer generated. That's not how stars move.

10 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 13

Ur correct, stars dont move, we do. (Im aware that stras do move araound the galaxy but so do we)

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Here's how you do the swirls: http://www.sgarciarill.com/vortex-star-trails-tutorial/

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's a multi exposure, motorized zoom during a time lapse then Photoshop all frames into one; use largest foreground element above all other

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Please people, even with the North star in focus, stars don't spiral towards it! They rotate around it, yes, but not spiral towards it.

10 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Everyone knows this. You're not saving the world here professor obvious. It looks neat. Chill.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Unless you are at the north/south pole and angle the camera perfectly, no?

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Why would they not move in a circular pattern at a pole? The circle would just be directly overhead.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Right, my bad.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You can get those swirls by slowly changing the zoom whilst taking the pictures

10 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 1

But wouldn't the tree in the foreground be disoriented?

10 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes, the tree and terrain have been exposed separately from the stars and later combined into a single image.

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Photographer here, if you love in the US, the north star, we use it; stars revolve around it. Promise homie. The only faked one is the first

10 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 10

[deleted]

[deleted]

10 years ago (deleted Mar 27, 2016 4:50 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

The colors are way to unreal for my taste, so it just looks faked.

10 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

I love ALL around the world. *wink*

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1st isnt faked, he zoomed in while doing the pictures

10 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

You're only partially right

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Stars don't spiral towards the centre, they form circles around it.

10 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The third (and others like it) make no sense. They don't spiral to some point

10 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The North Star is always directly north no matter which nationality you are, it's visible anywhere in the northern hemisphere... 1/

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1,3 & 4 are all composite images... 2

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep, the second one is accurate if it's close to a pole. the others don't make sense bc stars "move" as the earth rotates, they have a 1/2

10 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

I've taken dozens like the second photo.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Path just like the sun because they are fixed like the sun. They in no way spiral, it doesn't make any sense. Still pretty pictures though!

10 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The spiral are made by zooming, apparently... but why? It gives people a dumb idea of how stars move, which used to be important knowledge.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

...for navigating, knowing the time of year, etc. Sure this looks pretty, but it just deepens the disconnect between people and nature.

10 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

But . . . It looks cool. This is art, not science, dumbshit.

10 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1