Thinking again about how the names Arctic and Antarctica just means "bears" and "no bears."

Jan 21, 2025 6:03 AM

pilomotor

Views

52481

Likes

1158

Dislikes

20

Let the bears pay the bear tax! I pay the Homer tax!

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What about ants and bears?

1 year ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

This explains the surge of women looking for love in Northern Alaska.

1 year ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I mean it's probably pretty likely that people living in an area with bears might have looked up at the sky and been like hmmm....that looks like a bear.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

well, most people who visit antarctica find the place unbearably cold.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean, they do have a point

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This was magical...

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well it only means that because of Ursa Major, not because of actual bears.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, that's what the post says.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"ant" doesn't mean without, it's opposite. but you enjoy your free internet stupid points

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Without is the opposite of with.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Taxonomic name or the european brown bear is Ursus Arctos Arctos. Meaning "bear bear bear", makes it he most bear bear of all bears.

1 year ago | Likes 79 Dislikes 0

This sounds like a Torpenhow Hill situation....

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

1 year ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That bears repeating.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I wonder if that’s a close relative of the species Winnie the Pooh

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No, Winnie is of a different species, 'Excrementus Stoolis Stoolis', which means freely translated 'Poop Poop Poop'

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

They probably wouldn’t admit it if he’s a family member since he runs around with no pants on.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Australia means Duck-billed platypussies live here,
England means we'll have none of that silliness.

1 year ago | Likes 140 Dislikes 5

And where's the Arbor plain?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

naah , it means it is far far south.

1 year ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

England — where wild animals look so smooth and proper you can clothe them in children's books. You call that a badger? It looks like it's about to put a monocle on and correct my grammar.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought England meant, "Hippity Hippity your land is now our property"

1 year ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 0

England: Land of the angles, Scotland: land of the Scots, Wales: Where we put all those foreigners living here before us Anglo Saxons got here, vicious gits claiming our land before we got here for it.

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

No no that's Great Britain

1 year ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

“Platypussies”
Hear me out

1 year ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

1 year ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Come on, Jacen, you know wanna come to the dark side.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Well, Jacen *did* love animals...

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Technically antartica is not "no bears" since it's not the prefix "a" which would be akin to English word ending "less" like bearless , but "anti" which means "opposite to " so basically it means "placed opposite to arctic"

1 year ago | Likes 85 Dislikes 4

But you see *gestures wildly* Tumblr.

1 year ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 0

Anti-bear place.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You know why they couldn't say North Arctic and South Arctic, right?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Another way to look at it is a-theist vs anti-theist. Having no gods vs opposing gods.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can you put the prefix a in front of a word that starts with a? Feels like you gotta lot more on it than just an a to mean no bears? I’m asking because I’m not sure.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No it would be an- (like anarchy) , which is a good point, it would be anarctica. But it's anti.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

While that's most likely the actual reason for the naming scheme, anti/ant doesn't necessarily mean "placed opposite". Valid logical interpretations of the term (ignoring actual historical reasonings) would include "against/opposed to bears" and "some weird kind of inverse bears".

1 year ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Like the less known cousin of the Antichrist, the Antibear aims to corrupt the cubs and stir some shit up.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

So.. something with no claws, no hair, and no teeth that isn't a mammal and not earth tones? Penguins fit the bill perfectly.

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"Place opposite of the one with bears"

1 year ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

What the Layman would call "no bears."

1 year ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 1

They mean physically opposite, not ecologically opposite. As in, it's on the other side of the earth from the arctic.

1 year ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Ergo, on the other side from the side with bears haha

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

So, no bears?

1 year ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Even then it wouldn't mean no bears. Even if we exclude the "spatially opposite" if you take any English word with the prefix anti- X , it doesn't mean no X but the thing opposed to X . Antichrist isn't when "no Christ" it's the entity directly opposed to him. The difference isn't even that subtle hence the difference in definition of "asocial" and "antisocial"

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

But what's the opposite of a bear?

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

A raeb. Very dangerous.

1 year ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So, Jesus was a bear? Was he Gentile Ben?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yes Jesus was a bear. I can see how reading my comment above can lead to that conclusion. But i have a friend who shall not be named that doesn't get it. Would you be a doll and explain it to them?

1 year ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0