A good man.

Nov 19, 2017 8:40 PM

Megolas1

Views

194193

Likes

5382

Dislikes

199

On #InternationalMensDay I’m sharing a tweet from one of my favorite men.
And also, call your senators. This tax bill is a giveaway to the rich.
Though, I am looking forward to writing off the expenses on my new G650

Plane zero-tax.
Front Page Edit:
I’d like to thank the people of usersub for making this moment possible. These folks work long and hard for our poop-time enjoyment!
Cheers to you USERSUB! I kneel to you.

This yax system will turn the US into a 3rd world nation... A Theocratic Fascist one at that. That is not being hyperbolic either.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

If that tax plan passes; you'll be able to finally point out who actually owns the country I suppose... :-/

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

POTUS DOESN'T WRITE LAW! IT'S THE HOUSE AND SENATE. morons.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Claim the $250, and claim the rest as charitable donation. You can also claim the sales tax on just about everything you buy during the year

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

As a visiting PhD student in the US, I really don't get why people aren't rioting. Young people here are being fucked over big time!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

why don't we put a school IN a private jet!!!!

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Turbulence, probably

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

v the standard deduction will double, which is MORE than the $1000 being whined about.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 2

Lots of us itemize. Personally, I’m fine cuz mama gots her jet and all.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Why do you keep voting for these people??

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Forbes is not a leftist magazine. Get their opinion on this tax fraud! 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

Step 1: Make paper airplane. Step 2: Write off standard deduction for private jet. Step 3: Shit in a bag, light on fire, throw at Paul Ryan.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

This is brilliant.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That is absolutely ridiculous, no way Trump is getting a second term. Well, there is a way actually, if nobody reports on this.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 6

Yes. He absolutely could get a second term right now. Electoral college baby! *sigh*

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Thank God and Country for the Electoral College!

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Candidates still need to be pretty popular to win the electoral college, they can't just win 60-40 or something like that.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Any teacher making less than 80k and itemizing deductions may be hurting themselves. Standard deduction folks. It's doubling.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I think that was somehow their intention to make it simpler to file, by making itemizing pointless. Seems a backwards way to go about it tho

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Afaik, the plane thing isn't actually a write off for jet ownership. It's a clarification of who is required to pay fuel tax ($0.20/gal) on

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Private jet travel in cases where the jet is being rented. The clarification is that the renter is required to pay it, not the owner.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Next up for Congress after Tax cuts for the rich; Slashing Welfare programs to pay for Tax Cuts for the rich...not even joking....MAGA

8 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 5

Oh only the rich get a tax cut OH WAIT they don't everyone does but them republicans all evil rich people muttering "hurt the poor" all day

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

'Morons Are Governing America'?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

fucking American peasants.., G650? Not even the ER version! Dude, just go for Global Express 6000 and/or the Brazilian meme machine: Embraer

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

No joke I love the globals over the g650. Personal experience being lucky because of a client. The globals are the top jet these days.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Each seat on a global has an iPod Touch that can control lights, shades, and more. It’s crazy

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Global 6000 is a masterpiece. Can't wait to see what they do with the 7000/8000 and/or the next generation of Learjet.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Now I hate my new jet thanks to you.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

v

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 4

Is that really an accurate summary, or is it the only two things that anyone actually knows about it?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Grad students scholarships/graduate assistantships will be counted as income & taxed in it. Some of my classmates may have to drop out if...

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This passes cus they can't afford the additional expense. We're all already broke & trying to make it through school. This bill makes...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

higher education even less obtainable unless you come from an affluent family. It's screwing over so many people just cus they're not rich

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

We're having trouble getting facts because it's a big bill and it's getting rushed through congress. 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The standard deduction also doubled. So most school teachers will get a bigger tax cut. Not saying I like the Bill just pointing that out

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 3

This also depends on how many kids/dependents they have.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yeah but it expires. the tax cuts for the rich don't.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

i'm beginning to think republicans are the bad guys

8 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 13

I used to be republican. Now I just dislike both parties.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

This is why when people say both parties are bad, it infuriates me. The Dems motivation is to benefit everyone. GOP to benefit the few.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 4

We've been saying this for fucking years; Republicans have basically been outright comicbook villains for years, only barely kept in check.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 8

But when they lost to Obama not once but twice they fucking LOST it and now we've got this mess.

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 5

1)Okay, as a Republican there are some serious disagreements I have with the Democratic party. HOWEVER, the Republican party now seems to be

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 3

2) trying to outdo them in things I disagree with. Seriously considering switching parties. I'd go independent, buuuuut still feels like

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

3) wasting my vote

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Vote for whoever has the people at heart. Or whoever has the fewest shitty ideas.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Join us libertarians and live in an an endless existential crisis while repeating taxation is theft.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

You sound like my wife, lol

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just support repubs that are ousting the rhino's. Like Moore. The establishment is against him because he supports trump.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Forget talking to your Congressman. Go talk to Trump supporters. We gotta get this clown out of the Whitehouse.

8 years ago | Likes 45 Dislikes 21

Wow! I talked to my congressman and he said 'Yeah sure! That's how it works! Trump will be out on Tuesday!' :) :) :) :) :)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

Congress can pass it regardless who's in the chair, so long as they're a Republican. So DO talk to Congress. Do both!

8 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 1

If they still openly and proudly support him, they're pretty much past the point of intellectual/moral/ideological redemption at this point

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 2

He's not the one writing the legislation, he has an agenda of what he wants to accomplish, but I'm betting he didn't dictate these terms.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Talk? To Trump supporters. I think I'd have a more interesting conversation with a toddler.

8 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 17

Interesting? You'd have a more cogent conversation with a toddler.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No argument there, I was trying to be polite.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 10

And some are far-gone down the rabbit hole, living down there to stay away from gay frogs and roaming death panels. I think a lot of people

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

who voted for Trump did so about as willingly as if they had to vote for the man by tapping his prostate. Talk to them instead. @Boobs4Wade

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Dismissing each other as pure adversaries is what helps keep this new status quo. Those causing the problem promote divide-and-conquer,

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

and get to cause damage with impunity while everyone else fights among themselves.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Trying to talk sense to the senseless? Those people will rationalize anything to stick with what they decided.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Field trips are gonna be dope now.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

The House tax plan would count my tuition remission as taxable income. Wtf

8 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 2

But what's wrong with you? Why haven't you just become rich yet?

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 0

/s....

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah. Fucking slacker. Why weren't you born into nobility if you wanted to get an education?

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Exactly. Other people did it, so why not you?

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I'M SUCH A SLACKER, ahaha

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

(And sure, some aren't born into it. They're instead lucky enough to be in a place that allows some the ability to become wealthy, though

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

upward mobility itself has become stunted as well.)

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

yes but there is more to it that may possibly result in a higher income year round. cherry picking is not a good way to determine pros/cons

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 6

You are correct, cherry picking is not a good way to determine pros/cons. Since we have only a limited number of characters, I did not 1

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

like going into all the specifics. Yes the standard deduction goes up, but other deductions such as student loan interest, medical, 2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

as well as state and local taxes are among some that will/might impact me. So the standard deduction increase might help; it just depends 3

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

on how everything turns out for me. Alright?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

implying this bill has pros for anyone making less than 6 figures income.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

removing the $0-$10,000 tax bracket is a pro for anyone.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

From what I understand, the tax bill increases the tax rate by 2% for most of the current 10% tax bracket

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

See Forbes "From Mortgage Caps To Tax Brackets, How The House Tax Bill Could Impact Your Taxes"

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also it's going to raise taxes in Blue states more than Red states.

8 years ago | Likes 37 Dislikes 4

Well after last years election, there aren't many blue states left. Shocked about my home state of MI

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v such a shock

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 3

Wow. Who would've thought a tax plan under POTUS Orange Lantern would suck off the rich? I'm fucking SHOCKED!

8 years ago | Likes 309 Dislikes 28

This was Sherrod Brown's idea.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

For those that don't comics orange lantern represent avarice/greed

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Cheeto in charge

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

I’m sticking to my Orange Fucko term but that’s a damn good one, my fine e-stranger.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

If it helps, go read who added the amendment to the bill.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

the full abreviation would be POTUSOL and that's amazing because it sounds like some kind of fucked up drug.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Your actually funny quip aside, it's congress that's shitting on the bill. It was pretty good going into it.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 2

When the president and majority congress are the same party saying ones shits on the other doesn't cut it as a excuse for doing jack shit.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Fun fact. The republican party isn't a single person. Nor do they all work on a hivemind.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Funner fact: President and majority Rep Congress said they had better Healthcare and tax plans and 7 years to sort out the details.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

At least the president has a good idea for taxes. Too bad politicians are a bunch of monkeys.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I love you for "POTUS Orange Lantern," that was beautiful (no homo/hetero) ♡

8 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 2

Why did you bring the homo thing into this? I feel like I am getting some vibes here

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Hahaha, what kind of vibes? I mean, if a girl were to make intelligent political jokes to me, I might go homo!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I'm just happy people are getting it. I said it a few times before, but nobody for the reference. :(

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Oooooh Orange Lantern, now that’s a clever one.

8 years ago | Likes 41 Dislikes 0

I was gonna say...nicely done

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

This was actually added to the bill by a DEMOCRAT...suck on that

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 26

And yet, not one single Democrat voted "yea" on the House bill...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Party lines. Doesn't matter if it'll help or not. Same would be 100% true if majority were switched. Power is more important than policy

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Soooooo the Republicans want to increase the tax deduction for teachers? You say no? So suck on that.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

In NZ our Rightwing/Conservative Party is left of Obama DNC. We have Universal Healthcare on 0-35% Tax range. Mid class 20%.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

And a tiny ass country that has few of the challenges that the US faces.

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 15

Yes, we don't face world record stupidity of people who think having the worlds largest economy & 5th highest GDP per cap' is are challenges

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 8

NZ has no resources, is entirely dependent on trade but is isolated from major markets. What greater challenges does US have? Incompetence?

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 6

All the while dealing with the stupid shitstorms whipped up during the cold war. Have fun with your sheep on that island.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Those aren't inherent challenges of the size of your country that's the complication due to US policies, interventionism and incompetence.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

USAs willful ignorance of and arrogance towards other countries is also a human fault only. We have fun with Cows now, not sheep.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

USA's size, resources and geographical security gave it powerful international influence. It's American peoples fault they blew it so fast.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

USA is the luckiest country on Earth militarily. Bordered by allies and oceans make it easy to defend. The Cold War was a stupid US creation

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Managing 100 times as many people spread out over 50 different entities with differing ideals and approaches to every topic.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

That's not a challenge, it's a benefit, through cooperation and consolidation you can achieve more than the sum of your parts. e,g. NASA

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

In terms of political Administration USA is less varied than NZ. USAs 2 party system consolidates everyone. NZ Gov has 5 political parties

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Seems like a great solution would be dissolution of the country into numerous countries. Let each state run itself.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That was an idea once, half the countries liked it and half didn't so there was a pretty large war and lots of people died.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Well... not exactly. Jets are still taxed. In fact, they have an excise tax, which is an additional tax you pay just for having a jet. The »

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Shh! Don't say facts!

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 5

change in the bill is that the money you spend on maintenance and staffing is deductible from that excise tax.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

But why? Luxury taxes don't need to be cut. At all. They need to be raised if anything. We are in a second gilded age.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

Shrug. I'm not offering an opinion on whether the change is good or bad. I'm only trying to clarify the misconception of posts like this.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Also money that grad students get in tuition waivers becomes taxable income. Grad students are already poor. Now many could no longer exist.

8 years ago | Likes 299 Dislikes 5

This. I can barely afford rent as it is, lucky if I can afford food as well. If this tax bill goes through my family will be homeless.

8 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 1

I'm terrified and I don't have a family to feed. I'm praying universities *do* something to protect us in the event that this happens.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

With what money?

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

The wealthy greedy love keeping people poor and stupid.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That system kinda sounds like being paid in money that's only good at the company store

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 5

Expensive Universities will need to tweak their tuition systems quickly - or they will loose all their researchers

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 3

And all of America will the best minds to other countries or the private sector.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I'm not sure what anyone expected when they cast their vote for Trump. But those e-mails amiright

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 2

Trump is the anti-intellectual. I don’t think grad students were his voting base.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Or amiright?

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Worked at uni I got MS in, 46% taxable on tuition remission. Halved my income. If there is student loan forgiveness I'll ask govt for refund

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

WE NEED A FRENCH RIOT. LE PROTESTE! LE EGALITARIANISM! HELP US FRENCH PEOPLE

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

OUI!!!!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

LE BAGUETTE!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Really? No? What? What the hell is happening!?

8 years ago | Likes 99 Dislikes 2

You teach in exchange for tuition waiver. You never get the money, it's deducted from your bill. That amount is now taxable income.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yep. I'm lucky---I'm graduating this year. But if this passes, a lot of my friends are going to be paying ~$5,000 more in taxes.

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Yeah I'm in grad school & barely getting by financially. Luckily I can move in with my mom & not pay rent if this passes, but others can't

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

My TA is going to get slapped with an $8k a year tax. He doesn't even make $8K. He's getting taxed 100%+.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

Taxing their stipend, okay. They'll get that money back. Taxing them on their waived tuition too? That's completely fucked up.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Well then I guess I'm looking outside the US for my PhD then.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I’m reading it now. Thank you!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah all of my grad student friends are freaking out about it. This tax bill could prevent them from finishing their PhDs.

8 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

[deleted]

[deleted]

8 years ago (deleted Nov 20, 2017 1:27 PM) | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Yes, someone who is in the process of acquiring their PhD totally has the option to just stop and pursue a trade.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I guess I didn't think the /s was necessary. I guess I was wrong.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

That’s not a bad option for many but scientists are important. We need them just as much as we need carpenters, plumbers, etc.

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I’m super mad at my congressman who is in some science committee who also supports this tax bill. He can’t be pro science and pro this bill.

8 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 1

Bring in a science committee often means nothing as far as their actual interests go. Which congressman?

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Anymore it seems like the only requirement to be on a Congress science committee is to openly hate science and everything it stands for. :/

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Steve Stivers. Sorry he’s not in the committee he’s a co-chair of the biomedical research caucus. The tax bill does not advance their goals.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Cheap foreign PhD vs expensive ones from the US?

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Is it possible that stuff like tuition waivers are part of distortions that have been behind the ~300%+ increase in tuitions the past 20 yr?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I blame that more on unrestricted access to federal student loans and a keeping up with the Joneses effect between different schools.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Maybe a little bit of all of it. I hear a lot of talk about how to pay for university education in the US but rarely about why tuition 1/

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

has grown so rapidly and what the plan is to reverse that trend. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Also the waivers are really payment they receive for the work they do for the University. However the hours they work are much greater than

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What would be considered fair for the compensation they get. That’s why they don’t pay taxes on them. Not enough money to live otherwise.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That kind of sounds like the uni can undercompensate their workers via a tax loophole.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As someone who does taxes. Just write it off as a business expense.

8 years ago | Likes 53 Dislikes 17

this tax plan looks good to me. i work hard and end up paying big bucks at the end of the year. i try deducting as much as im allowed.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Seems like the 50% that don't currently pay income tax are the ones that hate it for the most part. They may finally have to pay some.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Tbh, the guy already stated he thinks most teachers are dumb, so that tells you what kind of person he is. No use debating with him...

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Which is exactly how the write the jet off too.

8 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 6

When they say that the new bill gets rid of itemization for the middle class, how will that affect writing things off as a business expense?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It gets rid of it by increasing the standard deduction so much that you'll get more back than you would by itemizing.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

Until it expires you mean. But after that, I'll personally get hurt really badly.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Right. Because there's no way Congress will try to extend the cuts by the time this plan is set to expire.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Will that teacher be able to write off school supplies? I didn't even know she could do that now.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, they can do it now and always could. Unreimbursed work expenses can be itemized.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Good point. And then, when they say that the new tax bill raises the middle class tax to 98%, how will that affect things? Just stop, ok?

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

When they say it increases taxes by 98% it's FUD.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I agree. They need to stop. This is repayment to their donors. Lindsey Graham admitted as much.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought that’s how they did it? When you’re employed full time you can’t write off as much, no?

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

Expenses must reach high % of ADJUSTED GROSS INCOME.... very difficult to reach the minimum

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Not if you are spending a meaningful amount of money on supplies and materials. You can deduct all sorts of things.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

just start a side business. even if it doesn't make revenue, if you have business expenses you can write them off.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Millions do it

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

No you can still write off any unreimbursed work expenses on your itemized deductions.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 5

Only if it equals a certain amount of your income. Like 3 or 4%. If it isn't that much at least doesn't do anything.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No. Must be over % AGI.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

This is part of the issue, though. Jet owners are going to itemize, school teachers are going to take the standard deduction.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

And that is their fault.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 9

And under Trump's tax plan, itemization goes away, and the standard deduction doubles. OP's complaint is exactly 100% invalid.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 3

You f-ing moron.. don't pretend to be a cpa and give advice. FALSE! TEACHERS are employees not owners and cannot just write it off.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 15

It's funny to call someone a moron while you make a moronic statement. There is an explicit deduction for unreimbursed work expenses.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

You are able to write off expenses if said expense is used for your job. So if you bought PPE for a job & your employer didn't refund you,

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Its deductible. Same with school supplies, etc if your employer doesn't refund you & you have receipts, its allowed as a deduction

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

But it's limited to how much you're allowed to deduct. Actual businesses have little to no limitations.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

No, you can deduct everything that is legitimate. You can even take a loss.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

The provision for the jet tax right off was put in by a Democrat, don't forget neither side gives a shit about you.

8 years ago | Likes 42 Dislikes 16

*write-off. You're welcome.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

^this

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 1

It's not actually a write off as being portrayed, it's saying that the 20 cents per gallon fuel tax paid by airplanes will be paid by the

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Renter rather than the owner of a jet in cases where the jet is being rented.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

business 101: the cost was passed on to the renter anyway...

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Proof please.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Sherrod Brown Democrat Ohio

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's accurate, and also not what it's being portrayed as. People can't write off jets, it's saying companies which own jets for the purpose

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Of renting them out don't have to pay tax on the milage the Jets travel while under lease; that tax is paid by the lease. Just clarification

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Name? If they deserve to be on a shitlist, so be it.

8 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Sherrod brown

8 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Huh, sounds like it's more of a clarification of an existing law than a new break. @megolas1 Still....there's the teacher deduction thing,

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

among a slew of other handouts for those who already wield an immense amount of wealth and political power. Power feeds power.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Teachers are under paid not due to budgets but the massive administrative level above them. They should be able to deduct all valid expenses

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

But should never have to incur them in the first place

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yeah, that too, that's more than slightly bullshit. "Oh, you're spending your own money because your employer is being crap? Well...here,

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That’s because a rich person buying a jet will trickle down and create 1,000 middle class jobs while teachers are lazy, don’t you know?? /s

8 years ago | Likes 468 Dislikes 21

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 2

This was the perfect gif reply.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

But Paul Ryan REALLY believes it. It's like... his thing. He jacked off in college thinking about doing this.

8 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 2

Fun fact: the effects of trickle-down economics have been *measured*: only 20% benefit for the people. Taxes do *much* more for the people.

8 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

Amen. I kneel to you as well.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

8 years ago | Likes 46 Dislikes 1

Love this.

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

"But Mah Trickle Down" a phrase for Marxist and Redneck Democrats who are too stupid to understand economics 101. ROFL

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 60

Redneck democrats?? ROTFL.....that class does not exist...Rednecks are dyed in the wool Republicans....or Trump supporters...

8 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 3

I take you're not familiar with the Liberal Redneck videos? I live in the deep South and have plenty of left leaning redneck friends.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 6

there are plenty of democrat rednecks. BUT unlike thenon democrat version, they took the time to look at the REALITY of trickle down bull.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

... what?

8 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

1% create wealth, innovation. Musk, Gates, Jobs. 5% are necessary to buy/make luxuries common. Cell phones/Computers were luxuries.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 64

@OP You're a fucking idiot. Thank goodness no one listens to Socialist fucktards like you who don't understand basic economics.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 63

Before you teach others about the basics of the economics maybe you should start researching history.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Okay Tiger. Your ideas would be more accepted if you, perhaps, took a different approach. Leading with anger never works. Just saying!

8 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

That must be why we've been cutting their taxes for 40 years! Just look at all the jobs and innovation everywhere. Thanks billionaires!

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Basic economics is that the middle class is the engine of growth, not the 1%.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

Hell to the mutha effing yes!!! Whoop and whoop! And one more whoop!

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Trickle down doesn't work guy. It never has. Rich people hoard wealth. It's always been this way. It's precisely why the wealth distribution

8 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 1

That's why most Americans will be in the top 20% at least once: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/here-are-your-odds-of-joining-the-1-percent/

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Is getting worse and worse as time goes on.

8 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 1

Another Democrat idiot who doesn't understand basic economics.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 82

Taking a page from your idiot president, I challenge you to an IQ contest

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Please take a look at Kansas economics in the last 6 years and most likely you’ll change your view point? Or don’t. You be you!

8 years ago | Likes 33 Dislikes 2

Please enlighten us

8 years ago | Likes 32 Dislikes 0

Did they say something false?

8 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

At worst it’s an oversimplification of GOP Econ theory, but it’s essentially what they believe!

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You must be a graduate from the "do the same thing that never works then obstruct and blame dems when it doesn't work" school of economics.

8 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Found the Republican

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 1

There is no evidence cutting taxes for the rich helps the economy, or that it benefits everyone else.

8 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

There were the roaring '20s, but to be fair, everyone's taxes were cut then, not just the rich's.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wasn't due to tax policy. Fed taxes were highest in 1950s, greatest period of US economic growth ever.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The Mellon plan was a major contributor. Nobody paid those taxes in the '50s. https://taxfoundation.org/taxes-rich-1950-not-high/

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

See, we did the whole trickle down economics thing, and it made a boom-bust cycle, leading to the great Depression. Considering how bad 1/2

8 years ago | Likes 83 Dislikes 9

we have it now, I want to have that Great Depression back. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 2

The boom bust cycle was a more a result of the credit systems instituted in the early 20th century. Trickle down economics is what lets 1/

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Apple hide billions in offshore accounts to avoid the already comical corporate taxing laws. 2/2

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You misunderstood me. I was just making a joke by continuing your 1/2 comment with my own 2/2.

8 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that was, we decided to try the exact same thing again, and that caused a boom bust cycle, leading to the great Recession. So, this time,2/3

8 years ago | Likes 67 Dislikes 6

We're going to do the exact same thing a THIRD time, and I'm sure it'll work out fine for everyone! And if not, we'll bail out the rich. 3/3

8 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 4

Trickle down isn't even sort of what causes the boom and bust cycle, the cycle is an effort to mitigate the damage of "trickle down" bull.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

What are we going to call the third low? The great concussion?

8 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 0

The great hindsight.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The Great Repetition

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

The Socialist Revolution.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

The Great Depression II, then the Great Recession II. Make it nice and confusing for anyone that doesn't study economics.

8 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Most likely the great extinction. #realtalk

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Impeachment.

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Lol the whole of the US has CTE from watching too much football

8 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

That would certainly explain the general amnesia.

8 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Dude we're trying fascism again. Don't t think we're above shite emonomic ideas.

8 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 3

Where are we trying fascism? Pretty sure America is a democracy, and Trump is going "I don't like them" to reporters, not shooting them.

8 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

The Nationalism, corruption, focus on corporations over workers, disproportionate military spending, theocracy... That you've always had.

8 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

I could probably name a thousand problems with Trump. "Intends to overthrow democracy" isn't one of them, and makes us look silly.

8 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 2

We're trying a goddamn ruling class again. How many tens of billions of dollars does an individual really need? At what point do people

8 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0