Hollywood vikings vs real vikings

Jan 22, 2019 7:41 PM

skillerious

Views

89627

Likes

1633

Dislikes

53

Just if anyone is curious

But both agree that they were likely to MISS THE GODDAM FIELD GOAL AND LOSE THE EFFING GAME!!!

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

maybe it's just me, but the neon pink smoky eye viking sounds lessimtimidatimg, ao maybe that's the reason

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

I'm by no means an expert, but it's my understanding that most vikings were disenfranchised men who were good with an axe.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Still a shitty depiction of a battle axe.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The big long haired tattooed ones with funny hats are so much fun though

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ironically one of these images is inspired by opera and it isn’t the brightly colored guy in makeup.

6 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Weren't most of the stories of Vikings told by the people they raided?

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yes - besides those stories local to us Nordic folk. And even they were romanticized and written by victors, often commissioned even.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Better then Spartans: naked warriors doing spin attacks vs Spartans: heavily armoured soldiers in formation.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

I mean, that is what separated them from the Persians, armor and tactics. That was the point.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

What about the techno Viking?

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

German variety, I believe.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Also they were called Norsemen, not Vikings. Viking was what they DID, e.g. "Let's go viking!"

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Unsurprisingly, they looked a lot like Celts.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The only viking I've seen portrayed like that was Ragnar from Mace: The Dark Age. In fact, he looked EXACTLY like that.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

this is why i couldnt stomach the show vikings after 2 seasons. the outfits were just too much

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 15

The outfits were fine and cool. The muddled and unnecessary plotlines of the later seasons were painful.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

The Vikings and axes from the left were made popular from opera.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Same with the stupid horned helmets. A horn sticking out like make a great grab handle to throw you off balance.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What!

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Into the Frazetta folder you go.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

That's from Conan the Barbarian

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Tell me about it. Find evidence a Viking has tattoos & BOOM every major character in every medium is tattooed.

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Don’t forget about padded cloth, and mail armour that the rich ones wore.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Historians also thought a random rock with a crack in it was a sacred text.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I love the inconsistency between reality and the impositions people put on those held up as exceptionally “manly”, particularly when it 1/

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

is now often derided as feminine. Like eye makeup and meticulously well groomed nails and hair. 2/2

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

How do they know men used eye makeup? And for what reason?

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

http://sciencenordic.com/what-vikings-really-looked It's not mentioned at all in that article, which describes them fairly well.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

AFAIK, there are accounts of various Christians complaining about the vanity of the pagan vikings (cleanliness, fashion, body paint).

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

It turns out the 'rape of their women' might have, in part, just been girls ditching their shitty farm life to bone handsome vikings.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

I too wish to know this.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

There were a few Muslim scholars that visited and wrote about the Rus. Theories for eye makeup include to reduce glare on the sea.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 1

I *hated Floki. “Ooohh I’m weeeird, viewers relate my snakey movements, spiky hair, & runny eyeshadow to goth weirdos because I’m weeiiird.”

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 3

I liked him when he was just a mildly eccentric ship builder with the eye makeup I use on Skyrim characters. I liked Athelstan more.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The helmet on the left there looks like the Praga-Stromovka example (10th century) which would be surprisingly accurate.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I mean Vikings got plenty of things wrong, but they got a shockingly large amount right, all things considered.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yeah looking at the scene in Hi Res it's not the Bojna/Stromovka/etc. helmet but it sort of imitates it.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Next you're going to tell me we don't actually send people to other planets and can't go faster than light speed!

7 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 1

The first is more of a "not yet". o3o

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

You think that’s crazy, you guys are going to flip your shit when I tell you about cowboys!

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

No that’s still truth

7 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

You mean the stuff in movies isn't historically accurate? I'm shocked... SHOCKED.

7 years ago | Likes 666 Dislikes 6

Username checks out.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Well... Not THAT shocked

7 years ago | Likes 61 Dislikes 0

7 years ago | Likes 122 Dislikes 0

v

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Even more shocking, there was no specific female armor, as they could just wear regular armor, of they fought.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Doubly shocking, in some cases, men would show off special penis armor.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

It's like how reality shows are scripted. Reality is boring.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's different when it's a commonly known to be inaccurate cliche and one that's so universal as to almost be intentional misinformation.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Well, it's a shame that the right side is still inaccurate

7 years ago | Likes 51 Dislikes 3

I am interested in your input.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No "one" style is accurate because there were many different countries/tribes over centuries that took part in viking.

7 years ago | Likes 44 Dislikes 1

No explanation. The end. Well I believe you completely, Dr. Givesnoevidence ;)

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 3

I can speak from recent lectures on Eastern European Vikings, that saying they all wore Byzantine inspired fashions is a simplification.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

So your saying the picture above is evidence?

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 3

I think they're saying that the person should say what exactly is wrong about the info instead of just saying it's wrong.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

Go on.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

http://www.hurstwic.org/history/articles/daily_living/pix/axeman.jpg is a more accurate rendition, but the drawing on the right isn't bad.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

... leg wraps were puttee style, not ribbon style, and weren't super common regardless; the hygiene fact is accurate enough though.

7 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 0

Tattoos and makeup are generally highly debated and there's more evidence to support it in Rus than Norse; definitely not commonplace.

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

The neckline would not have been cross stitched closed, dyed fabric was not prohibitively expensive, spears were more common than axes...

7 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

No one who carries a spear is going to only have a spear. At some point, you're going to need your sidearm and that an axe.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Knife actually. There are far more long knives found as sidearms than axes. Now don't get me wrong the liked axes, but it wasn't as >

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

> ubiquitous as it was with, like, the 6-7th century Franks. Those guys loved their axes.

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

and viking was a verb, calling them vikings is like calling someone a 'hunting', though in cultural they might call themselves hunters

7 years ago | Likes 173 Dislikes 12

It was a profession, like a knight or a pirate.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

No, Viking is a noun. Viking is the voyage. Vikingr is the Voyager. (Like Run is the noun, Runner is the person doing the running).

7 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

Yay for accurate vikers!

7 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Relax, don’t be a hunt!

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

You sir are incorrect.

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

anyone not them would likely have called them Danes, since most were traders.

7 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 1

We are still traders.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Northmen" or "Danes," yes. It's believed most were from Denmark, in fact.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Danes refers, obviously, to the country of Denmark where many of them came from. The traditional raiding Viking with boats is Norwegian.

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

well, yeah. I didnt mean they called them that cause they were traders. just that's likely how traders referred to themselves.

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I believe most "vikings" were traders. But the word "Viking" Fara i Viking. Meant to go raiding. So a Viking was a raider.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 2

Danes, Rus, Northman, Swedes, Ostmen, barbarians, spawns of Hell. They had a lot of names.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You've forgotten the Geats. And listing both "Swedes" and "spawn of Hel" is redundant.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

+ 1 dissing those of the accursed Svear.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

So you're saying they weren't 6'4" and all full of muscle?

7 years ago | Likes 256 Dislikes 4

It’s kinda hard to be feared and bloodthirsty warriors without those things...

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

No they were, just with fashion sense.

7 years ago | Likes 49 Dislikes 2

Historically, Napoleon was NOT short. But Norse men WERE tall. So we’re the Celts.

7 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

They still were, just fancily dressed.

7 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

Neither did they speak-a your language, nor did they smile and give out vegemite sandwiches.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ay sayed didja speeka meh language

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I said do you speaka my language?

7 years ago | Likes 24 Dislikes 0

I doubt many people back then achieved 6ft.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Average height of male early Scandinavian was 5'7", one inch shorter than their central European neighbors.

7 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

We do still have smokey eye shadow, tho...

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I saw a history channel series about the Vikings. It cited a journal of Arabic traders that made their way up to Scandinavia, it stated(1/2)

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

They were "as tall as palm trees"

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Yeah, Ibn Fadlan. Famous writer, wrote about the burial practices of the vikings (spoiler warning, gang rape), but the archeological >

7 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

> evidence doesn't back it up. We have found many viking age burials and the skeletons are not unusually tall.

7 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Them’s from a land down under

7 years ago | Likes 150 Dislikes 4

Not all of us, I'm 5'10" and full of depression

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Nah, from Brussels eh. “Buying bread from a man in Brussels He was six-foot-four and full of muscles”

7 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Who ate the vegimite samwitch?

7 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

The man from the land down under, who was handed the sammich by the man from Brussels as a form of communication.

7 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Where women roar?

7 years ago | Likes 34 Dislikes 0

*where women glow

7 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

And men...dunder?

7 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 2

*and men plunder

7 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

And the men chunder

7 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

*chunder

7 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

...I'm 6'4" and full of muscle and I haven't lifted since early 2017. It's the Viking genes, my whole family is like this.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You probably also eat a good amount of protein to keep the muscle.

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Deffo but I don't have to work out for it.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Same here :-) have you got the inward canted pink fingers tips too?

7 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No, but I have very mild Viking Hand Disease.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ouch :-?

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Naw, no problems, just some lumps in my tendons. I do yoga so I stretch it out and it won't be a problem.

7 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0