Good luck with that

May 15, 2024 4:43 PM

thatguyinportland

Views

64752

Likes

1568

Dislikes

23

I will verb however I want, Adobe.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 2

They do not currently have a registered trademark for the transitive verb form. You can search for yourself: https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/search/search-results

So get fucked Adobe.

2 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

OBEY CONSUME

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Isn't this about 25 years too late?

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

They totally Britted

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Adobe hates how their trademark has become a verb. It dilutes the protection of their trademark and may one day become a generic term enough to lose trademark status.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I got sick of using my pirated White Rabbit version and subscribed to PS a few years ago. I cancelled it in less than a year. I didn’t use it enough to justify the cost but I also hated how much crap it bloated my computer with. A lot of it is set to run automatically on startup. Ridiculous.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hey Adobe

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Google also really hates it when you say you "googled" something and not "i used Google to search for x"

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

If we use it enough they will lose their trademark and everything can be called photoshop

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

God can you imagine being the asshole whose out-of-touch boss made them type this up and actually put it out into the world?

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 2

They have to at least make an effort to show they're against using it in that manner, for legal reasons. If they allow their trademark to become 'generic' (like kleenex, or xerox, etc. has over the decades) they potentially lose the ability to enforce that trademark when needed.

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 2

Correct: Use Google to search for what you are looking for.

Incorrect: Just Google it.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

" 'shopped, dude. "

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Prescriptivist vs Descriptivist: one dictates usage, the other explains it. Adobe can control the use of language as much as people can control the new lingo the kids use. It’s futile and just makes you look bad.

2 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 2

It's about being able to maintain their trademarks and such; if they don't at least make an effort, then they'll eventually lose them.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If you don't defend your trademarks like a pedant you lose your trademarks.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Let me just Google that for you.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Correct: society decides what words mean and how they're used

Incorrect: a corporation dictates the meaning of a word for us to use

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Too late, Adobe. Several decades too late. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/photoshop Fuckers should be happy that their overpriced rental software is still so popular that its name has become a generic verb and adjective.

2 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

If it becomes a generic verb, they could lose the trademark on it. They're (poorly) attempting to fight that from happening.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

oh no, they'll lose a trademark on a word they made by removing a space. Fuck 'em with a rusty cactus.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

... And from seeing quite a few images enhanced with Adobe® Photoshop® in my time.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

most people just use " that's 'shopped" which (unintentionally) eliminates the trademark issue entirely.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

Yeah you should use the full version "photoshopped", especially when having used gimp or other alternative, to maximally dilute their trademark

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 1

Same company that's now telling people who use older versions of their software that they may be sued.

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

...maybe sued by Dolby.

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Someone didn't read the article.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Which article? The one where Adobe said they'd no longer keep the license alive that was embedded in software they sold you... "because they can"?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I vocabulary what happies me

2 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

The brain brains what it wants to brain

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

To quote Rocket Raccoon, "he don't know talking good like me and you"

2 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 0

I am reminded of my sister in law who used to work for Microsoft. When speaking about looking something up on the internet, she would say 'Bing it' as in trying to replace 'Google it'. Like 'fetch' it never happened.

2 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

I still say google it even though I haven't used google in years.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I tried using Bing for a bit to get points for free gamepass. My most common Bing search was to get to Google.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

most common bing search is "Systemsettings" .. every time you search something in the windows start-menue it counts as a bing search..

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

it used to be "how to get help in windows 10" because pressing F1 in Windows 10 opens Edge to Bing searching that.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 52 Dislikes 1

Wait; what?…

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I don't know the details, but there's some sort of dispute with another company over licenses or something. Tl;dr that's not literally true, unless you're using discontinued versions of the CC editions, or something. https://www.reddit.com/r/Design/comments/13l0j3h/adobe_tells_users_they_can_get_sued_for_using_old/?rdt=35450

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Other comments on that post explained it: Adobe had a deal with another company to pay them per user for the digital product, didn't hold their end of the deal, and now aim to shift the blame to the users.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

Shit give me a second let me Google that

2 years ago | Likes 70 Dislikes 0

“Enhance your searching with Google”

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 1

I refuse to use that verb and I encourage people to use alternative search engines.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 7

You should absolutely use it as a verb even if you don't use Google specifically. This kinda stuff causes companies to lose their trademarks, which is always morally correct.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Which is your right, but you also recognize that it is a verb and what it means because you're not being a petulant child (like Adobe is).

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

Dude. Google is rich enough and big and powerful enough that they don't need my help advertising them.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

PS: I don't shop with Amazon, either. Another of my tantrums, I guess.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Do you have any suggestions? I’ve tried Bing and DuckDuckGo, but they’re trash.

Google is trash too. 90% ads, worthless AI, and everything below the first two non-sponsored results are deliberately obtuse

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

There's alternatives if you search for them... Like ecosia or qwant

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In what way is DDG trash? They are my goto. I like their Privacy Essentials, as well.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

They’re good for privacy, but results-wise, it’s like the fourth page of Google back before Google was shit

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

You’ll have to get used to what search terms give you the best results. You’ve trained your subconscious brain how to google well for years. You’ll have to train it on how to duckduckgo or how to bing well.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Thanks for making the software, but we'll take it from here.

2 years ago | Likes 275 Dislikes 1

Naw, don't even thank them on the software, especially when it comes to the PSD file format. https://github.com/gco/xee/blob/master/XeePhotoshopLoader.m#L108

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Making the software?
I don't know for a fact in the case of photoshop, but for Adobe audition they just bought the rights to Cool edit pro and then had someone else re-skin it as Adobe audition.
Based off this evidence I think its safe to say there's a high probability they didn't make photoshop either. just purchased the rights rebranded it and sell it as a subscription service for millions in yearly profits.

2 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 1

"...who sold the distribution license to Adobe Systems Incorporated in 1988."

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Per the Wiki, Thomas Knoll wrote Photoshop (by that name) in 1988, his brother marketed the distribution rights and Adobe picked them up. They outright bought the rights in 1995.

Looks like they developed Illustrator, Premiere, and Acrobat in-house.

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

For those unaware, this is a common thing where a product gets so ubiquitous that there is a risk that the company loses all exclusivity rights of the name of their own brand or products. This is more common than you may think. Nintendo famously did a similar campaign in the 90s "There is no such thing as a Nintendo." because people would call all game consoles Nintendo. An example where a company failed to do this would be Bayer who lost their rights to the brand Aspirin in certain countries.

2 years ago | Likes 81 Dislikes 2

That does make sense.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Bayer also does not attempt to regain rights to heroin

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

So you're saying we need to use the word "photoshop" for even more things

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

None of my homes called all Nintendo consoles "a Nintendo" but our parents did.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Jacuzzi, Kleenex, Band-aid, Jell-O, Velcro. Idk how many of these actually lost trademarks but those are some trademarked names that ended up pretty widespread.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

was looking for this comment

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yep, they're desperate to not have their precious trademark become generic. It would be bad news for Adobe if every image editor could call itself a photoshop, so they have to do dumb shit like this to show they're protecting their trademark.

2 years ago | Likes 19 Dislikes 0

Interesting read. I didn't know the term "game console" came from that.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Unfortunately for Photoshop, they became so prominent that it's past the point of return. They're in Velcro territory now.

2 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Velcro comes in plaid!?

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

As long as they can show a court performative gestures like this to show they are defending their trademark they're unlikely to lose the trademark.

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

They're accomplishing the goal of keeping other image editors from using "photoshop" in their branding, and that's all they're accomplishing.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's gotta hurt. They should put a band-aid on it

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Ding ding ding! This is the message I was looking for. Can't have a brand name become too ubiquitous, but you still want everyone to be using it. It's a tightrope walk for companies.

2 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 1

The actual thing is that trademarks must be defended, or the owner vacates their rights to the trademark. Defending costs lots of legal dollars, and it's a constant war.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hey Adobe, v

2 years ago | Likes 1218 Dislikes 3

Yoink.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Here's my guess. A brand names lose some of their claim if their product becomes the generic term. i.e. Kleenex and Bandaids. They're trying to protect their asset name.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Feels like a slight against Paige. We try and protect Paige on imgur. She's always finding trouble to get in to her.

2 years ago | Likes 21 Dislikes 1

The gif I didn't know I needed until now

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I wonder if anyone has sent this to Greg Abbott yet. Seems like something he should see.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Gimp is a free source alternative. It may not be exactly equivalent but it's free.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

@adobe

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

The cactus was a surprise.

2 years ago | Likes 66 Dislikes 0

PAIGE NO

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Take your misogyni to twitter

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

So you went back a week to find something of mine to comment on and criticize, and not only did you incorrectly identify it as misogyny, you couldn't even spell it right? Wow, you are BIG mad, huh buddy?

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

You incorrectly identified my comment as transphobic, so I did the same kind of thing to you.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

Usually is.

2 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

"A surprise to be sure but an unwelcome one."

2 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

speak for yours... no no, you're right with this one

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Correct: I pirated Photoshop. Incorrect: I'm going to pay Adobe $20 a month for the rest of my life.

2 years ago | Likes 1282 Dislikes 2

im running ps cc 2015. with all the new tools I'm hoping there's a pirated version of whatever is out now

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or you could just use Gimp, watch is free and has been for DECADES. I haven't needed Photoshop in decades.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gimp it up, become a 31337 haX0r, it is surprisingly easy. Download the software, install, run, hax your images! https://www.gimp.org/

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I prefer Affinity’s suite - permanent license across all my devices for $200, with free updates

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ha, ha. Awesome!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Fuck it. Use open source GIMP for free. Make a donation to them. No worries.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

I'm sure Photoshop is probably worth it for professional use, but Gimp is some of the best FOSS I've used. Really powerful stuff.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Someone asked me if I Photoshop photos. I explain all photos from professional photographers are edited. So they reiterate, so you Photoshop them? I said I edit my photos in Lightroom. They said that's the same thing. I tried to explain that photoshopping an image is more synonymous with changing an image drastically vs editing only a few features/color/composition. They were still dead set on trying to say my photos are fake with out saying it. I told them their phone does the same thing.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I paid affinity 30 bucks once. No monthy fees. And i dont install cancer on my machine with pirated software. Can highly recommend.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

My small business uses Adobe. Prices just went up to $3100 per year. (40% + increase). Probably going with Foxit when our contract expires.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

More Correct: I pay for free image editing software designed by furries.

2 years ago | Likes 241 Dislikes 2

I don't care who made it so long as it works without drawbacks.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Sadly the furries haven't designed a good alternative to Substance Painter just yet

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Even More Correct: I use free software.

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

I donated to GIMP not that long ago. For what I do with it, it's almost the same thing as PS, but without CC refusing to uninstall without a removal tool because it asked me to login to uninstall it... and I didn't have an account on my extended free trial version.

2 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

That's fucking evil

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

You use GIMP too?

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

it's consensual, the GIMP even like it

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I pirated photoshop, and photoshopped the execs crying about it.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Krita might be a nice alternative

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Correct: I paid 70€ for Affinity Photo 2, one time payment. Incorrect: I'm gonna keep using adobes bloatware.

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

I heart the Affinity suite. Got the trio for under $200

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

One time payment, forever updates, tons of optional addons at no cost, and (as far as I can tell) no limit to how many times/machines I use that code for. Affinity has been baller af

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Yup, Affinity is my software of choice here too.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I paid out for the affinity suite, hoping it'll be a decent long term investment - so far so good

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Same - the iPad apps are great as well as PC. I don't do everything you can with them but I am not hampered on either.

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I wish they did an android version.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yeah there's only a couple of small things like shortcuts for + / - effects on tools being kinda awkward and fixed in place, or behaviours that I'm not used to from years of photoshop - but it's gradually becoming more flexible.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I am still salty AF that the CD version I own has apparently been disabled.

2 years ago | Likes 23 Dislikes 0

Affinity photo is better than cs .... and its a 1 time fee of like 30 bucks. I love it.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Thanks for the tip!

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

You're welcome I bought whole suite so I have publisher for layout and designer for vector work. Its great for what I do which is web and 3d game dev.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I bought the extended suite when it first came out, free updates for life, apparently. There's a learning curve and I don't always love how it handles Fuji images, but $70 a decade ago was so worth it

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Yup I also bought v1 suite and then paid for v2 like 4 years later. I am concerned affinity got bought by canva but as long as they do not do a monthly subscription I will stick around. Else i am outta there.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

About the recent "Adobe will sue you if you use old Photoshop" thing? Clarification is: older versions had licensed material from Dolby and that agreement has expired so -technically- Dolby could sue you for using the concerned material. Adobe just gave a "head's up" to the situation. Still f*CK Adobe, but I don't feel this one is totally on them

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

Yeah this post just makes me want to pirate their shit even harder

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And then get sued for using a version other than the latest.

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

I tried a free trial of an Adobe program since I was a student and qualified for some free suite and that was the first time I've ever used a legit Adobe product and tbh its a million times worse than the pirated versions, I've had malware less annoying than "Adobe creative cloud"

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Even the pirated version was too annoying for me. The Adobe Updater was constantly running in the background and deleting that made the whole thing not work, so I just went back to my original pirated copy of PS7. I could probably acquire a newer version, but meh, PS7 is fine.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Can you tell me where you got it from?

2 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

Limewire in 2003. It's so old it can't comprehend drives larger than 1TB. If you didn't grab a cracked copy of PS7 back in the '00s, try monkrus[dot]ws.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The problem is not "I have to pay $20 a month for this incredibly good software", the problem is "I now have 50 things asking me to pay $20 a month whether I am using them OR NOT using them and that $!000 fucking dollars a month"

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

If you're not using them cancel the subscription??

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

But it's not good software. Everything adobe makes has become incredibly unstable and they crash constantly, no matter the specs or OS the machine. They corrupt files frequently, as well. And while I agree a monthly charge wouldn't be a big deal if they started that way, they didn't. They proved they can run a profitable company without monthly fees and it's just greed

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Well gees that even worse then

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

GIMP

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Unless the UI has improved drastically since I last tried it, I'm not really a fan of GIMP, though I appreciate the effort. I do wholeheartedly recommend Inkscape for vector graphics though.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Inkscape is great. GIMP has updated the UI for ease of use

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Xerox the rule & scotch tape it to the wall.

2 years ago | Likes 544 Dislikes 1

Use some duck tape also.

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

Honestly, I'd assume that's more that people just failed to pronounce duct right, and the company came later to take advantage of it.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Why not just write it in magic marker?

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

And then toss it in the crapper

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

rollerblading all the way

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Can I Google how to do that?

2 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Post-it...

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If that fails, you can Velcro it

2 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Why not use velcro?

2 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

If we need to cut it to size, I can skil saw or sawzall it down

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

You googled that, didn't you

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

If it falls to the ground, just hoover it up.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Who the fuck says "scotch tape it"?

2 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 3

My dad

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It's awkward as a verb, but saying "scotch tape" to refer to any kind of small clear tape is common.

2 years ago | Likes 16 Dislikes 0

However that's still using it as a noun rather than a verb, like Googling something would be.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes, but it's also very common to turn a noun into a verb, such as "I'm busy today, I'm going to be adulting". This is two common casual linguistic practices merging into one final result.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Now do one that has lost its trademark this century…

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 19

Pilates became genericized in 2000.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What are you on about? Xerox, Kleenex, and Band-Aid all have active trademarks too. These are simply products that became so ubiquitous that we use the brand name as a generic term. No one says go grab me a facial tissue, it's grab a Kleenex.

2 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

Lawyers are always chicken little-ing people about losing trademarks, then they generally give you examples from 50 years ago.
In the current day, it is very uncommon for a trademark to be cancelled by the PTO because of general use.
But it keeps lawyers employed, sending letters to people who write Velcro instead of hook and loop fasten.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 4

I honestly can't recall the last time I heard someone refer to them as a Kleenex.. it's usually just "a tissue" here

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

I might have to Google it.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

And you’ll find “Google is still a valid trademark”. I have not seen anything that says they have lost their trademark. If you find it, please pass it along.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 6

Go to the app store or the dumpster any day even on taco Tuesday

2 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

App Store trademark remains "Issued and Active".
Dumpster trademark was cancelled in 2015.
Taco Tuesday was relinquished, not lost/cancelled. Yes, it matters, ask any lawyer.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 7

And if anyone complains, Boeing them.

2 years ago | Likes 82 Dislikes 4

Make sure you use a Jetway to get on that Boeing.

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I don’t think we have enough bandaids for that.

2 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

2 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

My favorite is that the Brits refer to vacuuming as “Hoovering”

2 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

When I, with my delicate and sensitive western Canadian ears, hears hoovering, I just think it's a Newfie trying to say hovering.

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

My friends say that for snorting …

2 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And I write with a Biro and drive on Tarmac

2 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

We also say "Sellotaping" rather than "Scotch taping". We have both brands but Sellotape is more prevalent.

2 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Because Sellotape is the British brand, Scotch tape is American. Being that both brands started in the 30's, Sellotape has had a much longer time to become the UK's go to brand.

2 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Yes, I first encountered Scotch tape in the 80s when I was a kid and it seemed new and amazing. I still remember the fancy sand-weighted dispenser I had. Sellotape seemed like old people's sticky tape!

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

And if you are concerned, grab a kleenex and dry your tears.

2 years ago | Likes 180 Dislikes 3

And then watch them weep into their Kleenex.

2 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Put a bandaid that cut, and get your velcro shoes on

2 years ago | Likes 54 Dislikes 0

Remember to Hoover the floor first otherwise you'll end up with dust stuck to your shoes.

2 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 0

Will someone get me a coke? Dr Pepper is my favorite.

2 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

Is Pepsi okay? If not, we’ve got a jacuzzi for you to relax in instead.

2 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0