True

Jan 6, 2017 4:11 AM

Rezrkt

Views

52942

Likes

1055

Dislikes

35

Because they're really expensive and to an untrained eye almost indistinguishable from cut glass.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

How does "The Economist" not know the answer to an incredibly simple economic question

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

because they're retarded.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 4

You can't play Battlefield 1 with that shit, that's why

9 years ago | Likes 25 Dislikes 0

Tried to talk my coworker into getting a moissanite ring for his wife/their anniversary. He was having none of it. Oh well, not my money

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Ahhh! You mean compressed carbon? The kind that's pretty much all over our beautiful earth, drastically inflated value artificially? No idea

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Precious metals are where it's at. There a finite amount of gold here in earth. It was created by a long dead star

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Diamonds are bullshit, and generations are bullshit.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Diamonds have better uses than jewelry so here's to hoping they devalue a lot

9 years ago | Likes 106 Dislikes 0

Synthetic ones are much cheaper and not sold as jewellery.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 1

Also because diamonds is just bullshit...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Other stones are prettier, cheaper, more rare, and more significant to them personally.

9 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

Herkimer diamonds

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Looking at you, opals.

9 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

Cause we're broke and we know better than to waste what little we have on shiny rocks.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Diamonds?? You mean baby boomer scam rocks??

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Because they're overpriced and, well, what's the use? Unless you're a tradie with a need for diamond-tipped drills or such, there is no use.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Instead of treating myself to a diamond, I will treat myself to a pudding. I'm sparing no expense.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Because diamonds suck. Seriously, they're like, 3/10, tops. Far prettier stuff out there at a fraction of the price, too!

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

To clarify: I am referring to use of diamonds in jewelry only, not for their industrial uses.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"Why aren't people buying our scam anymore!?! It's all their fault we're losing money!!!"

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

I give tree fifty.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

Two words: Cubic Zirconia.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I didn't get a diamond engagement ring because money, instead got a huge London Topaz for $400 and get a shit ton of compliments.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

What color is a London topaz?

6 years ago | Likes 0 Dislikes 0

Blue

6 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Diamonds are too common and overpriced anyway!

9 years ago | Likes 130 Dislikes 2

Yep my engagement ring cost £145. The diamond is tiny, but I'm thrilled with it.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's why I don't like the diamond necklace I got for Christmas. Small diamonds you just pay for the name.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

Not entirely true. Really pure diamonds of a big enough size for most jewelry are still pretty rare. Not saying the price is justified tho

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 4

Yeah but you could say that about just any precious stone.

9 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 1

I bought a diamond off ebay for £1, it is very small but hell it was £1 and I did it for a laugh.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Probably fake

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

http://www.ebay.co.uk/sch/Loose-Natural-Diamonds/3824/bn_1527900/i.html Or just 1mm in size and not amazing quality.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Synthetics are better (IMO) - at least then you know they're definitely not blood diamonds.

9 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 0

I'd never buy a diamond but if I did shell out that much for a rock someone better have died getting it to me.

9 years ago | Likes 36 Dislikes 1

That was dark... +1

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Because they aren't getting married because they can't find a job because baby boomers ruined the economy and won't retire.

9 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 3

The poor bastards keep voting against their own damn interest on top of it.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

In fairness, retiring has been proven to be bad for your health, the body just starts shutting down if you stop working cold turkey.

9 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 2

So has being unemployed or having to juggle multiple part time jobs.

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

The economy is not the problem -- I can't hire full-timers fast enough, and I'm not unique...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 3

Where are you? I know plenty of people that are looking for FT work.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What do you do, how much do you pay, where are you, and when can I start?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

What's your business?

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

For everyone who is commenting about how they aren't rare, overpriced or something about De Beers: why do they keep increasing in value?

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 2

Do some research about supply/demand/de beers?

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

They don't. They just increase in retail price. Try selling one used, and see if you can get a slice of pizza for it.

9 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 1

Yea I have. I've always gotten current market value. Which in turn was always more than I originally paid.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

"it was cold outside so climate change is a myth"

9 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 1

Hahaha! "I ate today so there's no world hunger." That tired old joke doesn't apply to this argument. Try again.

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

1) in order to even ask the question you did you had to completely ignore or dismiss the intial explanation...

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

2) which is why "that tired old joke" applies perfectly to this situation.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Diamonds are common, have no industrial value, and are overvalued by careful regulation of supply.

9 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 10

Diamonds have a lot of practical applications, industrial being chief among them.

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

They have industrial uses for diamond tipped saws as diamonds are harder than many metals

9 years ago | Likes 28 Dislikes 0

High supply, low demand. They have industrial uses, but that doesn't make them valuable (unlike i.e iron, oil, tin, sulphur, etc etc).

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 4

Agreed that they don't possess value. Just giving you as an example since you said "no" industrial purpose

9 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

Ah, a misunderstanding, my fault. I meant "no industrial value" as in, 'no value added by their industrial uses'.

9 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Not only do they have industrial value, but we've been manufacturing them since the 50s to use industrially

9 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

High supply, low demand. They have industrial uses, but that doesn't make them valuable (unlike i.e iron, oil, tin, sulphur, etc etc).

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 5

Tin? Are you joking? Sulphur? That shit is not exactly expensive.

9 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

But they are valuable in an industrial setting. You fuckers need to learn English. Something doesn't have to cost a lot to be valuable.

9 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 1

If something is cheap and plentiful then it is not valuable. That doesn't mean it isn't useful. Tin is cheap because it is easily recycled->

9 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0