The Right Stuff

Sep 25, 2020 1:17 AM

jarable

Views

132876

Likes

3706

Dislikes

34

A 18" tall kit version of this rocket has been available for 15+ years at FlisKits.com as the "ACME Spitfire."

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the tip is facing up, that's why it works, try and tip it to the side like in the picture...

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

they didnt consult professor Bobeye

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If its stupid but it works..

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Dont let it fool you, a lot of work would have went into that to make it look dumb AND work.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

In thrust we trust

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They changed the fins, but sure.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Okay, I need some kind of app that shows me shit like this, I want a little peace from the world at the moment

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What do you mean? Of course it worked!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Always upvote farside

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I went to school for aerospace eng, but ended up as a mechanical eng (non space related). I have this comic on my wall at work.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

“Aerodynamics are for people who can’t build engines.” -Enzo Ferrari

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Then he got beat by cars exploiting aerodynamics.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I landed a rocket on Mars. I have proof but you shall not see it. Just believe me.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Looks very much like the North Korea's space program.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

nee! flaps aren't the same. it is a modified design

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

"No! You can't just strap explosives to a plane cockpit and expect to break orbit!" Rocket scientists:"haha. Rockets go brrrrr."

5 years ago | Likes 60 Dislikes 1

Looks like the North Korean missile program

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If the fins were accurate to the comic it wouldn’t fly

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

amazing

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 1

It’s not rocket appliances

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Oooohhh, now we’re talking. Launch velocity and thrust for a Maytag!

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

If you put enough fins far enough behind the center of mass you can get a brick to fly stably.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

It’s not rocket surgery

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

They added stabilizers

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 1

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

In addition to rockets, building anything that might not work is better than talking about something that might work. Growth mindset.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I mean, if I were an astronaut, and the rocket scientists told me my rocket "might not work," I think I'd want to talk about it some more

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

https://youtu.be/THNPmhBl-8I

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

I scoured the comments for this we might be soulmates

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 112 Dislikes 1

Love that scene

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Wait is that Clint Howard

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

They should make a category at the Oscars for “ best bit part Actor who although they only have one line in a movie none-the-less elevate -

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

the scene by looking so weird”

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Yes, it is.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 204 Dislikes 13

The original dialogue here is "for science", considering the context the coincidence is remarkable.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 38 Dislikes 5

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Hams?

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Pablo!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

This is an entertaining comic series

5 years ago | Likes 26 Dislikes 0

If you enjoy blue balls maybe.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

Got sauce? I remember reading it but I can't find it again.

5 years ago | Likes 15 Dislikes 0

https://www.deviantart.com/vanheist/art/Blue-Comet-Standard-Version-616799553 it’s a lo-res but I can’t find the higher att

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Gogobomango. Sites down but he still has a patreon.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

To balance an asymmetric design like this is pretty impressive.

5 years ago | Likes 543 Dislikes 4

Welllll... they ARE using symmetrical, aligned stabilizer fins unlike the cartoon version.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Takes some time and math. Lotta fiddly bits.

5 years ago | Likes 14 Dislikes 1

Your mom's asymmetric design is pretty impressive.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Well, you got the pointy bit at the top and the firey bit on the bottom, don't see what is so hard about that.

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

You think it took... some rocket scientists?

5 years ago | Likes 47 Dislikes 0

Probably brain surgeons

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Idk, they dumped Beagle on Mars because they mixed imperial and metric then forgot. Goofed the original lens on Hubble, forgot about gravity

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

I mean I wouldn't get anywhere near mixing up units before I fucked up. Everyones human but rocket scientists are definitely powered up.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I thought the hubble lens was fucked because there was some kind of calibration error in one of the parts making the mirrors

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The one I read was they didn’t account for the distortion that occurs when it moves to a zero gravity environment

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 189 Dislikes 0

Yes, that is impressive for the same reasons

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Beautiful. Wish it was a cinemagraph with billowing clouds!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

What a magnificent shot

5 years ago | Likes 78 Dislikes 0

This just uses thrust to balance it tho. Notice how the thrusters on the shuttle angle backwards a bit?

5 years ago | Likes 31 Dislikes 0

Your mom angles backwards a bit.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 3

Yeah, the thrust vector goes through the center of mass:

5 years ago | Likes 22 Dislikes 0

Ooh kinky

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

NOICE!

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

i have seen the shuttle in real life but somehow this gives the idea of size disparity with the fuel tank better ...the whole thing fucking

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

flew ,that itself is an engineering miracle

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

How many billion did that cost again?

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 12

Totally worth it!

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

More preoccupied by the lifes lost while it was avoidable.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 2

How much money was put back into the economy? How much was learned by these endeavors? Not sure of your intent but it was poorly executed.

5 years ago | Likes 13 Dislikes 1

I was just trying to point out that with enough money, you can get any wacky shaped object to fly.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

If you want a debate on whether the shuttle was a gigantic mistake that never delivered on any of its promises, we can do that to.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

It's not like billions of dollars were shot into space. Most of that money was spent on all the people involved in the project.

5 years ago | Likes 9 Dislikes 0

I'm often surprised how many people don't understand how the economy works and think NASA just destroys money, then they get in their car

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

With enough thrust, everything is aerodynamic.

5 years ago | Likes 2055 Dislikes 3

the cone in the working model is also angled wrong

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

phrasing!

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Even manhole covers

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Once.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

They[rocket scientists?] said that about the F-4 Phantom II, right? "The triumph of thrust over aerodynamics"

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It was flying in much the same way that bricks don't..

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

“But Zats juzt mein assessment.” Says Wernher von Braun

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

You too can be a big hero, once you've learned to count backwards to zero!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

I want to build a rocket wall now.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Similarily, with enough thrust, everything is a cutting weapon.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Just look at the moose running on water.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Ya mom love my aerodynamics. Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

Even the Hulk couldn't thrust your mom into orbit.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Tell that to my wife... uh erm actually, please don't do that

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

That’s what @op mom said

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

“...the pelvic thrust really drives you in-saaaane! Let’s do the time warp again!”

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

If KSP taught me anything, is that even a brick can make it to space with enough rockets

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Or shrapnel

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

Just ask OP's mom.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That's what she thought.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Put enough thrust on a brick, it'll fly.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

And enough lubrication

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Thrust and aerodynamics reminds me of Chicken Run

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 1

ThrRrRrRrUST!

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

KSP taught me this is true.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

And if that doesn't work, add more struts.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

that's what she said.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

That’s what she said

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

No I didn’t

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Heh heh...”thrust”

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Paige no!

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I scrolled down to find it, thank you.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

“Aerodynamics are for people who can’t build engines.” -Enzo Ferrari

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

Whatta flex.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

*gets shown up by lotus using ground effects.

5 years ago | Likes 10 Dislikes 0

All get butchered by a redneck who stuck a Mongolian motor mangler on a junkyard 5.3 and jammed it into an old Monte Carlo.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 3

That's why your mum flies so well

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

The best plan B is more Delta V

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 1

I believe I have found my new life philosophy

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

PENIS JOKE PENIS JOKE!!!

5 years ago | Likes 367 Dislikes 3

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Careful, too much thrust and your 'rocket' might bend like the picture

5 years ago | Likes 27 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 48 Dislikes 0

v

5 years ago | Likes 11 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

It’s pronounced “Beetle Juice,” and you have to say it three times.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 139 Dislikes 2

Holy painful pencil dick

5 years ago | Likes 39 Dislikes 0

Well, it's a pencil dick only compared to his body size, that dick is probably 2-3 times as thick as an average human dick =P

5 years ago | Likes 12 Dislikes 0

OωO

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 1

PAIGE NO!

5 years ago | Likes 6 Dislikes 0

5 years ago | Likes 17 Dislikes 3

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

What

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Yes

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Imagine the gif with more pixels, the answer us right here I'm front of you.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 2

I support you, but reading this reply gave me a stroke.

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Oh wow my autocorrect went bezerk in that comment, what the hell????

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

"Imagine having the answer, and then you'll have the answer!"

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

The F-4 Phantom definitely proves that.

5 years ago | Likes 114 Dislikes 2

With a big enough engine even a brick can fly

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

F117 too

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

Came here to make that comment. Glad to see another fan of vectors. Thrust for life.

5 years ago | Likes 30 Dislikes 0

What is your vector, Victor?

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

But...it used to glide 6000’ for every 1000’ of altitude.

5 years ago | Likes 4 Dislikes 0

I see your Phantom, and raise you an X-15 with the XLR-99 motor.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

Isn't the X15 just a pilot operated missile?

5 years ago | Likes 3 Dislikes 0

It's just as much an aircraft as the F-4 or F-104.

5 years ago | Likes 1 Dislikes 0

I know nothing of aeronautical engineering but I looked up the phantom and I dont get it... it looks aerodymamic to my untrained eyes.

5 years ago | Likes 20 Dislikes 0

it is extremely heavy for an aircraft, has a relatively low lift ratio, and needs full A/B to get off the runway in a decent distance.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

It is aerodynamic, but it was also very heavy. It needed two powerful J79 engines to compete with single engine fighters.

5 years ago | Likes 7 Dislikes 0

It is. The joke is usually that the bigass giant engines make up for the tiny wings in allowing it to fly at all.

5 years ago | Likes 18 Dislikes 0

Tiny wings? The F-104 Starfighter would like a word with you.

5 years ago | Likes 8 Dislikes 0

The F-104 is very light, it weighs barely more than a P-51 mustang and about half the weight of fighters in it's era.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0

Google searched. Can confirm.

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

I swear that’s like the jet fighter equivalent to a T-Rex

5 years ago | Likes 5 Dislikes 0

Worst fighter bomber ever.

5 years ago | Likes 2 Dislikes 0